libraries in the information age - concert.stpi.narl.org.twconcert.stpi.narl.org.tw/year/file/ruarri...
TRANSCRIPT
| 1 | 1 | 1
Libraries in the Information Age Improving Library Feedback
Library Connect , November 2016 Ruarri Rogan, [email protected] Solutions Enablement
| 2 | 2 | 2
Introduction: Why feedback? 5 mins Feedback for RESEARCHERS 8 mins Feedback for PURCHASERS Current Feedback Systems 8 mins Future Developments 4 mins What Feedback Tells Us Trends in backfiles 8 mins Possible explanations 4 mins The role of the librarian 4 mins Questions 10 mins
2
AGENDA
Part 1
Part 2
| 4 | 4 | 4
Introduction: Why feedback? 5 mins Feedback for RESEARCHERS 8 mins Feedback for PURCHASERS Current Feedback Systems 8 mins Future Developments 4 mins What Feedback Tells Us Trends in backfiles 8 mins Possible explanations 4 mins The role of the librarian 4 mins Questions 10 mins
4
AGENDA
Part 1
Part 2
| 11 | 11 | 11
Introduction: Why feedback? 5 mins Feedback for RESEARCHERS 8 mins Feedback for PURCHASERS Current Feedback Systems 8 mins Future Developments 4 mins What Feedback Tells Us Trends in backfiles 8 mins Possible explanations 4 mins The role of the librarian 4 mins Questions 10 mins
11
AGENDA
Part 1
Part 2
|
1. Help me understand and communicate value of
your products 2. Help me generate stories to share with my
community of researchers and students. 3. Help me stay up to date with new developments
and offerings.
12
Questions our customers tell us that they’re faced with:
| 13 | 13 | 13
13
Usage reports Value stories Inst. Insights
1. COUNTER usage reports. Being a founding member Elsevier has always supported COUNTER and reported in a compliant way via our website and SUSHI protocol Since 2002
2. Personalised value analytics Multiple metrics regarding research outcomes at institutional level using the power of Scopus. Since 2012
3. Product Insights for Customers. Free personalised value analytics at institutional level using the power of Scopus, Mendeley and big data analytics From now on
Product Insights for Customers
| 15 | 15 | 15
Introduction: Why feedback? 5 mins Feedback for RESEARCHERS 8 mins Feedback for PURCHASERS Current Feedback Systems 8 mins Future Developments 4 mins What Feedback Tells Us Trends in backfiles 8 mins Possible explanations 4 mins The role of the librarian 4 mins Questions 10 mins
15
AGENDA
Part 1
Part 2
| 16 | 16 | 16
16
Future Developments
Value communication
Story Telling & Education
Update on new tools & content
Near future widgets
Scopus Backfile Subject
Collections Mendeley
| 17 | 17 | 17
Who Gets to Access E-PIC?
17
Scopus Product
ScienceDirect Product
SciVal Product
Other products
Mendeley Institutional
Edition
ScienceDirect Value metrics
Scopus Value
metrics
SciVal Value
metrics
Other product Value
metrics
Mendeley Value
metrics
Paid Product
Offerings for end users
Complementary engagement analytics for subscribing purchasers
Elsevier suite of information solutions
| 18 | 18 | 18
Introduction: Why feedback? 5 mins Feedback for RESEARCHERS 8 mins Feedback for PURCHASERS Current Feedback Systems 8 mins Future Developments 4 mins What Feedback Tells Us Trends in backfiles 8 mins Possible explanations 4 mins The role of the librarian 4 mins Questions 10 mins
AGENDA
Part 1
Part 2
| 19 | 19 | 19
“In 2013… 13% of citations were to articles >= 20 years old… an increase of 36% since 1990... Now that finding and reading relevant older articles is about as easy as finding and reading recently published articles, significant advances aren’t getting lost on the shelves and are influencing work worldwide for years after.”
Google Inc., November 2014
New technology opens up older content
| 20 | 20 | 20
Trends in backfiles “Literature Citations in the Internet Era,”
“Although many factors affect citation practices, two things are clear: Researchers are increasingly relying on older science, and citations are increasingly dispersed across a larger proportion of papers and journals” Larivière et al., in Literature Citations in the Internet Era, Science, 2009
| 22 | 22 | 22
Trends in backfiles
0 500000 1000000 1500000 2000000 2500000 3000000 3500000 4000000
Veterinary Science and Veterinary MedicinePublic Health and Health Policy
MathematicsCell Press
Inorganic ChemistryDecision Sciences
The LancetEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
Immunology and MicrobiologyHigh Energy/Nuclear Physics and Astronomy
Business, Management and AccountingEnergy and Power
Pharmacology, Toxicology and PharmaceuticsChemical Engineering
Organic ChemistrySocial Science
Computer SciencePsychology
NeurosciencePhysical and Analytical Chemistry
Environmental SciencePhysics General
Earth and Planetary SciencesAgricultural and Biological Sciences
Engineering and TechnologyMaterials Science
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular BiologyMedicine and Dentistry
Turnaways By Backfile Subject Package - Global - 2015
| 23 | 23 | 23
Introduction: Why feedback? 5 mins Feedback for RESEARCHERS 8 mins Feedback for PURCHASERS Current Feedback Systems 8 mins Future Developments 4 mins What Feedback Tells Us Trends in backfiles 8 mins Possible explanations 4 mins The role of the librarian 4 mins Questions 10 mins
AGENDA
Part 1
Part 2
| 25 | 25 | 25
Hypothesis 1: Technology has reinvigorated history Elsevier’s Investment in rescue & digitisation of classic content
Case in point: The Lancet – Volume 1, Number 1, 1823
| 26 | 26 | 26
Hypothesis 2a: Some ideas are ahead of their time ‘aka Sleeping beauties’
The Sleeping Beauty L.J. Romans, Physics Letters B • Published in 1986 • Article only cited 10 years after publication • Then cited intensively more than 60 times
The Prince J. Polchinski, Physics Review Letters 75 Published in 1995 Picked up Romans’ articles
| 28 | 28 | 28
Hypothesis 3: It’s an issue of funding
“a growing cited half-life might also reflect major structural shifts in the way science is funded and the way scientists are rewarded. A gradual move to fund incremental and applied research may result in fewer fundamental and theoretical studies being published. Giving credit to these founders may require authors cite an increasingly aging literature.” Phil Davies
| 29 | 29 | 29
Introduction: Why feedback? 5 mins Feedback for RESEARCHERS 8 mins Feedback for PURCHASERS Current Feedback Systems 8 mins Future Developments 4 mins What Feedback Tells Us Trends in backfiles 8 mins Possible explanations 4 mins The role of the librarian 4 mins Questions 10 mins
AGENDA
Part 1
Part 2
| 30 | 30 | 30
Thank you! For queries about E-PIC, speak to me afterward, or e-mail me at [email protected]