@let@token how censorship in china allows government ...censorship is not “leaky &...
TRANSCRIPT
How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticismbut Silences Collective Expression
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, Molly Roberts
Institute for Quantitative Social ScienceHarvard University
(talk at Emory University, 10/12/2012)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 1 / 34
Chinese Censorship
The largest selective suppression of human expression in history
Content filtering: Removing individual posts by hand
Estimated numbers of censors: ≈200,000
Internal censors at individual sites like Sina.com: up to ≈1,000Internet police: 20,000–50,000
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 2 / 34
Chinese Censorship
The largest selective suppression of human expression in history
Content filtering: Removing individual posts by hand
Estimated numbers of censors: ≈200,000
Internal censors at individual sites like Sina.com: up to ≈1,000Internet police: 20,000–50,000
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 2 / 34
Chinese Censorship
The largest selective suppression of human expression in history
Content filtering: Removing individual posts by hand
Estimated numbers of censors: ≈200,000
Internal censors at individual sites like Sina.com: up to ≈1,000Internet police: 20,000–50,000
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 2 / 34
Chinese Censorship
The largest selective suppression of human expression in history
Content filtering: Removing individual posts by hand
Estimated numbers of censors: ≈200,000
Internal censors at individual sites like Sina.com: up to ≈1,000Internet police: 20,000–50,000
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 2 / 34
Chinese Censorship
The largest selective suppression of human expression in history
Content filtering: Removing individual posts by hand
Estimated numbers of censors: ≈200,000
Internal censors at individual sites like Sina.com: up to ≈1,000
Internet police: 20,000–50,000
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 2 / 34
Chinese Censorship
The largest selective suppression of human expression in history
Content filtering: Removing individual posts by hand
Estimated numbers of censors: ≈200,000
Internal censors at individual sites like Sina.com: up to ≈1,000Internet police: 20,000–50,000
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 2 / 34
Our Main Point
Prevailing Wisdom: the goal of censorship: to stop government criticism
A BBC Reporter thought he found a contradiction in Chinese Premier WenJiabao’s fairwell speech:
“[Premier Wen] claimed that China’s leaders welcomed criticism expressed onthe internet. It is ‘natural for that to happen’, he said.
And yet he presides over a government that routinely censors theinternet — and has imprisoned many who have given voice to their criticism.”
We show:
There is no contradiction; Wen Jiabao was sincereChina allows plenty of criticism in social mediaCensorship is not “leaky & imperfect”; our understanding of it isThe goal: stopping collective action, clipping social ties(They also censor: pornography & criticism of the censors)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 3 / 34
Our Main Point
Prevailing Wisdom: the goal of censorship: to stop government criticism
A BBC Reporter thought he found a contradiction in Chinese Premier WenJiabao’s fairwell speech:
“[Premier Wen] claimed that China’s leaders welcomed criticism expressed onthe internet. It is ‘natural for that to happen’, he said.
And yet he presides over a government that routinely censors theinternet — and has imprisoned many who have given voice to their criticism.”
We show:
There is no contradiction; Wen Jiabao was sincereChina allows plenty of criticism in social mediaCensorship is not “leaky & imperfect”; our understanding of it isThe goal: stopping collective action, clipping social ties(They also censor: pornography & criticism of the censors)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 3 / 34
Our Main Point
Prevailing Wisdom: the goal of censorship: to stop government criticism
A BBC Reporter thought he found a contradiction in Chinese Premier WenJiabao’s fairwell speech:
“[Premier Wen] claimed that China’s leaders welcomed criticism expressed onthe internet. It is ‘natural for that to happen’, he said.
And yet he presides over a government that routinely censors theinternet — and has imprisoned many who have given voice to their criticism.”
We show:
There is no contradiction; Wen Jiabao was sincereChina allows plenty of criticism in social mediaCensorship is not “leaky & imperfect”; our understanding of it isThe goal: stopping collective action, clipping social ties(They also censor: pornography & criticism of the censors)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 3 / 34
Our Main Point
Prevailing Wisdom: the goal of censorship: to stop government criticism
A BBC Reporter thought he found a contradiction in Chinese Premier WenJiabao’s fairwell speech:
“[Premier Wen] claimed that China’s leaders welcomed criticism expressed onthe internet. It is ‘natural for that to happen’, he said.
And yet he presides over a government that routinely censors theinternet — and has imprisoned many who have given voice to their criticism.”
We show:
There is no contradiction; Wen Jiabao was sincereChina allows plenty of criticism in social mediaCensorship is not “leaky & imperfect”; our understanding of it isThe goal: stopping collective action, clipping social ties(They also censor: pornography & criticism of the censors)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 3 / 34
Our Main Point
Prevailing Wisdom: the goal of censorship: to stop government criticism
A BBC Reporter thought he found a contradiction in Chinese Premier WenJiabao’s fairwell speech:
“[Premier Wen] claimed that China’s leaders welcomed criticism expressed onthe internet. It is ‘natural for that to happen’, he said.
And yet he presides over a government that routinely censors theinternet — and has imprisoned many who have given voice to their criticism.”
We show:
There is no contradiction; Wen Jiabao was sincereChina allows plenty of criticism in social mediaCensorship is not “leaky & imperfect”; our understanding of it isThe goal: stopping collective action, clipping social ties(They also censor: pornography & criticism of the censors)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 3 / 34
Our Main Point
Prevailing Wisdom: the goal of censorship: to stop government criticism
A BBC Reporter thought he found a contradiction in Chinese Premier WenJiabao’s fairwell speech:
“[Premier Wen] claimed that China’s leaders welcomed criticism expressed onthe internet. It is ‘natural for that to happen’, he said.
And yet he presides over a government that routinely censors theinternet — and has imprisoned many who have given voice to their criticism.”
We show:
There is no contradiction; Wen Jiabao was sincere
China allows plenty of criticism in social mediaCensorship is not “leaky & imperfect”; our understanding of it isThe goal: stopping collective action, clipping social ties(They also censor: pornography & criticism of the censors)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 3 / 34
Our Main Point
Prevailing Wisdom: the goal of censorship: to stop government criticism
A BBC Reporter thought he found a contradiction in Chinese Premier WenJiabao’s fairwell speech:
“[Premier Wen] claimed that China’s leaders welcomed criticism expressed onthe internet. It is ‘natural for that to happen’, he said.
And yet he presides over a government that routinely censors theinternet — and has imprisoned many who have given voice to their criticism.”
