lets phase 3 review 4/29/08

31
LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Upload: salma

Post on 16-Jan-2016

29 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08. Agenda. Team Introduction Daedalus Concept Concept of Operations Subsystem Overview Daedalus Performance Daedalus Vision Public Outreach Questions. Team LunaTech. Nick Case, Project Manager Morris Morell, Systems Engineer Travis Morris, GN&C - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

LETS Phase 3 Review4/29/08

Page 2: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Agenda

• Team Introduction• Daedalus Concept• Concept of Operations• Subsystem Overview • Daedalus Performance• Daedalus Vision• Public Outreach• Questions

Page 3: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Team LunaTech• Nick Case, Project Manager• Morris Morell, Systems Engineer• Travis Morris, GN&C• Greg Barnett, Thermal Systems• Adam Garnick, Power Systems• Katherine Tyler, Power Systems• Tommy Stewart, Structures and Mechanisms• Julius Richardson, Conops• John Grose, Payload and Communications• Adam Fanning, Communications• Eric Brown, Technical Editor

Page 4: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Partners

• Mobility Concepts– Southern University

• Robert Danso• McArthur Whitmore

• Sample Return Vehicle Design– ESTACA

• Julie Monszajin• Sebastien Bouvet

Page 5: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

CDD Requirements

Page 6: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Daedalus Lander

1.The Need

2.The Mission

3.The Solution

Page 7: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Daedalus Lander•Simple, Adaptable, Autonomous Lander

•Solar Cell and Li-Ion Battery Power

•Semi-passive Thermal System

•Ka-Band and UHF Communications System

•Lunar Penetrator Exploration System (LPES) “Fire and Forget”

Page 8: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Daedalus Heritage

Structure based on Viking Lander

Communication based on MER

Power System based on Mars

Phoenix & Venus Express

DSMAC Technology for

GN&C based on Cruise Missile

Penetrators based on LUNAR-A

Page 9: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Daedalus Mass Statement

Page 10: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Concept of Operations

Page 11: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

LPESPayload•Micro-Seismometers

•Impact Accelerometer and Tilt Sensors

•Heat Flow Probe

•Geochemistry Package

•Water/Volatiles Detector

Design Requirements•1-1.2 Year Lifetime

•Impact Velocity: ~350 m/s

•Impact Force: ~4500 G’s

•Impact Depth: 1~2 m

•Scatter Distance: 500 m Penetration WebESTIMATED PENETRATOR SIZE

•Length: 480mm to 600mm

•Diameter: 60mm

•Estimated Mass: 14kg

LPES•22 Penetrators

•16 Launched into Shackleton Crater

•6 Launched into Lighted Region

•Spring-Loaded Ejection System

LUNAR-A

Page 12: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Daedalus ScienceDaedalus Payload Mass kg Power W Stereo imaging system or Radar or Lidar 0.8 6 Mast for stereo imaging system 3.5 9.5 Drill and drill deployment mechanism 20 30 Arm 13 43 Scoop 0.5 0 Mass Spectrometer 19 75 Geotechnical Experiments - cone penetrometer 1.5 0 Geotech - bearing plate 1 0 Geotech - shear vane 0.5 0 Magnets 0.5 0 XRD/XRF 2 10 Total 62.3 173.5 Estimated 168

Basic Requirements for Single Site Science Box:Determine Lighting conditions every 2 hours over the course of one yearStudy Micrometeorite fluxObserve Electrostatic dust levitation and its correlation with lighting conditions

Page 13: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Daedalus Power• Lithium Ion Batteries

– Total of 9 Sony 1860HC – Total mass of 42.24 kg– Total Volume of 1.341 ft^3

• Solar Cells– Total of 3 Gallium Arsenide Panels– Total mass of 46 kg– Total Surface area of 6.161 ft^3– Total Power of 937 Watts

• Power Regulation and Control– 6 Auxiliary Power Regulators. 2 per Solar Cell – 1 Battery Charge/Discharge Regulator per battery– ON Semiconductor LM350 Positive Voltage Regulators– STM Microelectronix ST0269 Digital Signal/Microprocessor– Crydom CMX60D10 Solid State Relays

