lessons learned from in-situ resistive heating of tce
TRANSCRIPT
1
1 52
IW
A
RS0048
Lessons Learned from In-Situ Resistive Heating of TCE
East Gate Disposal YardFort LewisWashington
21000 ft
“Window” between aquifers:TCE flows fromVashon to Sea Level Aquifer
EGDY TCE Source Area(in Vashon aquifer)
TCE Plumes
11
3
Site History1989 • Fort Lewis Log Center placed on NPL
• RI/FS Performed
1990 • ROD signed• construction of 2 GW P&T systems• additional investigation into contamination of lower (Sea Level) aquifer
1995 • GW P&T system began operating for hydraulic control of lower aquifer
1998 • ESD prepared that resulted in ESI to evaluate presence of NAPL• Results: GW P&T alone will not remediate shallow Vashon aquifer to beneficial
use within ROD 30-year timeframe
2001 • EE/CA prepared to address NAPL source removal• Results: Removal action of shallow partially intact containers and selection of in
situ thermal remediation• Removal Action performed of over 2,000 containers in various conditions
2002 • Performance-based specs for bid /selection of in situ thermal remediation• ERSH Selected
2004 • Treatment completed for NAPL area 1
2005 • Treatment complete for NAPL area 2
40 100 200 300 400
Feet
0 100 200 300 400
Feet
Aerial Photo Analysis Results
50 100 200 300 400
Feet
EM-61 Survey Results
60 100 200 300 400
Feet
Soil Gas Sampling
70 100 200 300 400
Feet
Exploratory Trenching Results
80 100 200 300 400
Feet
Drive Point Groundwater Results
90 100 200 300 400
Feet
Drum Removal Results
100 100 200 300 400
Feet
MIP Results
110 100 200 300 400
Feet
Sonic Drilling Results
120 100 200 300 400
Feet
Selection of Treatment Volumes
13
EGDY NAPL TREATMENT AREAS
14
Source Treatment Goals
• Maximize NAPL removal and destruction in source areas defined to contain the majority of NAPL mass
• Reduce risk to potential groundwater receptors• Reduce timeframe within which pump and treat of
groundwater dissolved phase plume is required • When do we stop heating?
– Criteria must be adopted that balances the cost of the remediation with the potential for adequate mass removal – heavily dependent on system monitoring data
– Requires “social capital”
15
Project Management Approach
• Adaptive site management/Triad• Performance based contract• Challenges to bid schedule design:
• Flexibility was desired to discontinue treatment based on performance
• It needed to account for area expansion and/or extension of treatment time
• It needed to encourage the Contractor to optimize the system
16
Contract Performance Monitoring
• Establish, maintain, and verify subsurface temperatures of 90 C and 100 C for the vadose zone and saturated zones respectively– Thermocouples 1 per 100 yd3
• Hydraulic and vapor control• Electrical consumption rates• Water reinjection standards• Limitations on CVOC mass discharge to
atmosphere– < 639 kg of TCE per year
17
Contracting Lessons Learned • Use of performance based design build contract
facilitated system modification during construction – Additional hydraulic control wells – Second power control unit – Installation of additional electrodes
• Multiple line of evidence approach required to reach consensus on termination decision– Communication and data management critical
• Contract performance metrics required modifications to optimize operations to meet overall treatment performance goals – Initial contract expectation for consistent heat-up proved
