leveraging quality processes in technology businesses
DESCRIPTION
Leveraging Quality Processes In Technology Businesses. Satyendra Kumar Padmanabha Rao. Infosys Excellence Initiative 2000. 2001 - 9947 employees. 5. CMM Level 5 in 1999. 1999 - 4000 employees. CMM Level 4 in 1997. 1997 - 2500 Employees. ISO 9001 Certification. 1993 - 1000 Employees. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Leveraging Quality ProcessesIn Technology Businesses
Satyendra KumarPadmanabha Rao
InfosysExcellence
Initiative2000
2001 - 9947 employees
Excellence @ Infosys
1999 - 4000 employeesCMM Level 5 in 1999
5
1997 - 2500 EmployeesCMM Level 4 in 1997
1993 - 1000 EmployeesISO 9001 Certification
Infosys Excellence Initiative
Core Processes
Leveraging CMM Level 5
Management Processes
Baldrige Framework
Business Processes
Six Sigma CFPM
Industry Average Level 4 Companies
Industry AverageLevel 5 Companies
Infosys0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
Nov-97
Mar-98
Jul-98
Oct-98
Jul-99
Sep-99
May-00
Jan-01
Def
ects
/ P
erso
n H
our Industry Average
Level 4 Companies
Industry AverageLevel 5 Companies
Infosys
Defect Prevention
Identify CommonDefect Types
Identify CommonDefect Types
PrioritizePrioritize
Find SolutionsAnd Pilot
Find SolutionsAnd Pilot
ImplementMonitor Results
ImplementMonitor Results
Project LevelOrganization Wide
Reduction in Defect Injection
Reduction in Delivered Defects0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
Nov-97
Mar-98
Jul-98
Oct-98
Jul-99
Sep-99
May-00
Jan-01D
eliv
ered
def
ects
/ fu
nctio
n po
ints
Caper Jones 2000Level 5 Benchmark
Caper Jones 2000Level 4 Benchmark
Process Change Management
PL Suggestions11
33
44
55
66
MonitorProgressPrioritize
22
Form Team
Pilot
Enab
leDe
ploy
men
t
Deploy
Measure
Effectiveness
Improvements in Productivity
Value as Perceived by Customers1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Honouringcommitments
Deliveringthe promise
Partnering Value formoney
Servicingemerging
needsValue
Ratin
gs o
n 7
poin
t sca
le
Jul-99
Sep-99
Nov-99
Jan-00
Mar-00
May-00
Jul-00
Sep-00
Nov-00
Jan-01
Mar-01
May-01
Pro
duct
ivity
(FP
/p-m
onth
)
Caper Jones 2000 Productivity Benchmark
Jul-99
Sep-99
Nov-99
Jan-00
Mar-00
May-00
Jul-00
Sep-00
Nov-00
Jan-01
Mar-01
May-01
Pro
duct
ivity
(FP
/p-m
nth)
Caper Jones 2000 Productivity Benchmark
Delivery Response
Robust Deployment
Sustenance through Systems
Variable Cost Productivity
CMM & Six Sigma: Components of Delivery Excellence
Customer Value
ReduceProject
Cost
ReduceMaintenance
Cost
IncreaseProductivity
ReduceTime
To Market
ReduceLife cycle
Cost
StrengthenPartnership
IncreaseReliability
ReduceResponse
Time
IncreasePredictability
Robust Deployment: ROFO - A Unique Approach
Partnering process definitions
Leadership in process deployment
Driving process evolution
Senior Management Reviews
Deployment is the responsibility of Delivery
Quality Department Delivery Practice Units
Working Groups for Process Definition
SQA SEPGDeliveryExcellenceManagers
PSQA
80+9947
10+ 200+
25+
WG1 WG2 WG3 WG4 WG n
250
InternalAuditors
Process Council
800+
Integrated Project Management System
Transforming Intranet into a decision enabler
Project HealthVisibility
Hierarchical ViewsOn Line TrackingProject Budgeting
Life Cycle Improvement
ProposalManagement
ContractManagementResource
Management
ProjectManagement
DefectTracking
ProcessManagement
AuditManagement
Supporting Cost Leadership ….