We show:
There is no contradiction; Wen Jiabao was sincereChina allows plenty of criticism in social media
Censorship is not “leaky & imperfect”; our understanding of it isThe goal: stopping collective action, clipping social ties(They also censor: pornography & criticism of the censors)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 3 / 34
Our Main Point
Prevailing Wisdom: the goal of censorship: to stop government criticism
A BBC Reporter thought he found a contradiction in Chinese Premier WenJiabao’s fairwell speech:
“[Premier Wen] claimed that China’s leaders welcomed criticism expressed onthe internet. It is ‘natural for that to happen’, he said.
And yet he presides over a government that routinely censors theinternet — and has imprisoned many who have given voice to their criticism.”
We show:
There is no contradiction; Wen Jiabao was sincereChina allows plenty of criticism in social mediaCensorship is not “leaky & imperfect”; our understanding of it is
The goal: stopping collective action, clipping social ties(They also censor: pornography & criticism of the censors)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 3 / 34
Our Main Point
Prevailing Wisdom: the goal of censorship: to stop government criticism
A BBC Reporter thought he found a contradiction in Chinese Premier WenJiabao’s fairwell speech:
“[Premier Wen] claimed that China’s leaders welcomed criticism expressed onthe internet. It is ‘natural for that to happen’, he said.
And yet he presides over a government that routinely censors theinternet — and has imprisoned many who have given voice to their criticism.”
We show:
There is no contradiction; Wen Jiabao was sincereChina allows plenty of criticism in social mediaCensorship is not “leaky & imperfect”; our understanding of it isThe goal: stopping collective action, clipping social ties
(They also censor: pornography & criticism of the censors)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 3 / 34
Our Main Point
Prevailing Wisdom: the goal of censorship: to stop government criticism
A BBC Reporter thought he found a contradiction in Chinese Premier WenJiabao’s fairwell speech:
“[Premier Wen] claimed that China’s leaders welcomed criticism expressed onthe internet. It is ‘natural for that to happen’, he said.
And yet he presides over a government that routinely censors theinternet — and has imprisoned many who have given voice to their criticism.”
We show:
There is no contradiction; Wen Jiabao was sincereChina allows plenty of criticism in social mediaCensorship is not “leaky & imperfect”; our understanding of it isThe goal: stopping collective action, clipping social ties(They also censor: pornography & criticism of the censors)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 3 / 34
Our Data Source
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 4 / 34
Our Data Source
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 4 / 34
Chinese Social Media: Fractured over 1,400+ sites
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 5 / 34
Chinese Social Media: Fractured over 1,400+ sites
hi.baidu 12%
bbs.voc.com.cn 5%
bbs.m4.cn 4%tianya 3%bbs.beijingww.com 2%
Share of Posts in Our Analysis by Internet Content Provider (ICP)
(Plus 59% from Sina Blog)Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 6 / 34
Posts Collected and Analyzed
Collect 3,674,698 social media posts in 85 topic areas over 6 months
Random sample: 127,283
(Repeat design; Total analyzed: 11,382,221)
For each post (on a timeline in one of 85 content areas):
Download content the instant it appears(Carefully) revisit each later to determine if it was censoredUse computer-assisted methods of text analysis
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 7 / 34
Posts Collected and Analyzed
Collect 3,674,698 social media posts in 85 topic areas over 6 months
Random sample: 127,283
(Repeat design; Total analyzed: 11,382,221)
For each post (on a timeline in one of 85 content areas):
Download content the instant it appears(Carefully) revisit each later to determine if it was censoredUse computer-assisted methods of text analysis
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 7 / 34
Posts Collected and Analyzed
Collect 3,674,698 social media posts in 85 topic areas over 6 months
Random sample: 127,283
(Repeat design; Total analyzed: 11,382,221)
For each post (on a timeline in one of 85 content areas):
Download content the instant it appears(Carefully) revisit each later to determine if it was censoredUse computer-assisted methods of text analysis
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 7 / 34
Posts Collected and Analyzed
Collect 3,674,698 social media posts in 85 topic areas over 6 months
Random sample: 127,283
(Repeat design; Total analyzed: 11,382,221)
For each post (on a timeline in one of 85 content areas):
Download content the instant it appears(Carefully) revisit each later to determine if it was censoredUse computer-assisted methods of text analysis
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 7 / 34
Posts Collected and Analyzed
Collect 3,674,698 social media posts in 85 topic areas over 6 months
Random sample: 127,283
(Repeat design; Total analyzed: 11,382,221)
For each post (on a timeline in one of 85 content areas):
Download content the instant it appears(Carefully) revisit each later to determine if it was censoredUse computer-assisted methods of text analysis
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 7 / 34
Posts Collected and Analyzed
Collect 3,674,698 social media posts in 85 topic areas over 6 months
Random sample: 127,283
(Repeat design; Total analyzed: 11,382,221)
For each post (on a timeline in one of 85 content areas):
Download content the instant it appears
(Carefully) revisit each later to determine if it was censoredUse computer-assisted methods of text analysis
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 7 / 34
Posts Collected and Analyzed
Collect 3,674,698 social media posts in 85 topic areas over 6 months
Random sample: 127,283
(Repeat design; Total analyzed: 11,382,221)
For each post (on a timeline in one of 85 content areas):
Download content the instant it appears(Carefully) revisit each later to determine if it was censored
Use computer-assisted methods of text analysis
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 7 / 34
Posts Collected and Analyzed
Collect 3,674,698 social media posts in 85 topic areas over 6 months
Random sample: 127,283
(Repeat design; Total analyzed: 11,382,221)
For each post (on a timeline in one of 85 content areas):
Download content the instant it appears(Carefully) revisit each later to determine if it was censoredUse computer-assisted methods of text analysis
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 7 / 34
