let's go aero v. u-haul - complaint
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
1/120
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Civil Action No.
LET’S GO AERO, INC., a Colorado corporation
Plaintiff
v.
U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Nevada
corporation,
and
WYERS PRODUCTS GROUP, INC., a Colorado corporation
d/b/a TRIMAX
Defendants
COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff Let’s Go Aero, Inc., a Colorado corporation (“LGA”), as and for its Complaint
against U-Haul International, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“U-Haul”) and Wyers Products Group,
Inc., d/b/a Trimax, a Colorado corporation (“Wyers”), alleges and states as follows:
SUMMARY OF CASE
1. This is an action for damages and injunctive relief to remedy the intellectual
property infringements of LGA’s patents, copyrighted materials, and trademarks and unfair trade
practices by the Defendants as described below through: (a) the unauthorized manufacture, use,
sale, and/or offer to sell products by Defendants U-Haul and Wyers which infringe on one or
more claims of U.S. Patents held by LGA which relate to its “Silent Hitch Pin®” or “SHP”, the
LGA GearCage® and the LGA Bike Rack; and (b) Defendant U-Haul’s unlawful use and
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
2/120
2
infringements of LGA’s rights under its trademarks and copyrighted materials and U-Haul’s
unfair trade practices.
2. The patent infringements by Defendant Wyers involve its manufacture, use, sale
and/or offer for sale of infringing products which include towing products marketed and sold
under the names of “TAR 300” and “Anti-Rattle Pin Receiver Pin” (“Wyers Accused Products”).
The Wyers Accused Products were sold to and by U-Haul.
3. Non-Party Cequent Performance Products, Inc. is a manufacturer, importer and
supplier of products including Highland Gear Cage®, Transporter Cargo Carrier, PN 5800300,
Pro Series Gear Cage, PN 5800300, Sportwing Bike Rack, and upon information and belief
Silent Hitch Pin® or Anti Rattle Hitch Pin, all of which infringed on Plaintiff’s United States
Patents after the termination of Cequent’s license to manufacture and sell such products in
January of 2012 and the selloff of approved remaining inventory, (“Cequent Infringing
Products”) that were then sold through U-Haul.
PARTIES AND RELEVANT NON-PARTIES
4. Plaintiff LGA is a Colorado corporation with its principal place of business in
Colorado Springs, Colorado.
5. Defendant U-Haul is a Nevada corporation with its principal place of business at
2727 N. Central Ave., Phoenix, Arizona 85004.
6.
Defendant Wyers Products (“Wyers”) is a Colorado corporation with its principal
place of business at 6770 S. Dawson Circle, Suite 200, Centennial, Colorado 80112.
7. Non- party Cequent Performance Products, Inc. (“Cequent”) is a Delaware
corporation with its principal place of business in Plymouth, Michigan.
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
3/120
3
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
8. This Court has jurisdiction to render declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to
28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202 as well as jurisdiction over the claims contained herein for patent
infringement, copyright infringement, and trademark infringement pursuant to the laws of the
United States, including but not limited to 35 U.S.C. §§ 101, et seq., (specifically 35 U.S.C.
§§ 271, 281 to 287, 292), 17 U.S.C. §§ 101, et seq., and 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) and (c). This Court
also has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338. Supplemental jurisdiction over
LGA’s state law claims exists pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367 because they are so related to the
other claims that together all of the claims form the same case or controversy.
9. This Court has personal jurisdiction over each of the Defendants because each
regularly has and continues to transact business in this judicial district by, among other things,
selling or offering to sell its infringing products and utilizing the LGA Trademark and
Copyrighted Materials to enable such sales or offers to sell to customers located in this judicial
district pursuant to C.R.S. § 13-1-124.
10. Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b), (c) and 1400(b).
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
LGA Inventions and Patents, Trademarks and Copyrighted Works
11. LGA is the sole assignee and beneficial owner of various patents for inventions
created by its founder and president, Marty L. Williams.
12. LGA is a manufacturer and distributor of a variety of towing products for use
within the camping/recreational cargo transport industry. Its product line can be viewed at
www.letsgoaero.com.
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
4/120
4
13. LGA sells its products through national retail and specialty stores throughout the
United States and elsewhere, under its registered and un-registered trademarks and has
achieved a world-wide reputation based upon the quality, design and innovation of LGA’s
products.
LGA’s Silent Hitch Pin® Patents
14. The applicable Utility Patents that relate to the Silent Hitch Pin® (also listed as
“SHP”) were assigned to LGA and include Nos. 6,609,725 (“’725 Patent”) (Exhibit A), and
6,945,550 (“’550 Patent”) (Exhibit B).
15. The ‘725 Patent and ‘550 Patent are collectively referred to hereinafter as the
“SHP Patents” and are in full force and effect.
LGA’s GearCage® Patent
16. LGA was assigned a Utility Patent for its vehicle mounted cargo carrier,
“GearCage®” product, No. 8,858,141 (“’141 Patent”) (Exhibit C).
17. The ‘141 Patent is referred to herein as the “GearCage® Patent” and is in full
force and effect.
LGA’s Bike Rack Patent
18. LGA was assigned Design and Utility Patents for its “VME Bike Rack” product,
Utility Patent No. 8,889,456 and Design Patent Nos. D684,917, D717,716, D717,717 and
D722,289 (“’456 Patent” [Exhibit D] Design Patents D684,917 [Exhibit E], D717,716 [Exhibit
F], D717,717 [Exhibit G] and D722,289 [Exhibit H].)
19. The ‘456 and Design Patents D684,917, D717,716, D717,717 and D722,289 are
referred to herein as the “Bike Rack Patents.”
