legacy dispute resolution scheme• ‘written communication’ will include a letter intimating...
TRANSCRIPT
MUMBAI | NEW DELHI | BENGALURU | AHEMDABAD | PUNE | CHENNAI
Legacy Dispute Resolution Scheme
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Rohit [email protected]
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Excise & Service Tax Litigation – Pendency
Pendency of Excise/ Service tax litigation as per CAG Report tabled in parliament in Feb 2019
Forum No. of Matters
Pursued by Department
Pursued by Taxpayer
Total
Supreme Court 1,555 866 2,421
High Court 6,434 3,744 10,178
Tribunal 27,996 24,660 52,656
Appellate Commissioner
9,936 14,389 24,325
Total 45,921 43,659 89,580
MORE THAN INR 3.75 LAKH CRORE IS BLOCKED IN LITIGATIONS IN SERVICE
TAX AND EXCISE - Finance Minister in Budget Speech 2019
Forum Department Succeeding in Appeals (Past Trends)
Pursued by Department
Pursued by Taxpayer
Tribunal & above
22% 23%
Appellate Commissioner
47% 49%
Success in Appeal – Performance Overview
2
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Past Amnesty Schemes
Sr No
Scheme Relief granted Actual Collection
(Cr)
1 Income Tax VDIS (1997) - 50% of applicable tax- No interest and penalty
9,760
2 Service Tax VCES (2013) - No interest and penalty 7,750
3 Income Tax IDS (2016) - Interest and partial penalty 29,362
4 Various State VAT amnesty schemes
Partial waiver of tax, interest and penalty
Ongoing
3
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Amnesty Schemes - Validity
Key jurisprudence
• All India Federation Of Tax Practitioners vs Union Of India [1998 236 ITR 1 Delhi, 1998]; • R.K. Garg v. Union of India [(1981) 4 SCC 675]
4
Potential arguments on Constitutional validity of the Scheme
Aspect Grounds against the Scheme Grounds in favour of the Scheme
Article 14 –classification and discrimination
- Classification between assesses engaged in same activity
- Discriminatory treatment to honest taxpayers
- No discrimination in tax assessment and liability, but in tax realization
- Recovery of tax not an essential component of concept of tax
- Discrimination to achieve object of the Scheme
Extent of relief - Discrimination in quantum of relief eligible based on stage of litigation is unconstitutional
- Extent of relief to be granted is a matter of administrative decision
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
FILINGS EVALUATION DISPOSAL
Notification issued appointing START DATE as 01.09.2019 and END DATE as 31.12.2019
FINANCE BILL
FINANCE ACT
Passed by Parliament followed by Presidential assent
Designated Committee constituted
Rules issued & Forms notified
Circular* and FAQs issued clarifying issues
Operation
*Circular no. 1071/4/2019-CX. dated 27.08.2019
6
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Coverage – key aspects
7
Central Excise
- CE Act
- CETA, 1985
- Goods of Fourth Schedule not covered under the Scheme (tobacco, petroleum products)
Service tax
- All matters under Ch. V of FA, 1994
Cess & Other
related levies
Other misc. central levies subsumed into GST
Pending litigation under the various Central tax laws subsumed into GST covered under the Scheme
Customs duty disputes not covered under the SchemeCustoms duty disputes not covered under the Scheme
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Coverage – cesses and other levies…
8
Tobacco Cess Act, 1975Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance) Act, 1957
Finance Act, 2016 (Krishi Kalyan Cess & Infrastructure Cess)
Additional Duties of Excise (Textiles and Textile Articles) Act, 1978
Finance Act, 2004 (Education cess) Finance Act, 2007 (Secondary & Higher Secondary Education cess)
Agricultural Produce Cess Act,1940 & Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Cess Act, 1985
Medicinal and Toilet Preparations (Excise Duties) Act, 1955
Finance Act, 2015 (Swachh Bharat Cess)
Limestone and Dolomite Mines Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1972
Coal Mines (Conservation and Development) Act, 1974
Sugar (Special Excise Duty) Act, 1959 Textiles Committee Act, 1963
Spices Cess Act, 1986
Produce Cess Act, 1966
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
…Coverage – cesses and other levies
9
Sugar Cess Act, 1982 Jute Manufacturers Cess Act, 1983
Coffee Act, 1942 Bidi Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1976 Mica Mines Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1946
Rubber Act, 1947Iron Ore Mines, Manganese Ore Mines and Chrome Ore Mines Labour Welfare
Cess Act, 1976
Sugar Cess Act, 1982 Jute Manufacturers Cess Act, 1983
Coffee Act, 1942 Bidi Workers Welfare Cess Act, 1976
Salt Cess Act, 1953
Mineral Products (Additional Duties of Excise and Customs) Act, 1958
Mica Mines Labour Welfare Fund Act, 1946
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Sr No
Where tax dues are in respect of Quantum of tax dues
Tax relief (as % of Tax dues)
