let's go aero v. u-haul - complaint

Upload: sarah-burstein

Post on 07-Aug-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    1/120

     

    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

    Civil Action No.

    LET’S GO AERO, INC., a Colorado corporation 

    Plaintiff

    v.

    U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC., a Nevada

    corporation,

    and

    WYERS PRODUCTS GROUP, INC., a Colorado corporation

    d/b/a TRIMAX

    Defendants

    COMPLAINT AND JURY DEMAND 

    Plaintiff Let’s Go Aero, Inc., a Colorado corporation (“LGA”), as and for its Complaint

    against U-Haul International, Inc., a Nevada corporation (“U-Haul”) and Wyers Products Group,

    Inc., d/b/a Trimax, a Colorado corporation (“Wyers”), alleges and states as follows:

    SUMMARY OF CASE

    1.  This is an action for damages and injunctive relief to remedy the intellectual

     property infringements of LGA’s patents, copyrighted materials, and trademarks and unfair trade

     practices by the Defendants as described below through: (a) the unauthorized manufacture, use,

    sale, and/or offer to sell products by Defendants U-Haul and Wyers which infringe on one or

    more claims of U.S. Patents held by LGA which relate to its “Silent Hitch Pin®” or “SHP”, the

    LGA GearCage® and the LGA Bike Rack; and (b) Defendant U-Haul’s unlawful use and

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    2/120

     

    2

    infringements of LGA’s rights under its trademarks and copyrighted materials and U-Haul’s

    unfair trade practices.

    2.  The patent infringements by Defendant Wyers involve its manufacture, use, sale

    and/or offer for sale of infringing products which include towing products marketed and sold

    under the names of “TAR 300” and “Anti-Rattle Pin Receiver Pin” (“Wyers Accused Products”). 

    The Wyers Accused Products were sold to and by U-Haul.

    3.   Non-Party Cequent Performance Products, Inc. is a manufacturer, importer and

    supplier of products including Highland Gear Cage®, Transporter Cargo Carrier, PN 5800300,

    Pro Series Gear Cage, PN 5800300, Sportwing Bike Rack, and upon information and belief

    Silent Hitch Pin® or Anti Rattle Hitch Pin, all of which infringed on Plaintiff’s United States

    Patents after the termination of Cequent’s license to  manufacture and sell such products in

    January of 2012 and the selloff of approved remaining inventory, (“Cequent Infringing

    Products”) that were then sold through U-Haul.

    PARTIES AND RELEVANT NON-PARTIES

    4.  Plaintiff LGA is a Colorado corporation with its principal place of business in

    Colorado Springs, Colorado.

    5.  Defendant U-Haul is a Nevada corporation with its principal place of business at

    2727 N. Central Ave., Phoenix, Arizona 85004.

    6. 

    Defendant Wyers Products (“Wyers”) is a Colorado corporation with its principal

     place of business at 6770 S. Dawson Circle, Suite 200, Centennial, Colorado 80112.

    7.   Non- party Cequent Performance Products, Inc. (“Cequent”) is a Delaware

    corporation with its principal place of business in Plymouth, Michigan.

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    3/120

     

    3

    JURISDICTION AND VENUE

    8.  This Court has jurisdiction to render declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to

    28 U.S.C. §§ 2201 and 2202 as well as jurisdiction over the claims contained herein for patent

    infringement, copyright infringement, and trademark infringement pursuant to the laws of the

    United States, including but not limited to 35 U.S.C. §§ 101, et seq., (specifically 35 U.S.C.

    §§ 271, 281 to 287, 292), 17 U.S.C. §§ 101, et seq., and 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) and (c).  This Court

    also has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 and 1338. Supplemental jurisdiction over

    LGA’s state law claims exists pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1367 because they are so related to the

    other claims that together all of the claims form the same case or controversy.

    9.  This Court has personal jurisdiction over each of the Defendants because each

    regularly has and continues to transact business in this judicial district by, among other things,

    selling or offering to sell its infringing products and utilizing the LGA Trademark and

    Copyrighted Materials to enable such sales or offers to sell to customers located in this judicial

    district pursuant to C.R.S. § 13-1-124.

    10.  Venue is proper in this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1391(b), (c) and 1400(b).

    FACTUAL BACKGROUND

    LGA Inventions and Patents, Trademarks and Copyrighted Works

    11.  LGA is the sole assignee and beneficial owner of various patents for inventions

    created by its founder and president, Marty L. Williams.

    12.  LGA is a manufacturer and distributor of a variety of towing products for use

    within the camping/recreational cargo transport industry. Its product line can be viewed at

    www.letsgoaero.com.

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    4/120

     

    4

    13.  LGA sells its products through national retail and specialty stores throughout the

    United States and elsewhere, under its registered and un-registered trademarks and has

    achieved a world-wide reputation based upon the quality, design and innovation of LGA’s 

     products.

    LGA’s Silent Hitch Pin® Patents

    14.  The applicable Utility Patents that relate to the Silent Hitch Pin® (also listed as

    “SHP”)  were assigned to LGA and include Nos. 6,609,725 (“’725 Patent”) (Exhibit A), and

    6,945,550 (“’550 Patent”) (Exhibit B).

    15.  The ‘725 Patent  and ‘550 Patent are collectively referred to hereinafter as the

    “SHP Patents” and are in full force and effect.

    LGA’s GearCage® Patent

    16.  LGA was assigned a Utility Patent for its vehicle mounted cargo carrier,

    “GearCage®” product, No. 8,858,141 (“’141 Patent”) (Exhibit C).

    17.  The ‘141 Patent is referred to herein as the “GearCage® Patent”  and is in full

    force and effect.

    LGA’s Bike Rack Patent

    18.  LGA was assigned Design and Utility Patents for its “VME Bike Rack” product,

    Utility Patent No. 8,889,456 and Design Patent Nos. D684,917, D717,716, D717,717 and

    D722,289 (“’456 Patent” [Exhibit D] Design Patents D684,917 [Exhibit E], D717,716 [Exhibit

    F], D717,717 [Exhibit G] and D722,289 [Exhibit H].)

    19.  The ‘456 and Design Patents D684,917, D717,716, D717,717 and D722,289 are

    referred to herein as the “Bike Rack Patents.” 

