lessons learned: compact investigations & discipline valerie smith, ms, rn, fre associate...

35
Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

Upload: antonio-barry

Post on 27-Mar-2015

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline

Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE

Associate Director

Arizona State Board of Nursing

Page 2: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

Nurse Licensure Compact (NLC) Definitions

“Multistate licensure privilege means current, official authority from a remote state permitting the practice of nursing as either a registered nurse or a licensed practical/vocational nurse in such party state. All party states have the authority, in accordance with existing state due process law, to take actions against the nurse’s privilege such as: revocation, suspension, probation or any other action which affects a nurse’s authorization to practice.” NLC Art. II (h).

Page 3: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

More NLC Definitions

Home state – party state which is the nurse’s primary state of residence (PSOR)

Party state – any state that has adopted this compact

Remote state – a party state, other than the home state:where the patient is located recipient of nursing practice located

Page 4: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

NLCA Policy No. 5.1Conducting Investigations

Investigations may be conducted either by home state or remote stateThe party state receiving the initial

complaint shall conduct an initial inquiry and open the case if warranted

If more than a minor infraction, the party state shall post a Notice of Investigation on Nursys

Page 5: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

NLCA Policy No. 5.1Conducting Investigations Cont ..

One state shall take the lead in conducting the investigation, but party state(s) may conduct an investigation simultaneously in collaboration with the lead state

The investigating state shall contact another party state(s) if nurse is known to be practicing or moved to new party state

Page 6: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

NLCA Policy No. 5.1Conducting Investigations cont ..

Relevant information concerning an investigation which affects more than one party state shall be shared with the state(s) by telephone or written communication within 10 business days of receipt of the information.

Page 7: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

Bird’s-eye view: Complaint investigation process

Licensee practicing in a remote

state on MSP Complaint allegation received

Remote state, home state, or both states

Two states mutually determine investigative lead

Page 8: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

8

Investigative Lead Decision Points:

Access to witnesses Access to respondent Ability to obtain documentary evidence Public risk involved Ability to timely process case

8

Page 9: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

NLCA Policy 5.2: Issuing Subpoenas in Another Party State

Compact states will issue subpoenas for other party states as allowed by state lawThe party state needing the

documentary evidence shall request in writing that the nurse licensing authority of the state where the incident occurred subpoena the records.

Page 10: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

NLCA Policy 4.3 Current Significant Investigative Information

Investigative information that indicates that a nurse represents an immediate threat to public health and safety regardless of whether the nurse has been notified and had an opportunity to respond.Posted in NursysRemoved within 10 days of action

Page 11: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

11

Discipline decision points: Action against license vs. PTP

Risk to patient safety Current status of nursing practice Mobility “moving target” Timeliness

Page 12: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

Definition: Home State Action

“… means any administrative, civil, equitable, or criminal action permitted by the home state’s laws…including actions against an individual’s license such as: revocation, suspension, probation or any other action which affects a nurse’s authorization to practice.” NLC Art. II (f).

Page 13: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

Definition: Remote State Action

“… any administrative, civil, equitable, or criminal action permitted by a remote state’s laws…including actions against an individual’s multistate privilege to practice in a remote state, and cease and desist and other injunctive or equitable orders issued by remote states or the licensing boards thereof. NLC Art. II (i).

Page 14: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

Home State Action vs. Remote State Action

“A remote state may take adverse action affecting the multistate licensure privilege to practice within that party state. However, only the home state shall have the power to impose adverse action against the license issued by the home state.” NLC Art. V (c)

Home state action affects ability to practice in all party states

Page 15: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

Remote State Action

Affects only the MSP in the remote state and not the home state license

Nurse may practice in another party (remote) state or home state

The home state may take adverse action based on the factual findings of the remote state, so long as each state follows its own procedures for imposing such adverse action

Page 16: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

Multistate Practice of Licensees Under Discipline or Alternative Program Agreements

“A licensee who is under a disciplinary order or agreement that limits practice or requires monitoring or has an agreement with an alternative program may not work in a remote state without prior written authority of both states.”

NLCA Policy 5.3

Page 17: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

Multistate Practice of Licensees Under Discipline or Alternative Program Agreements Obtaining permission

Request permission from home state to seek or retain employment in a remote state

Permission, if approved, is in writing Home state reviews and determines if

employment is consistent with the terms of the order or agreement

Request permission from remote state

NLCA Policy 5.3

Page 18: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

Monitoring Multi-State Practice of Nurses under Discipline or in an Alternative Program

Nurse shall submit any required reports and adhere to the original order and directives regardless of where working If a violation occurs, the state determining that the

violation shall immediately notify the other state The home state and the remote state shall determine

which state shall initiate action on the violation The home state and the remote state shall determine if

the nurse may continue employment in the remote state The state taking action on the violation shall notify the

other state of the final action taken

NLCA Policies 5.3 & 5.4

Page 19: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

Licensure in Another State After Surrender, Revocation, Suspension, or Denial of a License/Privilege …

The individual that has a license or privilege to practice which was/is surrendered, revoked, suspended, or denied may be issued a single state license in the current primary state of residence until such time as the individual would be eligible for reinstatement in the prior state(s) of adverse action. Once eligible for licensure in the prior state(s), a multistate license may be issued.