Censorship is not Ambiguous: BBS Error Page
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 8 / 34
Censorship is not Ambiguous: BBS Error Page
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 9 / 34
The Censors are Fast; Our Automated Methods are Faster
Days Until Censorship, Shanghai Subway Analysis
Days After Post Was Written
Num
ber C
enso
red
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
050
100
150
200
250
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 10 / 34
The Censors are Fast; Our Automated Methods are FasterExample: Shanghai Subway Crash
Days Until Censorship, Shanghai Subway Analysis
Days After Post Was Written
Num
ber C
enso
red
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
050
100
150
200
250
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 10 / 34
The Censors are Fast; Our Automated Methods are FasterExample: Shanghai Subway Crash
Days Until Censorship, Shanghai Subway Analysis
Days After Post Was Written
Num
ber C
enso
red
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
050
100
150
200
250
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 10 / 34
For Rare Topics, Censorship Effort Appears Constant
05
1015
Count
Jan Mar Apr May Jun
Count PublishedCount Censored
Count PublishedCount Censored
010
2030
4050
Count
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Count PublishedCount Censored
Students Throw Shoes at
Fang BinXing
Pornography Criticism of the Censors
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 11 / 34
For Rare Topics, Censorship Effort Appears Constant0
510
15
Count
Jan Mar Apr May Jun
Count PublishedCount Censored
Count PublishedCount Censored
010
2030
4050
Count
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Count PublishedCount Censored
Students Throw Shoes at
Fang BinXing
Pornography Criticism of the Censors
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 11 / 34
For most topics: Censorship & Post Volume are “Bursty”
010
2030
4050
6070
Count
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Count PublishedCount Censored Riots in
Zengcheng
Unit of analysis:
volume burst(3 SDs greater thanbaseline volume)
We monitored 85 topicareas (Jan–July 2011)
Found 87 volume burstsin total
Identified real worldevents associated witheach burst
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 12 / 34
For most topics: Censorship & Post Volume are “Bursty”0
1020
3040
5060
70
Count
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Count PublishedCount Censored Riots in
Zengcheng
Unit of analysis:
volume burst(3 SDs greater thanbaseline volume)
We monitored 85 topicareas (Jan–July 2011)
Found 87 volume burstsin total
Identified real worldevents associated witheach burst
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 12 / 34
For most topics: Censorship & Post Volume are “Bursty”0
1020
3040
5060
70
Count
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Count PublishedCount Censored Riots in
Zengcheng
Unit of analysis:
volume burst(3 SDs greater thanbaseline volume)
We monitored 85 topicareas (Jan–July 2011)
Found 87 volume burstsin total
Identified real worldevents associated witheach burst
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 12 / 34
For most topics: Censorship & Post Volume are “Bursty”0
1020
3040
5060
70
Count
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Count PublishedCount Censored Riots in
Zengcheng
Unit of analysis:
volume burst
(3 SDs greater thanbaseline volume)
We monitored 85 topicareas (Jan–July 2011)
Found 87 volume burstsin total
Identified real worldevents associated witheach burst
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 12 / 34
For most topics: Censorship & Post Volume are “Bursty”0
1020
3040
5060
70
Count
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Count PublishedCount Censored Riots in
Zengcheng
Unit of analysis:
volume burst(3 SDs greater thanbaseline volume)
We monitored 85 topicareas (Jan–July 2011)
Found 87 volume burstsin total
Identified real worldevents associated witheach burst
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 12 / 34
For most topics: Censorship & Post Volume are “Bursty”0
1020
3040
5060
70
Count
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Count PublishedCount Censored Riots in
Zengcheng
Unit of analysis:
volume burst(3 SDs greater thanbaseline volume)
We monitored 85 topicareas (Jan–July 2011)
Found 87 volume burstsin total
Identified real worldevents associated witheach burst
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 12 / 34
For most topics: Censorship & Post Volume are “Bursty”0
1020
3040
5060
70
Count
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Count PublishedCount Censored Riots in
Zengcheng
Unit of analysis:
volume burst(3 SDs greater thanbaseline volume)
We monitored 85 topicareas (Jan–July 2011)
Found 87 volume burstsin total
Identified real worldevents associated witheach burst
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 12 / 34
For most topics: Censorship & Post Volume are “Bursty”0
1020
3040
5060
70
Count
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Count PublishedCount Censored Riots in
Zengcheng
Unit of analysis:
volume burst(3 SDs greater thanbaseline volume)
We monitored 85 topicareas (Jan–July 2011)
Found 87 volume burstsin total
Identified real worldevents associated witheach burst
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 12 / 34
The Goals of Chinese Censorship
Theories. The Purpose of Censorship is to:
1 Stop collective action
Right
Either or both could be right or wrong.
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 13 / 34
The Goals of Chinese Censorship
Theories. The Purpose of Censorship is to:
1 Stop criticism of the state
2 Stop collective action
Right
Either or both could be right or wrong.
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 13 / 34
The Goals of Chinese Censorship
Theories. The Purpose of Censorship is to:
1 Stop criticism of the state
2 Stop collective action
Right
Either or both could be right or wrong.
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 13 / 34
The Goals of Chinese Censorship
Theories. The Purpose of Censorship is to:
1 Stop criticism of the state
2 Stop collective action
Right
Either or both could be right or wrong.
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 13 / 34
The Goals of Chinese Censorship
Theories. The Purpose of Censorship is to:
1 Stop criticism of the state Wrong
2 Stop collective action
Right
Either or both could be right or wrong.
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 13 / 34
The Goals of Chinese Censorship
Theories. The Purpose of Censorship is to:
1 Stop criticism of the state Wrong
2 Stop collective action Right
Either or both could be right or wrong.
