letter from scott rille to chief justice john roberts and to the associate justices of the supreme...

7/31/2019 Letter from Scott Rille to Chief Justice John Roberts and to the Associate Justices of the Supreme Court of the Unit…

http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/letter-from-scott-rille-to-chief-justice-john-roberts-and-to-the-associate 1/8

Letter from Scott Rille to Chief Justice John Roberts and to the Associate Justices of the Supreme Court

of the United States – SCOTUS – April 16, 2012.

April 16, 2012

John G. Roberts, Jr., Chief Justice of the United StatesSUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES1 First Street, NEWashington, DC 20543

Honorable Chief Justice Roberts:

I am writing to express my sincere concern for the survival of our ConstitutionalRepublic and LIBERTY of all Americans. I wish to share with you the followingdocument I have composed:

CONSTITUTIONAL FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSION OF LAW

THE CONSTITUTION:“The Congress shall have Power . . . To define and punish Piracies and Feloniescommitted on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations; . . . “

United States Constitution, Article I, Section 8.

FINDING OF FACT:1. Our Founding Fathers and Constitutional Framers wisely, deliberately andirrefutably included The Law of Nations as an integral part of the Constitution of the United States of America.

THE LAW OF NATIONS:“The citizens are the members of the civil society: bound to this society by certainduties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages. Thenatives, or natural-born citizens, are those born in the country, of parents who are

citizens.” The Law of Nations, Chapter XIX,Emer de Vattel (1714-1767),

First French Edition 1758,First English Edition 1760.

(Please see photo images of The Law of Nations, address given by Abraham Lincoln,and 1775 Letter written by Dr. Benjamin Franklin below.)

of 8



FINDINGS OF FACT:2. At The Law of Nations, Chapter XIX is found the only Constitutionally-valid andauthoritative definition of “natural-born citizens”. Our Founding Fathers andConstitutional Framers DID NOT leave this most fundamental and critical to thesurvival of our Constitutional Republic “natural born Citizen” clause undefined. 3. To qualify as “natural-born citizens”, persons must be:

a. “born in the country”, and b. “of parents who are citizens.”

THE CONSTITUTION:“No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the

time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;. . . “ United States Constitution, Article II, Section 1.

CONCLUSION OF LAW:To qualify as a “natural born Citizen” and to “be eligible to the Office of President”of the United States, in addition to being “born in the country” (including UnitedStates Territories), both parents of every candidate seeking the Office of Presidentof the United States must be citizens of the United States (“of parents who arecitizens”). No exceptions. Failure to meet these two (2) eligibility requirementsrenders any Presidential candidate ineligible to campaign for, and to hold, theOffice of President of the United States of America.

____________________________

I am a 72 year-old Vietnam-era Veteran and AMERICAN PATRIOT. I amrespectfully and proudly standing shoulder-to-shoulder with our Founding Fathersand brave men and women in uniform, past and present, in defense of our

Constitution, Constitutional Republic and LIBERTY. In reference to Rules of theSupreme Court, Rule 37(1), I sincerely suspect that I am, herein, bringing “to theattention of the Court relevant matter not already brought to its attention by theparties and should be of considerable help to the Court.”

I believe, pursuant to the Constitutional evidence I have presented above, that itmakes absolutely no difference whatsoever whether Barack Hussein Obama, II was,or was not, born in the United States of America, he is Constitutionally ineligible tohold the Office of President of the United States of America.

I believe our Founding Fathers and Constitutional Framers, contrary to popular

false belief, did, in fact, provide the American People, the Congress, the Courts andthe Governments of America the Constitutional, legal and authoritative definitionof through their 2-step Constitutional process.

I believe for the Congress to be able to exercise the authority and “Power” theFramers conferred upon it at United States Constitution, Article I, Section 8 (to wit,specifically “the Law of Nations” clause), it must thoroughly understand and fully

of 8



support the controlling nature of The Law of Nations, including Emer de Vattel‟sdefinition of for all nations on planet earth, found atChapter XIX. I believe , by including The Law of Nations as an integral part of theConstitution at Article I, Section 8 and the 1775 Letter written by Dr. BenjaminFranklin, included below and here quoted in part, “I am much obliged by the kind

present you have made us of your edition of Vattel. It came to us in good season,

when the circumstances of a rising state make it necessary frequently to consult the law of nations. Accordingly that copy, which I kept (after depositing one in our own

public library here, and sending the other to the College of Massachusetts Bay, as you directed,) has been continually in the hands of the members of our Congress,now sitting, who are pleased with your notes and preface, and have entertained a high and just esteem for their author.” , the Framers of our Constitution clearly andirrefutably indicated they were thoroughly knowledgeable of the precepts set forthby Vattel in his scholarly masterpiece The Law of Nations, including his definitionof

In addition, when John Jay, American politician, statesman, revolutionary,diplomat, Founding Father of the United States, President of the ContinentalCongress (December 10, 1778 - September 28, 1779), and first Chief Justice of theUnited States, on July 25, 1787 wrote the following letter to George Washington,presiding officer of the Constitutional Convention, “Permit me to hint, whether it

would be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to,nor devolve on, any but ” , I believe John Jay penned thesewords of wisdom precisely because he was, in fact, thoroughly knowledgeable and incomplete agreement with Vattel‟s definition of

I believe, when the issue of presidential eligibility qualifications was raised duringthe Constitutional Convention and this clause wasintroduced by the drafting Committee of Eleven, and then adopted withoutdiscussion, debate or opposition by the Convention as a whole, “No Person except

” , at United States Constitution, Article II, Section 1, a special,distinct and limited class of and was created, the Framers weretotally in agreement with Vattels‟ definition of anddeliberately intended “to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on,

any but .” (Please reference John Jay‟s letter above.)

