life cycle assessment and application in waste managementg30/lca_in_waste_management.pdf · •...
TRANSCRIPT
Life Cycle Assessment and application in waste
management
PE INTERNATIONAL GmbHLeinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany
Who is speaking?PE INTERNATIONAL – Company and selected Customers
Consulting, Software SystemsGaBi / SoFi, Databases
20 years LCA experience in all mayor branches
Global player in sustainability business
Customers in more then 75 countries
Over 500 multinational companies (DJSI) trust in our solutions
PE INTERNATIONAL employs over 140 multinational people worldwide
Headquarters are in Stuttgart, Germany.
Sustainable DevelopmentWhy?
3
Mankind had become a main geological force of the planet.Vladimir Vernadski
Avoid...
...solving a problem...
Sustainable DevelopmentLife Cycle Thinking I
4
... by creating
a new problem.
5
System thinkingQuotes from the system theory:
• Systems can have emergent properties (system is more than just the
sum of its parts)
• Systems can only be optimized on a system level
→ Impossible to understand system by analyzing components
independently
→ Impossible to optimize system by optimizing components (sub-systems)
individually
Life-cycle assessment – practical standardized tool, allowing to apply the system approach in decision making in industrial activities.
Sustainable DevelopmentLife Cycle Thinking III
• In 1960s, first of the whole product’s life cycle were performed (US). They were
called REPAs (Resource and Environmental Profile Analyses);
• In1970s/80s, first LCAs were performed without common methodology
(Sundström,1973,Sweden, Boustead,1972, UK, Basler&Hofmann,1974,Switzerland,
Hunt et al.,1974 USA). Contradicting results.
• 1993, SETAC publishes Guidelines for Life-Cycle Assessment: A ‘Code of Practice’,
• 1997-2000, ISO publishes Standards 14040-43, defining the different LCA stages
• 1998-2001, ISO publishes Standards and Technical Reports 14047-49
• 2000, UNEP and SETAC create Life Cycle Initiative
• 2006 ISO publishes Standards 14040 & 14044, update and replace 14040-43
History : Life Cycle Assessment
7
Principles of Life Cycle AssessmentFramework of LCA - ISO 14044
Goal and scope definition
Inventory analysis
Impact assessment
Inte
rpre
tatio
n
LCA framework
§4.2 ISO 14044
§4.3 ISO 14044
§4.4 ISO 14044
§4.5 ISO
14044
LCA is a technique […] compiling an inventory of relevant inputs and outputs of a product system; evaluating the potential environmental impacts associated with those inputs and outputs; and interpreting the results of the inventory and impact phases in relation to the objectives of the study.
Definition of Life Cycle Assessmentfrom DIN ISO 14040:
8
Life cycle assessment approach
economicprocess
economicprocess
economicprocess
economicprocess
Functional unit
Elementary flows (e.g. water or resource) – input flows
Elementary flows (e.g. emissions to air) – output flows
Economy-environment system boundary
Intermediateflow
Intermediateflow
Intermediateflow
Product system
Life cycle assessment terminology (ISO 14040:2006)
ProduktionProduction NutzungUse End of LifeEnd of Life
ProduktionProduction
Production
10
Life Cycle InventoryInventory analysis – structure
Polypropylene scrap500 kg
Thermal energy712 MJ
Power74.5 kWh
PP scrap (washed)495 kg
Input:
Process water4,800 kg
Output:
PP (consumer waste)5 kg
Waste water4,800 kg
Process:
Washing and drying ofPP scrap
• What is the weight of one complete battery housing?
• Which material inputs are used (specification)?
• How is the cooling water treated (closed or open loop)?
• Generation of thermal energy (which kind of fuel is used)?
• Compressed air: power demand of the compressor, air pressure?
energy
materials operating mat.
losses
waste
products
by-products
emissions
process
500 g
Used battery housings made of polypropylene
No cooling water necessary
Don’t know the power demand, air pressure is 7 bar STP
Natural gas
• What is the weight of one complete battery housing?
• Which material inputs are used (specification)?
• How is the cooling water treated (closed or open loop)?
• Generation of thermal energy (which kind of fuel is used)?