unrealistic
18
CSM Heterogeneity Impacts • Heat up of subsurface highly variable and
controlled by complex stratigraphy and hydraulic gradients– Horizontal hydraulic conductivity values range 850-16
ft/day– Vertical hydraulic conductivity values range 590-.9
ft/day
• Hydraulic control difficult to measure– Differences in head that are relatively small difficult to
measure– Pressure transducers measure average vertical head
19
NAPL Area 2 Cross-Section A-A’ Plan View
1496940 1496980 1497020 1497060 1497100 1497140 1497180 1497220
Easting NAD27 (feet)
651900
651920
651940
651960
651980
652000
652020
652040
652060
652080
652100
Nor
thin
g N
AD
27 (f
eet)
MWF17
MWG15TJ14
TK12 TL11
MWL12
MWD19
RS0005
RS0024
A
A'
Directio
n of
groundwater flow
NAPL Area 2
RS0019
20
NAPL Area 2 Cross-Section and Isotherm Plot
280
270
260
250
240
230
220
280
270
260
250
240
230
220
RS0
019
RS0
024
RS0
005
Qvr/Qva Qvt
Qvr
TemperatureColor Scale
MW
F17
MW
G15
TJ1
TK12
MW
L12
MW
D19
TL11
Temperatures measuredAugust 7, 2005
A A'
30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
110
120
4
21Temperatures
22
Groundwater Temperature Downgradient of NAPL Area 2 (July 21, 2005)
LC-133(26)
LC-156 (13)
LC-174 (13)
LC-190-4 (12)
LC-191-2 (21)
LC-192-4 (16)LC-193-5 (17)
LC-27 (13)
MW-2 (13)
MW-3 (15)
MW-4 (15)
MW-5 (26)
MW-6 (14)
Old 10 (19)
ST-3 (28)
ST-8 (18)
15.2
12
10.4
41.7
36.4
46.621.8
27.8
13.8
30.9
16.8
14.3
32.8
63.2
14.6
66.2
61
32
25
85
72
38
83
95
90
98
72
21
103
10389
72
9443
9970
46
Well monitored for groundwatertemperature
LEGEND:
Groundwater temperature contourJuly 21, 2005 (deg. C, depth in parentheses)0 100 200 300 400
Scale (FT)
23
Groundwater Temperature Downgradient of NAPL Area 2 (September 8, 2005)
16.2
13.3
10.7
38.2
42.5
43.418.1
33.1
36
16.5
13.6
41.4
58
17.9
54.1
52
38
19
50
61
23
26
70
34
46
62
13
61
5755
38
4836
6440
24
LC-133(26)
LC-156 (13)
LC-174 (13)
LC-190-4 (12)
LC-191-2 (21)
LC-192-4 (16)LC-193-5 (17)
LC-27 (13)
MW-2 (13)
MW-3 (15)
MW-4 (15)
MW-5 (26)
MW-6 (14)
Old 10 (19)
ST-3 (28)
ST-8 (18)
Well monitored for groundwatertemperature
LEGEND:
Groundwater temperature contourSep 8, 2005 (deg. C, depth in parentheses)0 100 200 300 400
Scale (FT)
24
NAPL Mass Estimates
• Data Used:– Visual observations of NAPL in sonic core and
air rotary cuttings.– Sonic soil core samples VOC and TPH
analytical data.– Laboratory porosity.– Laboratory NAPL saturation.
25
Primary Sources of Uncertainty
• Volume of subsurface contaminated with NAPL.
• NAPL saturation.• Analyte mass fractions in NAPL.
26
Estimated Initial Mass by Constituent & Area
TCE (Kg) c-DCE (Kg)
TPH (Kg)
AREA 1Initial Mass Estimate 11,800 5,300 79,100Revised Initial Mass Est. (range) 3,800-
13,4001,700-6,000 25,000-
89,700
AREA 2Initial Mass Estimate 13,400 600 102,100Revised Initial Mass Est. (range) 3,400-
10,900200-500 22,400-
70,300
AREA 3Initial Mass Estimate 43,000 2,400 19,100Revised Initial Mass Est. (range) 4,200-
13,700200-800 2,300-7,400
27
Net NAPL Thickness RI data
28
Net NAPL Thickness RI& RA data
29
242 ft
247 ft
252 ft
257 ft
262 ft
267 ft
272 ft
Elevation (Groundsurface = 278 feet)
Based on interpretation of TRS infrastructure borings (June-July 2006), soil core drill-back borings (April 2006), North Wind bioremediation cell borings (2003),and Phase II RI borings (2001-2002).