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    5/120

     

    5

    LGA’s Trademarks

    20.  LGA has common law and registered trademarks on the “Silent Hitch Pin®”

    (SHP), first used in 1999, via U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,296,604 (Exhibit I) and on the

    GearCage®, first used in 2004, via U.S. Trademark Registration No. 4,296,605 (Exhibit J) and

    for Moover™, first used in 2006, all of which have become distinctive by the acquisition of

    secondary meaning pursuant to 15 U.S.C. 1052 (f). Defendant U-Haul was authorized to use

    these marks on its sale of Cequent’s properly licensed LGA products   and certain products

    manufactured by LGA under a short term agreement, until Cequent’s license was terminated and

    the private label agreement with LGA ceased, after which U-Haul would have no authority to use

    the trademarks. Other trademarks owned by LGA may be relevant to LGA’s claims. 

    LGA Copyrights

    21.  LGA owns the copyright for LGA Cargo Rack Operating Manuals, GearCage®  

    Ramp Accessory, Moover™ Transporter System, GearCage® SP Cargo Rack, GearCage® TT

    Cargo Rack, TwinTube U-Build-IT registered with the U.S. Copyright Office, (No. TXu 1-847-

    969) (“LGA Copyrights”) (shown in Exhibit K) as well as other copyrights on works of text, line

    art and photos which upon discovery may have been infringed by one or both Defendants.

    Defendants’ Misconduct

    22.  In April of 2012, U-Haul signed a non-disclosure agreement with LGA related to

    U-Haul’s potential licensing or sale of certain LGA inventions  and intellectual property,

    including the SHP and the GearCage®. After the termination of Cequent’s license in January of

    2012, and any approved sell-off of Cequent’s inventory,  U-Haul was never again licensed by

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    6/120

     

    6

    LGA to sell the Silent Hitch Pin®, the VME Bike Rack,or the GearCage®, to copy any of LGA

    manuals and sales materials, or to use LGA’s trademarks.

    23.  Through direct and email communications with LGA beginning in the year 2001,

    Wyers gained knowledge of LGA’s SHP, and received actual product samples in 2001, to review

    for licensing the technology from LGA or using LGA as a private label source for the SHP

     product.

    24.   Nevertheless, on information and belief, from and after January 29, 2012, and the

    sell-off of any remaining inventory, Defendant U-Haul has purchased, imported, distributed,

    sold, offered to sell, licensed and/or obtained financial benefit from marketing and sale of the

    infringing copies of LGA’s patented designs for Silent Hitch Pin®, the GearCage® and the Bike

    Rack without the agreement or consent of LGA.

    25.  Defendant Wyers manufactures and sells the Wyers Accused Products which

    unlawfully copy and infringe on LGA’s Silent Hitch Pin® patents, and which are inferior to and

    “knock -off” the SHP products.

    26.  On information and belief, U-Haul has acquired from Cequent, after the

    termination of Cequent’s license and after the sell-off of licensed inventory, the Accused

    Products and falsely sold and promoted the Cequent Accused Products to be LGA’s Silent Hitch

    Pin® using the “Silent Hitch Pin®”, “Gear Cage®” and “Moover ™” trademarks.

    27. 

    These sales by Wyers and U-Haul occurred without attribution of true ownership

    including by mislabeling or misrepresentation as to the nature of the product, and without

    consent or authority from LGA to do so.

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    7/120

     

    7

    28.  Wyers has made, used, sold and/or offered for sale within the United States,

    towing products, including the Wyers Accused Products that infringe at least claims 1, 2, 3 and 4

    of the ‘725 Patent. 

    29.  Wyers has made, used, sold and/or offered for sale within the United States,

    towing products, including the Wyers Accused Products, that infringe at least claims 1, 2, 3 and

    6 of the ‘550 Patent.

    30.  U-Haul has used, sold and/or offered for sale within the United States, towing

     products, including the Cequent infringing SHP product that infringes at least claims 1, 2, 3 and

    4 of the ‘725 Patent.

    31.  U-Haul has used, sold and/or offered for sale within the United States towing

     products, including Cequent Accused Products. Cequent infringing SHP products infringe at

    least claims 1, 2, 3 and 6 of the ‘550 Patent.

    32.  U-Haul has used, sold and/or offered for sale within the United States,

    GearCage® towing products, including the Cequent infringing GearCage® product, that

    infringes at least claims 1-8 of the ‘141 Patent. 

    33.  U-Haul has used, sold and/or offered for sale within the United States, towing

     products, including Cequent’s infringing Bike Rack products, that infringe at least claims 1-6 of

    the ‘456 Patent and Design Patents D684,917, D717,716, D717,717 and D722,289.

    34. 

    All Cequent infringing products are designated as “Cequent Infringing Products.” 

    35.  U-Haul has also infringed the SHP Patents by reselling the Wyers Accused

    Products knowing that Wyers is thereby infringing the SHP Patents.

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    8/120

     

    8

    36.  U-Haul marketed and sold the Cequent Infringing Products to the public,

    representing them to be LGA’s SHPs, LGA’s GearCage® and LGA’s Bike Racks, including

    using LGA’s trademark s, “Silent Hitch Pin®”, “GearCage®” and “Moover™.” 

    37.  In or about September of 2014, U-Haul discontinued selling the infringing

    Cequent Product SHPs and started selling the infringing Wyers Accused Products to the public

    instead.

    38.  The marketing and product materials U-Haul provides to customers (shown in

    Exhibit M), copies, distributes, displays, and makes derivative works of photos, line art, text and

    content created and owned by LGA and subject to registered copyright (Exhibit K) and thereby

    infringes LGA’s copyrighted works. 

    39.  On information and belief, U-Haul has been and is now selling the infringing

    Wyers and Cequent Infringing Products, and distributing copies of LGA’s copyrighted works 

    through various wholesale and retail outlets, including but not limited to U-Haul Moving and

    Storage of Highlands Ranch, 1750 E. County Line Rd., Highlands Ranch, CO 80126. The

    wholesale and retail outlets where the Wyers and Cequent Products are sold are located in

    Colorado and elsewhere.