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 13 / 34
Our Central Hypothesis: The Rules Censors Follow
1 Monitor many broad topic areas
2 Detect volume bursts; identify associated real world events
3 Choose events that could (or did) generate collective action
4 Censor all posts within bursts associated with these events
5 Judge individual posts for association with events, not for collectiveaction potential (or for criticism of the state)
The government censors all posts (regardless of how critical orsupportive of the state) in volume bursts associated with events withcollective action potential
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 14 / 34
Our Central Hypothesis: The Rules Censors Follow
1 Monitor many broad topic areas
2 Detect volume bursts; identify associated real world events
3 Choose events that could (or did) generate collective action
4 Censor all posts within bursts associated with these events
5 Judge individual posts for association with events, not for collectiveaction potential (or for criticism of the state)
The government censors all posts (regardless of how critical orsupportive of the state) in volume bursts associated with events withcollective action potential
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 14 / 34
Our Central Hypothesis: The Rules Censors Follow
1 Monitor many broad topic areas
2 Detect volume bursts; identify associated real world events
3 Choose events that could (or did) generate collective action
4 Censor all posts within bursts associated with these events
5 Judge individual posts for association with events, not for collectiveaction potential (or for criticism of the state)
The government censors all posts (regardless of how critical orsupportive of the state) in volume bursts associated with events withcollective action potential
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 14 / 34
Our Central Hypothesis: The Rules Censors Follow
1 Monitor many broad topic areas
2 Detect volume bursts; identify associated real world events
3 Choose events that could (or did) generate collective action
4 Censor all posts within bursts associated with these events
5 Judge individual posts for association with events, not for collectiveaction potential (or for criticism of the state)
The government censors all posts (regardless of how critical orsupportive of the state) in volume bursts associated with events withcollective action potential
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 14 / 34
Our Central Hypothesis: The Rules Censors Follow
1 Monitor many broad topic areas
2 Detect volume bursts; identify associated real world events
3 Choose events that could (or did) generate collective action
4 Censor all posts within bursts associated with these events
5 Judge individual posts for association with events, not for collectiveaction potential (or for criticism of the state)
The government censors all posts (regardless of how critical orsupportive of the state) in volume bursts associated with events withcollective action potential
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 14 / 34
Our Central Hypothesis: The Rules Censors Follow
1 Monitor many broad topic areas
2 Detect volume bursts; identify associated real world events
3 Choose events that could (or did) generate collective action
4 Censor all posts within bursts associated with these events
5 Judge individual posts for association with events, not for collectiveaction potential (or for criticism of the state)
The government censors all posts (regardless of how critical orsupportive of the state) in volume bursts associated with events withcollective action potential
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 14 / 34
Our Central Hypothesis: The Rules Censors Follow
1 Monitor many broad topic areas
2 Detect volume bursts; identify associated real world events
3 Choose events that could (or did) generate collective action
4 Censor all posts within bursts associated with these events
5 Judge individual posts for association with events, not for collectiveaction potential (or for criticism of the state)
The government censors all posts (regardless of how critical orsupportive of the state) in volume bursts associated with events withcollective action potential
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 14 / 34
Our Central Hypothesis: The Rules Censors Follow
1 Monitor many broad topic areas
2 Detect volume bursts; identify associated real world events
3 Choose events that could (or did) generate collective action
4 Censor all posts within bursts associated with these events
5 Judge individual posts for association with events, not for collectiveaction potential (or for criticism of the state)
The government censors all posts (regardless of how critical orsupportive of the state) in volume bursts associated with events withcollective action potential
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 14 / 34
Our Central Hypothesis: The Rules Censors Follow
1 Monitor many broad topic areas
2 Detect volume bursts; identify associated real world events
3 Choose events that could (or did) generate collective action
4 Censor all posts within bursts associated with these events
5 Judge individual posts for association with events, not for collectiveaction potential (or for criticism of the state)
The government censors all posts (regardless of how critical orsupportive of the state) in volume bursts associated with events withcollective action potential
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 14 / 34
Our Central Hypothesis: The Rules Censors Follow
1 Monitor many broad topic areas
2 Detect volume bursts; identify associated real world events
3 Choose events that could (or did) generate collective action
4 Censor all posts within bursts associated with these events
5 Judge individual posts for association with events, not for collectiveaction potential (or for criticism of the state)
The government censors all posts (regardless of how critical orsupportive of the state) in volume bursts associated with events withcollective action potential
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 14 / 34
Our Central Hypothesis: The Rules Censors Follow
1 Monitor many broad topic areas
2 Detect volume bursts; identify associated real world events
3 Choose events that could (or did) generate collective action
4 Censor all posts within bursts associated with these events
5 Judge individual posts for association with events, not for collectiveaction potential (or for criticism of the state)
The government censors all posts (regardless of how critical orsupportive of the state) in volume bursts associated with events withcollective action potential
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 14 / 34
Our Central Hypothesis: The Rules Censors Follow
1 Monitor many broad topic areas
2 Detect volume bursts; identify associated real world events
3 Choose events that could (or did) generate collective action
4 Censor all posts within bursts associated with these events
5 Judge individual posts for association with events, not for collectiveaction potential (or for criticism of the state)
The government censors all posts (regardless of how critical orsupportive of the state) in volume bursts associated with events withcollective action potential
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 14 / 34
Our Evidence
3 increasingly specific tests based on
1 Post volume
2 Nature of the event generating each volume burst
3 Content of the posts
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 15 / 34
Our Evidence
3 increasingly specific tests based on
1 Post volume
2 Nature of the event generating each volume burst
3 Content of the posts
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 15 / 34
Our Evidence
3 increasingly specific tests based on
1 Post volume
2 Nature of the event generating each volume burst
3 Content of the posts
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 15 / 34
Our Evidence
3 increasingly specific tests based on
1 Post volume
2 Nature of the event generating each volume burst
3 Content of the posts
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 15 / 34
Our Evidence
3 increasingly specific tests based on
1 Post volume
2 Nature of the event generating each volume burst
3 Content of the posts
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 15 / 34
Test 1: Post Volume
Begin with our 87 volume bursts in 85 topics areas
For each burst, calculate change in % censorship inside to outsideeach volume burst within topic areas – censorship magnitude
If goal of censorship is to stop collective action, we expect:
1 On average, % censoredshould increase duringvolume bursts
2 Some bursts (associatedwith politically relevantevents) should havemuch higher censorship -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
01
23
45
Censorship Magnitude
Density
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 16 / 34
Test 1: Post Volume
Begin with our 87 volume bursts in 85 topics areas
For each burst, calculate change in % censorship inside to outsideeach volume burst within topic areas – censorship magnitude
If goal of censorship is to stop collective action, we expect:
1 On average, % censoredshould increase duringvolume bursts
2 Some bursts (associatedwith politically relevantevents) should havemuch higher censorship -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
01
23
45
Censorship Magnitude
Density
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 16 / 34
Test 1: Post Volume
Begin with our 87 volume bursts in 85 topics areas
For each burst, calculate change in % censorship inside to outsideeach volume burst within topic areas – censorship magnitude
If goal of censorship is to stop collective action, we expect:
1 On average, % censoredshould increase duringvolume bursts
2 Some bursts (associatedwith politically relevantevents) should havemuch higher censorship -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
01
23
45
Censorship Magnitude
Density
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 16 / 34
Test 1: Post Volume
Begin with our 87 volume bursts in 85 topics areas
For each burst, calculate change in % censorship inside to outsideeach volume burst within topic areas – censorship magnitude
If goal of censorship is to stop collective action, we expect:
1 On average, % censoredshould increase duringvolume bursts
2 Some bursts (associatedwith politically relevantevents) should havemuch higher censorship -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
01
23
45
Censorship Magnitude
Density
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 16 / 34
Test 1: Post Volume
Begin with our 87 volume bursts in 85 topics areas
For each burst, calculate change in % censorship inside to outsideeach volume burst within topic areas – censorship magnitude
If goal of censorship is to stop collective action, we expect:
1 On average, % censoredshould increase duringvolume bursts
2 Some bursts (associatedwith politically relevantevents) should havemuch higher censorship -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
01
23
45
Censorship Magnitude
Density
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 16 / 34
Test 1: Post Volume
Begin with our 87 volume bursts in 85 topics areas
For each burst, calculate change in % censorship inside to outsideeach volume burst within topic areas – censorship magnitude
If goal of censorship is to stop collective action, we expect:
1 On average, % censoredshould increase duringvolume bursts
2 Some bursts (associatedwith politically relevantevents) should havemuch higher censorship
-0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
01
23
45
Censorship Magnitude
Density
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 16 / 34
Test 1: Post Volume
Begin with our 87 volume bursts in 85 topics areas
For each burst, calculate change in % censorship inside to outsideeach volume burst within topic areas – censorship magnitude
If goal of censorship is to stop collective action, we expect:
1 On average, % censoredshould increase duringvolume bursts
2 Some bursts (associatedwith politically relevantevents) should havemuch higher censorship -0.2 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8
01
23
45
Censorship Magnitude
Density
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 16 / 34
Test 2: Nature of Event Generating Increases in Volume
Event classification (each of which could be negative, positive, or neutralcomments about the state)
protest or organized crowd formation outside the Internetindividuals who have organized or incited collective action on theground in the past;topics related to nationalism or nationalist sentiment that have incitedprotest or collective action in the past.