Revised NAPL Extents in Area 3
Drawing created 7/20/06
3a
3b 3c
30
Thermal Treatment Performance Lessons Learned
• Groundwater concentration reductions significant• All soil TCE concentrations reduced to < 1261
ppb in Area 1 and < 544 ppb in Area 2 ug/kg• > 50% of soil samples ND at 100 ppb TCE• Groundwater data indicates surgical treatment• Data suggest potentially significant in situ
destruction of contaminants• No foreseeable rebound
31
EGDY Contamination
12
32
5
434
304
11
34
0
0
206
1,460
34
144
287
617
3,131
3,309
5,485
28,678
7,600
4,300
0
3,183
29
474
4,831
8
202
2,484
3
959
5
165
135
1,538
4
1
2
3
HCW01
HCW02
HCW03
HCW04
HCW05
HCW06
HCW08
LC201
LC202
LC203
LC204
LC205
LC206
LC207
LC211
LC212
LC213
MWB09
MWD03
MWD14
MWE07
MWF03
MWF14
MWH06
MWH15
MWI08
MWJ
MWJ04
MWJ10
MWL07
MWL10
MWM12
MWN02
MWP07
LC208
LC209
LC210
LC214
LC215
MWC08
MWF11
MWF12
MWI07
NAPL Area 1Pre-Treatment
TCE in Shallow GroundwaterSeptember-November 2003
Lower Vashon Well; TCE (ug/l) not contoured.Upper Vashon Well; TCE (ug/l).TCE (ug/l)
NAPL Treatment Area
LEGEND:
Scale (FT)
0 10 20 30 40
33
670
240
260
80
0
43
199
5
4
2
6
3
3
345
173
1,056
1,520
814
780
460
137
437
195
26
14
1,320
3,066
3
44
383
3
23,400
9
20,482
814
950,000
250
0
3
3
HCW01
HCW02
HCW03
HCW04
HCW05
HCW06
HCW08
LC201
LC202
LC203
LC204
LC205
LC206
LC207
LC211
LC212
LC213
MWB09
MWD03
MWD14
MWE07
MWF03
MWF14
MWH06
MWH15
MWI08
MWJ
MWJ04
MWJ10
MWL07
MWL10
MWM12
MWN02
MWP07
LC208
LC209
LC210
LC214
LC215
MWC08
MWF11
MWF12
MWI07
April 2004
NAPL Area 1Peak-Thermal
TCE in Shallow Groundwater
Lower Vashon Well; TCE (ug/l) not contoured.Upper Vashon Well; TCE (ug/l).TCE (ug/l)
NAPL Treatment Area
LEGEND:
Scale (FT)
0 10 20 30 40
34
HCW04
HCW05
HCW09
HCW10
HCW11
HCW14
HCW15
MWA16
MWB09
MWC11
MWD19
MWF10
MWF12
MWG13
MWG15
MWG20
MWL15
MWM18
MWN12
MWQ08
MWQ13
MWS13
MWS15
HCW08
LC202
LC203
LC204
LC205
LC206
LC207
LC211
LC212
LC213
MWD03
MWD14
LC220
LC221
MWD15
MWF17
MWL12
MWL16
LC208
LC209
LC210
LC214
LC215
MWC08
344
26
135
3
61
19
572
1460
51
12
173
779
238
471
3
1
83
274
72
872
395
63
84
27
47
904
1624
2091
2902
41
2
32
100
60
54
12
22
165
Lower Vashon Well; TCE (ug/l) not contoured.Upper Vashon Well; TCE (ug/l).TCE (ug/l)
NAPL Treatment Area
LEGEND:NAPL Area 2
Pre-TreatmentTCE in Shallow Groundwater
January 2005
1
Scale (FT)
0 10 20 30 40
35
3420
1130
1240
130
1610
3520
7620
4800
15
3360
89
156
157
2410
253
