Lightning in other planets

Christiane Helling

Centre for Exoplanet Science, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9SS, UKSUPA, School of Physics & Astronomy, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, KY16 9SS, UKSRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht, NL

E-mail: ch80@st-and.ac.uk

Abstract. More than 4000 planet are known that orbit stars other than our Sun. Manyharbor a dynamic atmosphere that is cold enough that cloud particles can form in abundance.The diversity of exoplanets leads to differences in cloud coverage depending on global systemparameters. Some planets will be fully covered in clouds, some have clouds on the nightside butare largely cloud-free on the dayside. These cloud particles can easily be charged and lightningdischarges will occur in cloudy, dynamic exoplanet atmosphere. Lightning supports a GlobalElectric Circuit (GCE) on Earth and we argue that exoplanet may develop a GCE in particularif parts of the exoplanet atmospheres can remain cloud free.

1. IntroductionToday, about 4070 planets are known that orbit stars other than our Sun. No Earth-twin hasbeen found so far, instead, planets bigger than Earth (super-Earths) or bigger than Jupiter(giant gas planets), smaller than Neptune (mini-Neptune), to name a few, were discovered.Several of the known exoplanets orbit their host star very closely such that a rocky surfaceturns into magma or Jupiter-like exoplanets expand their atmosphere considerably. Inside theatmospheres of exoplanets, clouds form and the cloud particles (also called aerosols) are madeof a mix of minerals, for example silicates and iron oxide [1]. Spectroscopic studies of exoplanetsare repeatedly frustrated by clouds blocking the view into the underlying atmosphere to revealthe existence of potential biosignatures. Observations of the planet’s thermal emission showthat the atmosphere of giant gas planets may have very dynamic global circulation [2] dueto a strong day/night temperature difference. Although the solar system gas planets havefar less dynamic atmospheres globally, lightning events are directly detected for the cloudyatmospheres of Earth, Jupiter, and Saturn, are debated for Venus, and indirectly inferred forNeptune and Uranus in our solar system. Sprites and high-energy particles are observed abovethunderclouds on Earth [3, 4], and are theoretically predicted for Jupiter, Saturn, and Venus.On Earth, lightning measurements can be conducted in situ, but the lightning statistics for allother solar system planets are rather incomplete [5, 6]. Other possible analogs for lightning onexoplanets are terrestrial volcanoes that produce lightning during an eruption inside the plume[7]. Studying lightning on other planets inside and outside our solar system is of interest becauseit enables us to study the electrostatic character of such alien atmospheres, but also opens newpossibilities for tracking the dynamic behavior and the associated chemical changes in suchextraterrestrial environments. The presence of an atmosphere that shelters life may enable theformation of electrified clouds and the emergence of lightning, and hence, the occurrence of an

arX

iv:1

910.

1272

2v1

[as

tro-

ph.E

P] 2

8 O

ct 2

019

extrasolar Global Electric Circuit (eGEC). In fact, lightning discharges are also studied in otherastronomical objects, in brown dwarfs and planet-forming disks [8, 9]. The fascination of thisresearch field lays in the universality of the underlying physical processes which would benefitfrom a multilateral exchange of ideas [10] in contrast to siloing approaches.