(Other) News
Government Policies
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 17 / 34
Test 2: Nature of Event Generating Increases in Volume
Event classification (each of which could be negative, positive, or neutralcomments about the state)
protest or organized crowd formation outside the Internetindividuals who have organized or incited collective action on theground in the past;topics related to nationalism or nationalist sentiment that have incitedprotest or collective action in the past.
(Other) News
Government Policies
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 17 / 34
Test 2: Nature of Event Generating Increases in Volume
Event classification (each of which could be negative, positive, or neutralcomments about the state)
Collective Action Potential
protest or organized crowd formation outside the Internetindividuals who have organized or incited collective action on theground in the past;topics related to nationalism or nationalist sentiment that have incitedprotest or collective action in the past.
(Other) News
Government Policies
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 17 / 34
Test 2: Nature of Event Generating Increases in Volume
Event classification (each of which could be negative, positive, or neutralcomments about the state)
Collective Action Potential
protest or organized crowd formation outside the Internet
individuals who have organized or incited collective action on theground in the past;topics related to nationalism or nationalist sentiment that have incitedprotest or collective action in the past.
(Other) News
Government Policies
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 17 / 34
Test 2: Nature of Event Generating Increases in Volume
Event classification (each of which could be negative, positive, or neutralcomments about the state)
Collective Action Potential
protest or organized crowd formation outside the Internetindividuals who have organized or incited collective action on theground in the past;
topics related to nationalism or nationalist sentiment that have incitedprotest or collective action in the past.
(Other) News
Government Policies
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 17 / 34
Test 2: Nature of Event Generating Increases in Volume
Event classification (each of which could be negative, positive, or neutralcomments about the state)
Collective Action Potential
protest or organized crowd formation outside the Internetindividuals who have organized or incited collective action on theground in the past;topics related to nationalism or nationalist sentiment that have incitedprotest or collective action in the past.
(Other) News
Government Policies
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 17 / 34
Test 2: Nature of Event Generating Increases in Volume
Event classification (each of which could be negative, positive, or neutralcomments about the state)
Collective Action Potential
protest or organized crowd formation outside the Internetindividuals who have organized or incited collective action on theground in the past;topics related to nationalism or nationalist sentiment that have incitedprotest or collective action in the past.
Criticism of censors
(Other) News
Government Policies
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 17 / 34
Test 2: Nature of Event Generating Increases in Volume
Event classification (each of which could be negative, positive, or neutralcomments about the state)
Collective Action Potential
protest or organized crowd formation outside the Internetindividuals who have organized or incited collective action on theground in the past;topics related to nationalism or nationalist sentiment that have incitedprotest or collective action in the past.
Criticism of censors
Pornography
(Other) News
Government Policies
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 17 / 34
Test 2: Nature of Event Generating Increases in Volume
Event classification (each of which could be negative, positive, or neutralcomments about the state)
Collective Action Potential
protest or organized crowd formation outside the Internetindividuals who have organized or incited collective action on theground in the past;topics related to nationalism or nationalist sentiment that have incitedprotest or collective action in the past.
Criticism of censors
Pornography
(Other) News
Government Policies
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 17 / 34
Test 2: Nature of Event Generating Increases in Volume
Event classification (each of which could be negative, positive, or neutralcomments about the state)
Collective Action Potential
protest or organized crowd formation outside the Internetindividuals who have organized or incited collective action on theground in the past;topics related to nationalism or nationalist sentiment that have incitedprotest or collective action in the past.
Criticism of censors
Pornography
(Other) News
Government Policies
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 17 / 34
Test 2: Nature of Event Generating Increases in Volume
Event classification (each of which could be negative, positive, or neutralcomments about the state)
Collective Action Potential
protest or organized crowd formation outside the Internetindividuals who have organized or incited collective action on theground in the past;topics related to nationalism or nationalist sentiment that have incitedprotest or collective action in the past.
Criticism of censors
Pornography
(Other) News
Government Policies
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 17 / 34
Test 2: Nature of Event Generating Increases in Volume
Event classification (each of which could be negative, positive, or neutralcomments about the state)
Collective Action Potential
protest or organized crowd formation outside the Internetindividuals who have organized or incited collective action on theground in the past;topics related to nationalism or nationalist sentiment that have incitedprotest or collective action in the past.
Criticism of censors
Pornography
(Other) News
Government Policies
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 17 / 34
Test 2: Nature of Event Generating Increases in Volume
Event classification (each of which could be negative, positive, or neutralcomments about the state)
Collective Action Potential
protest or organized crowd formation outside the Internetindividuals who have organized or incited collective action on theground in the past;topics related to nationalism or nationalist sentiment that have incitedprotest or collective action in the past.