    40.  Upon information and belief, LGA’s copyright  management information

    contained on LGA’s copyrighted works was removed in order to further conceal the infringing

    action. U-Haul knew or should have known of LGA’s rights and the fact that the copyright

    management information had been altered. U-Haul’s sale and distribution of the infringing

     products and copyright was in violation of 17 U.S.C. § 1202.

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    9/120

     

    9

    41.  U-Haul sells Cequent Infringing Products with Plaintiff LGA’s patent numbers 

    (See Exhibit N) and patent markings and otherwise represented that the Cequent Infringing

    Products were genuine LGA SHP, GearCage® and Bike Rack products when U-Haul had no

    such authority and acted with knowledge that U-Haul was marketing and selling infringing

     products and counterfeit goods. The mis-marking and misrepresentation of the Cequent

    Infringing Products without LGA’s authority or permission was an essential material element in

    U-Haul’s marketing of these infringing products.

    42. 

    By mis-marking and improperly marketing the Cequent Infringing Products, and

     by misrepresenting that it had LGA’s authority to sell them and use LGA’s designs, trademarks

    and patent numbers, U-Haul has unfairly competed with LGA, resulting in lost sales and sales

    opportunities, and impaired LGA’s ability to gain market share and customers.

    43.  With knowledge of LGA’s intellectual property rights, Wyers has encouraged and

    instructed purchasers of the Wyers Accused Products to sell, market and use them as

    replacement Silent Hitch Pin®s, such that purchasers and users of the Wyers Accused Products

    inevitably infringe the SHP Patents. Wyers has actively induced and contributed to the

    infringement of the SHP Patents by the end users of the Wyers Accused Products by a history of

    sales to U-Haul and Curt Manufacturing and others, for whom Wyers produced private label

    knock-offs of the SHP.

    44. 

    U-Haul has, or in conjunction with others, taken these actions while mismarking

    and falsely misrepresenting their products as LGA’s SHP, GearCage® and Bike Racks, and have

    misrepresented the facts of invention and ownership of the licensing patents to the SHP, Bike

    Rack and/or GearCage® products sold to the public, knowing those facts were false.

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    10/120

     

    10

    45.  U-Haul and Wyers each acted with the intent to injure LGA and to unlawfully

     profit from LGA’s innovations of the SHP, Bike Rack and/or GearCage®.

    46.  LGA has been harmed by Defendants’  trademark infringement and mislabeling

    of the SHP, Bike Rack and GearCage® products that Defendants sold to the public, including

    damage to LGA’s goodwill.

    47.  U-Haul and Wyers have, separately or together violated, and conspired with

    others to violate, LGA’s intellectual property rights on more than two occasions.

    48. 

    U-Haul and Wyers knew, should have known, or acted in reckless disregard of

    LGA’s ownership to and rights in the patents for the SHP, Bike Rack and GearCage® products,

    the trademarks and the copyrights of the works of authorship.

    49.  LGA has suffered damage flowing from the false representations, mismarking of

     products, and infringements by Defendants’ conduct.

    CAUSES OF ACTION AND CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

    FIRST CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (Declaratory Judgment Against All Defendants)

    50.  LGA incorporates fully by reference all of the allegations contained in paragraphs

    1 through 49, as set forth above.

    51.  Pursuant to F.R.C.P. 57 this Court has the power to declare the rights, status, and

    legal relations of LGA and the Defendants with respect to the infringing and falsely labeled

    SHPs and the wrongful sales thereof.

    52.  An actual existing and bona fide  antagonistic assertion and denial of right and

    actual justiciable controversy exists between LGA and the Defendants and each of them as to

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    11/120

     

    11

    their legal relations with respect to the Accused Products and SHPs which can only be

    determined by declaratory judgment.

    53.  By reason of the Defendants’ conduct as set forth in this Complaint, LGA seeks,

    among other relief, the following declarations (“Declarations”):

    a.   Neither of the Defendants have the lawful right to distribute, re-label

    and/or sell the SHPs or products identical or substantially similar thereto,

    such as the Wyers Accused Products and/or the Cequent Products without

    the express consent of LGA;

     b.  LGA has not consented to the sale, re-labeling or distribution of the

    Wyers Accused Products or Cequent Products by either of the Defendants;

    c.  Defendants should each be enjoined and restrained from manufacturing,

    advertising, re-labeling, distributing or selling the Wyers Accused

    Products and/or the Cequent Infringing Products and from holding out in

    any way a claim of ownership, right, or authority to manufacture or sell

    the Wyers Accused Products and/or Cequent Infringing Products, without

    the express prior consent of LGA;

    d.  The acts and omissions of Defendants or either of them with respect to the

    Wyers Accused Products and/or Cequent Infringing Products were

    conducted knowingly, willfully, and in bad faith;

    e.  LGA has been damaged and Defendants have each been unjustly enriched

     by their misconduct.

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 11 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    12/120

     

    12

    SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (Direct Infringement of Patents Against All Defendants)

    54.  LGA incorporates fully by reference all of the allegations contained in paragraphs

    1 through 53, as set forth above.

    55.  Since at least January 29, 2012 and to the present, U-Haul has and continues to

    willfully and knowingly purchase, use, distribute, license, sell and/or offer for sale products

    which infringe LGA’s patents in SHP, GearCage® and the Bike Rack without right and in

    violation of LGA’s rights therein.

    56.  Wyers, by its manufacture, sale, and offer for sale of its Anti-Rattle Receiver Pin

    (ARRP), is willfully infringing LGA’s SHP Patents. 

    57.  U-Haul is a reseller of the infringing Wyers Accused Products (ARRP) and knows

    those products infringe LGA’s SHP Patents.

    58.  By way of U-Haul’s trademark infringement and use of SHP’s patent marking,

    consumers have been confused by U-Haul’s sale of products and have called on LGA to provide

    customer service or warranty work on those products. To protect its reputation, LGA has

     provided these consumers with customer service and warranty work.

    59.  Defendants’ infringements are and at all times have been willful, deliberate, and

    intentional and with full knowledge of LGA’s rights in  the SHP Patents, the Bike Rack Patent

    and/or the GearCage® Patent.