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
5/120
5
LGA’s Trademarks
20. LGA has common law and registered trademarks on the “Silent Hitch Pin®”
(SHP), first used in 1999, via U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,296,604 (Exhibit I) and on the
GearCage®, first used in 2004, via U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,296,605 (Exhibit J) and
for Moover™, first used in 2006, all of which have become distinctive by the acquisition of
secondary meaning pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1052 (f). Defendant U-Haul was authorized to use
these marks on its sale of Cequent’s properly licensed LGA products and certain products
manufactured by LGA under a short term agreement, until Cequent’s license was terminated and
the private label agreement with LGA ceased, after which U-Haul would have no authority to use
the trademarks. Other trademarks owned by LGA may be relevant to LGA’s claims.
LGA Copyrights
21. LGA owns the copyright for LGA Cargo Rack Operating Manuals, GearCage®
Ramp Accessory, Moover™ Transporter System, GearCage® SP Cargo Rack, GearCage® TT
Cargo Rack, TwinTube U-Build-IT registered with the U.S. Copyright Office, (No. TXu 1-847-
969) (“LGA Copyrights”) (shown in Exhibit K) as well as other copyrights on works of text, line
art and photos which upon discovery may have been infringed by one or both Defendants.
Defendants’ Misconduct
22. In April of 2012, U-Haul signed a non-disclosure agreement with LGA related to
U-Haul’s potential licensing or sale of certain LGA inventions and intellectual property,
including the SHP and the GearCage®. After the termination of Cequent’s license in January of
2012, and any approved sell-off of Cequent’s inventory, U-Haul was never again licensed by
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
6/120
6
LGA to sell the Silent Hitch Pin®, the VME Bike Rack,or the GearCage®, to copy any of LGA
manuals and sales materials, or to use LGA’s trademarks.
23. Through direct and email communications with LGA beginning in the year 2001,
Wyers gained knowledge of LGA’s SHP, and received actual product samples in 2001, to review
for licensing the technology from LGA or using LGA as a private label source for the SHP
product.
24. Nevertheless, on information and belief, from and after January 29, 2012, and the
sell-off of any remaining inventory, Defendant U-Haul has purchased, imported, distributed,
sold, offered to sell, licensed and/or obtained financial benefit from marketing and sale of the
infringing copies of LGA’s patented designs for Silent Hitch Pin®, the GearCage® and the Bike
Rack without the agreement or consent of LGA.
25. Defendant Wyers manufactures and sells the Wyers Accused Products which
unlawfully copy and infringe on LGA’s Silent Hitch Pin® patents, and which are inferior to and
“knock -off” the SHP products.
26. On information and belief, U-Haul has acquired from Cequent, after the
termination of Cequent’s license and after the sell-off of licensed inventory, the Accused
Products and falsely sold and promoted the Cequent Accused Products to be LGA’s Silent Hitch
Pin® using the “Silent Hitch Pin®”, “Gear Cage®” and “Moover ™” trademarks.
27.
These sales by Wyers and U-Haul occurred without attribution of true ownership
including by mislabeling or misrepresentation as to the nature of the product, and without
consent or authority from LGA to do so.
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
7/120
7
28. Wyers has made, used, sold and/or offered for sale within the United States,
towing products, including the Wyers Accused Products that infringe at least claims 1, 2, 3 and 4
of the ‘725 Patent.
29. Wyers has made, used, sold and/or offered for sale within the United States,
towing products, including the Wyers Accused Products, that infringe at least claims 1, 2, 3 and
6 of the ‘550 Patent.
30. U-Haul has used, sold and/or offered for sale within the United States, towing
products, including the Cequent infringing SHP product that infringes at least claims 1, 2, 3 and
4 of the ‘725 Patent.
31. U-Haul has used, sold and/or offered for sale within the United States towing
products, including Cequent Accused Products. Cequent infringing SHP products infringe at
least claims 1, 2, 3 and 6 of the ‘550 Patent.
32. U-Haul has used, sold and/or offered for sale within the United States,
GearCage® towing products, including the Cequent infringing GearCage® product, that
infringes at least claims 1-8 of the ‘141 Patent.
33. U-Haul has used, sold and/or offered for sale within the United States, towing
products, including Cequent’s infringing Bike Rack products, that infringe at least claims 1-6 of
the ‘456 Patent and Design Patents D684,917, D717,716, D717,717 and D722,289.
34.
All Cequent infringing products are designated as “Cequent Infringing Products.”
35. U-Haul has also infringed the SHP Patents by reselling the Wyers Accused
Products knowing that Wyers is thereby infringing the SHP Patents.
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
8/120
8
36. U-Haul marketed and sold the Cequent Infringing Products to the public,
representing them to be LGA’s SHPs, LGA’s GearCage® and LGA’s Bike Racks, including
using LGA’s trademark s, “Silent Hitch Pin®”, “GearCage®” and “Moover™.”
37. In or about September of 2014, U-Haul discontinued selling the infringing
Cequent Product SHPs and started selling the infringing Wyers Accused Products to the public
instead.
38. The marketing and product materials U-Haul provides to customers (shown in
Exhibit M), copies, distributes, displays, and makes derivative works of photos, line art, text and
content created and owned by LGA and subject to registered copyright (Exhibit K) and thereby
infringes LGA’s copyrighted works.
39. On information and belief, U-Haul has been and is now selling the infringing
Wyers and Cequent Infringing Products, and distributing copies of LGA’s copyrighted works
through various wholesale and retail outlets, including but not limited to U-Haul Moving and
Storage of Highlands Ranch, 1750 E. County Line Rd., Highlands Ranch, CO 80126. The
wholesale and retail outlets where the Wyers and Cequent Products are sold are located in
Colorado and elsewhere.