NLCA Policy 3.8

Page 20: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

Licensure in Another State after Surrender, Revocation, Suspension, or Denial of a License/Privilege …

Information of disciplinary history and Board action(s) shall be made available upon request of the Board in the individual's current primary state of residence

The current primary state of residence may issue a single state license (see policy 3.1)

Each state will notify Nursys…

Procedure NLCA Policy 3.8

Page 21: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

21

Issuing a Single State License

When a party state issues a license authorizing practice only in that state and not authorizing practice in other party states (i.e., a single state license), the license shall be clearly marked with words indicating that it is valid only in the state of issuance

NLCA Policy 3.1

21

Page 22: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

22

Investigative & Discipline Case Scenario

Complaint allegation (diversion) received in remote state (AZ); not reported to home state by complainant/employer

Remote state and home state case coordinate. Remote state takes lead

Case elevated to high priority as new information receivedimpaired on duty; similar complaints in

other states, including non-compact

22

Page 23: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

23

Investigative & Discipline Case Example

Timelines 1/13/2010 complaint received remote state assigned for initial investigative review 1/28/2010 home state and remote state

share information & determine remote state takes lead

2/26/2010 new complaint received by home state re: diversion in a non-compact state Information shared with lead state (remote)

2/26/2010 - Complainant (#2) interviewed & documents requested

23

Page 24: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

24

Investigative & Discipline Case Example Timelines cont ...

3/2/2010: notice of probable summary suspension

3/4/2010: signed consent agreement surrender privilege. Other states of licensure notified (N = 6)

3/17/2010: non-compact state takes action incorporating above information

3/23/2010: home state action incorporating information and action from remote state

1/28/2011 second non-compact state action24

Page 25: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

25

Investigative & Discipline Case Example

NLC Article V“…home state shall give same priority

and effect to reported conduct received from remote state as it would if such conduct had occurred within the home state.”

“The home state may take adverse action based upon the factual findings of the remote state, so long as each state follows its own procedures …”

25

Page 26: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

NLC Challenges: Survey Responses

Different Board Structures Umbrella vs. independent Authority for investigative and legal staff

varies Identifying & establishing key contacts Differences in interpretation rules & policies Knowledge of NLC rules & policies by

licensees, Boards, investigative & legal staff varies

Page 27: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

27

NLC Challenges: Survey Responses

Mobility of populationDifficult to locate, especially those who

do not want to be located Time it takes for some states to complete

investigation Communication of investigative findings

Page 28: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

Responding to the Challenges: Enhance Understanding of NLC

Educating board, investigative & discipline staff

• continuous & on-going Develop internal expertise

• access to policies, data, trends Establish & maintain current contact

information• networking across state lines

Page 29: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

Responding to the Challenges: Enhance Understanding of NLC

Education of employers/public• Checking current licensure with PSOR

and/or Nursys• Identifying PSOR and when licensure

application is required in new home state• Where & how to report alleged violations

& misconduct

Page 30: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

Responding to the Challenges: Enhance Understanding of NLC

Education board, investigative & discipline staff about discipline under the compact

Limits of practice within the state under Board disciplinary orders and alternative programs

Developing consistency in limiting practice (license vs. contractual or order)

Page 31: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

31

Regulatory Challenges Not New& Not Unique

Many of our challenges existed prior and are not unique to the nurse licensure compact mobile populationinvestigative timelinesdifferences between jurisdictionscommunications before action

Page 32: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

32

Advantages Survey Responses

Ability to share complaint & investigative information

Shared responsibility for patient safety not governed by geographical boundaries

Shared commitment to improving our collective ability to protect patients

Page 33: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

33

Advantages: Survey Responses

Multiple states working together on a priority case to assure patient safety

Ability to locate, isolate or limit ability to practice on MSP

Reduces duplicative actions Uniform rules applicable to compact

states

Page 34: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

In Summary

Communication, cooperation, collaboration & ongoing education are important to the success and understanding of NLC

Many of the investigative & discipline challenges are not unique to NCL

NLC promotes shared responsibility As nursing practice continues to

evolve so does nursing regulation

Page 35: Lessons Learned: Compact Investigations & Discipline Valerie Smith, MS, RN, FRE Associate Director Arizona State Board of Nursing

Questions?

Thank you!