    60.  The acts alleged above will continue unless enjoined by this Court, and

    Defendants have damaged LGA by reducing LGA’s sales, injuring LGA’s reputation and

    deceiving the public, thus causing Plaintiff LGA irreparable harm, the extent of which is

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 12 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    13/120

     

    13

     presently unknown. LGA has no adequate remedy at law and injunctive relief, both preliminary

    and permanent, should be granted.

    61.  U-Haul for its infringement of the Bike Rack design patents should be required to

    account to LGA for its profits from such infringements from and after January 29, 2012, or as the

    date of issue of each design patent. LGA should also be awarded its damages for the utility

     patent infringement as against each Defendant in an amount adequate to compensate for such

    infringements, but in no event less than a reasonable royalty for the use made by Defendants as

     provided by 35 U.S.C. § 284, together with reasonable attorneys’ fees pursuant to 35 U.S.C.

    § 285 and such other damages as may be allowable by law due to the exceptional nature of the

    infringement.

    THIRD CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (Inducement to Infringe the SHP Patents Against Defendant Wyers)

    62.  LGA incorporates fully by reference all of the allegations contained in paragraphs

    1 through 61, as set forth above.

    63.  Defendant Wyers had actual knowledge of the SHP Patents.

    64.  Defendant Wyers sold Defendant U-Haul the infringing Wyers Accused Products

     by producing private label knock-off supplies of the SHP product for U-Haul with actual

    knowledge that the products infringed LGA SHP patents.

    65. 

    Defendant Wyers knew that Defendant U-Haul and other users, as the purchaser

    and user of the Wyers Accused Products, would by that use infringe the SHP Patents.

    66.  Defendant Wyers is liable to Plaintiff LGA for inducing the infringement of the

    SHP Patents as provided by 35 U.S.C. §271(b).

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 13 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    14/120

     

    14

    FOURTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (Trademark Infringement and Unfair Competition Against Defendant U-Haul)

    67.  LGA incorporates fully by reference all of the allegations contained in paragraphs

    1 through 66, as set forth above.

    68.  LGA is owner of the LGA Trademarks identified as “GearCage®”,

    “GearSpace®”, “GearDeck®,” “TwinTube®” and “Silent Hitch Pin®” both by way of common

    law rights through direct use and licensed use, and by way of registration at the USPTO. LGA

    also owns the common law trademark rights in Moover™. 

    69.  The LGA’s rights in the Trademarks are valid and by way of secondary meaning

     protectable.

    70.  On information and belief, U-Haul has, since January 29, 2012 or after the

    authorized sell-off of licensed Cequent Products, infringed on LGA’s Trademarks and competed

    unfairly in violation of the Colorado Consumer Protection Act 6-1-101 et seq. and Federal

    Lanham Act 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a) by using and displaying them in commerce in multiple retail

    outlets and on the internet, without the permission of LGA, in advertising and packaging for

     products sold or supplied to others in violation of LGA’s rights in the LGA Trademarks, all to

    the detriment and damage of LGA. Such representations by U-Haul are either false, misleading

    or have a tendency to deceive consumers purchasing either product.

    71. 

    U-Haul’s affirmative and material misrepresentations in commercial advertising

    and promotion have been disseminated to its customers and potential customers, many, if not all,

    of whom are also customers or potential customers of LGA, which is likely to cause confusion.

    The marks are similar, if not identical.

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 14 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    15/120

     

    15

    72.  Customers have been actually confused and/or deceived by the false claims

     published by U-Haul. LGA and U-Haul market the same products and use the same marketing

    channels in Colorado. U-Haul’s advertising and promotion are likely to further deceive existing

    and potential customers of the parties by implying a licensing relationship between the parties

    and/or by implying deficiencies in LGA’s products that do not exist.

    73.  The actions of U-Haul have and are likely to continue to injure LGA by confusing

    the public and by causing LGA to lose customers and sales, resulting in business losses in an

    amount to be determined at trial and that are presently unknown to LGA, but that are believed to

     be substantial and are accumulating on an ongoing basis. Because of U-Haul’s intentional and

    willful infringement, LGA is entitled to recover U-Haul’s profits, LGA’s damages, including

    trebled amount, prejudgment interest, and costs as provided by C.R.S. 6-1-113 and 15 U.S.C.

    § 1117 (a), (b) and (c). Further the facts support recovery of LGA’s attorneys’ fees as the

    infringement is exceptional.

    74.  The actions of U-Haul have and will continue to cause LGA substantial harm.

    LGA has a reasonable interest in its products, including GearCage® and Silent Hitch Pin® and

    which interest has been harmed or is subject to harm from the affirmative misrepresentations of

    U-Haul.

    75.  The damage to LGA’s reputation and goodwill is continuing. U-Haul has caused

    and continues to cause irreparable harm to LGA for which LGA is entitled to preliminary and

     permanent injunctive relief.

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 15 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    16/120

     

    16

    FIFTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (Copyright Infringement Against Defendant U-Haul)

    76.  LGA incorporates fully by reference all of the allegations contained in paragraphs

    1 through 75, as set forth above.

    77.  LGA possesses valid copyrights as evidenced by the registration. (Exhibit K)

    78.  On information and belief, U-Haul has willfully infringed on, misappropriated,

    copied and distributed protectable elements of LGA’s copyrights, images and written manuals

    developed by LGA for its GearCage® invention, with the intent to commercially exploit these

    works to which U-Haul has no proprietary rights. U-Haul has published, distributed and used

    LGA’s copyr ighted materials, without the permission of LGA, in advertising and packaging for

    U-Haul’s products sold or supplied to others in violation of LGA’s rights, all to the detriment

    and damage of LGA.

    79.  As an example of the use of Plaintiff’s copyrighted material we include Exhibit N

    with a comparison of materials from Plaintiff and U-Haul’s sales and manual material.

    80.  By reason of these willful infringements of copyrights, LGA has sustained injury,

    loss and damage to its ownership rights and Defendant U-Haul has unlawfully, unfairly and

    wrongfully derived and will continue to derive income from these infringing acts.

    81.  For the infringements, LGA seeks its damages and U-Haul’s profits, or applicable

    statutory damages as provided by 17 U.S.C. § 504 and cost and atto rneys’ fees under 17 U.S.C. §

    505.