40. Upon information and belief, LGA’s copyright management information
contained on LGA’s copyrighted works was removed in order to further conceal the infringing
action. U-Haul knew or should have known of LGA’s rights and the fact that the copyright
management information had been altered. U-Haul’s sale and distribution of the infringing
products and copyright was in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 1202.
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
9/120
9
41. U-Haul sells Cequent Infringing Products with Plaintiff LGA’s patent numbers
(See Exhibit N) and patent markings and otherwise represented that the Cequent Infringing
Products were genuine LGA SHP, GearCage® and Bike Rack products when U-Haul had no
such authority and acted with knowledge that U-Haul was marketing and selling infringing
products and counterfeit goods. The mis-marking and misrepresentation of the Cequent
Infringing Products without LGA’s authority or permission was an essential material element in
U-Haul’s marketing of these infringing products.
42.
By mis-marking and improperly marketing the Cequent Infringing Products, and
by misrepresenting that it had LGA’s authority to sell them and use LGA’s designs, trademarks
and patent numbers, U-Haul has unfairly competed with LGA, resulting in lost sales and sales
opportunities, and impaired LGA’s ability to gain market share and customers.
43. With knowledge of LGA’s intellectual property rights, Wyers has encouraged and
instructed purchasers of the Wyers Accused Products to sell, market and use them as
replacement Silent Hitch Pin®s, such that purchasers and users of the Wyers Accused Products
inevitably infringe the SHP Patents. Wyers has actively induced and contributed to the
infringement of the SHP Patents by the end users of the Wyers Accused Products by a history of
sales to U-Haul and Curt Manufacturing and others, for whom Wyers produced private label
knock-offs of the SHP.
44.
U-Haul has, or in conjunction with others, taken these actions while mismarking
and falsely misrepresenting their products as LGA’s SHP, GearCage® and Bike Racks, and have
misrepresented the facts of invention and ownership of the licensing patents to the SHP, Bike
Rack and/or GearCage® products sold to the public, knowing those facts were false.
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
10/120
10
45. U-Haul and Wyers each acted with the intent to injure LGA and to unlawfully
profit from LGA’s innovations of the SHP, Bike Rack and/or GearCage®.
46. LGA has been harmed by Defendants’ trademark infringement and mislabeling
of the SHP, Bike Rack and GearCage® products that Defendants sold to the public, including
damage to LGA’s goodwill.
47. U-Haul and Wyers have, separately or together violated, and conspired with
others to violate, LGA’s intellectual property rights on more than two occasions.
48.
U-Haul and Wyers knew, should have known, or acted in reckless disregard of
LGA’s ownership to and rights in the patents for the SHP, Bike Rack and GearCage® products,
the trademarks and the copyrights of the works of authorship.
49. LGA has suffered damage flowing from the false representations, mismarking of
products, and infringements by Defendants’ conduct.
CAUSES OF ACTION AND CLAIMS FOR RELIEF
FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Declaratory Judgment Against All Defendants)
50. LGA incorporates fully by reference all of the allegations contained in paragraphs
1 through 49, as set forth above.
51. Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 57 this Court has the power to declare the rights, status, and
legal relations of LGA and the Defendants with respect to the infringing and falsely labeled
SHPs and the wrongful sales thereof.
52. An actual existing and bona fide antagonistic assertion and denial of right and
actual justiciable controversy exists between LGA and the Defendants and each of them as to
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
11/120
11
their legal relations with respect to the Accused Products and SHPs which can only be
determined by declaratory judgment.
53. By reason of the Defendants’ conduct as set forth in this Complaint, LGA seeks,
among other relief, the following declarations (“Declarations”):
a. Neither of the Defendants have the lawful right to distribute, re-label
and/or sell the SHPs or products identical or substantially similar thereto,
such as the Wyers Accused Products and/or the Cequent Products without
the express consent of LGA;
b. LGA has not consented to the sale, re-labeling or distribution of the
Wyers Accused Products or Cequent Products by either of the Defendants;
c. Defendants should each be enjoined and restrained from manufacturing,
advertising, re-labeling, distributing or selling the Wyers Accused
Products and/or the Cequent Infringing Products and from holding out in
any way a claim of ownership, right, or authority to manufacture or sell
the Wyers Accused Products and/or Cequent Infringing Products, without
the express prior consent of LGA;
d. The acts and omissions of Defendants or either of them with respect to the
Wyers Accused Products and/or Cequent Infringing Products were
conducted knowingly, willfully, and in bad faith;
e. LGA has been damaged and Defendants have each been unjustly enriched
by their misconduct.
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 11 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
12/120
12
SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Direct Infringement of Patents Against All Defendants)
54. LGA incorporates fully by reference all of the allegations contained in paragraphs
1 through 53, as set forth above.
55. Since at least January 29, 2012 and to the present, U-Haul has and continues to
willfully and knowingly purchase, use, distribute, license, sell and/or offer for sale products
which infringe LGA’s patents in SHP, GearCage® and the Bike Rack without right and in
violation of LGA’s rights therein.
56. Wyers, by its manufacture, sale, and offer for sale of its Anti-Rattle Receiver Pin
(ARRP), is willfully infringing LGA’s SHP Patents.
57. U-Haul is a reseller of the infringing Wyers Accused Products (ARRP) and knows
those products infringe LGA’s SHP Patents.
58. By way of U-Haul’s trademark infringement and use of SHP’s patent marking,
consumers have been confused by U-Haul’s sale of products and have called on LGA to provide
customer service or warranty work on those products. To protect its reputation, LGA has
provided these consumers with customer service and warranty work.