2. Lightning in other planets inside and outside our solar system2.1. How much charges are required for lightning in exoplanet cloudsLightning occurs if an ensemble of cloud particles has acquired enough charges and if a sufficientelectrostatic potential is established to overcome the local breakdown field of the atmosphericgas. A number of free electrons is needed to build an unstable ionisation front that eventuallydevelops into the lightning plasma channel. For astrophysical purposes, the critical electricbreakdown field is only marginally depending on the chemical composition of the gas (unlessthe gas is made of compounds of heavy elements only). The values for the minimum electricpotential, Vt,min, for gases (mixes of CO2, N2, O2, H2, He, CH4) that dominate the solar systemplanets varies between ≈ 400 . . . 620V (Table 1 in [11]). The solar system’s gas planets Saturn,Jupiter, Uranus and Neptune have atmospheres dominated by H2/He/CH4 (in this order) whichis a representative starting point for extrasolar planets, too. The more challenging question ishow many charges an ensemble of mineral cloud particles carries under certain environmentalconditions. This question can be approached experimentally [12, 13] or theoretically. It is tiedto the cloud formation processes which determine the composition, sizes and size distributionof the cloud particles. The cloud formation process in exoplanet atmospheres is stronglyaffected by changing thermodynamic conditions inside the atmosphere. This results in cloudparticles changing their sizes and their material composition (e.g. Fig. 3 in [14]): Small particles(≈ 10−7 . . . 10−5cm) made of a mix of silicates and oxides (e.g. MgSiO3[s], Mg2SiO4/Fe2SiO4[s],SiO[s], SiO2[s], MgO[s], Fe2O3[s]; [s] stands for ’solid’) compose the upper and middle part ofthe clouds (Tgas < 1000 . . . 1500K, pgas < 10−5bar ) and can grow to 10−4 . . . 1cm in deeperregions with pgas > 1 bar where the gas temperatures reach 1800K [15]. These big cloud particlesare made of mixes of high-temperature condensates (Fe[s], CaTiO3[s], Al2O3[s], TiO2[s]). Thegas phase is collisional dominated in most of these atmosphere regions, but the cloud particlesfrictionally decouple quickly, hence, they fall into the atmosphere with a velocity different tothat of the gas. The energy balance between frictional and latent heat, and collisional andradiative cooling results in a ∆T ≈ 3K only [16]. The relative velocity between gas and cloudparticles is, however, insufficient to charge the exoplanet mineral cloud particles. Turbulencedriven particle-particle collisions that result from larger-scale convective-hydrodynamic motionsprovide the required kinetic energy to overcome the work function of the materials that thecloud particles are made of [17, 18]. Charges can only effectively separate between two particlesby collisions [19], hence, liquid droplets do not charge easily.

The critical charge density, σcrit, or the number of charges per cloud particle (Eq. 3) or pertotal cloud surface per volume (Eq. 2) can be estimated for a given minimal breakdown voltage,Vt,min, and a geometrical distance of d of two charge-carrying surfaces,

σcrit =ε0 d Vt,min

r2(1)

⇒ σcrib ×Atotcloud [e−cm−3] (2)

⇒ σcrib ×Atot

cloud

nd[e−grain−1]. (3)

The charge distribution is assumed to be spherical and of radius r (being either the cloudparticle size or the cloud extension; ε0 = 8.85 1012 F m−14 – vacuum dielectric constant orelectric permittivity of free space). nd and Atot

cloud are the local number density of cloud particles

and the total cloud particle surface per unit volume of atmospheric gas, respectively. The criticalcharge density per particle needed for an electric field breakdown to initiate an ionisation frontas precursor for a lightning strike ranges from 1010 e−grain−1 in low-pressure regions and and105 e−grain−1 at higher pressures in an exoplanet atmosphere. The exact values will vary fordifferent atmospheric conditions in different extrasolar planets. The number do, however, allowus to make some first comparison with laboratory experiments. Laboratory experiments are anessential tool to test our basic assumptions as modelling the individual charge processes of cloudparticles that change size and composition remains a challenge. But also experiments come withchallenges as they mainly represent Earth-like conditions with respect to thermodynamics and/orparticle composition; a short summary is given in [11]. Experiments on frictional electrificationof KCl[s] and ZnS[s] particles [13] demonstrate that they attain charge densities similar to thosefound on volcanic ash particles of 105 . . . 108 e−grain−1. Both are consistent with our theoreticalestimates for exoplanet clouds.