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 16 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    17/120

     

    17

    SIXTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (Copyright Infringement Against Defendant U-Haul)

    82.  LGA incorporates fully by reference all of the allegations contained in paragraphs

    1 through 81, as set forth above.

    83.  By removing LGA’s copyright management information from the LGA sales

    materials and owner ’s manuals and replacing it with U-Haul’s, U-Haul infringed LGA’s

    copyright under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, 17 U.S.C. § 1202(a) and (b).

    84. 

    LGA is entitled to damages or statutory damages pursuant to 17 U.S.C. § 1203

    and attorneys’ fees.

    SEVENTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (Passing Off Against Defendant U-Haul) 

    85.  LGA incorporates fully by reference all of the allegations contained in paragraphs

    1 through 84, as set forth above.

    86.  The Cequent Products (knock-offs of the Silent Hitch Pin® and GearCage®) that

    have been marketed, licensed and sold by U-Haul, were obtained by U-Haul from Cequent.

    87.  U-Haul falsely designated and misrepresented the origin of the Accused Products

    it sold to the public and represented them to the public as LGA being the origin of those products

     by the use of LGA’s trademarks.

    88.  U-Haul’s false designation of the origin of its products was likely to cause and has

    caused customer confusion.

    89.  LGA has been harmed by U-Haul’s false designation of the origin of the Accused

    Products sold to the public, including but not limited to damage to LGA’s goodwill from U-

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 17 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    18/120

     

    18

    Haul’s sale of defective or inferior products identical to or intended to resemble LGA’s SHP and

    GearCage® products.

    EIGHTH CLAIM FOR RELIEF

    (Patent Mismarking)

    90.  LGA incorporates fully by reference all of the allegations contained in paragraphs

    1 through 89, as set forth above.

    91.  U-Haul has distributed and published information with their infringing products

    that falsely claims that their infringing products are sold and offered for sale with the

    authorization of LGA by the inclusion of LGA’s patent numbers. 

    92.  U-Haul knew that as of the termination of Cequent’s licensing with LGA,

    Cequent was no longer licensed to manufacture, sell or offer for sale the SHP or any other LGA

     product.

    93.  U-Haul by continuing to sell and offer for sale the SHP product, with LGA’s

     patent numbers listed, was misleading consumers.

    94.  U-Haul’s actions have caused LGA damage and lost sales  due to said

    misrepresentation.

    95.  As provided by 35 U.S.C. § 292, U-Haul is liable for said mismarking for each

     product sold with the false patent numbers.

    PRAYER FOR RELIEF

    WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Let’s Go Aero, Inc. requests that the Court:

    a.  issue an Order containing the Declarations set forth above;

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 18 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    19/120

     

    19

     b.  award LGA compensatory and multiplied damages against Defendants

     jointly and severally, for amounts to be proven at trial, to the fullest extent

     provided by law;

    c.  statutory damages where permitted for copyright infringement;

    d.  order Defendants to account for all sales, purchases, revenues and profits

    derived from its or their improper use and sale of LGA’s SHPs,

    GearCage® and Bike Rack and to disgorge the profits forthwith or,

    alternatively, for judgment in the amount of at least a reasonable royalty;

    e.  award LGA its reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs to the fullest extent

     provided by law and equity and for such other and further relief as the

    nature of the case may require;

    f.  issue preliminary and permanent injunctions enjoining each of the

    Defendants and their affiliated officers, directors, representatives,

    successors and assigns and all those in active concert or active

     participation with either of them:

    i.  from advertising or selling the SHPs; and,

    ii.  from aiding, abetting or inducing in any way the sale thereof by

    others without LGA’s consent;

    f. 

    order each of the Defendants to undertake a corrective advertising

    campaign to rectify the confusion, deception, or misrepresentations caused

     by their illegal actions; and,

    g.  grant such other and further relief as the nature of the case may require.

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 19 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    20/120

     

    20

    PLAINTIFF REQUESTS TRIAL BY JURY ON ALL CLAIMS SO TRIABLE

    Dated: February 19, 2016.

    Respectfully submitted,

    SILVER & DeBOSKEY,

    A Professional Corporation

    By:  /s/Martin D. Beier  

    Thomas M. Haskins III (#17651)

    Martin D. Beier (#20188)Silver & DeBoskey P.C.

    1801 York Street

    Denver, CO 80206(303) 399-3000

    [email protected] 

     [email protected] 

    J. Mark Smith (#973)

    BERG HILL GREENLEAF R USCITTI LLP

    1525 17th

     StreetDenver, CO 80202

    (303) 402-1600

    [email protected] 

    ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF

    FK0861

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 20 of 20

    mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    21/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6

    Exhibit A

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    22/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    23/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 6

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    24/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 6

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    25/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 6

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    26/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-1 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 6

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    27/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-2 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 6

    Exhibit B

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    28/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-2 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 6

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    29/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-2 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 6

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    30/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-2 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 6

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    31/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-2 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 6

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    32/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-2 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 6

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    33/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10

    Exhibit C

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    34/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    35/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    36/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    37/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    38/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    39/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    40/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    41/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    42/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-3 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    43/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 20

    Exhibit D

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    44/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    45/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    46/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    47/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    48/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    49/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    50/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    51/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    52/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    53/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 11 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    54/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 12 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    55/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 13 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    56/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 14 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    57/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 15 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    58/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 16 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    59/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 17 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    60/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 18 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    61/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 19 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    62/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-4 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 20 of 20

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    63/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-5 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9

    Exhibit E

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    64/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-5 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 9

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    65/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-5 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 9

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    66/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-5 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 9

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    67/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-5 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 9

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    68/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-5 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 9

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    69/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-5 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 9

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    70/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-5 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 9

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    71/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-5 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 9

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    72/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10

    Exhibit F

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    73/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    74/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    75/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    76/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    77/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    78/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    79/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    80/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    81/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-6 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    82/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 10

    Exhibit G

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    83/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    84/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    85/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    86/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    87/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    88/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    89/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    90/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    91/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-7 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 10 of 10

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    92/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-8 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 9

    Exhibit H

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    93/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-8 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 9

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    94/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-8 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 9

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    95/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-8 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 9

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    96/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-8 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 9

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    97/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-8 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 6 of 9

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    98/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-8 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 7 of 9

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    99/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-8 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 8 of 9

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    100/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-8 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 9 of 9

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    101/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-9 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2

    Exhibit I

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    102/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-9 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    103/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-10 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2

    Exhibit J

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    104/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-10 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    105/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-11 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2

    Exhibit K

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    106/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-11 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    107/120

    Operation Tips: 

    •  Keep this manual for future reference.