Page 14: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Daedalus Thermal• Passive Techniques

• Paints – White and Black

• Multi-layered Insulation

• 15 layers

• Betacloth, aluminized Kapton

• Dacron Netting, Kapton laminate

• Thermal Switches

• Diaphragm Thin Plate Switch (Paraffin)

• Between heat generators and sinks

• Active Systems

• Electrical Resistance Heaters

• Tayco solid-state controller

• Variable Radioisotope Heater Units

• 50 Employed (50 Watts)

• Cassini-Huygens (117)

• 10 VRHU containers

• Variable Conductance Heat Pipes

• Aluminum(1.27cm) & Ammonia

• Integrated with radiator panels

• Axial groove composite wickMLI – exposed separator layers shown

Page 15: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

GN&C

•Provides Completely Autonomous Landing sequence

•Very Precise landing location

•Landing location determined before launch

•Hazard Avoidance

Objective: To deliver Daedalus from 5km altitude safely and accurately to the lunar surface

Guidance CompBAE Systems

RAD6000

ACS 12 AeroJet

MR-108

Main Engines2 AeroJet

MR-80 IMUHoneywell HG1930

LiDARBall Aerospace

Long Range Optical Camera

Attitude thrust commands

Altitude thrust commands

high res photograph

Altitude signal

Surface terrain signals

attitude signals

Accelerometer signals

relative vel signal

Page 16: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Daedalus Communications

Earth Receiver and Transmitter

Lunar Penetrators

LRO

Penetrators to LRO using UHF

Data Rate: 2 Kbps

LRO to Earth using Ka-band

Data Rate: 100 Mbps

Daedalus to LRO using Ka-Band

Data Rate: 100 Mbps

View Time: 1 Hour per Day (approx)

Daedalus

Page 17: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Daedalus Structures

•A 8200 Newton load was applied to the foot of the leg assembly. •Loads were then transferred to the chassis•Results indicate the Minimum Factor of Safety is 1.15

Landing Scenario

Page 18: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Daedalus Structures

•To simulate loads experienced at launch a 54000 Newton load was applied.• Results indicate the Minimum Factor of Safety is 1.3

Launch Scenario

Page 19: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Daedalus PerformanceFigures of Merit Goal Daedalus

Number of surface objectives accomplished

15 Samples in permanent dark and 5 samples in lighted

terrain

16 Samples in permanent dark and 7 samples in lighted

terrain

Percentage of mass allocated to payload

Higher is better 40% of Dry Mass

Ratio of objectives (SMD to ESMD) validation

2 to 1 1.95 to 1

Efficiency of getting data in stakeholders hands vs. capability of mission

Higher is better 83.5 %

Percentage of mass allocated to power system

Lower is better 14% of Dry Mass

Ratio of off-the-shelf hardware to new

development hardware Higher is better 1.67 to 1

Page 20: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Daedalus Vision

1970 1980 1990 2000

Mariner

7 & 9

Viking

1 & 2

Mars Global Surveyor

Mars Pathfinder

2001 Mars Odyssey

Mars Express Orbiter

Mars Exploration

Rovers

Mars Reconnaissance

Orbiter

Mars Phoenix Lander

Mars Science Laboratory

Present

Mars Exploration Roadmap

Page 21: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Daedalus VisionProposed LPRP Timeline Using Daedalus

LCS

(2011)

LCROSS

(2008)

LRO

(2008)

Daedalus I

(2012)

Daedalus II

(2014)

SRV

(ESTACA)

Rover

(Southern)

Page 22: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Daedalus Vision

Daedalus I• Mission to Shackleton Crater• Lunar South Pole

Reconnaissance achieved by LPES

• Single Site Science Conducted• Scientific data used to justify

funding for Daedalus II

Daedalus II• Return Mission to Shackleton

Crater• Further Investigation based on

LPES findings• Robotic Rover and Sample

Return Vehicle Capability

Page 23: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Daedalus Vision

•Provide a basic, yet powerful and adaptable Lunar Exploration Transportation System