I believe when the Framers included amongthe other powers they conferred on Congress, at United States Constitution, ArticleI, section 8, they purposely intended Vattel‟s definition of to be, in fact and in verity, the Constitutional, legal and authoritative definition of

, found at United States Constitution, Article II, Section 1.

of 8



I believe the Constitutional, legal and authoritative definition of “natural bornCitizen” irrefutably requires that both parents of every person who campaigns for,and holds, the Office of President of the United States must be American citizens,no exceptions (“of parents who are citizens”). It is an irrefutable and well-established fact that Barack Hussein Obama, II‟s father, Barack Hussein Obama,Senior, was not an American citizen.

I sincerely believe Harvard Law School graduate, believed by many to be the mostprestigious law school in the United States, past editor of the Harvard Law Review,university Constitutional Law professor, and Constitutional attorney BarackObama fails to meet all of the Constitutional presidential eligibility requirementsfound at The Law of Nations, Chapter XIX and United States Constitution, ArticleII, Section 1, and that he is clearly and irrefutably not a . Isincerely believe Mr. Obama is fully aware he is committing “Offenses against theLaw of Nations”, knowingly and willfully violating United States Constitution,

Article I, Section 8, Clause “the Law of Nations”, and United States Constitution, Article II, Section 1, Clause “No Person except a natural born Citizen”, and he mustimmediately resign, or be legally removed from the Office of the President and theWhite House, pursuant to United States Constitution, Article I, Section 8, The Lawof Nations, Chapter XIX, and United States Constitution, Article II, Section 1.

I sincerely believe this vitally important issue regarding Mr. Obama‟s presidentialeligibility is the most important issue ever taken under consideration by theSupreme Court of the United States in its 224-year history. I sincerely believe theHonorable Justices of the Supreme Court would perform a vital and invaluableservice to the Citizens of the United States, including themselves, the Constitutionof the United States of America, the survival of our Constitutional Republic, and

our priceless LIBERTY by finding and declaring Barack Obama ineligible to holdthe Office of President of the United States of America.

I sincerely believe an UN-Constitutionally and illegally-elected and inaugurated„president‟ and the Constitution cannot co-exist. Please, in the interest of Justiceand love of LIBERTY, restore our Constitution to its rightful position of

(United States Constitution, Article VI). Our Nation will beeternally grateful when you do so.

I sincerely hope and pray the Honorable Justices of the Supreme Court of theUnited States will honor and keep their solemn Oaths to support and defend the

Constitution of the United States of America, defend our Constitutional Republic,and defend our priceless LIBERTY. The courtesy of your reply is appreciated.

Respectfully submitted.

of 8



Yours for LIBERTY,

Scott Rille AMERICAN PATRIOT

Natural-born American Citizen Vietnam-era Veteran

of 8



The Law of Nations French Edition

1758

The Law of Nations, Ch. XIX, Emer de Vattel (1714-1767), First French Edition 1758, First English Edition 1760,

Knud Haakonssen, General Editor, LIBERTY FUND, INC., 8335 Allison Pointe Trail, Suite 300, Indianapolis,

Indiana 46250-1684 © 2008.

of 8



Natural born citizen of the United States From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_born_citizen_of_the_United_States

There is no record of a debate on the "natural born Citizen" qualification during the

Constitutional Convention. This clause was introduced by the drafting Committee of Eleven,

and then adopted without discussion by the Convention as a whole. One possible source of the

clause can be traced to a July 25, 1787 letter from John Jay to George Washington, presiding

officer of the Convention. Jay wrote: “Permit me to hint, whether it would be wise and

seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of

our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Commander in Chief of the

American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen.”

John Jay (December 12, 1745 – May 17, 1829) was an American politician, statesman,

revolutionary, diplomat, a Founding Father of the United States, and the first Chief Justice of

the United States (1789 –95). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Jay

of 8



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constitutional_Convention


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Jay



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Washington



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Politician



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statesman



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriot_(American_Revolution)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diplomat



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Founding_Fathers_of_the_United_States



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chief_Justice_of_the_United_States





















There can be no doubt whatsoever our Founding Fathers and ConstitutionalFramers relied heavily on Vattel‟s THE LAW OF NATIONS while struggling withthe weighty matter of creating our Constitution and Constitutional Republic:

of 8

letter from scott rille to chief justice john roberts and to the associate justices of the supreme...

Documents