59. Defendants’ infringements are and at all times have been willful, deliberate, and
intentional and with full knowledge of LGA’s rights in the SHP Patents, the Bike Rack Patent
and/or the GearCage® Patent.
60. The acts alleged above will continue unless enjoined by this Court, and
Defendants have damaged LGA by reducing LGA’s sales, injuring LGA’s reputation and
deceiving the public, thus causing Plaintiff LGA irreparable harm, the extent of which is
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 12 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
13/120
13
presently unknown. LGA has no adequate remedy at law and injunctive relief, both preliminary
and permanent, should be granted.
61. U-Haul for its infringement of the Bike Rack design patents should be required to
account to LGA for its profits from such infringements from and after January 29, 2012, or as the
date of issue of each design patent. LGA should also be awarded its damages for the utility
patent infringement as against each Defendant in an amount adequate to compensate for such
infringements, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made by Defendants as
provided by 35 U.S.C. § 284, together with reasonable attorneys’ fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C.
§ 285 and such other damages as may be allowable by law due to the exceptional nature of the
infringement.
THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Inducement to Infringe the SHP Patents Against Defendant Wyers)
62. LGA incorporates fully by reference all of the allegations contained in paragraphs
1 through 61, as set forth above.
63. Defendant Wyers had actual knowledge of the SHP Patents.
64. Defendant Wyers sold Defendant U-Haul the infringing Wyers Accused Products
by producing private label knock-off supplies of the SHP product for U-Haul with actual
knowledge that the products infringed LGA SHP patents.
65.
Defendant Wyers knew that Defendant U-Haul and other users, as the purchaser
and user of the Wyers Accused Products, would by that use infringe the SHP Patents.
66. Defendant Wyers is liable to Plaintiff LGA for inducing the infringement of the
SHP Patents as provided by 35 U.S.C. §271(b).
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 13 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
14/120
14
FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition Against Defendant U-Haul)
67. LGA incorporates fully by reference all of the allegations contained in paragraphs
1 through 66, as set forth above.
68. LGA is owner of the LGA Trademarks identified as “GearCage®”,
“GearSpace®”, “GearDeck®,” “TwinTube®” and “Silent Hitch Pin®” both by way of common
law rights through direct use and licensed use, and by way of registration at the USPTO. LGA
also owns the common law trademark rights in Moover™.
69. The LGA’s rights in the Trademarks are valid and by way of secondary meaning
protectable.
70. On information and belief, U-Haul has, since January 29, 2012 or after the
authorized sell-off of licensed Cequent Products, infringed on LGA’s Trademarks and competed
unfairly in violation of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act 6-1-101 et seq. and Federal
Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) by using and displaying them in commerce in multiple retail
outlets and on the internet, without the permission of LGA, in advertising and packaging for
products sold or supplied to others in violation of LGA’s rights in the LGA Trademarks, all to
the detriment and damage of LGA. Such representations by U-Haul are either false, misleading
or have a tendency to deceive consumers purchasing either product.
71.
U-Haul’s affirmative and material misrepresentations in commercial advertising
and promotion have been disseminated to its customers and potential customers, many, if not all,
of whom are also customers or potential customers of LGA, which is likely to cause confusion.
The marks are similar, if not identical.
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 14 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
15/120
15
72. Customers have been actually confused and/or deceived by the false claims
published by U-Haul. LGA and U-Haul market the same products and use the same marketing
channels in Colorado. U-Haul’s advertising and promotion are likely to further deceive existing
and potential customers of the parties by implying a licensing relationship between the parties
and/or by implying deficiencies in LGA’s products that do not exist.
73. The actions of U-Haul have and are likely to continue to injure LGA by confusing
the public and by causing LGA to lose customers and sales, resulting in business losses in an
amount to be determined at trial and that are presently unknown to LGA, but that are believed to
be substantial and are accumulating on an ongoing basis. Because of U-Haul’s intentional and
willful infringement, LGA is entitled to recover U-Haul’s profits, LGA’s damages, including
trebled amount, prejudgment interest, and costs as provided by C.R.S. 6-1-113 and 15 U.S.C.
§ 1117 (a), (b) and (c). Further the facts support recovery of LGA’s attorneys’ fees as the
infringement is exceptional.
74. The actions of U-Haul have and will continue to cause LGA substantial harm.
LGA has a reasonable interest in its products, including GearCage® and Silent Hitch Pin® and
which interest has been harmed or is subject to harm from the affirmative misrepresentations of
U-Haul.
75. The damage to LGA’s reputation and goodwill is continuing. U-Haul has caused
and continues to cause irreparable harm to LGA for which LGA is entitled to preliminary and
permanent injunctive relief.
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 15 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
16/120
16
FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Copyright Infringement Against Defendant U-Haul)
76. LGA incorporates fully by reference all of the allegations contained in paragraphs
1 through 75, as set forth above.
77. LGA possesses valid copyrights as evidenced by the registration. (Exhibit K)
78. On information and belief, U-Haul has willfully infringed on, misappropriated,
copied and distributed protectable elements of LGA’s copyrights, images and written manuals
developed by LGA for its GearCage® invention, with the intent to commercially exploit these
works to which U-Haul has no proprietary rights. U-Haul has published, distributed and used
LGA’s copyr ighted materials, without the permission of LGA, in advertising and packaging for
U-Haul’s products sold or supplied to others in violation of LGA’s rights, all to the detriment
and damage of LGA.
79. As an example of the use of Plaintiff’s copyrighted material we include Exhibit N
with a comparison of materials from Plaintiff and U-Haul’s sales and manual material.