2.2. How lightning leaves chemical tracersLightning introduces a drastic change of the atmospheric thermodynamic properties locally.Only during the first stage of the discharge process is the gas chemistry driven by kineticprocesses [20] as result of the fast electrons impacting the gas phase. The chemical compositionis determined by the local temperature at later stages when thermodynamic equilibrium hasbeen reached. In thermodynamic equilibrium, the drastic increase in temperature alone causethe concentration of molecules that are generally abundant in oxygen-rich planetary atmospheresof solar element composition to drop by orders of magnitudes [21]. This includes moleculesinvolved in the formation of cloud particles like H2O, SiO, MgOH, FeO, and others like TiO,CO, CH4. The concentration of CH increases and larger carbohydrate molecule show a marginalincrease. While lightning will locally affect the gas-phase chemistry, it is reasonable to expectthat there will be no substantial feedback on the cloud formation processes other than due tocreating a bulk of free electrons that can attach themselves to the surfaces of the cloud particles.

HCN is suggested to be a byproduct of lightning in the solar system giant planets [22],or any discharge for that matter, that could exist long enough to potentially be observablealso in extrasolar planets. HCN would be present for 2-3 yrs in the detectable, optical thinatmosphere at . 0.1 bar after the lightning event in the atmosphere of the exoplanet HAT-P-11b (RP ≈ 5REarth, MP ≈ 26MEarth) [23]. For a mJy- radio emission to be detectable at 150MHz for HAT-P-11b, a flash rate ∼ 4× 105 flashes km −2 h−1 is required.

3. The extrasolar Global Electric Circuit (eGEC)The presence of an atmosphere that shelters life, the formation of electrified clouds and large-scale discharges under the affect of an external radiation field lead to the emergence of a GlobalElectric Circuit (GEC) on Earth which impacts the daily weather and traces the global climate([24]). A global electric circuit is an electric current between charge-separating (i.e. clouds)and non-charge-separating (i.e. cloud-free, ’fair weather’) regions in an atmospheres. Theatmospheric gas in cloud-free regions has a higher conductivity than in cloudy regions, hence,a leaking current establishes, which was first discovered for Earth [25]. Can global electriccircuits occur on extrasolar planets? A global electric circuit requires an upper and a lowerconducting region, charge separating processes and current flows [10, 26, 27]. Lightning playsa key role in discharging the cloudy regions and in closing the electric current cycle by drivinga return current into the upper atmosphere, the ionosphere on Earth. Without lightning, theatmosphere’s leaking current would equilibrate atmospheric potential differences quickly.

Three aspects need consideration in view of the large diversity of the known exoplanetsand regarding the possibility that we may not yet be aware of all the physio-chemical processesinvolved. We explicitly include brown dwarfs into this discussion because they have atmospheric

thermodynamic conditions comparable to giant gas planets and also form clouds in theiratmospheres. Firstly, only exoplanets that have an atmosphere will form clouds with atmosphericlightning that creates the required return current. This excludes exoplanets comparable toMercury in size, proximity to the host star, planetary mass and radius. According to ourpresent knowledge, brown dwarfs always have an atmosphere. While lightning (as dischargesin general) will occur in other electrified environments (like volcanoes on Earth, dust devils onMars), we will confine ourselves to atmosphere environment to be able to benefit from knowledgeabout the presently known ensemble of exoplanets (and brown dwarfs). Secondly, we discussthe formation of an ionosphere as upper conducting regions and argue for a lower conductingregion in exoplanets and brown dwarfs. Thirdly, we need to consider where in the exoplanetatmosphere clouds may form as this has implication for the emergence of an eGEC.