Interest relief (as % of interest
payable)
Penalty (as % of penalty payable)
1 SCN or one or more appeals arising out of such notice
≤ 50 lakhs 70% 100% 100%
> 50 lakhs 50% 100% 100%
2 SCN for late fee or penalty only (where there is no tax liability or the same is already paid)
Any NA 100% of late fee 100%
3 Amount in arrears ≤ 50 lakhs 60% 100% 100%
> 50 lakhs 40% 100% 100%
4 Inquiry or Investigation or Audit ≤ 50 lakhs 70% 100% 100%
> 50 lakhs 50% 100% 100%
5 Voluntary disclosure Any NIL 100% 100%
Eligibility Relief granted
10
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
SCN or appeals arising out
of SCN
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Benefit and eligibility
Dispute ≤ 50 lacs = Pay only 30% tax dues | Dispute > 50 lacs = Pay only 50% tax dues
Eligibility Ineligibility
SCN pending on 30.06.2019 Final hearing concluded before 30.06.2019
One or more appeals arising out of SCN pending on 30.06.2019 (Scheme eligible only when opted for the entire matter, i.e. appeals filed by assessee + Revenue for matter arising out of an SCN)
Person who has been issued SCN for a refund or an erroneous refund
Application filed before the Settlement Commission
Partial declaration for one or more issues arising out of a single SCN, but not covering all the issues
12
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Relevant clarifications in the Circular / FAQ
• The Scheme is wide enough to cover all disputes, including call book cases (Circular, Para 6)
• Cases which are outside the purview of the Settlement Commission, such as rejection of application by theCommission or order of the Commission not being passed within prescribed time etc., shall be covered under theScheme (Circular, Para 10(f))
• Appeal/reference/writ petition or arrears arising out of the order of the Settlement Commission are covered underthe Scheme (Circular, Para 10(f))
• The Declarant shall be required to file a declaration for all the matters concerning duty liability covered in an SCNand hence, declaration cannot be filed for selected matters / issues covered in SCN (Circular Para 10(h))
• Any amount paid as pre-deposit at any stage of appellate proceeding under the indirect tax enactment or asdeposit during enquiry, investigation or audit, shall be adjusted while issuing the statement indicating the amountpayable by the declarant (FAQ 28)
13
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
SCN for late fee or penalty
only
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Benefit and eligibility
Waiver for entire amount of late fee or penalty
Eligibility Ineligibility
SCN for late fee or penalty only pending on 30.06.2019 where either there is no demand of tax or the tax has already been paid
Final hearing concluded before 30.06.2019
Application filed before the Settlement Commission
Are cases involving only dispute of interest or interest & penalty covered here? – Interest vs. late fee
15
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
SCN issued to co-noticee for penalty
• The co-noticee (on whom personal penalty is imposed) cannot avail the benefit of the Scheme till the main noticee settles the tax dues (Circular, Para 10(i), FAQ 45)
• Co-noticee is an independent assessee and hence, a separate declarant
• Discrimination – co-noticee not eligible for the Scheme even if demand from him is only for penalty amount
• Section 124(1)(b) of the Finance Act does not provide any such restriction explicitly
Clarification in the Circular
Key aspects for consideration
16
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Amount in arrears
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Scope, benefit and eligibility
Eligibility Ineligibility
Qualification as amount in arrears Tax liability admitted in return filed after 30.06.2019
Amount in arrears means the amount of duty which is recoverable as arrears of duty under the indirect tax enactment, on account of—
i. no appeal having been filed by the declarant against an order or an order in appeal before expiry of the period of time for filing appeal; or
ii. an order in appeal relating to the declarant attaining finality; oriii. the declarant having filed a return under the indirect tax enactment on or before the 30th day of June, 2019,
wherein he has admitted a tax liability but not paid it.
Dispute ≤ 50 lacs = Pay only 40% tax dues | Dispute > 50 lacs = Pay only 60% tax dues
18
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Appeals vs. Amount in arrears
Sr. no.
Due date for filing of appeal
Status of actual filing of appeal
Whether eligible under the Scheme
Relevant category under the Scheme
1 29.06.2019 Appeal filed on 28.06.2019
Yes Appeals
2 29.06.2019 Appeal filed on 01.07.2019
Yes Amount in arrears
3 02.07.2019 Appeal filed on 29.06.2019
Yes Appeals
4 02.07.2019 Appeal filed on 02.07.2019
No – As per FAQ 7Discriminatory?