    •  Recommended for use with the GearCage™ SP Cargo Rack.

    If this product was purchased from a dealer, all documentation MUST be furnished to the customer.

    Part One Safe Use and Operation Page 2

    Part Two Parts Identification Page 3

    Part Three Assembly and Installation Page 4

    GEARC AGE™ R AMP ACCESSORY ACC 3050, ACCESSORY  R AMP FOR GEARC AGE™ C ARGO R ACK

    User Assembly and Operation Manual

    © Copyright 2006 Let’s Go Aero, Inc.

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-12 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 5

    Exhibit L

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    108/120

     – 2 – 

    GEARC AGE™ R AMP ACCESSORY 

    GCRamp vC

    S AFE  U SE  & O PERATION Be sure to follow these guidelines to prevent possible hazards from misuse.

    • When operating the vehicle, the ramp must be either removed, secured in the upright position, or positioned tolay flat on the GearCage™ SP Cargo Rack.

    • Always secure the hinge bolts with locking nuts that are furnished with the Ramp Accessory so that at least two(2) threads protrude through the nut’s nylon insert. Failure to do so may result in loss of ramp from carrier in

    transit, property damage and bodily injury.

    We warrant this product to the first consumer to be free from defect in material and workmanship for one year (Please retain your sales slip for your records)Any product or part thereof found to be defective within that period will be replaced without charge provided that: (1) the product was not misused; (2) noalterations or modifications were made; (3) its failure resulted from a defect in material or workmanship and not from normal wear expected in the use ofthe product; (4) the product or part is delivered, freight prepaid, to Let’s Go Aero. Please contact Let’s Go Aero, toll free, at 877-464-2376 to get a returnauthorization number prior to return. Manufacturers only obligation shall be to replace such products or parts proved to be defective.

    U.S. And International Patent Numbers: 6,409,203; 6,609,725; 6,945,550;6,910,609; Patents Pending

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-12 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 5

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    109/120

     – 3 – 

    GEARC AGE™ R AMP ACCESSORY 

    GCRamp vC

    P ARTS  I DENTIFICATION 

    Parts ListItem Description Quantity 

    Tools Needed7/16" Wrench

    7/16" Socket

    If you are missing any items, contact your sales agent if the

    product was assembled by them.If not, or if purchased from Let’s Go Aero, please contact us

    at 1-877-GO-4-AERO (464-2376).

    A Base Panels 3

    B Side Tubes 2C Cross Tubes 4

    D 3/4" x 1/4" Bolts 4E 1-3/4" x 1/4" Bolts 8F 1-1/4" x 1/4" Bolts 8

    G 3/4" x 1/4" Washers 32H 1/4" Nyloc Nuts 13

    I Ramp Stop Bracket Assembly 1J Ramp Stop Lever 1K Hinges 2

    L 3" x 1/4" Bolts 2M Lynch Pin 1

    N Pin Clip 1O End Caps 6

    P 1/4" x 20 Split Ring Lock Washers 8

    Q Seal Gaskets 8  A

     A

    K

    L

    FG

    G

    G

    G

    P

    D

    H

    H

    H

    I

    J

    CO

    Q

    M

    N

    B

    E

     A

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-12 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 3 of 5

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    110/120

     – 4 – 

    GEARC AGE™ R AMP ACCESSORY 

    GCRamp vC

    1

    3.  Orient the outside Base Panels (A) to the Ramp TubeAssembly. Place the Hinges (K) over the end holes

    in the outside Base Panels (A) nearest the Lynch Pinhole. Install eight (8) 1-1/4" x 1/4" Bolts (F) with 3/4" x

    1/4" Washers (G) to secure the outside Base Panels(A) and Hinges (K) to the Ramp Tube Assembly. Donot tighten these bolts completely at this time.

    4.  Place the center Base Panel (A) between the two (2)outside panels. Use a 3/4" x 1/4" Bolt (D), two (2) 3/4"x 1/4" Washers (G) and a 1/4" Nyloc Nut (H) at each of

    the four (4) locations to secure this panel to the outsidepanels.

    Firmly tighten all hardware.

    G EAR C AGE ™ R AMP  ASSEMBLY 

    1.  Place the Cross Tubes (C) between the Side Tubes(B) so that the ends of the Cross Tubes (C) line upwith the holes in the Side Tubes (B). Insert a Seal

    Gasket (Q) into each end of each Cross Tube (C).Install a 1-3/4" x 1/4" Bolt (E) with a 3/4" x 1/4" Washer

    (G) and 1/4" x 20 Split Ring Lock Washers (P) throughthe Side Tube (B) and into the pin nuts in the end ofeach Cross Tube (C). 

    Securely tighten all hardware.

    2. Use a 1/4" Nyloc Nut (H) and a 3/4" x 1/4" Washer (G)to install the Lynch Pin (M) in the 3/8" hole in the SideTube (B). Secure the pin with the Pin Clip (N).

    Side Tube (B)

    Cross Tube (C)

    3/4" x 1/4"

    Washer (G)

    1-3/4" x 1/4"

    Bolt (E)

    Lynch Pin (M)

    1/4" x 20 Split RingLock Washer (P)

    Pin Clip (N)

    Lynch PinHole

    Outside Base

    Panels (A)

    Hinges (K)

    1-1/4" x 1/4"Bolt (F)

    3/4" x 1/4"Washer (G)

    5.  Insert the Plastic End Caps (O) in the ends of the SideTubes (B).

    Center Panel (A)

    3/4" x 1/4" Bolts (D) with3/4" x 1/4" Washers (G)

    3/4" x 1/4" Washers (G)with 1/4" Nyloc Nuts (H)

    Plastic End Caps (O)

    Plastic End Caps (O)

    SealGaskets (Q)

    1/4" Nyloc Nut(H) and 3/4" x1/4" Washer (G)

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-12 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 4 of 5

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    111/120

     – 5 – 

    GEARC AGE™ R AMP ACCESSORY 

    GCRamp vC

    8.  Place the hole in the rounded end of the Ramp StopLever (J) over the hole in the vertical side of thebracket and secure it in place with the hardware from

    the Ramp Stop Bracket Assembly (I).