82
113
2470
350
104
108
87
HCW04
HCW05
HCW09
HCW10
HCW11
HCW14
HCW15
MWA16
MWB09
MWC11
MWD19
MWF10
MWF12
MWG13
MWG15
MWG20
MWL15
MWM18
MWN12
MWQ08
MWQ13
MWS13
MWS15
HCW08
LC202
LC203
LC204
LC205
LC206
LC207
LC211
LC212
LC213
MWD03
MWD14
LC220
LC221
MWD15
MWF17
MWL12
MWL16
LC208
LC209
LC210
LC214
LC215
MWC08
Lower Vashon Well; TCE (ug/l) not contoured.Upper Vashon Well; TCE (ug/l).TCE (ug/l)
NAPL Treatment Area
LEGEND:NAPL Area 2Peak-Thermal
TCE in Shallow GroundwaterMarch-April 2005
Scale (FT)
0 10 20 30 40
36
47212
101
142
48
58
34
109
2730
6
62
188
71
163
59
22
10
186
93
37
97
413
1362
348
3
1
85
1
2
58
2
2
2
28
1
21
162
254
6
HCW04
HCW05
HCW09
HCW10
HCW11
HCW12
HCW14
HCW15
MWA16
MWB09
MWC11
MWD19
MWF10
MWF12
MWG13
MWG15
MWG20
MWJ08
MWL15
MWM18
MWN12
MWQ08
MWQ13
MWS13
MWS15
HCW01
HCW02
HCW03
HCW06
HCW07
HCW08
LC201
LC202
LC203
LC204
LC205
LC206
LC207
LC211
LC212
LC213
MWD03
MWD14
MWE07
MWF03
MWF14
MWH06
MWH15
MWI08
MWJ01
MWJ04
MWJ10
MWL07
MWL10
MWM12
MWN02
MWP07
LC-191-1
LC-192-1
LC-193-1
LC220LC221
MWD15
MWF17
MWL12
MWL16
LC208
LC209
LC210
LC214
LC215
MWC08
MWF11
MWF12
MWI07
Lower Vashon Well; TCE (ug/l) not contoured.Upper Vashon Well; TCE (ug/l).TCE (ug/l)
NAPL Treatment Area
LEGEND:
NAPL Areas 1 & 2Post-Treatment TCE in Shallow Groundwater
September 2005
0 50 100 150 200
Scale (FT)
37
284109
68
415
8
201
1090
292
118
0
274
572
2
274
572
2
48
2367
5
572
6
10
45
14
162
28
13
8
6
6
25
197
7
35
1
4
1
6
3
1
4
2
4
13
48
298
54
HCW04
HCW05
HCW09
HCW10
HCW11
HCW12
HCW14
HCW15
MWA16
MWB09
MWC11
MWD19
MWF10
MWF12
MWG13
MWG15
MWG20
MWJ08
MWL15
MWM18
MWN12
MWQ08
MWQ13
MWS13
MWS15
HCW01
HCW02
HCW03
HCW06
HCW07
HCW08
LC201
LC202
LC203
LC204
LC205
LC206
LC207
LC211
LC212
LC213
MWD03
MWD14
MWE07
MWF03
MWF14
MWH06
MWH15
MWI08
MWJ01
MWJ04
MWJ10
MWL07
MWL10
MWM12
MWN02
MWP07
LC-191-1
LC-192-1
LC-193-1
LC220LC221
MWD15
MWF17
MWL12
MWL16
LC208
LC209
LC210
LC214
LC215
MWC08
MWF11
MWF12
MWI07
Lower Vashon Well; TCE (ug/l) not contoured.Upper Vashon Well; TCE (ug/l).TCE (ug/l)
NAPL Treatment Area
LEGEND:
NAPL Areas 1 & 2Post-Treatment TCE in Shallow Groundwater
March 2006
0 50 100 150 200
Scale (FT)
38
HCW04
HCW05
HCW09
HCW10
HCW11
HCW12
HCW14
HCW15
MWA16
MWB09
MWC11
MWD19
MWF10
MWF12
MWG13
MWG15
MWG20
MWJ08
MWL15
MWM18
MWN12
MWQ08
MWQ13
MWS13
MWS15
HCW01
HCW02
HCW03
HCW06
HCW07
HCW08
LC201
LC202
LC203
LC204
LC205
LC206
LC207
LC211
LC212
LC213
MWD03
