lh e c design goals
DESCRIPTION
Luminosity Prospects of LH e C, a Lepton Proton Collider in the LHC Tunnel DESY Colloquium May 23 2006 F. Willeke, DESY. LH e C Design Goals. Luminosity L = 1 ∙ 10 33 cm -2 s -1 Energy E cm = 1.4 TeV. Design Asumptions. based on LHC Proton beam parameters - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Luminosity Prospects of LHeC,a Lepton Proton Collider in the
LHC Tunnel
DESY Colloquium May 23 2006F. Willeke, DESY
![Page 2: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
LHeC Design Goals
Luminosity L = 1 ∙1033 cm-2s-1
Energy Ecm = 1.4 TeV
![Page 3: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Design Asumptionsbased on LHC Proton beam parameters
Energy Ep = 7 TeV
Particles per Bunch Np = 1.68 1011
Emittance Np = 3.76 radm
Bunch spacing b = 75 ns (instead of 25ns)
Bunch Length p = 7.6 cm
Ee = 70 GeV
![Page 4: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Luminosity
yeyeypypxexexpxp
brevep nfNNL
ββββπ +⋅+⋅⋅
⋅⋅⋅=
2 yeyeypypxexexpxp
brevep nfNNL
ββββπ +⋅+⋅⋅
⋅⋅⋅=
2
ypxpNp
ppe
e
NIL
ββπγ
⋅⋅⋅⋅
⋅⋅=
2 ypxpNp
ppe
e
NIL
ββπγ
⋅⋅⋅⋅
⋅⋅=
2
Matched beam cross sections at IP xp = xe, yp = ye
Lepton Beam-beam tune shift avoided
With the proton beam brightness given by LHC, Npγp / Np=3.2·1020m-1
m
AI
ypxp
e 063.0=ββ m
AI
ypxp
e 063.0=ββ
![Page 5: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Lepton Beam Current Assumptions: Limited by RF Power only
depends on Bending radius
= 80% ∙ (CLHC-8∙Lstraigth) / 2π = 2886 m
eUloss= CgEe4 / (eMeV
CERN Power Consumption
If 50 MW beam power considered as a limit Ie = 68mA Ne=1.3 1010
![Page 6: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
mypxp 1=⋅ββ mypxp 1=⋅ββ
Design Task: e-Ring and IR Design which provides
• sufficient dynamic aperture
•With matched beams,
• Small crossing angle <xe/p
• Small hour glass effect βye ≥ p
• tolerable synchrotron radiation background
• feasible components
![Page 7: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Dynamic Aperture Scaling
Taken from HERA: 0.2
for FODO cell structure, N number of FODO Cells
Arc chromaticity IR chromaticity for matched beams
This assumes a
Plain FODO
structure
This assumes a
Plain FODO
structure
![Page 8: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Choosing Lepton Ring Lattice Parameters
![Page 9: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
e Lattice8 Octants with 500m Straight section400 FODO cells, Cell length 54 mDipole length 2 x 11.33 m B= 780 Gauss
Quadrupole length 1.5 m (G = 7 T/m)
bend bend bend bend
54m
11.33m
xe = 26 nmfodo = 72 degree
![Page 10: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Synchrotron Radiation
Values for IR
Instantaneous Power for one electron
Pg Ee ir,( ) .20 10 −× watt=
Total Power 2 PsynEe ir, ir, Ie,( )⋅ 1.1kW=
Power per unit LengthPs Ee ir, Ie,( ) 0.55kWm 1−⋅=
Critical Energy uc Ee ir,( ) 10.2keV=
![Page 11: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Bypass around Atlas and CMS
![Page 12: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Which IR?
![Page 13: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
IR Parameters
xp = xe, yp = ye
xp = 0.5 nm xe = 26 nm
Need to match “flat” e beam with “round” p beam
βxp/βyp = 4
βxp = 2 m
βyp = 50 cm
βxe = 5 cm
βye = 5 cm
![Page 14: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
IR Layoute-low-beta
triplets
Vertically focussing Quadrupole
magnet for pOther
P beam
![Page 15: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
IR Layout
![Page 16: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Luminosity
1233 sec1001.1 −−⋅= cmLpeak
![Page 17: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Beam-Beam Effect
Central crossing beam-beam parameters well within the HERA range
![Page 18: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Parasitic Crossings75ns
50ns25ns
x = 8 separation, ok
x = 3.5 separation, not ok
x = 1 separation, not ok
1st parasitic crossing for different bunch spacing
Nominal Bunch spacing LHC not compatible with maximum LHeC luminosity !
![Page 19: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Crab Crossing
p e
c=0.5mr
“Crabbed Trajectories
IPTransverse
RF resonators
c/2
90 degree
Crossing angle will enhance effective beam size 2 = β+2s2
![Page 20: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Quadrupole Magnets
![Page 21: LH e C Design Goals](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062407/56812f52550346895d94e354/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Conclusions A first look at a possible lepton proton collider in the LHC tunnel with a luminosity of 1033cm-2s-1 appears to be technical possible
Simultaneous operation of pp and ep should be possible (however with reduced pp luminosity)
More work is needed to determine the most optimum parameters, the optimum technical choices and the cost of such a facility
A workshop to discuss this exciting option together with experimental physicists and accelerator scientists is planned in October 06