Criticism of censors
Pornography
(Other) News
Government Policies
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 17 / 34
Test 2: Nature of Event Generating Increases in Volume
Event classification (each of which could be negative, positive, or neutralcomments about the state)
Collective Action Potential
protest or organized crowd formation outside the Internetindividuals who have organized or incited collective action on theground in the past;topics related to nationalism or nationalist sentiment that have incitedprotest or collective action in the past.
Criticism of censors
Pornography
(Other) News
Government Policies
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 17 / 34
Test 2: Nature of Event Generating Increases in Volume
Event classification (each of which could be negative, positive, or neutralcomments about the state)
Collective Action Potential
protest or organized crowd formation outside the Internetindividuals who have organized or incited collective action on theground in the past;topics related to nationalism or nationalist sentiment that have incitedprotest or collective action in the past.
Criticism of censors
Pornography
(Other) News
Government Policies
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 17 / 34
What Types of Events Are Censored?
Censorship Magnitude
Density
02
46
810
12
-0.2 -0.1 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8
Collective ActionCriticism of CensorsPornography
PolicyNews
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 18 / 34
What Types of Events Are Censored?
Censorship Magnitude
Popular Book Published in Audio FormatDisney Announced Theme ParkEPA Issues New Rules on LeadChinese Solar Company Announces EarningsChina Puts Nuclear Program on HoldGov't Increases Power PricesJon Hunstman Steps Down as Ambassador to ChinaNews About Iran Nuclear ProgramIndoor Smoking Ban Takes EffectPopular Video Game ReleasedEducation Reform for Migrant ChildrenFood Prices RiseU.S. Military Intervention in Libya
Censorship Magnitude
New Laws on Fifty Cent PartyRush to Buy Salt After Earthquake
Students Throw Shoes at Fang BinXingFuzhou Bombing
Localized Advocacy for Environment LotteryGoogle is Hacked
Collective Anger At Lead Poisoning in JiangsuAi Weiwei Arrested
Pornography Mentioning Popular BookZengcheng Protests
Baidu Copyright LawsuitPornography Disguised as News
Protests in Inner Mongolia
PoliciesNews
Collective ActionCriticism of CensorsPornography
-0.2 0 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.7
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 18 / 34
Censoring Collective Action: Protests in Inner Mongolia
05
1015
Count
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Count PublishedCount Censored
Protests in Inner Mongolia
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 19 / 34
Censoring Collective Action: Ai Weiwei’s Arrest
010
2030
40
Count
Jan Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Count PublishedCount Censored
Ai Weiwei arrested
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 20 / 34
Low Censorship on One Child Policy
010
2030
40
Count
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Count PublishedCount Censored
Speculation of
Policy Reversal at NPC
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 21 / 34
Low Censorship on News: Power Prices
010
2030
4050
6070
Count
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
Count PublishedCount Censored
Power shortages Gov't raises power prices
to curb demand
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 22 / 34
Test 3: Content of Posts
We adapted “ReadMe” (Hopkins-King) methodology to the content ofcensored posts in Chinese
Standardize encoding of Chinese text
Eliminate punctuation and stop words
Experiment with segmenting characters into words
Calculate new the quantity of interest (% censored by category)
Code a validation setReadMe estimates: % of posts in each categoryQuantity of interest: % of posts censored in a category
P(Censored |Category) =P(Category |Censored)P(Censored)
P(Category)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 23 / 34
Test 3: Content of Posts
We adapted “ReadMe” (Hopkins-King) methodology to the content ofcensored posts in Chinese
Standardize encoding of Chinese text
Eliminate punctuation and stop words
Experiment with segmenting characters into words
Calculate new the quantity of interest (% censored by category)
Code a validation setReadMe estimates: % of posts in each categoryQuantity of interest: % of posts censored in a category
P(Censored |Category) =P(Category |Censored)P(Censored)
P(Category)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 23 / 34
Test 3: Content of Posts
We adapted “ReadMe” (Hopkins-King) methodology to the content ofcensored posts in Chinese
Standardize encoding of Chinese text
Eliminate punctuation and stop words
Experiment with segmenting characters into words
Calculate new the quantity of interest (% censored by category)
Code a validation setReadMe estimates: % of posts in each categoryQuantity of interest: % of posts censored in a category
P(Censored |Category) =P(Category |Censored)P(Censored)
P(Category)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 23 / 34
Test 3: Content of Posts
We adapted “ReadMe” (Hopkins-King) methodology to the content ofcensored posts in Chinese
Standardize encoding of Chinese text
Eliminate punctuation and stop words
Experiment with segmenting characters into words
Calculate new the quantity of interest (% censored by category)
Code a validation setReadMe estimates: % of posts in each categoryQuantity of interest: % of posts censored in a category
P(Censored |Category) =P(Category |Censored)P(Censored)
P(Category)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 23 / 34
Test 3: Content of Posts
We adapted “ReadMe” (Hopkins-King) methodology to the content ofcensored posts in Chinese
Standardize encoding of Chinese text
Eliminate punctuation and stop words
Experiment with segmenting characters into words
Calculate new the quantity of interest (% censored by category)
Code a validation setReadMe estimates: % of posts in each categoryQuantity of interest: % of posts censored in a category
P(Censored |Category) =P(Category |Censored)P(Censored)
P(Category)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 23 / 34
Test 3: Content of Posts
We adapted “ReadMe” (Hopkins-King) methodology to the content ofcensored posts in Chinese
Standardize encoding of Chinese text
Eliminate punctuation and stop words
Experiment with segmenting characters into words
Calculate new the quantity of interest (% censored by category)
Code a validation setReadMe estimates: % of posts in each categoryQuantity of interest: % of posts censored in a category
P(Censored |Category) =P(Category |Censored)P(Censored)
P(Category)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 23 / 34
Test 3: Content of Posts
We adapted “ReadMe” (Hopkins-King) methodology to the content ofcensored posts in Chinese