    Use the Pin Clip (N) to secure the other end of the

    Ramp Stop Lever to the Lynch Pin (M) installed in

    Step 2.

    I NSTALL R AMP  ON  G EAR C AGE ™

    C ARGO  R ACK 

    When installing the 3" x 1/4" Bolts (L) with 1/4" NylocNuts (H), always make sure that at least two (2) threads

    protrude through the nut. Failure to do so may cause theRamp to separate from the carrier in transit, resulting in

    property damage, and bodily injury.

    WARNING

    6.  Remove the tube on the passenger side of theGearCage™. Remove the bolts that mount theoutside panels on the GearCage to the U-Tube. Install

    a 3" x 1/4" Bolt (L), two (2) 3/4" x 1/4" Washers (G)

    and a 1/4" Nyloc Nut (H) through each Ramp Hinge tosecure the Ramp to the GearCage™.

    7.  Remove the bolt that secures the second Side Railfrom the end of the GearCage™. Place the bracket

    from the Ramp Stop Bracket Assembly (I) over thehole and reinstall the bolt.

    RampAssembly

    GearCage™Cargo Rack

    3/4" x 1/4"Washers (G)

    3" x 1/4" Bolts(L)

    3/4" x 1/4"Washer (G)

    1/4" NylocNut (H)

    Ramp StopBracket

    Ramp StopLever

    Pin Clip

    Ramp Stop BracketAssembly Hardware

    When operating the vehicle, the ramp must be either

    removed, secured in the upright position as shown, orpositioned to lay flat on the GearCage™ Cargo Rack.

    WARNING

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-12 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 5 of 5

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    112/120

    Cequent Performance Products

    47774 Anchor Court WestPlymouth, MI 48170

    Technical Service: (888) 521-0510 5800300N 11-5-09 Rev

    5800300

    GearCage™ Ramp

    Printed in China

    ITEM:

    DESCRIPTION:

    User Assembly and Operat ion Manual 

    Part One 

    Safe Use and Operation Page 1

    Part Two 

    Parts Identification Page 2

    Part Three 

     Assembly and Installation Page 3

    Operation Tips:

    • Keep this manual for future reference.

    • Recommended for use with the GearCage™ SP Cargo Rack.

    I f th is product w as purchased from a dealer , al l documentat ion MUST be furnished to the customer.

    Safe Use & Operat ion Be sure to follow these guidelines to prevent possible hazards from misuse.

    • When operating the vehicle, the ramp must be either removed, secured in the upright position, or

    positioned to lay flat on the GearCage™ SP Cargo Rack.

    • Always secure the hinge bolts with locking nuts that are furnished with the Ramp Accessory so that at

    least two (2) threads protrude through the nut’s nylon insert. Failure to do so may result in loss of ramp

    from carrier in transit, property damage and bodily injury.

    We warrant this product to the first consumer to be free from defect in material and workmanship for one year (Please retain your sales

    slip for your records). Any product or part thereof found to be defective within that period will be replaced without charge provided that:

    (1) the product was not misused; (2) no alterations or modifications were made; (3) its failure resulted from a defect in material or

    workmanship and not from normal wear expected in the use of the product; (4) the product or part is delivered, freight prepaid, to

    Cequent Performance Products Inc. Please contact Cequent Performance Products Inc., toll free, at 888-521-0510 to get a return

    authorization number prior to return. Manufacturers only obligation shall be to replace such products or parts proved to be defective.

    U.S. And International Patent Numbers: 6,409,203; 6,609,725; 6,945,550;6,910,609; Patents Pending

    Page 1 of 4

    Exhibit M

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    113/120

    Cequent Performance Products

    47774 Anchor Court WestPlymouth, MI 48170

    Technical Service: (888) 521-0510 5800300N 11-5-09 Rev

    5800300

    GearCage™ Ramp

    Parts List

    Item Descr ip t ion Quant i ty  

     A Base Panels 3

    B Side Tubes 2

    C Cross Tubes 4

    D 1/4" x 3/4" Bolts 5

    E 1/4" x 2" Bolts 8

    F 1/4" x 1-1/2" Bolts 8

    G 1/4" Washers 31

    H 1/4" Nyloc Nuts 16

    I Ramp Stop Bracket Assembly 1

    J Ramp Stop Lever 1

    K Hinges 2

    L 1/4" x 2-1/2" Bolts 2

    M Lynch Pin 1

    N Pin Clip 1

    O End Caps 4

    P 1/4" Split Ring Lock Washers 8

    Q Seal Gaskets 8

    If you are missing any items, contact your

    sales agent if the product was assembled by

    them. If not, or if purchased from Cequent

    Performance Products Inc., please contact us

    at 1-888-521-0510 .

    Tools Needed

    7/16" Wrench

    7/16" Socket

    Page 2 of 4

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    114/120

    Cequent Performance Products

    47774 Anchor Court WestPlymouth, MI 48170

    Technical Service: (888) 521-0510 5800300N 11-5-09 Rev

    5800300

    GearCage™ Ramp

    GearCage™ Ramp Assemb ly 1 . Place the Cross Tubes (C) between the Side Tubes (B)

    so that the ends of the Cross Tubes (C) line up with the

    holes in the Side Tubes (B). Insert a Seal Gasket (Q) into

    each end of each Cross Tube (C).Install a 1/4" x 2" Bolt (E) with a 1/4" Washer (G) and 1/4"

    Split Ring Lock Washers (P) through the Side Tube (B) and

    into the pin nuts in the end of each Cross Tube (C).

    Securely tighten all hardware.