5 02.07.2019 Appeal filed on 05.07.2019
Potentially eligible as amount in arrears – clause (i) of the definition of ‘Amount in arrears’ doesn’t refer to 30.06.2019 as cut off date
19
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Inquiry, investigation or
audit
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Scope, benefit and eligibility
Scope and eligibility
• Where an enquiry or investigation or audit is pending against the declarant• Where amount of duty involved is quantified on or before 30.06.2019
Dispute ≤ 50 lacs = Pay only 30% tax dues | Dispute > 50 lacs = Pay only 50% tax dues
Term Definition
Quantified ‘‘quantified”, with its cognate expression, means a written communication of the amount of duty payable under the indirect tax enactment
Audit “audit” means any scrutiny, verification and checks carried out under the indirect tax enactment, other than an enquiry or investigation, and will commence when a written intimation from the central excise officer regarding conducting of audit is received;
Enquiry or investigation
‘‘enquiry or investigation’’, under any of the indirect tax enactment, shall include the following actions, namely:—i. search of premises;ii. issuance of summons;iii. requiring the production of accounts, documents or other evidence;iv. recording of statements;
21
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Ineligibility, key clarifications
Ineligibility
• Where tax dues are not quantified as of 30.06.2019
• Voluntary disclosure not eligible after having been subjected to enquiry, investigation or audit
Key clarifications
• ‘Written communication’ will include a letter intimating duty/tax demand or duty/tax liability admitted by the person during enquiry, investigation or audit or audit report etc. (FAQ 51)
• Any amount paid as pre-deposit at any stage of appellate proceeding under the indirect tax enactment or as deposit during enquiry, investigation or audit, shall be adjusted while issuing the statement indicating the amount payable by the declarant (FAQ 28)
22
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Voluntary disclosure
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Benefit and eligibility
Pay 100% tax dues, interest & penalty waived
Eligibility Ineligibility
Voluntary disclosure (where matter is not covered or pending in any SCN, appeal, etc.)
Voluntary disclosure after having been subjected to enquiry, investigation or audit
Person making voluntary disclosure having filed the return showing tax payable but not paid
24
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Relevant clarifications in the Circular / FAQ
• A person, having filed a return declaring tax dues but not paid, cannot make a voluntary disclosure in respect of thesame. However, the declaration can be filed under ‘arrears’ category if return is filed on or before 30.06.2019. (FAQ13)
• A person who has received an intimation for audit/inquiry/investigation on or before 30.06.2019 cannot make avoluntary disclosure of his liability under the Scheme (FAQ 43)
25
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Key aspects
AMOUNT PAID UNDER THE SCHEME NOT AVAILABLE AS INPUT TAX CREDIT
AMOUNTS PAID NOT REFUNDABLE, IN ANY SCENARIO
NO ACQUIESCENCE BY THE DEPATMENTDECLARATION NOT TREATED ADMISSION OF TAX LIABILITY (Para 10(a) of the Circular)
ONLY CASH PAYMENTS ALLOWED UNDER THE SCHEME Pre-deposit paid or duty/tax paid earlier allowed as deduction even if paid by utilizing CENVAT credit
(FAQ 52)
PERSONS CONVICTED OF AN OFFENCE UNDER INDIRECT ENACTMENT NOT ENTITLED TO GO FOR THE SCHEME FOR THE SAME MATTER
However, declarations may be made for other matters
26
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
Application to be filed electronically on
https://cbic-gst.gov.in
Designated Committee to issue statement in 60 days
a)Declarant to pay the amount in 30 days
b)Appeal to be withdrawn*
“Discharge Certificate” to be issued in 30 days
YES
Designated Committee to issue its estimate in 30 days
NO
Designated Committee agrees with the estimates of the amount payable declared
Proof of payment & withdrawal of appeal
* Appeal/reference/reply to SCN filed up to the Tribunal stage would be
deemed to be withdrawn; while proceedings pending before the High Court and Supreme Court will have to be withdrawn through a written application
Declarant to agree/disagree with the estimate and
opportunity of being heard is granted
Application process
Separate application to be filed for each case / matter
Submissions containing reasons for disagreement
can be made online
Declaration would lapse
Declarant decides to
make payment
27
Any further remedy available to dispute decision of the Designated Committee?
© Economic Laws Practice 2019
No further payment of amount by way of tax/duty, interest and penalty for the matter and time period covered
Show cause notice can be issued for, i) different matter for the same time period or ii) the same matter for subsequent time period
No further proceedings and prosecution or re-opening of case for the matter and time period covered
In case where the voluntary disclosure is found to be false, within one year from issue of certificate, applicable proceeding will be initiated
Discharge certificate
28
© Economic Laws Practice 2018
MUMBAI
109 A, 1st Floor
Dalamal Towers
Free Press Journal Road
Nariman Point
Mumbai 400 021
T: +91 22 6636 7000
F: +91 22 6636 7172
NEW DELHI
801 A, 8th Floor
Konnectus Tower
Bhavbhuti Marg
Opp. Ajmeri Gate Railway
Station
Nr. Minto Bridge
New Delhi 110 002
T: +91 11 4354 8400
F: +91 11 4353 8436
AHMEDABAD
801, 8th Floor
Abhijeet III
Mithakali Six Road
Ellisbridge
Ahmedabad 380 006
T: +91 79 6605 4480/1
F: +91 79 6605 4482
PUNE
202, 2nd Floor
Vascon Eco Tower
Baner Pashan Road
Pune 411 045
T: +91 20 49127400
BENGALURU
6th Floor
Rockline Centre
54, Richmond Road
Bangalore 560 025
T: +91 80 4168 5530/1
CHENNAI
No. 6, 4th Lane
Nungambakkam High Road
Chennai 600 034
T: +91 44 4210 4863
Thank You©
Eco
no
mic
Law
s P
ract
ice
20
19