lifecycle management work group moving toward geospatial portfolio management tuesday, august 04,...
TRANSCRIPT
Lifecycle Management Work Group
Moving Toward Geospatial Portfolio Management
Tuesday, August 04, 2009
2
Session Purpose Provide brief update and answer Coordination Group (CG) questions on Lifecycle Work Group activities and progress Obtain CG feedback on
Proposed reorganization of the current A-16 theme structure and definitions Validate theme organization Review approach and validate outcomes
Process and scope for stakeholder review of proposed themes and associated datasets
Additional stakeholder sessions to discuss lifecycle stages, roles & responsibilities, and maturity assessment tools
Options for dataset walk through prior to validation of proposed themes and associated datasets
Candidates for prototyping roles and responsibilities outlined in the A-16 Supplemental Guidance - with ROI in mind
3
Vision, Approach and Outcomes Attain a shift in Federal Enterprise focus from individual geospatial
development efforts in agencies/business units to meeting government-wide demands/needs of the customers
Develop tools, approaches and governance to encourage new behaviors for optimization of both enterprise as well as agency/business objectives with built in decision rights and accountability
Tie data portfolio into overall geospatial asset portfolio management which includes data, funding, infrastructure, personnel, hardware, software, applications, services and products
Intended outcome
One Government-One Team (Federal, State, and Local) Geospatial data as a strategic asset managed as a portfolio Improved policy development, program decisions and business
outcomes Increased ROI: dollars and business support
4
Premise Need for leadership, building and maintaining strong leadership
Envision 80% development & governance accomplished through specific themes/communities; 20% being driven centrally
A significant portion of portfolio management focusing on adding value to business level to meet stakeholder requirements
Need synergy at both the business level and the enterprise level to achieve integrated solutions and increased ROI benefiting from economies of scale
5
Complexity / Maturity
5
Portfolio ManagementFrom Project to Portfolio Management
Pro
ject
s D
one
Rig
htR
ight
P
roje
cts
Don
e
Project Management
Project Management
Perform
ance
Management
Perform
ance
Management
Portfolio
Management
Portfolio
Management
Get
ting
The
Int
ende
d B
enef
its
Activities Underway • Validating stages of lifecycle & benchmarks – develop dashboards• Walking datasets through the lifecycle stages – 4 completed, more to come• Identifying Management Practices from walk through – many identified, 2 being developed
Activities Underway • Identifying benchmarks by lifecycle stage• Creating performance dashboards • Inserting walk through results to dashboards • Framing a maturity model • Creating Management Practice rating criteria and summary sheets
Activities Underway • Proposing candidate themes based on A-16 principles• Talking with current theme managers re: prototyping A-16 roles and responsibilities • Identifying and documenting Management Practices• Creating portfolio dashboards• Harmonizing management
Portfolio Management Activities• Strategic Alignment• Gaps/Redundancies Identified• Capability Based Planning• Risk Management• Enterprise Budgeting• Etc.
Performance Management Activities• Baseline Performance Estimates• Performance Indicators / Measures• Performance Metrics• Dashboard Reporting• Etc.
Project Management Activities• Baseline Cost Estimates• Scope Management• Time Management• Quality Management• Risk Management•Etc.