    Cross Tube (C)Side Tube (B)

    Seal

    Gaskets (Q)

    ¼” Flat washer (G)

    ¼” Lock washer (P)

    ¼” x 2” long bolt (E)

    4. Place the center Base Panel (A) between the two (2)

    outside panels. Use a 1/4" x 3/4" Bolt (D), two (2) 1/4"

    Flat Washers (G) and a 1/4" Nyloc Nut (H) at each of the

    four (4) locations to secure this panel to the outside

    panels.Firmly tighten all hardware.

    2. Use a 1/4" Nyloc Nut (H) and a 1/4" Washer (G) to install

    the Lynch Pin (M) in the 3/8" hole in the Side Tube (B).

    Secure the pin with the Pin Clip (N).

    ¼” Nyloc Nut (H)

    ¼” Flat washer (G)

    Lynch

    Pin (M)

    Pin Clip (N)

    ¼” x ¾” Long Bolts (D)

    ¼” Flat washers (G)

    Center Panel (A)

    ¼” Flat washers (G)

    ¼” Nyloc Nuts (H)

    3. Orient the outside Base Panels (A) to the Ramp Tube

     Assembly. Place the Hinges (K) over the end holes in the

    outside Base Panels (A) nearest the Lynch Pin hole. Install

    eight (8) 1-1/2" x 1/4" Bolts (F) with 1/4“ Washers (G) to

    secure the outside Base Panels (A) and Hinges (K) to the

    Ramp Tube Assembly. Do not tighten these bolts completely

    at this time.

    5. Insert the Plastic End Caps (O) in the ends of the Side

    Tubes (B).

    Lynch Pin

    Hole

    ¼” Flat washer (G)¼” x 1-1/2”

    Long Bolts (F)

    Hinges (K)

    Outside Base

    Panels (A)

    Plastic End Caps (O)

    Plastic End Caps (O)

    Page 3 of 4

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    115/120

    Cequent Performance Products

    47774 Anchor Court WestPlymouth, MI 48170

    Technical Service: (888) 521-0510 5800300N 11-5-09 Rev

    5800300

    GearCage™ Ramp

    Ins ta ll Ramp On GearCage™ Cargo Rack 

    6. Remove the tube on the passenger side of the

    GearCage™. Remove the bolts that mount the outsidepanels on the GearCage to the U-Tube. Install a 1/4” x 2-

    1/2" Bolt (L), two (2) 1/4" Washers (G) and a 1/4" Nyloc Nut

    (H) through each Ramp Hinge to secure the Ramp to the

    GearCage™.

    W RNING

    When installing the 1/4” x 2-1/2" Bolts (L) with 1/4"

    Nyloc Nuts (H), always make sure that at least two (2)

    threads protrude through the nut. Failure to do so may

    cause the Ramp to separate from the carrier in transit,

    resulting in property damage, and bodily injury.

    ¼” Flat washers (G)

    ¼” x 2-1/2” Long Bolts (L)

    GearCage ™ Cargo Rack

    Ramp

    Assembly

    ¼” Nyloc Nuts (H)

    ¼” Flat washers (G)

    7. Remove the bolt that secures the second Side Rail from

    the end of the GearCage™. Place the bracket from the

    Ramp Stop Bracket Assembly (I) over the hole and reinstall

    the bolt.

    W RNING

    When operating the vehicle, the ramp must be either 

    removed, secured in the upright position as shown, orpositioned to lay flat on the GearCage™ Cargo Rack.

    8. Place the hole in the rounded end of the Ramp Stop

    Lever (J) over the hole in the vertical side of the bracket

    and secure it in place with the hardware from the Ramp

    Stop Bracket Assembly (I).

    Use the Pin Clip (N) to secure the other end of the

    Ramp Stop Lever to the Lynch Pin (M) installed in

    Step 2.

    Ramp Stop Bracket

    Assembly Hardware

    Pin Clip

    Ramp Stop

    Lever 

    Page 4 of 4

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    116/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-14 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 2

    Exhibit N

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    117/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-14 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 2 of 2

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    118/120

    AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action

    U NITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the

     __________ District of __________

    )

    ))

    )

    )

    )

    )

    Plaintiff 

    v. Civil Action No.

     Defendant 

    SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

    To: (Defendant’s name and address)

    A lawsuit has been filed against you.

    Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

    are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

    P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of 

    the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

    whose name and address are:

    If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.

    You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

    CLERK OF COURT 

    Date:Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk 

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-15 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1

      District of Colorado

    LET'S GO AERO, INC. a Colorado corporation,

    U-HAUL INTERNATIONAL, INC. a Nevadacorporation

    U-Haul International, Inc.

     

    Martin D. Beier, Esq.Thomas M. Haskins, Esq.Silver & DeBoskey P.C.1801 York StreetDenver, CO 80206

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    119/120

    AO 440 (Rev. 12/09) Summons in a Civil Action

    U NITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the

     __________ District of __________

    )

    ))

    )

    )

    )

    )

    Plaintiff 

    v. Civil Action No.

     Defendant 

    SUMMONS IN A CIVIL ACTION

    To: (Defendant’s name and address)

    A lawsuit has been filed against you.

    Within 21 days after service of this summons on you (not counting the day you received it) — or 60 days if you

    are the United States or a United States agency, or an officer or employee of the United States described in Fed. R. Civ.

    P. 12 (a)(2) or (3) — you must serve on the plaintiff an answer to the attached complaint or a motion under Rule 12 of 

    the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. The answer or motion must be served on the plaintiff or plaintiff’s attorney,

    whose name and address are:

    If you fail to respond, judgment by default will be entered against you for the relief demanded in the complaint.

    You also must file your answer or motion with the court.

    CLERK OF COURT 

    Date:Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk 

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-16 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1

      District of Colorado

    LET'S GO AERO, INC. a Colorado corporation,

    WYERS PRODUCTS GROUP, INC., a Coloradocorporation d/b/a TRIMAX

    Wyers Products Group, Inc. d/b/a TRIMAX

     

    Martin D. Beier, Esq.Thomas M. Haskins, Esq.Silver & DeBoskey P.C.1801 York StreetDenver, CO 80206

  • 8/20/2019 Let's Go Aero v. U-Haul - Complaint

    120/120

    Case 1:16-cv-00410 Document 1-17 Filed 02/19/16 USDC Colorado Page 1 of 1