Variable Cost Productivity
11007550250-25-50
Productivity 2000
3002001000-100
Productivity 2001
Productivity increases by 10 %
Effort
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80
USL
Variable Cost 2000
16 36 64
USL
Variable Cost 2001
Variable costs decreases by 5 %
ReworkReviewTestingTraining
Reducing Total Cost of Ownership
100 -50 0 50
Mean schedule slip down to 3.7 % from 19.6%
403020100-10-20-30-40
Process DataUSL
20.0000Target
*LSL
10.0000Mean
19.6024Sample N
103St Dev (Overall)
35.5838
Observed Performance%<LSL
50.49%>USL
32.04%Total
82.52
LSL USL
Schedule Slip % CY 2000
Schedule Slip % CY 2001
LSL USL
Process DataUSL
20.0000Target
*LSL
10.0000Mean
3.7494Sample N
25St Dev (Overall)
13.1715
Observed Performance%<LSL
68.00%>USL
12.00%Total
80.00
-4 -1 0 1 4 9 14 25 36
806040200-20
Mean delivered defectsdown to 3.8 % from 8.8%
Process DataUSL 8.00000Target *LSL 0.00000Mean 8.84286Sample N 77St Dev (Overall) 11.3541
Observed Performance%<LSL 0.00%>USL 35.06%Total 35.06
Delivered defects % CY 2000
Sqrt of Delivered defects % CY 2001
Process DataUSL 3.00000Target *LSL 0.00000Mean 1.81403Sample N 15St Dev (Overall) 1.23112
Observed Performance%<LSL 0.00%>USL 20.00%Total 20.00
LSL USL
LSL USL
Business Process Excellence
SelectProcess
DefineAs-Is
DevelopShould-Be
DetailDesign
ImplementProcess
MonitorResults
Motorola Six Sigma CFPM Process
Order through Receipt Process»Revenue gain > $ 1 Million»15% Reduction in renewal time
Talent Deployment Process»96% Readiness In < 22 Days»70% internal customers > satisfied
Customer Relationship Process»Customer Management Skills»Relationship Management Process»Project Initiation Process
Management Process Excellence
Customer and Market Focused Strategy and Action PlansCustomer and Market Focused Strategy and Action Plans
ResultsTriad
LeadershipTriad
2StrategicPlanning
2StrategicPlanning
1Leadership
1Leadership
3Customer andMarket Focus
3Customer andMarket Focus
5Human Resource
Focus
5Human Resource
Focus
6Process
Management
6Process
Management
7BusinessResults
7BusinessResults
4Information And Analysis
4Information And Analysis
Guiding Evolution To World-Class Management Practices
Infosys Leadership System
Customer Value Measurement Support Quality System
Benchmarking - Jugalbandhi
IMC Ramakrishna Bajaj Award
0
250
500
750
1000
Ass
essm
ent S
core
Scores 450 525 750
MBNQA 1 MBNQA 2 IMC Award
IMC Ramakrishna Bajaj Award
0
250
500
750
1000
Ass
essm
ent S
core
Scores 450 525 750
MBNQA 1 MBNQA 2 IMC Award
IMC Ramakrishna Bajaj Award
0
250
500
750
1000
Ass
essm
ent S
core
Scores 450 525 750
MBNQA 1 MBNQA 2 IMC Award
Coming together to Deliver Customer Value
APAC CAPS CENA ES ESCP EURP SONA WENA
Satis
fact
ion
Ratin
g
Customer Satisfaction Internal Partner Satisfaction
Voice of the Customer
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1996 1997 1998 1999 20000%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000
Customer More Than SatisfiedCustomer more than satisfied
Measures Of Customer Loyalty
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Met Needs Recommend ConsiderBetter
Measures of customer loyalty
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Met Needs Recommend ConsiderBetter
Quality Process Consulting
A value added service for key customers
To strengthen selected customer relationships
Based on actual implementation experience
A testimonial of customer confidence in Infosys quality
To Summarize
Core Processes
Leveraging CMM Level 5
Management Processes
Baldrige Framework
Business Processes
Six Sigma CFPM
Thank You