80. By reason of these willful infringements of copyrights, LGA has sustained injury,
loss and damage to its ownership rights and Defendant U-Haul has unlawfully, unfairly and
wrongfully derived and will continue to derive income from these infringing acts.
81. For the infringements, LGA seeks its damages and U-Haul’s profits, or applicable
statutory damages as provided by 17 U.S.C. § 504 and cost and atto rneys’ fees under 17 U.S.C. §
505.
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 16 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
17/120
17
SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Copyright Infringement Against Defendant U-Haul)
82. LGA incorporates fully by reference all of the allegations contained in paragraphs
1 through 81, as set forth above.
83. By removing LGA’s copyright management information from the LGA sales
materials and owner ’s manuals and replacing it with U-Haul’s, U-Haul infringed LGA’s
copyright under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 1202(a) and (b).
84.
LGA is entitled to damages or statutory damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 1203
and attorneys’ fees.
SEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Passing Off Against Defendant U-Haul)
85. LGA incorporates fully by reference all of the allegations contained in paragraphs
1 through 84, as set forth above.
86. The Cequent Products (knock-offs of the Silent Hitch Pin® and GearCage®) that
have been marketed, licensed and sold by U-Haul, were obtained by U-Haul from Cequent.
87. U-Haul falsely designated and misrepresented the origin of the Accused Products
it sold to the public and represented them to the public as LGA being the origin of those products
by the use of LGA’s trademarks.
88. U-Haul’s false designation of the origin of its products was likely to cause and has
caused customer confusion.
89. LGA has been harmed by U-Haul’s false designation of the origin of the Accused
Products sold to the public, including but not limited to damage to LGA’s goodwill from U-
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 17 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
18/120
18
Haul’s sale of defective or inferior products identical to or intended to resemble LGA’s SHP and
GearCage® products.
EIGHTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF
(Patent Mismarking)
90. LGA incorporates fully by reference all of the allegations contained in paragraphs
1 through 89, as set forth above.
91. U-Haul has distributed and published information with their infringing products
that falsely claims that their infringing products are sold and offered for sale with the
authorization of LGA by the inclusion of LGA’s patent numbers.
92. U-Haul knew that as of the termination of Cequent’s licensing with LGA,
Cequent was no longer licensed to manufacture, sell or offer for sale the SHP or any other LGA
product.
93. U-Haul by continuing to sell and offer for sale the SHP product, with LGA’s
patent numbers listed, was misleading consumers.
94. U-Haul’s actions have caused LGA damage and lost sales due to said
misrepresentation.
95. As provided by 35 U.S.C. § 292, U-Haul is liable for said mismarking for each
product sold with the false patent numbers.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Let’s Go Aero, Inc. requests that the Court:
a. issue an Order containing the Declarations set forth above;
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 18 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
19/120
19
b. award LGA compensatory and multiplied damages against Defendants
jointly and severally, for amounts to be proven at trial, to the fullest extent
provided by law;
c. statutory damages where permitted for copyright infringement;
d. order Defendants to account for all sales, purchases, revenues and profits
derived from its or their improper use and sale of LGA’s SHPs,
GearCage® and Bike Rack and to disgorge the profits forthwith or,
alternatively, for judgment in the amount of at least a reasonable royalty;
e. award LGA its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs to the fullest extent
provided by law and equity and for such other and further relief as the
nature of the case may require;
f. issue preliminary and permanent injunctions enjoining each of the
Defendants and their affiliated officers, directors, representatives,
successors and assigns and all those in active concert or active
participation with either of them:
i. from advertising or selling the SHPs; and,
ii. from aiding, abetting or inducing in any way the sale thereof by
others without LGA’s consent;
f.
order each of the Defendants to undertake a corrective advertising
campaign to rectify the confusion, deception, or misrepresentations caused
by their illegal actions; and,
g. grant such other and further relief as the nature of the case may require.
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 19 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
20/120
20
PLAINTIFF REQUESTS TRIAL BY JURY ON ALL CLAIMS SO TRIABLE
Dated: February 19, 2016.
Respectfully submitted,
SILVER & DeBOSKEY,
A Professional Corporation
By: /s/Martin D. Beier
Thomas M. Haskins III (#17651)
Martin D. Beier (#20188)Silver & DeBoskey P.C.
1801 York Street
Denver, CO 80206(303) 399-3000
J. Mark Smith (#973)
BERG HILL GREENLEAF R USCITTI LLP
1525 17th
StreetDenver, CO 80202
(303) 402-1600
ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF
FK0861
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 20 of 20
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
21/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6
Exhibit A
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
22/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
23/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 6
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
24/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 6
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
25/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 6
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
26/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 6
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
27/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-2 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6
Exhibit B
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
28/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-2 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
29/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-2 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 6
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
30/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-2 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 6
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
31/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-2 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 6
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
32/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-2 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 6
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
33/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10
Exhibit C
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
34/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
35/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
36/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
37/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
38/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
39/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
40/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
41/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
42/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
43/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 20
Exhibit D
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
44/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
45/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
46/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
47/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
48/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
49/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
50/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
51/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
52/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
53/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 11 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
54/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 12 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
55/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 13 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
56/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 14 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
57/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 15 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
58/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 16 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
59/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 17 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
60/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 18 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
61/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 19 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
62/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 20 of 20
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
63/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-5 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9
Exhibit E
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
64/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-5 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 9
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
65/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-5 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 9
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
66/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-5 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 9
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
67/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-5 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 9
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
68/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-5 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 9
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
69/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-5 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 9
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
70/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-5 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 9
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
71/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-5 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 9
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
72/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10
Exhibit F
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
73/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
74/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
75/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
76/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
77/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
78/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
79/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
80/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
81/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
82/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10
Exhibit G
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
83/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
84/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
85/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
86/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
87/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
88/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
89/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
90/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
91/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 10
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
92/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-8 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9
Exhibit H
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
93/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-8 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 9
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
94/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-8 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 9
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
95/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-8 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 9
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
96/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-8 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 9
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
97/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-8 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 9
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
98/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-8 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 9
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
99/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-8 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 9
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
100/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-8 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 9
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
101/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-9 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Exhibit I
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
102/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-9 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
103/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-10 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Exhibit J
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
104/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-10 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
105/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-11 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Exhibit K
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
106/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-11 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
107/120
Operation Tips:
• Keep this manual for future reference.