Upper conducting regions: Ionisation of the upper atmosphere: The presence of an upperconducting region is determined by the irradiation (incl. cosmic rays) that a planet or a browndwarf receives. This will depend on the host star (hot vs cool, active vs. inactive). For a givenhost star, the flux impacting the upper atmosphere will depend on the orbital distance, a, as1/a2 between planet and star. Brown dwarfs occur as single stars in the interstellar medium andhave recently been found in binary systems with white dwarfs. Both, the interstellar mediumand the white dwarfs will have a larger flux of high-energy radiation than most of the presentlyknown planet-hosting stars. The major difference for the formation of an ionosphere is thereforethe ionisation process of the upper atmospheric layers. For exoplanets orbiting close to theirhost star, the very uppermost layers of a planetary atmosphere will be ionised by stellar photonspredominantly. Their intermediate atmosphere layers will be heated by the thermal effect ofphotons being absorped by the atmospheric gas which leads to a gas temperature of 3500K onthe dayside of super-hot Jupiter like WASP-18b or HAT-P-7b [28, 29]. No clouds will form here.The nightside can be 2500K colder at similar pressures and clouds can therefore form. In browndwarfs and planets with large semi-major axis (Fig. 1), high-energy radiation fluxes may createa shell of almost completely ionised gas in the outer atmosphere [30]. It is therefore reasonableto assume that, similar to Earth, an electron current forms from these layers of ionised gas tothe boundary layers of the clouds. The free electrons attach themselves to the surface of cloudparticles which, hence, makes the gaseous charges particular immobile compared to cloud-freeparts of atmospheres. The conductivity of the remaining gas phase is therefore low before thedischarge, and hence, supports the electrostatic potential difference.

Lower conducting regions: Exoplanets come in many sizes and temperatures (Fig.1), they canbe rocky or have large gaseous envelope with only a small rocky core. Brown dwarfs areheavier and form as stars, hence, they are gaseous throughout. The lower conducting regionis therefore, similar to Earth, the rocky surface of a rocky planet. Depending on its place inits planetary system, this surface maybe lava-like. Giant gas planets have warmer or even hotinner atmosphere temperatures of 2000K . . . 3500K. Warmer brown dwarfs reach temperaturesof upto 4000K in their inner atmosphere. We therefore suggest that this thermally ionised inneratmosphere part of giant gas planets and brown dwarfs serves as lower, inner conducting regionbecause thermal ionisation creates a partially ionised gas (e.g., Fig. 2 in [31]). Ohmic heatingmay cause the temperature to rise further, hence, our reasoning adopts a conservative position.

The distribution of clouds in exoplanet atmospheres: The global distribution of clouds inexoplanet atmospheres depends on system parameters like orbital distance, rotational period,mass, radius, global temperature (represented in Fig.1) and stellar spectral type as thesedetermine the local temperature distribution inside a planet’s atmosphere. Several of the knownexoplanets are tidally locked, hence, the same side of the planet always receives the highest

partialcloudcoverage

fullcloudcoverage

Figure 1. Extrasolar planets differ largely with respect to their orbital distance, masses andradii (top) which affect the global (’calculated’) temperature (bottom). The combination oforbital distance, planetary mass, radii and global temperature provide a first indication for thepresence of clouds, the possibility of lightning, and if a extrasolar global electric circuit candevelop. The shaded areas are regimes of full cloud coverage (gray shaded) and particle cloudcoverage (blue shaded). Lightning can occur in cloud-forming exoplanets, but a global electriccircuit may establish in planets with partial cloud coverage only. Note: MEarth ≈ 3 · 10−3 MJup,

REarth ≈ 9 · 10−2, RJup TglobalEarth ≈ 250K, Tglobal

Jup ≈ 150K. [plots based on exoplanet.eu]

radiation flux from the host star and the other is in permanent darkness (like the Moon).Giant gas planets like HD 189733b and HD 209458b with an orbital distance of ∼ 0.03AU and∼ 0.05AU, respectively, have a cloud cover that extends across the whole globe [15, 32]. Movinga little further towards the host star increases the dayside temperature of planets like WASP-18b (orbital distance of ∼ 0.02AU) such that clouds only form on the nightside and in someterminator regions. The dayside remains largely cloud free [29]. All known brown dwarfs thatdo not orbit a white dwarf will have a global cloud coverage comparable to giant gas planets likeHD 189733b and HD 209458b. Such a cloud coverage can, however, be inhomogeneous showingholes, vortexes or banded structures depending on the atmosphere dynamic which is affected bythe brown dwarf rotation rather than by an external radiation source [33]. Recent observationshave compared the banded cloud structure of a brown dwarf with that observed on Jupiter andNeptune in the Solar System [34].