•Build upon the design practices and valuable data collected

•Evolve the Daedalus to accomplish each mission

•Provide a Low-Cost Solution for LPRP

This is the Vision for Daedalus…. and the Mission of

LunaTech

Page 24: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Public Outreach

• Union Hill School• May 8, 2008• 4th Grade• Presentation about

the Moon, LPRP and Daedalus

• Launch a Model Rocket

Page 25: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Questions

Page 26: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Thermal Backup 1MAE 491 Preliminary Calculations for Thermal Control SubsytemLETS Design, Team LunatechGreg Barnett

Ambient Temperature: -173 degC

Worst-Case Cold Scenario

1-D, Steady State Analysis

Information: kal 185.2watt

m K tins 1in tal

1

8in Ti 20 273( )K L 6in

kins_eff 2.5 105

BTU

hr ft R kins_eff 4.327 10

5watt

m K To 110K Tinf 100K

Tsur 100K Eheater 80watt A 20.5m2 tins 0.025m tal 3.175 10

3 m

Calculation of Cross-Sectional Area of Supports: Assumed 8 aluminum rods of 0.25in radius

r 0.25in Arod r2 rods 8 Ac Arod rods

Ac 1.013 103 m

2 Cross-Section of all supports

Page 27: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Thermal Backup 2

Effective Emittance:

fA1

100.373 log 3( )

fA 0.664 fN 1.164 For 15 layers

fP 1.322 For 2% Penetrations

Th 293 Tc 130

Tm

3Th

4Tc

4

4 Th Tc Tm 221.489 5.67108

eff 0.0001361

4 Tm2

0.000121Tm0.667

fN fA fP eff 0.017

Thermal Resistance: Rtotal

tal

kal A

tins

kins_eff A Rtotal 28.636

K

watt 5.6710

8watt

m2

K4

Page 28: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Thermal Backup 3

Energy Balance:

ERHU 50watt

Given

Ti To

Rtotaleff A To

4Tsur

4

Eheater ERHUTi To

Rtotalkal Ac

Ti To

L

To

Eheater

Find To Eheater To 134 C Temperature of outside surface

Erequired Eheater

Erequired 145watt Power required to maintain 20C inside vehicle

Page 29: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Thermal Backup 4

MAE 491 Preliminary Calculations for Thermal Control SubsytemLETS Design, Team LunatechGreg Barnett

Ambient Temperature: 100 degC / 373 K

Worst-Case Hot Scenario

1-D, Steady State Analysis

Albedo Assumed Negligible

Information: kal 185.2watt

m K tins 1in tal

1

8in L 6in Gsolar 1368

watt

m2

kins_eff 2.5 105

BTU

hr ft R kins_eff 4.327 10

5watt

m K Ti 20 273( )K Tsur 373K

A 20.5m2 tins 0.025m tal 3.175 10

3 m mli 0.15 mli 1 mli Atop 6.25m2

Page 30: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Thermal Backup 5

Effective Emittance for MLI:

fA1

100.373 log 3( )

fA 0.664 fN 1.164 For 15 layers

fP 1.322 For 2% Penetrations

Th 373 Tc 293 Hot and Cold Side Temperatures

Tm

3Th

4Tc

4

4 Th Tc Tm 334.594 5.67108

eff 0.0001361

4 Tm2

0.000121Tm0.667

fN fA fP eff 0.011

Thermal Resistancefor Conduction:

Rtotal

tal

kal A

tins

kins_eff A Rtotal 28.636

K

watt 5.6710

8watt

m2

K4

Page 31: LETS Phase 3 Review 4/29/08

Thermal Backup 6Energy Balance:

To 400K

ERHU 50watt

EVCHP 150watt

Given

To Ti

RtotalmliGsolar Atop eff A To

4Tsur

4

ERHU

To Ti

Rtotal EVCHP

To

EVCHP

Find To EVCHP To 311C Temperature of outside surface

EVCHP 60watt Power that must be removed from cabin by VCHPs tomaintain 20 degC