MWD14
MWE07
MWF03
MWF14
MWH06
MWH15
MWI08
MWJ01
MWJ04
MWJ10
MWL07
MWL10
MWM12
MWN02
MWP07
LC-191-1
LC-192-1
LC-193-1
LC220LC221
MWD15
MWF17
MWL12
MWL16
LC208
LC209
LC210
LC214
LC215
MWC08
MWF11
MWF12
MWI07
0.17
37
34
19
2.8
4.2
14
8.1
1.4
16
22
67
8.4
6.9
8.5
19
11
180
461
44
1
4.2
0.16
32
2.3
0.89
3.5
0.97
3.2
9.9
51
243
46
388123
78
275
5.7
185
1410
322
87
0.04
352
734
3.171.874404375171
Lower Vashon Well; TCE (ug/l) not contoured.Upper Vashon Well; TCE (ug/l).TCE (ug/l)
NAPL Treatment Area
LEGEND:
NAPL Areas 1 & 2Post-Treatment TCE in Shallow Groundwater
June 2006
0 50 100 150 200
Scale (FT)
LC-190-1
39
HCW04
HCW05
HCW09
HCW10
HCW11
HCW12
HCW14
HCW15
MWA16
MWB09
MWC11
MWD19
MWF10
MWF12
MWG13
MWG15
MWG20
MWJ08
MWL15
MWM18
MWN12
MWQ08
MWQ13
MWS13
MWS15
HCW01
HCW02
HCW03
HCW06
HCW07
HCW08
LC201
LC202
LC203
LC204
LC205
LC206
LC207
LC211
LC212
LC213
MWD03
MWD14
MWE07
MWF03
MWF14
MWH06
MWH15
MWI08
MWJ01
MWJ04
MWJ10
MWL07
MWL10
MWM12
MWN02
MWP07
LC-191-1
LC-192-1
LC-193-1
LC220LC221
MWD15
MWF17
MWL12
MWL16
LC208
LC209
LC210
LC214
LC215
MWC08
MWF11
MWF12
MWI07
0.77
54
1087.1
3.3
3.8
77
2.4
3.2
8.9
34
20
9.6
158
45
8
99
372
178
1.6
0.12
0.13
3.6
3.4
1.8
1.3
0.71
5.2
8.6
49
224
14
72
68
2.4
3.6
0.67
28
9.6
1.6
0.1
41
37
2.6
Lower Vashon Well; TCE (ug/l) not contoured.Upper Vashon Well; TCE (ug/l).TCE (ug/l)
NAPL Treatment Area
LEGEND:
NAPL Areas 1 & 2Post-Treatment TCE in Shallow Groundwater
September 2006
0 50 100 150 200
Scale (FT)
LC-190-1
40
MWA16
MWF12
MWG15
MWG20
MWL15 MWQ13
LC201
LC202
LC203
LC204
LC205
LC206
LC207
LC211
LC212
LC213
MWE07
MWF14
MWI08MWL07
LC-191-1
LC-192-1
LC-193-1
1.3
35
6.4
17
17 22
93
21
2.4
6.3
21.5
34
180
110
16
620
1.2
MWD15
MWL16
MWF11
MWI07
LC208
LC209
LC210
LC214
LC215
Lower Vashon Well; TCE (ug/l) not contoured.Upper Vashon Well; TCE (ug/l).TCE (ug/l)
NAPL Treatment Area
LEGEND:
NAPL Areas 1 & 2Post-Treatment TCE in Shallow Groundwater
April 2007
0 50 100 150 200
Scale (FT)
LC-190-1
41
380
68041
91
19
15
<10
210
55
93
79
140
190
44
160
22
310
MWC07
MWE03
MWD08
MWG04
MWE10
MWK02
MWJ08
MWM04
MWM08
MWP05
MWF06
MWH06
LC-159
FX3-17
FX3-18
FX3-19
PZ-1b PZ-1c
PZ-5b PZ-5c
PZ-6b PZ-6c
PZ-8a
PZ-9b
LC-155
LX-17
LX-19
PW-2
PW-4
FX-03
FX3-01
FX3-02
FX3-04
FX3-06
FX3-11
FX3-12
FX3-13
FX3-14
FX3-15
PZ-5a
PZ-6a
PZ-8b
PZ-9a
3c
NAPL Area 3b
3a
TCE (ug/l)Lower Vashon wells; TCE (ug/l) not contoured.Upper Vashon wells; TCE (ug/l).
