let ’ s consider a simpler case first

20
Let’s consider a simpler case first Thought experiment: Consider a beaker with a partition right in the middle that starts out holding molecules in only one half. What happens when you remove the partition? t is H for this process? o (at least if molecules don’t interact, “ideal solution”) So why does it happen? How about the reverse process? [Relevan ce to drug distribu tion]

Upload: aderyn

Post on 07-Feb-2016

25 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Let ’ s consider a simpler case first. Thought experiment: Consider a beaker with a partition right in the middle that starts out holding molecules in only one half. What happens when you remove the partition?. How about the reverse process?. What is D H for this process? - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

Let’s consider a simpler case first

Thought experiment: Consider a beaker with a partition right in the middle that starts out holding molecules in only one half. What happens when you remove the partition?

• What is H for this process?

• Zero (at least if molecules don’t interact, “ideal solution”)

So why does it happen?

How about the reverse

process?

[Relevance to drug

distribution]

Page 2: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

How about the reverse process?

Thought experiment: Molecules spontaneously moving to only one half of beaker?

•H is still zero

• This seems unlikely, except maybe if there are very few particles

• Let’s calculate the probabilities quantitatively

Page 3: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

Probability of being on one side

1 mol

N = 1p = 1/2

N = 2p = 1/4

Np = (1/2)N

N ~ 6 x 1023

p = (1/2)N = very very small

This fits with our intuition (and the second law) which says that things tend toward disorder, i.e., higher entropy [unless there is an input of energy to counteract …]

Page 4: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

Statistical thermodynamics tells us how to compute entropy

• There are multiple ways to define entropy, including the one on Boltzmanns tombstone

In modern notation, this is typically written S = kB ln W

W is the number of configurations available to a system, and is related to the probabilities we just calculated.

Note that S is a state function, and positive values of S are favorable, not negative like H. Units on S are J/K (more on this later).

Page 5: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

Let’s compute S for this processThis is not just a thought experiment. This is equivalent to entropy change upon dilution, or mixing two solutions.

State 1 State 2

S1 = kB ln W1 S2 = kB ln W2

Page 6: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

N = 1S = kB ln 2

= 1.38x10-23 J/K * 0.693 ~ 10-23 J/K

We can define the number of “configurations” of the system in different ways, but regardless, W clearly doubles for a single molecule when we double the volume.

To get units of energy, multiply by temperature (300 K),which gives 3x10-21 J. TINY amount of energy.

Page 7: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

N = 1S = kB ln 2

N = 2S = kB ln 4

We assume that the 2 molecules are uncorrelated, i.e., the configuration of one is unrelated to the other.

(This is again the definition of an “ideal solution”.)

This then implies that the total number of configurations is the product (not sum) of the configurations for each molecule.

Page 8: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

N = 1S = kB ln 2

N = 2S = kB ln 4

N moleculesS = kB ln 2N =NkBln 2

Page 9: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

N = 1S = kB ln 2

N = 2S = kB ln 4

N = NA = 1 moleS = NAkBln 2 = R ln 2

N = # of moleculesNA = Avogadro’s numberkB = Boltzmann’s constantR = NAkB = gas constant

Page 10: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

N = 1S = kB ln 2

N = 2S = kB ln 4

N = NA = 1 moleS = NAkBln 2 = R ln 2

Generalizing to any volume change, Molar entropy: N = # of molecules

NA = Avogadro’s numberkB = Boltzmann’s constantR = NAkB = gas constant

Page 11: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

V = volumeN = # of moleculesn = # of molesR = NAkB = gas constant

We can also think of this in terms of concentrations

State 1 State 2

Convert to concentrations, in molarity units: M = n/V, so V = n/M

Page 12: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

There are other flavors of entropy

• We focused here on “translational” entropy, which is equivalent to entropy of dilution, or entropy of mixing

• There is also “rotational” entropy and “vibrational entropy”, very important in drug binding as well

Page 13: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

Free Energy• At constant pressure, the correct criterion is

G < 0where G = H – TS

• If we additionally assume constant T, you get the famous equation

G = H – TS• Key point: note the sign on the entropy term• When G = 0, this is called “equilibrium”• Molar free energy for a substance also referred to as

“chemical potential”:

Page 14: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

An intuitive feel for free energy?

• Enthalpy = energy • Entropy = disorder• Free energy = ??

• Best understood as a statement of the 2nd law of thermodynamics

Page 15: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

Free energy of dilution/mixingState 1 State 2

Recall that …

Page 16: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

Derivation of G=-RTln K for a simple AB reaction

Page 17: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

BA At equilibrium (constant T, P):

Assume ideal solution, Mº = 1 molar (to make argument of the

logarithm unitless)

Equating these two:

Page 18: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

Constant that depends only on nature of

reactants and products

DEFINE KM= (MB/MA)eq

Page 19: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

Extension to more general equilibria:

aA + bB cC + dD

BADC badc

At equilibrium (constant T, P; closed system):

eq

ba

dc

C BADC

K

][][][][

Alternate Notation

Page 20: Let ’ s consider a simpler case first

Other concentration units

Derivations are extremely similar.

For molality (mol/kg solvent), the chemical potential can be written as

where the standard state is now defined by mº = 1 molal. The equilibrium constant winds up looking like

A

Bm m

mK mK-RTG ln 0

Expression for gasses is also very similar, with partial pressures replacing concentrations.