4. Conclusion: Which extrasolar planetary objects are favorable for developing aextrasolar Global Electric Circuits?Every extrasolar planetary object, i.e. exoplanets and brown dwarfs, that harbors an atmospherecan establish a Global Electric Circuit (GEC) if lightning is possible. Lightning will occur wheredynamic clouds form. This depends on the planet’s and brown dwarf’s system parameters whichchange as the planet / brown dwarf evolves. Given the diversity of exoplanets, detailed studiesare required for individual objects but three general scenarios can be considered in order todecide which objects may be favorable for extrasolar Global Electric Circuits:

A) Full cloud coverage: If the exoplanet is fully covered in clouds, fair-weather regions throughwhich a leaking current equilibrates large-scale electric potential differences will be difficultto establish but lightning may occur easily. A global circuit system might fail to establish.However, smaller circuit systems may develop on local scales. Giant gas planets that arenot too close to their host star (e.g. HD 189733b and HD 209458b) are fully covered inclouds which extent over several vertical pressure scale heights. Repeated observations ofthe super-Earth GJ1214b [35] suggest that a geometrically thick cloud coverage is presenthere, too. Also most brown dwarfs may fail to establish a eGCE because they are fullycovered in clouds unless they are part of a highly-irradiating white dwarf binary system.

B) Intermittent cloud coverage: Earth is an example for intermittent cloud coverage wherecloudy and fair-weather regions characterise the atmosphere. Observations point to variablecloud properties (like height, particle size) on brown dwarfs [34], but it is impossible todraw conclusions about implications for the presence of fair-weather regions. No suchmeasurements can be obtained for exoplanets with the present technology.

C) Partial cloud coverage: Ultra-hot giant gas planets (e.g. WASP-18b, HAT-P-7b) form cloudspredominantly on their night side but no clouds on the dayside. In addition, the higherlocal temperature does increase the dayside’s atmospheres local conductivity compared tothe nightside. Brown dwarfs that are part of a white-dwarf binary system may fall intothis category (e.g. WD0137-349B [36]), too. Both classes of objects will, hence, develop afair-weather dayside and a cloudy, lightning producing nightside. Exoplanet objects thatdevelop a partial cloud coverage may therefore develop a global electric circuit over largerscales than known for Earth.

AcknowledgmentsThe funding from the European commission is acknowledged under which part of this researchwas conducted. We highlight financial support of the European Union under the FP7 by anERC starting grant number 257431.

References[1] Helling Ch 2019 Annual Review of Earth and Planetary Sciences 47 583–606 (Preprint https://doi.org/

10.1146/annurev-earth-053018-060401)[2] Stevenson K B, Desert J M, Line M R, Bean J L, Fortney J J, Showman A P, Kataria T, Kreidberg L,

McCullough P R, Henry G W, Charbonneau D, Burrows A, Seager S, Madhusudhan N, Williamson M Hand Homeier D 2014 Science 346 838–841 (Preprint 1410.2241)

[3] Fullekrug M, Diver D, Pincon J L, Phelps A D R, Bourdon A, Helling Ch, Blanc E, Honary F, HarrisonR G, Sauvaud J A, Renard J B, Lester M, Rycroft M, Kosch M, Horne R B, Soula S and Gaffet S 2013Surveys in Geophysics 34 1–41

[4] Fullekrug M, Kolmasova I, Santolik O, Farges T, Bor J, Bennett A, Parrot M, Rison W, Zanotti F, ArnoneE, Mezentsev A, Lan R, Uhlir L, Harrison G, Soula S, van der Velde O, Pincon J L, Helling Ch and DiverD 2013 Environmental Research Letters 8 035027

[5] Hodosan G, Helling Ch, Asensio-Torres R, Vorgul I and Rimmer P B 2016 MNRAS 461 3927–3947 (Preprint1606.09172)

[6] Lorenz R D 2018 Progress in Earth and Planetary Science 5 34[7] James M R, Lane S J and Gilbert J S 2000 JGR 105 16[8] Helling Ch, Rimmer P B, Rodriguez-Barrera I M, Wood K, Robertson G B and Stark C R 2016 Plasma