• Recommended for use with the GearCage™ SP Cargo Rack.
If this product was purchased from a dealer, all documentation MUST be furnished to the customer.
Part One Safe Use and Operation Page 2
Part Two Parts Identification Page 3
Part Three Assembly and Installation Page 4
GEARC AGE™ R AMP ACCESSORY ACC 3050, ACCESSORY R AMP FOR GEARC AGE™ C ARGO R ACK
User Assembly and Operation Manual
© Copyright 2006 Let’s Go Aero, Inc.
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-12 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5
Exhibit L
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
108/120
– 2 –
GEARC AGE™ R AMP ACCESSORY
GCRamp vC
S AFE U SE & O PERATION Be sure to follow these guidelines to prevent possible hazards from misuse.
• When operating the vehicle, the ramp must be either removed, secured in the upright position, or positioned tolay flat on the GearCage™ SP Cargo Rack.
• Always secure the hinge bolts with locking nuts that are furnished with the Ramp Accessory so that at least two(2) threads protrude through the nut’s nylon insert. Failure to do so may result in loss of ramp from carrier in
transit, property damage and bodily injury.
We warrant this product to the first consumer to be free from defect in material and workmanship for one year (Please retain your sales slip for your records)Any product or part thereof found to be defective within that period will be replaced without charge provided that: (1) the product was not misused; (2) noalterations or modifications were made; (3) its failure resulted from a defect in material or workmanship and not from normal wear expected in the use ofthe product; (4) the product or part is delivered, freight prepaid, to Let’s Go Aero. Please contact Let’s Go Aero, toll free, at 877-464-2376 to get a returnauthorization number prior to return. Manufacturers only obligation shall be to replace such products or parts proved to be defective.
U.S. And International Patent Numbers: 6,409,203; 6,609,725; 6,945,550;6,910,609; Patents Pending
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-12 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 5
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
109/120
– 3 –
GEARC AGE™ R AMP ACCESSORY
GCRamp vC
P ARTS I DENTIFICATION
Parts ListItem Description Quantity
Tools Needed7/16" Wrench
7/16" Socket
If you are missing any items, contact your sales agent if the
product was assembled by them.If not, or if purchased from Let’s Go Aero, please contact us
at 1-877-GO-4-AERO (464-2376).
A Base Panels 3
B Side Tubes 2C Cross Tubes 4
D 3/4" x 1/4" Bolts 4E 1-3/4" x 1/4" Bolts 8F 1-1/4" x 1/4" Bolts 8
G 3/4" x 1/4" Washers 32H 1/4" Nyloc Nuts 13
I Ramp Stop Bracket Assembly 1J Ramp Stop Lever 1K Hinges 2
L 3" x 1/4" Bolts 2M Lynch Pin 1
N Pin Clip 1O End Caps 6
P 1/4" x 20 Split Ring Lock Washers 8
Q Seal Gaskets 8 A
A
K
L
FG
G
G
G
P
D
H
H
H
I
J
CO
Q
M
N
B
E
A
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-12 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 5
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
110/120
– 4 –
GEARC AGE™ R AMP ACCESSORY
GCRamp vC
1
2
3. Orient the outside Base Panels (A) to the Ramp TubeAssembly. Place the Hinges (K) over the end holes
in the outside Base Panels (A) nearest the Lynch Pinhole. Install eight (8) 1-1/4" x 1/4" Bolts (F) with 3/4" x
1/4" Washers (G) to secure the outside Base Panels(A) and Hinges (K) to the Ramp Tube Assembly. Donot tighten these bolts completely at this time.
3
4. Place the center Base Panel (A) between the two (2)outside panels. Use a 3/4" x 1/4" Bolt (D), two (2) 3/4"x 1/4" Washers (G) and a 1/4" Nyloc Nut (H) at each of
the four (4) locations to secure this panel to the outsidepanels.
Firmly tighten all hardware.
4
G EAR C AGE ™ R AMP ASSEMBLY
1. Place the Cross Tubes (C) between the Side Tubes(B) so that the ends of the Cross Tubes (C) line upwith the holes in the Side Tubes (B). Insert a Seal
Gasket (Q) into each end of each Cross Tube (C).Install a 1-3/4" x 1/4" Bolt (E) with a 3/4" x 1/4" Washer
(G) and 1/4" x 20 Split Ring Lock Washers (P) throughthe Side Tube (B) and into the pin nuts in the end ofeach Cross Tube (C).
Securely tighten all hardware.
2. Use a 1/4" Nyloc Nut (H) and a 3/4" x 1/4" Washer (G)to install the Lynch Pin (M) in the 3/8" hole in the SideTube (B). Secure the pin with the Pin Clip (N).