Standardize encoding of Chinese text
Eliminate punctuation and stop words
Experiment with segmenting characters into words
Calculate new the quantity of interest (% censored by category)
Code a validation set
ReadMe estimates: % of posts in each categoryQuantity of interest: % of posts censored in a category
P(Censored |Category) =P(Category |Censored)P(Censored)
P(Category)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 23 / 34
Test 3: Content of Posts
We adapted “ReadMe” (Hopkins-King) methodology to the content ofcensored posts in Chinese
Standardize encoding of Chinese text
Eliminate punctuation and stop words
Experiment with segmenting characters into words
Calculate new the quantity of interest (% censored by category)
Code a validation setReadMe estimates: % of posts in each category
Quantity of interest: % of posts censored in a category
P(Censored |Category) =P(Category |Censored)P(Censored)
P(Category)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 23 / 34
Test 3: Content of Posts
We adapted “ReadMe” (Hopkins-King) methodology to the content ofcensored posts in Chinese
Standardize encoding of Chinese text
Eliminate punctuation and stop words
Experiment with segmenting characters into words
Calculate new the quantity of interest (% censored by category)
Code a validation setReadMe estimates: % of posts in each categoryQuantity of interest: % of posts censored in a category
P(Censored |Category) =P(Category |Censored)P(Censored)
P(Category)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 23 / 34
Test 3: Content of Posts
We adapted “ReadMe” (Hopkins-King) methodology to the content ofcensored posts in Chinese
Standardize encoding of Chinese text
Eliminate punctuation and stop words
Experiment with segmenting characters into words
Calculate new the quantity of interest (% censored by category)
Code a validation setReadMe estimates: % of posts in each categoryQuantity of interest: % of posts censored in a category
P(Censored |Category) =P(Category |Censored)P(Censored)
P(Category)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 23 / 34
“ReadMe” Algorithm Validated in Chinese
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 24 / 34
“ReadMe” Algorithm Validated in ChineseExample: Labor Strikes, 2010 (Training set: 100; Test set: 900)
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 24 / 34
“ReadMe” Algorithm Validated in ChineseExample: Labor Strikes, 2010 (Training set: 100; Test set: 900)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
ReadMe Results for Chinese Sampled, Not Segmented
Probability
Facts Supporting Employers
Facts Supporting Workers
Opinions Supporting Workers
Opinions Supporting Employers or Irrelevant
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 24 / 34
“ReadMe” Algorithm Validated in ChineseExample: Labor Strikes, 2010 (Training set: 100; Test set: 900)
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
ReadMe Results for Chinese Sampled, Not Segmented
Probability
Facts Supporting Employers
Facts Supporting Workers
Opinions Supporting Workers
Opinions Supporting Employers or Irrelevant
ReadMeTrue
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 24 / 34
Test 3: Content of Censored and Uncensored Posts
Predictions of
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 25 / 34
Test 3: Content of Censored and Uncensored PostsPredictions from Two Theories of Censorship
Predictions of State Criticism Theory
Collective Action
yes no
State Critiqueyes
no
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 25 / 34
Test 3: Content of Censored and Uncensored PostsPredictions from Two Theories of Censorship
Predictions of Collective Action Theory
Collective Action
yes no
State Critiqueyes
no
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 25 / 34
With Collective Action, Posts that Support or Oppose theState are Censored
Per
cent
Cen
sore
d
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Criticize Support Criticize Support Criticize Support
Ai Weiwei Inner MongoliaFuzhou Bombing
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 26 / 34
With Collective Action, Posts that Support or Oppose theState are Censored
Per
cent
Cen
sore
d
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Criticize Support Criticize Support Criticize Support
Ai Weiwei Inner MongoliaFuzhou Bombing
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 26 / 34
Without Collective Action, Posts that Support or Opposethe State are NOT Censored
Per
cent
Cen
sore
d
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Criticize Support Criticize Support Criticize Support
One Child Policy Corruption Policy Food Prices Rise
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 27 / 34
Without Collective Action, Posts that Support or Opposethe State are NOT Censored
Per
cent
Cen
sore
d
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
Criticize Support Criticize Support Criticize Support
One Child Policy Corruption Policy Food Prices Rise
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 27 / 34
Uncensored Posts (w/o Collective Action Potential)Critical of the State
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 28 / 34
Uncensored Posts (w/o Collective Action Potential)Critical of the State
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 28 / 34
Uncensored Posts (w/o Collective Action Potential)Critical of the State
This is a city government [Yulin City,Shaanxi] that treats life with contempt, thisis government officials run amuck, a citygovernment without justice, a city govern-ment that delights in that which is vul-gar, a place where officials all have mis-tresses, a city government that is shamelesswith greed, a government that trades dig-nity for power, a government without hu-manity, a government that has no limits onimmorality, a government that goes back onits word, a government that treats kindnesswith ingratitude, a government that caresnothing for posterity. . .
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 28 / 34
Censored Post (with Collective Action Potential)Supporting the State
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 29 / 34
Censored Post (with Collective Action Potential)Supporting the State
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 29 / 34
Censored Post (with Collective Action Potential)Supporting the State
The bombing led not only to the tragedy ofhis death but the death of many governmentworkers. Even if we can verify what QianMingqi said on Weibo that the building de-molition caused a great deal of personal dam-age, we should still condemn his extreme actof retribution. . . . The government has con-tinually put forth measures and laws to pro-tect the interests of citizens in building de-molition. And the media has called attentionto the plight of those experiencing housingdemolition. The rate at which compensationfor housing demolition has increased exceedsinflation. In many places, this compensationcan change the fate of an entire family.