Physics and Controlled Fusion 58 074003 (Preprint 1604.03369)[9] Desch S J and Cuzzi J N 2000 Icarus 143 87–105

[10] Helling Ch, Harrison R G, Honary F, Diver D A, Aplin K, Dobbs-Dixon I, Ebert U, Inutsuka S i, Gordillo-Vazquez F J and Littlefair S 2016 Surveys in Geophysics 37 705–756 (Preprint 1601.04594)

[11] Helling Ch, Jardine M, Stark C and Diver D 2013 ApJ 767 136 (Preprint 1301.7586)[12] Bilici M A, Toth J R, Sankaran R M and Lacks D J 2014 Review of Scientific Instruments 85 103903[13] Mendez Harper J, Helling Ch and Dufek J 2018 ApJ 867 123 (Preprint 1809.07281)[14] Helling Ch 2018 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 1812.03793)[15] Lee G, Dobbs-Dixon I, Helling Ch, Bognar K and Woitke P 2016 A&A 594 A48 (Preprint 1603.09098)[16] Woitke P and Helling Ch 2003 A&A 399 297–313[17] Voelk H J, Jones F C, Morfill G E and Roeser S 1980 A&A 85 316–325[18] Helling Ch, Jardine M and Mokler F 2011 ApJ 737 38 (Preprint 1105.4409)[19] Saunders C 2008 SSRev 137 335–353[20] Parra-Rojas F C, Luque A and Gordillo-VaZquez F J 2013 Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics)

118 5190–5214[21] Bailey R L, Helling Ch, Hodosan G, Bilger C and Stark C R 2014 ApJ 784 43 (Preprint 1312.6789)[22] Lewis J S 1980 Science 210 1351[23] Hodosan G, Rimmer P B and Helling Ch 2016 MNRAS 461 1222–1226 (Preprint 1604.07406)[24] Williams E R 2009 Atmospheric Research 91 140–152[25] Wilson C T R 1906 Proc Camb Philos Soc 13 363?382[26] Rycroft M J and Harrison R G 2012 SSRev 168 363–384[27] Aplin K L, Harrison R G and Rycroft M J 2008 Investigating Earth’s Atmospheric Electricity: a Role Model

for Planetary Studies p 11[28] Parmentier V, Line M R, Bean J L, Mansfield M, Kreidberg L, Lupu R, Visscher C, Desert J M, Fortney

J J, Deleuil M, Arcangeli J, Showman A P and Marley M S 2018 A&A 617 A110 (Preprint 1805.00096)[29] Helling Ch, Gourbin P, Woitke P and Parmentier V 2019 arXiv e-prints (Preprint 1901.08640)[30] Rodrıguez-Barrera M I, Helling Ch and Wood K 2018 A&A 618 A107[31] Rodrıguez-Barrera M I, Helling Ch, Stark C R and Rice A M 2015 MNRAS 454 3977–3995 (Preprint

1509.02769)[32] Lines S, Mayne N J, Boutle I A, Manners J, Lee G K H, Helling Ch, Drummond B, Amundsen D S, Goyal

J, Acreman D M, Tremblin P and Kerslake M 2018 A&A 615 A97 (Preprint 1803.00226)[33] Zhang X and Showman A P 2014 ApJL 788 L6 (Preprint 1403.2143)[34] Apai D, Karalidi T, Marley M S, Yang H, Flateau D, Metchev S, Cowan N B, Buenzli E, Burgasser A J,

Radigan J, Artigau E and Lowrance P 2017 Science 357 683–687[35] Kreidberg L, Bean J L, Desert J M, Benneke B, Deming D, Stevenson K B, Seager S, Berta-Thompson Z,

Seifahrt A and Homeier D 2014 Nature 505 69–72 (Preprint 1401.0022)[36] Longstaff E S, Casewell S L, Wynn G A, Maxted P F L and Helling Ch 2017 MNRAS 471 1728–1736

(Preprint 1707.05793)