• Compressed air: power demand of the compressor, air pressure?
energy
materials operating mat.
losses
waste
products
by-products
emissions
process
energy
materials operating mat.
losses
waste
products
by-products
emissions
process
500 g
Used battery housings made of polypropylene
No cooling water necessary
Don’t know the power demand, air pressure is 7 bar STP
Natural gas
11
Life Cycle InventoryExample of a data collection sheet of PE International
Life Cycle Model in professional software
Life Cycle Model in professional software
Human toxicity
Photochemical oxidant formation
Ozone depletion
Climate change
Acidification
Eutrophication
Ecotoxicity
Land use impacts
Species & organism dispersal
Abiotic resources deplection
Biotic resources deplection
LCIresults
Human Health
Biotic & abioticnatural environment
Biotic & abioticnatural resources
Biotic & abioticmanmade resources
Source: Int J of LCA 9(6) 2004
Impact categories proposed by UNEP/SETACLife Cycle Initiative in 2003
GWP =
AP =
Σ GWPi kgi * i
Σ APi
kgi * i
15
Life Cycle Impact Assessment Aggregation of single factors to potentials
Global Criteria- Resource depletion- Global Warming Potential (GWP)- Ozone Depletion Potential (ODP)
Regional Criteria- Acidification Potential (AP)
- Land use
Local Criteria - Human- and Eco-Toxicity Potential (HTP, ETP)- Eutrophication Potential (EP)- Photochemical Oxidant Creation Potential (POCP)
Other Criteria - Nisance (noise, odour, landfill demand, ionising radiation)
Life Cycle Impact AssessmentImpacts - global, regional and local
16
Effect: Increased warming of the troposphere due to anthropogenic greenhouse gases e.g. from the burning of fossil fuels.
Reference Substance: Carbon Dioxide (CO2)
Reference Unit: kg CO2-Equivalent
Source: IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climatic Change)
CO2 CH4
CFCs
UV - radiation
AbsorptionReflection
Infraredradiation
Trace gases in the atmosphere
17
Life Cycle Impact AssessmentGlobal Warming Potential (GWP)
Effect: Reduction in the ozone concentration of the Stratosphere due to emissions such as Chloro-fluoro-carbons (CFCs)
Reference Substance: Tri-chloro-fluoro-methane (R11)
Reference Unit: kg R11-Equivalent
Source: CML, (Heijungs, Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden), 1992
Life Cycle Impact Assessment Ozone Depletion Potential (ODP)
CFCsNitrogen oxide
Stratosphere15 - 50 km Absorption Absorption
UV - radiation
18
Effect: Increase in the pH-value of precipitation due to the wash-out of acidifiying gases e.g. Sulphur dioxide (SO2) and Nitrogen oxides (NOx).
Reference Substance: Sulphur dioxide (SO2)
Reference Unit: kg SO2-Equivalent
Source: CML, (Heijungs, Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden), 1992
Life Cycle Impact Assessment Acidification Potential (AP)
SO2
NOX
H2SO44HNO3
19
Effect: Excessive nutient input into water and land from substances such asphosphorus und nitrogen from agriculture, combustion processes and effluents.
Reference Substance: Phosphate (PO4-)
Reference Unit: kg PO4- Equivalent
Source: CML, (Heijungs, Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden), 1992
Life Cycle Impact Assessment Eutrophication Potential (EP)
Waste water
Air pollutionFertilisation
PO4-3
NO3-
NH4+
NOXN2O
NH3
20
HydrocarbonsNitrogen Oxides
Dry and warmclimate
Hydrocarbons
Nitrogen Oxides
Ozone
Effect: Formation of low level ozone by sunlight instigating the photochemical reaction of nitrogen oxides with hyrocarbons and volatile organic compounds (VOC)
Reference Substance: Ethylene (C2H4)
Reference Unit: kg C2H4 -Equivalent
Source: Udo de Haes et al., 1999
21
Life Cycle Impact Assessment Photochemical Ozone Creation Potential (POCP) - Summer smog
Effect: Continuous toxicological impact on humans
(arbitrary estimation)
Reference Substance: 1,4-Di-chloro-benzene (DCB, C6H4Cl2)
Reference Unit: kg DCB - Equivalent
Source: CML (Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden); RIVM (National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection)
Life Cycle Impact Assessment Human Toxicity Potential (HTP)
Heavy metals
Halogenorganiccompounds
PCBDCB
PAH
Air
Food
Products
22
Effect: Continuous toxicological impact on water and soils
(arbitrary estimation)
Reference Substance: 1,4-Di-chloro-benzene (DCB, C6H4Cl2)
Reference Unit: kg DCB - Equivalent
Source: CML (Centrum voor Milieukunde Leiden); RIVM (National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection)
Life Cycle Impact Assessment Aquatic (AETP) and Terrestrial (TETP) = Ecotoxicity Potential (ETP)
(Terrestrial Ecosystem) Biosphere
Heavy metals
Halogenorganiccompounds
PCBDCBPAH
Biosphere(Aquatic ecosystem)
23
Pulp and paper
Absorbent gel
LDPE film PP fabric
Tapes, elastics, adhesives
Raw cotton
Cotton fabric
Disposable diaper
Reusable diaper
Diaperuse
Diaperuse
Diaperlaundry
Diaper landfill
Diaper landfill
43%
27%
7%
23%
Other materials
Source: World Resources Institute,1994. Adapted from R.Geyer lecture slides 2008
Results: LCA Disposable and Reusable Nappies (UK)
Disposable Home laundered reusable
Commercially laundered reusable
Abiotic resource depletion (kg Sb eq) 4.82 4.09 5.76
Acidification (kg SO2 eq) 3.78 3.13 3.05