6
Lifecycle Stages - Walk Through Outcomes
7
Management Practices
Identify
Evaluate
Rank
Implement
Share
Maturity Model
8
Moving Toward Portfolio Management
OMB Circular A-16 Appendix E identified 34 themes
September 2008 data call resulted in approx. 140 “nationally significant” datasets under these themes
In May 2009, a small group evaluated the A-16 framework against the principles and other existing geospatial organizational frameworks
Participants from: DOD, EPA, FGDC, GSA, Census, NOAA, USGS
Facilitated by: Ken Shaffer (FGDC)
The goal was to collaboratively consider options for re-organizing OMB Circular A-16 themes and associated datasets
9
Creating Geospatial ThemesProcess: The group conducted a brainstorming exercise to organize themes
Map themes to multiple frameworks including ISO, A-16, The National Map, GIS for the Nation, GOS Communities, DHS Feature Base, HSPD-7, and TIGER
Applied the geospatial data principles (from A-16 Supplemental Guidance) to evaluated this initial list of themes, identified “no brainers”, and discussed organizational options for the remaining themes
Results: A list of potential new themes and definitions
10
Organization of Datasets by Themes – Example Boundaries (DRAFT)
Boundaries
Estuarine and Marine Reserves DOC-NOAA
Voting District Boundaries DOC-Census
Statistical Area Boundaries (tracts, blocks, UAs, CDPs, etc) DOC-Census
State (+ Territories) Boundaries DOC-Census
School District Boundaries DOC-Census
Metropolitan/micropolitan area boundaries DOC-Census
FIPS/ANSI codes for states,counties, congressional districts & metro/micropolitan areas
DOC-Census
County, place, MCD Boundaries DOC-Census
Congressional District Boundaries DOC-Census
AIR, ANVSA, Hawaiian Homelands Boundaries DOC-Census
Territorial Sea DOC-NOAA
Contiguous Zone DOC-NOAA
Sanctuaries DOC-NOAA
Continental Shelf Boundary Data DOI-MMS Enterprise Zones, Empowerment Communities, Revitalization Areas, Qualified Census Tracts, etc. (census geography based)
HUD-Policy Development & Research
Assisted Housing (census geography or point-based) see http://www.huduser.org/picture2000/
HUD-Policy Development & Research
Exclusive Economic Zone DOI-MMS and DOC-NOAA
11
Proposed New Organization of A-16 Themes
Geology
Imagery
Land Use-Land Cover
Structures & Facilities*
Transportation
Utilities & Communications*
Water – Inland
Water – Oceans & Coasts
*Framework working session participants flagged this theme
as “needing further discussion”
Agriculture & Food*
Biology
Boundaries
Cadastre
Climate and Weather
Cultural & Demographic Statistics*
Cultural Resources
Elevation
Geodetic Control
12
Coordination of A-16 ThemesThe A-16 Supplemental Guidance discusses an approach for coordinating datasets within and across themes
A theme manager is a person designated for each theme per the A-16 Supplemental Guidance
Nationally significant datasets are defined in the A-16 Supplemental Guidance
A theme manager is responsible for working with theme stakeholders to identify specific datasets they consider “nationally significant”
A process for adopting dataset recommendations is found in the A-16 Supplemental Guidance
13
Potential A-16 Reorganization – Review Proposal
Existing Agencies with A-16 responsibilities
10 FGDC Sub-Committee Chairs
Agency Geospatial Committees (DOI EGIM, EPA GIS Work Group Steering Committee, etc.)
Agency Enterprise Architecture Work Groups
Others?
14
Linking Dataset Assessments to Maturity Models
15
Complexity / Maturity
15
Portfolio ManagementFrom Project to Portfolio Management
Pro
ject
s D
one
Rig
htR
ight
P
roje
cts
Don
e
Project Management
Project Management
Perform
ance
Management
Perform
ance
Management
Portfolio
Management
Portfolio
Management
Get
ting
The
Int
ende
d B
enef
its
Recommendations for Proceeding• Continue walking datasets through lifecycle• Develop consistent evaluations process and tools• Continue development of Management Practices tools & dashboards
Recommendations for Proceeding• Test benchmarking & develop stage assessment tool• Develop Management Practices dashboard and tools• Complete maturity model• Identify performance metric gaps• Evaluate efficiency using ROI methods•Stakeholder sessions on lifecycle stages, roles & responsibilities, and dashboards
Recommendations for Proceeding• Stakeholder review of proposed themes and associated datasets• Stakeholder sessions on lifecycle stages, roles & responsibilities, and dashboards• Prototype roles & responsibilities in Supplemental Guidance with ROI • Assess & recommend policy development
Portfolio Management Activities• Strategic Alignment• Gaps/Redundancies Identified• Capability Based Planning• Rish Management• Enterprise Budgeting• Etc.
Performance Management Activities• Baseline Performance Estimates• Performance Indicators / Measures• Performance Metrics• Dashboard Reporting• Etc.
Project Management Activities• Baseline Cost Estimates• Scope Management• Time Management• Quality Management• Risk Management•Etc.
16
Discussion & Questions