5
Side Tube (B)
Cross Tube (C)
3/4" x 1/4"
Washer (G)
1-3/4" x 1/4"
Bolt (E)
Lynch Pin (M)
1/4" x 20 Split RingLock Washer (P)
Pin Clip (N)
Lynch PinHole
Outside Base
Panels (A)
Hinges (K)
1-1/4" x 1/4"Bolt (F)
3/4" x 1/4"Washer (G)
5. Insert the Plastic End Caps (O) in the ends of the SideTubes (B).
Center Panel (A)
3/4" x 1/4" Bolts (D) with3/4" x 1/4" Washers (G)
3/4" x 1/4" Washers (G)with 1/4" Nyloc Nuts (H)
Plastic End Caps (O)
Plastic End Caps (O)
SealGaskets (Q)
1/4" Nyloc Nut(H) and 3/4" x1/4" Washer (G)
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-12 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 5
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
111/120
– 5 –
GEARC AGE™ R AMP ACCESSORY
GCRamp vC
8. Place the hole in the rounded end of the Ramp StopLever (J) over the hole in the vertical side of thebracket and secure it in place with the hardware from
the Ramp Stop Bracket Assembly (I).
Use the Pin Clip (N) to secure the other end of the
Ramp Stop Lever to the Lynch Pin (M) installed in
Step 2.
I NSTALL R AMP ON G EAR C AGE ™
C ARGO R ACK
When installing the 3" x 1/4" Bolts (L) with 1/4" NylocNuts (H), always make sure that at least two (2) threads
protrude through the nut. Failure to do so may cause theRamp to separate from the carrier in transit, resulting in
property damage, and bodily injury.
WARNING
6
6. Remove the tube on the passenger side of theGearCage™. Remove the bolts that mount theoutside panels on the GearCage to the U-Tube. Install
a 3" x 1/4" Bolt (L), two (2) 3/4" x 1/4" Washers (G)
and a 1/4" Nyloc Nut (H) through each Ramp Hinge tosecure the Ramp to the GearCage™.
7. Remove the bolt that secures the second Side Railfrom the end of the GearCage™. Place the bracket
from the Ramp Stop Bracket Assembly (I) over thehole and reinstall the bolt.
7
8
RampAssembly
GearCage™Cargo Rack
3/4" x 1/4"Washers (G)
3" x 1/4" Bolts(L)
3/4" x 1/4"Washer (G)
1/4" NylocNut (H)
Ramp StopBracket
Ramp StopLever
Pin Clip
Ramp Stop BracketAssembly Hardware
When operating the vehicle, the ramp must be either
removed, secured in the upright position as shown, orpositioned to lay flat on the GearCage™ Cargo Rack.
WARNING
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-12 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 5
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
112/120
Cequent Performance Products
47774 Anchor Court WestPlymouth, MI 48170
Technical Service: (888) 521-0510 5800300N 11-5-09 Rev
5800300
GearCage™ Ramp
Printed in China
ITEM:
DESCRIPTION:
User Assembly and Operat ion Manual
Part One
Safe Use and Operation Page 1
Part Two
Parts Identification Page 2
Part Three
Assembly and Installation Page 3
Operation Tips:
• Keep this manual for future reference.
• Recommended for use with the GearCage™ SP Cargo Rack.
I f th is product w as purchased from a dealer , al l documentat ion MUST be furnished to the customer.
Safe Use & Operat ion Be sure to follow these guidelines to prevent possible hazards from misuse.
• When operating the vehicle, the ramp must be either removed, secured in the upright position, or
positioned to lay flat on the GearCage™ SP Cargo Rack.
• Always secure the hinge bolts with locking nuts that are furnished with the Ramp Accessory so that at
least two (2) threads protrude through the nut’s nylon insert. Failure to do so may result in loss of ramp
from carrier in transit, property damage and bodily injury.
We warrant this product to the first consumer to be free from defect in material and workmanship for one year (Please retain your sales
slip for your records). Any product or part thereof found to be defective within that period will be replaced without charge provided that:
(1) the product was not misused; (2) no alterations or modifications were made; (3) its failure resulted from a defect in material or
workmanship and not from normal wear expected in the use of the product; (4) the product or part is delivered, freight prepaid, to
Cequent Performance Products Inc. Please contact Cequent Performance Products Inc., toll free, at 888-521-0510 to get a return
authorization number prior to return. Manufacturers only obligation shall be to replace such products or parts proved to be defective.
U.S. And International Patent Numbers: 6,409,203; 6,609,725; 6,945,550;6,910,609; Patents Pending
Page 1 of 4
Exhibit M
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
113/120
Cequent Performance Products
47774 Anchor Court WestPlymouth, MI 48170
Technical Service: (888) 521-0510 5800300N 11-5-09 Rev
5800300
GearCage™ Ramp
Parts List
Item Descr ip t ion Quant i ty
A Base Panels 3
B Side Tubes 2
C Cross Tubes 4
D 1/4" x 3/4" Bolts 5
E 1/4" x 2" Bolts 8
F 1/4" x 1-1/2" Bolts 8
G 1/4" Washers 31
H 1/4" Nyloc Nuts 16
I Ramp Stop Bracket Assembly 1
J Ramp Stop Lever 1
K Hinges 2
L 1/4" x 2-1/2" Bolts 2
M Lynch Pin 1
N Pin Clip 1
O End Caps 4
P 1/4" Split Ring Lock Washers 8
Q Seal Gaskets 8
If you are missing any items, contact your
sales agent if the product was assembled by
them. If not, or if purchased from Cequent
Performance Products Inc., please contact us
at 1-888-521-0510 .