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 29 / 34
Censorship Pre-empting Collective Action: Ai Weiwei’sArrest
Mar 19 Mar 29 Apr 08 Apr 18
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
2011
% o
f Pos
ts C
enso
red
Actual %censorship
Predicted %censor trend basedon 3/19−3/29 data
Mar. 29,5 days prior
Apr. 3,Ai Weiwei Arrested
Placebo Test: Mostextreme of all effects
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 30 / 34
Censorship Pre-empting Collective Action: Ai Weiwei’sArrest
Mar 19 Mar 29 Apr 08 Apr 18
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
2011
% o
f Pos
ts C
enso
red
Actual %censorship
Predicted %censor trend basedon 3/19−3/29 data
Mar. 29,5 days prior
Apr. 3,Ai Weiwei Arrested
Placebo Test: Mostextreme of all effects
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 30 / 34
Censorship Pre-empting Collective Action: Ai Weiwei’sArrest
Mar 19 Mar 29 Apr 08 Apr 18
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
2011
% o
f Pos
ts C
enso
red
Actual %censorship
Predicted %censor trend basedon 3/19−3/29 data
Mar. 29,5 days prior
Apr. 3,Ai Weiwei Arrested
Placebo Test:
Mostextreme of all effects
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 30 / 34
Censorship Pre-empting Collective Action: Ai Weiwei’sArrest
Mar 19 Mar 29 Apr 08 Apr 18
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
2011
% o
f Pos
ts C
enso
red
Actual %censorship
Predicted %censor trend basedon 3/19−3/29 data
Mar. 29,5 days prior
Apr. 3,Ai Weiwei Arrested
Placebo Test: Mostextreme of all effects
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 30 / 34
Predicting the South China Sea Peace Agreement
Jun 12 Jun 22 Jul 02
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
2011
% o
f Pos
ts C
enso
red
Predicted % censortrend basedon 6/10−6/20 data
Actual %censorship
Jun. 20,5 days prior
Jun. 25,PeaceAgreement
Placebo Test: Mostextreme of all effects
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 31 / 34
Predicting the South China Sea Peace Agreement
Jun 12 Jun 22 Jul 02
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
2011
% o
f Pos
ts C
enso
red
Predicted % censortrend basedon 6/10−6/20 data
Actual %censorship
Jun. 20,5 days prior
Jun. 25,PeaceAgreement
Placebo Test: Mostextreme of all effects
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 31 / 34
Predicting the South China Sea Peace Agreement
Jun 12 Jun 22 Jul 02
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
2011
% o
f Pos
ts C
enso
red
Predicted % censortrend basedon 6/10−6/20 data
Actual %censorship
Jun. 20,5 days prior
Jun. 25,PeaceAgreement
Placebo Test:
Mostextreme of all effects
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 31 / 34
Predicting the South China Sea Peace Agreement
Jun 12 Jun 22 Jul 02
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
2011
% o
f Pos
ts C
enso
red
Predicted % censortrend basedon 6/10−6/20 data
Actual %censorship
Jun. 20,5 days prior
Jun. 25,PeaceAgreement
Placebo Test: Mostextreme of all effects
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 31 / 34
Censorship Pre-empting Collective Action: Wang Lijun’sDemotion
Jan 23 Jan 30 Feb 06 Feb 13
−0.
20.
00.
20.
40.
60.
81.
0
2012
% o
f Pos
ts C
enso
red
Jan. 28,5 days prior
Feb. 2,Wang Lijundemoted
Actual %censorship
Predicted %censor trend basedon 1/18−1/28 data
Placebo Test: Mostextreme of all effects
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 32 / 34
Censorship Pre-empting Collective Action: Wang Lijun’sDemotion
Jan 23 Jan 30 Feb 06 Feb 13
−0.
20.
00.
20.
40.
60.
81.
0
2012
% o
f Pos
ts C
enso
red
Jan. 28,5 days prior
Feb. 2,Wang Lijundemoted
Actual %censorship
Predicted %censor trend basedon 1/18−1/28 data
Placebo Test: Mostextreme of all effects
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 32 / 34
Censorship Pre-empting Collective Action: Wang Lijun’sDemotion
Jan 23 Jan 30 Feb 06 Feb 13
−0.
20.
00.
20.
40.
60.
81.
0
2012
% o
f Pos
ts C
enso
red
Jan. 28,5 days prior
Feb. 2,Wang Lijundemoted
Actual %censorship
Predicted %censor trend basedon 1/18−1/28 data
Placebo Test:
Mostextreme of all effects
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 32 / 34
Censorship Pre-empting Collective Action: Wang Lijun’sDemotion
Jan 23 Jan 30 Feb 06 Feb 13
−0.
20.
00.
20.
40.
60.
81.
0
2012
% o
f Pos
ts C
enso
red
Jan. 28,5 days prior
Feb. 2,Wang Lijundemoted
Actual %censorship
Predicted %censor trend basedon 1/18−1/28 data
Placebo Test: Mostextreme of all effects
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 32 / 34
Concluding Remarks
The Chinese Censorship Program:
Stops collective action not criticismReveals government intentions; predicts actions
Our methodology:
Automated text analysis methods validated in Chinese (withouttranslation)Enables continuous time measurement of Chinese governmentcensorship activitiesReveals information about state action when traditional media is silentMight be applicable to other countries
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 33 / 34
Concluding Remarks
The Chinese Censorship Program:
Stops collective action not criticism
Reveals government intentions; predicts actions
Our methodology:
Automated text analysis methods validated in Chinese (withouttranslation)Enables continuous time measurement of Chinese governmentcensorship activitiesReveals information about state action when traditional media is silentMight be applicable to other countries
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 33 / 34
Concluding Remarks
The Chinese Censorship Program:
Stops collective action not criticismReveals government intentions; predicts actions
Our methodology:
Automated text analysis methods validated in Chinese (withouttranslation)Enables continuous time measurement of Chinese governmentcensorship activitiesReveals information about state action when traditional media is silentMight be applicable to other countries
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 33 / 34
Concluding Remarks
The Chinese Censorship Program:
Stops collective action not criticismReveals government intentions; predicts actions
Our methodology:
Automated text analysis methods validated in Chinese (withouttranslation)Enables continuous time measurement of Chinese governmentcensorship activitiesReveals information about state action when traditional media is silentMight be applicable to other countries
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 33 / 34
Concluding Remarks
The Chinese Censorship Program:
Stops collective action not criticismReveals government intentions; predicts actions
Our methodology:
Automated text analysis methods validated in Chinese (withouttranslation)
Enables continuous time measurement of Chinese governmentcensorship activitiesReveals information about state action when traditional media is silentMight be applicable to other countries
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 33 / 34
Concluding Remarks
The Chinese Censorship Program:
Stops collective action not criticismReveals government intentions; predicts actions
Our methodology:
Automated text analysis methods validated in Chinese (withouttranslation)Enables continuous time measurement of Chinese governmentcensorship activities
Reveals information about state action when traditional media is silentMight be applicable to other countries
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 33 / 34
Concluding Remarks
The Chinese Censorship Program:
Stops collective action not criticismReveals government intentions; predicts actions
Our methodology:
Automated text analysis methods validated in Chinese (withouttranslation)Enables continuous time measurement of Chinese governmentcensorship activitiesReveals information about state action when traditional media is silent
Might be applicable to other countries
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 33 / 34
Concluding Remarks
The Chinese Censorship Program:
Stops collective action not criticismReveals government intentions; predicts actions
Our methodology:
Automated text analysis methods validated in Chinese (withouttranslation)Enables continuous time measurement of Chinese governmentcensorship activitiesReveals information about state action when traditional media is silentMight be applicable to other countries
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 33 / 34
For more information
gking.harvard.edu
people.fas.harvard.edu/˜jjpan
scholar.harvard.edu/mroberts
Gary King, Jennifer Pan, & Molly Roberts () Chinese Censorship 12 October 2012 34 / 34