Eutrophication (kg PO4 eq) 0.338 0.334 0.275
Global warming (GWP100) (kg CO2 eq) 626 559 762
Ozone layer depletion (ODP) (kg CFC-11 eq) 0.000261 0.00004 0.00008
Photochemical oxidation (kg C2H2) 0.174 0.048 0.049
Human toxicity (kg 1,4-DB eq) 49.4 132 123
Fresh water aquatic ecotox. (kg 1,4-DB eq) 7.01 11.4 11.6
Terrestrial. ecotoxicity (kg 1,4-DB eq) 1.92 1.53 2.7
Results: LCA Disposable and Reusable Nappies (UK)
0
5E-11
1E-10
1.5E-10
2E-10
2.5E-10
3E-10
3.5E-10
4E-10
ADP AP EP GWP ODP POCP HTP FAETP TETP
Disposable
Reusable,homelaunderingReusable,commerciallaundry
Normalization factor: Total estimated impact of Western Europe in 1995
Source: Adapted from R. Geyer lecture slides (UCSB, 2009)
Results: LCA Disposable and Reusable Nappies (UK)
Completeness check
Has Something important been left out? Look at cut-offs, data gaps & missing impact categories. Justify why missing elements are not relevant with respect to goal and scope of study;
Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis
How much can different parameters (assumptions) change the result? Look at variations in process data, boundary, allocation etc.
Consistency check
Are the assumptions, methods, models and data consistent withgoal and scope & with each other?
- data quality along a product life cycle or between different product systems- regional and temporal aspects- allocation rules and system boundaries- impact assessment
InterpretationCompleteness, sensitivity and consistency checks
LCA basics: some take home messages
Role of LCA in sustainablility assessments:best known method to cover LCmost established method to cover LConly standardized method to cover LCQuantitativetechnical/reality basedconsitent (if used properly) „The knife and the doctor“flexibleholisticexpandable
Main task: Reducing complex problems to the relevant aspects (emissions to impacts, process chain elements to sub-systems) and making them understanable.
Innovation without LCA justification is not longer accepted and wanted
LCA: some general Trends
Trends & Future improvements (ed personal opinion)
• Integration of LCA in Environmental Management Systems;
• Quality and availability of data (Growth of available databases);
• Impact assessment methodology is still in development (Toxicity indicators, plus new issues are gaining attention – biodiversity, land use, water footprint);
• Multidimensionality in decision making (management decisions with trade offs and uncertainty);
• Hybrid LCA (to address cut-off issues);
• Social LCA to address social aspects of sustainability.
29
LCA in Waste Management (WM)The LC from the viewpoint of “Recycling” (1)
• Recyclability is influenced by law e.g.:Take back RegulationsResource/Energy policiesWaste policies
• Recyclability is influenced by the product e.g.:Consumer productValue of productDurability of product
• Recyclability is influenced by production process e.g.:CompoundQualityAssembly has backflash on disassembly possibilitiesMaterial mixValue of materialIntegration possibilities of post comsumer material in production process
• Recyclability is influenced by location e.g.:Location of waste generationLocation of waste recyclingTransport costsCollection and Distribution network
• Recyclability is influenced by the demand e.g.:Demand of recycled materialValue of recycled material in comparison to virgin material
• Recyclability is influenced by possibilities of the recycling methods e.g.:Quality of recycled materialExpenses of recycling process (energy, emissions, costs) Availability of technologiesPossibilities of new technologiesTechnology integrated in closed-loop, open-loop LC, downcycling (parkbench)
LCA in Waste Management (WM)The LC from the viewpoint of “Recycling” (2)
Topics addressed by LCA in WMAnalyzing recycling methods
• Resource scarcity
• Options to use recycled material (substitute virgin material, substitute other materials,substitute energy carrier)
• Closing of material loops (keeping materials in technoshpere, e.g. steel, aluminium)
• Expenses / Impacts for different recycling methods (energy, emissions, waste)
• Reduction of dump site volume / space
• Chances of new or future technologies
• Inventories primary material / secondary material
Approach: Identifying relevant parameters of recycling options leading to a LCA
Ways to identify proper methodsSelecting of recycling methods
Boundaries: Many processes, influencing parameters and different impacts
complex decision
Goal: Reliable decision with accurate expenses
Possibility: Reducing degree of complexity before an analysis
High loss of information
Screening the systems and identifying relevant parameters
Little loss of information
Metal separation
• bigger metal parts (even stones) are best separated in a washing tank (sink effect)
• Ferrous metals separated by magnetic separators, non-ferrous e.g. by metal detectors
LCA relevant parameters: water demand, electricity
Example Mechanical RecyclingPurifying
General
The use of mixed or impure plastic waste by direct remolding leads to recycling product of low demand. Thus purification (detection, separation, cleaning and sorting) gains importance.