LEGEND:
(deep)
(deep)
(deep)
(deep)
NAPL Area 3Post-Treatment TCE in Shallow Groundwater
April 2007
Scale (FT)
0 50
42
649
25.435.3
69.9
265
62.1
22.3
91.4
47.5
48.7
6.9
149
32
156
28.6
156
9.3
381
31.5
43.7
MWC07
MWE03
MWD08
MWG04
MWE10
MWK02
MWJ08
MWM04
MWM08
MWP05
MWF06
MWH06
MWH01
MWP01
MWG12
MWA12
LC-159
FX3-17
FX3-18
FX3-19
PZ-1b PZ-1c
PZ-5b PZ-5c
PZ-6b PZ-6c
PZ-8a
PZ-9b
LC-155
LX-17
LX-19
PW-2
PW-4
FX-03
FX3-01
FX3-02
FX3-04
FX3-06
FX3-11
FX3-12
FX3-13
FX3-14
FX3-15
PZ-5a
PZ-6a
PZ-8b
PZ-9a
3c
NAPL Area 3b
3a
TCE (ug/l)Lower Vashon wells; TCE (ug/l) not contoured.Upper Vashon wells; TCE (ug/l).
LEGEND:
(deep)
(deep)
(deep)
(deep)
NAPL Area 3End of Treatment TCE in Shallow Groundwater
January 2007
Scale (FT)
0 50
43
NAPL Area 1Pre- vs. Post-Treatment TCE Soil Concentration (ug/kg)
7 ft 22 ft 27 ft 29 ft 51 ftPost-Treat
Pre-Treat110
1001000
10000
1000001000000
6.5 ft 29 ft42 ft
Post-TreatPre-Treat1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
6 ft 14 ft 51 ft
Post-TreatPre-Treat1
100
10000
1000000
100000000
RS0032
RS0008
RS0012
6 ft 8 ft 22.5 ft 38 ft 42 ftPost-Treat
110
1001000
10000100000
1000000
10.5 ft 22 ft 28 ft
Post-TreatPre-Treat1
10100
100010000
1000001000000
5 ft 8 ft 26 ft 28 ft 51 ftPost-Treat
Pre-Treat110
1001000
10000
1000001000000
RS0009
RS0003
<<
Pre-Treat
RS0006
<<
< <
<<
<
44
NAPL Area 2Pre- vs. Post-Treatment TCE Soil Concentration (ug/kg)
7 ft18 ft
Post-Treat
Pre-Treat1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
12 ft 38 ft55 ft
Post-TreatPre-Treat1
100
10000
1000000
100000000
8 ft 16 ft 25 ft 44.5 ft 59 ft
Post-Treat1
10
100
1000
5.5 ft 17 ft 27 ft 43 ft
Post-Treat1
10
100
1000
10000
7 ft 19.5 ft 35 ft 41 ft 50 ft
Post-Treat1
100
10000
1000000
100000000
7 ft 10 ft 20 ft 30 ft 46 ft
Post-Treat1
10
100
1000
10000
RS0018
<
RS0005
RS0029
<
<
Pre-Treat
RS0031
Pre-Treat
RS0024
<
Pre-Treat
RS0038
<
< <
Pre-Treat