Tools Needed
7/16" Wrench
7/16" Socket
Page 2 of 4
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
114/120
Cequent Performance Products
47774 Anchor Court WestPlymouth, MI 48170
Technical Service: (888) 521-0510 5800300N 11-5-09 Rev
5800300
GearCage™ Ramp
GearCage™ Ramp Assemb ly 1 . Place the Cross Tubes (C) between the Side Tubes (B)
so that the ends of the Cross Tubes (C) line up with the
holes in the Side Tubes (B). Insert a Seal Gasket (Q) into
each end of each Cross Tube (C).Install a 1/4" x 2" Bolt (E) with a 1/4" Washer (G) and 1/4"
Split Ring Lock Washers (P) through the Side Tube (B) and
into the pin nuts in the end of each Cross Tube (C).
Securely tighten all hardware.
Cross Tube (C)Side Tube (B)
Seal
Gaskets (Q)
¼” Flat washer (G)
¼” Lock washer (P)
¼” x 2” long bolt (E)
4. Place the center Base Panel (A) between the two (2)
outside panels. Use a 1/4" x 3/4" Bolt (D), two (2) 1/4"
Flat Washers (G) and a 1/4" Nyloc Nut (H) at each of the
four (4) locations to secure this panel to the outside
panels.Firmly tighten all hardware.
2. Use a 1/4" Nyloc Nut (H) and a 1/4" Washer (G) to install
the Lynch Pin (M) in the 3/8" hole in the Side Tube (B).
Secure the pin with the Pin Clip (N).
¼” Nyloc Nut (H)
¼” Flat washer (G)
Lynch
Pin (M)
Pin Clip (N)
¼” x ¾” Long Bolts (D)
¼” Flat washers (G)
Center Panel (A)
¼” Flat washers (G)
¼” Nyloc Nuts (H)
3. Orient the outside Base Panels (A) to the Ramp Tube
Assembly. Place the Hinges (K) over the end holes in the
outside Base Panels (A) nearest the Lynch Pin hole. Install
eight (8) 1-1/2" x 1/4" Bolts (F) with 1/4“ Washers (G) to
secure the outside Base Panels (A) and Hinges (K) to the
Ramp Tube Assembly. Do not tighten these bolts completely
at this time.
5. Insert the Plastic End Caps (O) in the ends of the Side
Tubes (B).
Lynch Pin
Hole
¼” Flat washer (G)¼” x 1-1/2”
Long Bolts (F)
Hinges (K)
Outside Base
Panels (A)
Plastic End Caps (O)
Plastic End Caps (O)
Page 3 of 4
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
115/120
Cequent Performance Products
47774 Anchor Court WestPlymouth, MI 48170
Technical Service: (888) 521-0510 5800300N 11-5-09 Rev
5800300
GearCage™ Ramp
Ins ta ll Ramp On GearCage™ Cargo Rack
6. Remove the tube on the passenger side of the
GearCage™. Remove the bolts that mount the outsidepanels on the GearCage to the U-Tube. Install a 1/4” x 2-
1/2" Bolt (L), two (2) 1/4" Washers (G) and a 1/4" Nyloc Nut
(H) through each Ramp Hinge to secure the Ramp to the
GearCage™.
W RNING
When installing the 1/4” x 2-1/2" Bolts (L) with 1/4"
Nyloc Nuts (H), always make sure that at least two (2)
threads protrude through the nut. Failure to do so may
cause the Ramp to separate from the carrier in transit,
resulting in property damage, and bodily injury.
¼” Flat washers (G)
¼” x 2-1/2” Long Bolts (L)
GearCage ™ Cargo Rack
Ramp
Assembly
¼” Nyloc Nuts (H)
¼” Flat washers (G)
7. Remove the bolt that secures the second Side Rail from
the end of the GearCage™. Place the bracket from the
Ramp Stop Bracket Assembly (I) over the hole and reinstall
the bolt.
W RNING
When operating the vehicle, the ramp must be either
removed, secured in the upright position as shown, orpositioned to lay flat on the GearCage™ Cargo Rack.
8. Place the hole in the rounded end of the Ramp Stop
Lever (J) over the hole in the vertical side of the bracket
and secure it in place with the hardware from the Ramp
Stop Bracket Assembly (I).
Use the Pin Clip (N) to secure the other end of the
Ramp Stop Lever to the Lynch Pin (M) installed in
Step 2.
Ramp Stop Bracket
Assembly Hardware
Pin Clip
Ramp Stop
Lever
Page 4 of 4
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
116/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-14 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2
Exhibit N
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
117/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-14 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
118/120
AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action
U NITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the
__________ District of __________
)
))
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff
v. Civil Action No.
Defendant
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION
To: (Defendant’s name and address)
A lawsuit has been filed against you.
Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you
are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.
P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,
whose name and address are:
If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.
You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
CLERK OF COURT
Date:Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-15 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
District of Colorado
LET'S GO AERO, INC. a Colorado corporation,
U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC. a Nevadacorporation
U-Haul International, Inc.
Martin D. Beier, Esq.Thomas M. Haskins, Esq.Silver & DeBoskey P.C.1801 York StreetDenver, CO 80206
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
119/120
AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action
U NITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the
__________ District of __________
)
))
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff
v. Civil Action No.
Defendant
SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION
To: (Defendant’s name and address)
A lawsuit has been filed against you.
Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you
are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.
P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of
the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,
whose name and address are:
If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.
You also must file your answer or motion with the court.
CLERK OF COURT
Date:Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-16 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1
District of Colorado
LET'S GO AERO, INC. a Colorado corporation,
WYERS PRODUCTS GROUP, INC., a Coloradocorporation d/b/a TRIMAX
Wyers Products Group, Inc. d/b/a TRIMAX
Martin D. Beier, Esq.Thomas M. Haskins, Esq.Silver & DeBoskey P.C.1801 York StreetDenver, CO 80206
-
8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint
120/120
Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-17 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1