Plastics from recycled materials therefore are more (economical) interesting, if the prices of primary plastic materials is relatively high.
Mechanical RecyclingPurifying, GaBi
Metal
separation
Shredder > 50mm
• high volume waste (cars, refrigerator) are processed. In Germany 500.000 t/a shredder waste, 30% plastics (mainly incinerated)
• other examples: screw disintegrator, rolling cutter
LCA relevant parameters: processing of shredder light weight fraction, significant energy demand for big shredders (high weight, air blowers), dust emissions, heavy metals in air, dioxins in air, noise (cars: mainly outdoor operation)
Mechanical RecyclingPurifying
Shredder
The shredding process can be separated into different target particle sizes
a) > 50mm b) > 5mm c) < 1mm
Shredding is one of the most important process in plastic recycling.
Shredder > 50mm
Mechanical RecyclingPurifying
Shredder > 50mm
Mechanical RecyclingPurifying, GaBi
Chemical RecyclingPetrochemical processes
Pyrolysis
• decomposition at 400°-800°C (no O2 , no combustion)
• petrochemical products (40% gases, 25% oils, 30% waste)
• gases (electr./heating), oils (chem. use)
• no sorting, cleaning necessary
• possible dioxine/furane synthesis
LCA relevant parameters: energy (50% of product used internal), gaseous emissions dioxins/furans possible or treatment needed
waste
pyrolysis oilpyrolysis gas 50%
pyrolysis gas 50%
soot
Chemical RecyclingPetrochemical processes
Synthesis gas generation
• base substance for NH3 and methanol production
• partial oxidation of hydrocarbons (plastics)
• 160 bar, 1500°C, combustion of hydrocarbons prevented by O2 regulation
• Plants to process plastics at recycling center “Schwarze Pumpe (SVZ)”. Product mainly H2, CO as base substances for methanol. Methanol partly further used for plastic production
LCA relevant parameters: very high temperatures (internal use of product may high)
Thermal RecyclingCo-Combustion
Waste Incineration Plants
• only existing (economical feasible) large scale technology
Grate firing
• Principle: Drying, degassing
• gasification, combustion
• Complex off-gas treatment
• product: electricity
LCA relevant parameters: heavy metal treatment (e.g. Hg), efficiency of electricity generation, internal energy demand, allocation of emissions (who is responsible for what?)
Thermal RecyclingMono-Combustion
Different technologies
• grate firing: technological realized (e.g. in waste incineration plants)
• rotary kiln: Not suitable for low-ash plastics
• fluidized bed reactor: technological possible, but still in development (1994 Japan)
Thermal RecyclingOthers
BRAM (“Fuel from Waste”)
• Briquettes from waste (70-85% pulp/paper, 10-13% plastics)
• Goal: homogenization of waste, better storage, better process conditions
• BRAM produced in DE, NL, GB, FR
• High heavy metal concentrations in flue gases (even higher than in coal)
• Extensive flue gas cleaning
LCA relevant parameters: heavy metal contents, efficiency of process using BRAM (gas cleaning)
Altauto
Shredder
RecyclingKKB
SLF
RecyclingKKB
DeponieSLF
SLF
Used car
Dry up
Disassembly Shredder
RecyclingSLF
Spare parts
SLF
RecyclingTank
DisposalSLF
Verbrennung SLF
Szenario„Dump site“
FTP Project
Szenario„Max. Recycling“
Szenario„FTP-Project“
Metals
Szenario„Incineration“
EU-Used car regulation goal: increase recycling rate
Recycling of integrated plastics on the example of car recyclingSystem comparison
Recycling of integrated plastics (e.g. car recycling) The LC in GaBi
Recycling of integrated plastics (e.g. car recycling) The LC in GaBi
Recycling of integrated plastics (e.g. car recycling) Results and Interpretation
Primary energy [MJ]
Comparison of LC-stagesof new technology
-2,0E-10
0,0E+00
2,0E-10
4,0E-10
6,0E-10
8,0E-10
1,0E-09
1,2E-09
Impacts
Nor
m.
Impa
cts
productionuseend of Lifetotal
GWP ODP AP EP POCP
0
48
Thank you for your attention
Questions ?