left-aligned lockup east campus development … · 4. embody the district’s urban design &...
TRANSCRIPT
P U B L I C M E E T I N G
Logo revision study, Option A1
CENTERED LOCKUP
DRAFT 04/29/2011
LEFT-ALIGNED LOCKUP
EAST CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT PRINCIPLES1. CAPTURE THE UNIQUE IDENTITY TO CREATE A SENSE OF PLACE
2. REINVIGORATE THE CAMPUS AS AN IMPORTANT NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER
3. PRESERVE AND CELEBRATE HERITAGE RESOURCES
4. EMBODY THE DISTRICT’S URBAN DESIGN & SUSTAINABILITY GOALS
5. IMPROVE CONNECTIVITY AND OPEN UP THE CAMPUS
6. ENHANCE MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATION NETWORKS
7. CREATE A STRONG PUBLIC REALM
8. SUPPORT WIDER ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INITIATIVES
P U B L I C M E E T I N G
Logo revision study, Option A1
CENTERED LOCKUP
DRAFT 04/29/2011
LEFT-ALIGNED LOCKUP
2005 2006 2008 2011 2014Federal
Government planning process
begins for West Campus.
Draft Framework
plan for East Campus
produced, but not
submitted to City Council.
Initial Framework
Plan updated and approved by City Council.
East Campus Implementation
Plan begins.
Expected completion date of first
phase of site development.
Future phases of development.
PROCESS TIMELINE
Master Plan with Phase One Development Area
Transportation Environmental Assessment
Site Zoning and Historic Approvals
Phase One Roadway and Infrastructure Design
Development Partner Selection
Phase One Roadway and Infrastructure Construction
Phase One Development Design and Construction
Spring - Summer 2011
Fall - Winter 2011-12
Spring - Summer 2012
Fall - Winter 2012-13 2013 2014
P U B L I C M E E T I N G
Logo revision study, Option A1
CENTERED LOCKUP
DRAFT 04/29/2011
LEFT-ALIGNED LOCKUP
2008 FRAMEWORK PLAN
43 REDEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK
SAINT ELIZABETHS EAST - FINAL NOVEMBER 2008
Right: Land Use Diagram
Land UsesOne of the development principles of theFramework Plan is to reinvigorate the campus as animportant multi-neighborhood center. Central to thisprinciple is the presence of a dynamic mix of useson the campus and within each new neighborhoodthat blend places to live, work and play. Communityamenities, including cultural, educational, social,and recreational spaces are important features inthis plan. New residential development at SaintElizabeths should include a range of housing choicesthat are affordable to multiple income levels. Thereis also a unique opportunity to provide housing forpeople with special needs, especially the physicallyand mentally challenged and seniors.
The land use diagram right illustrates the preferredlocations for land uses by new neighborhood. Thecategories are purposefully broad to be responsiveto future market shifts and potential for multipledevelopment partners. Still, each campus has itsown identity supported by a tailored mix of usesthat blend together to create a comprehensiveframework for redevelopment. In case of thehistoric buildings, future uses may depend upon thecondition of the buildings and the appropriatenessof the use to the physical character of the buildings.
North CampusCommercial Of ceGovernment Of ce (federal and municipal)Neighborhood RetailHotel/ConferenceResidential
Maple QuadInstitutionalEducationalCommunity AmenitiesNeighborhood Retail* Other adaptive reuses that is appropriate for thecharacter of the existing historic buildings
Town SquareNeighborhood RetailCommunity Amenities
CT VillageResidential* Other adaptive reuses that are appropriate for thecharacter of the existing historic buildings
Transit VillageResidentialCommercial Of ceGovernment Of ce (municipal)Neighborhood RetailCommunity Amenities
Existing and New Government UsesUni ed Communications Center
Hospital (new)Hospital (old – to be demolished)Evidence Warehouse (planned)
44 REDEVELOPMENT FRAMEWORK
Urban Design and Sustainability
3-4 stories
4-7 stories
6-8 stories
Right: Development Scale Diagram
Green BuildingGreen building is an approach to buildings design, construction and operations that conserves resources while it protects human health. Green buildings use less energy, consume fewer natural resources such as water and forest products, and emit fewer pollutants into the environment. Because they are designed to make use of natural light and good ventilation, green buildings provide a healthier indoor environment for their occupants. Studies show that students in green buildings learn better and workers in green buildings are more productive.
Green buildings is an integral part of the District’s sustainable development strategy. The Green Building Act of 2006 requires that all District public buildings meet the US Green Building Council’s LEED certi cation standards for environmental performance. The Districtsupports private sector innovation by expediting LEED Gold-level projects through the permitting process. By 2012, all new private development projects will be required to meet LEED certi cation.
Sustainable Neighborhood SystemsEnergy -sharing systems, such as geo-thermal loops, can take excess heat generation form one use (of ce) and harness it for another use (residential) where it is needed. these systems within multi-building projects can achieve signi cant cost-savings.
Stormwater ManagementThe management and treatment of stormwater and its runoff by replicating pre-development watershed conditions, replenishing groundwater, ltering pollutants, and reducing and slowing runoff could reduce ooding in the area. A wide range of innovative techniques can lessen the demand on traditional structured “pipe” techniques. An example could be the utilization of “Green Roofs” to lower energy costs and reduce impervious surface water runoff.
Development Scale and Urban Design
Saint Elizabeths presents a unique opportunity torealize the District’s urban design and sustainabilitygoals at a large scale. Sustainability can be achieved through innovation and excellence in both individual building design and neighborhood systems.
The diagram on the right illustrates the ranges of development intensity on the East campus. Higher density, mixed-use development at the Congress Heights Metro station and the North Campus is a critical step insupporting any redevelopment of Saint ElizabethsEast, in serving local commercial needs, andin responding to the District’s desire for TransitOriented Development (TOD). The chart on thefollowing page provides recommendation on thescale of development and urban design features.These are critical to achieving the dual goals ofsensitive in ll development and walkable, amenityrich, urban neighborhoods.
General Urban Design recommendations:
High-quality architecture that is creative, • sustainable, and contextual to the campusStreet wall variety through articulation of building • facades, massing, setbacks, etc.Ground oor retail and pedestrian level conditions • that encourage retail creation and walkability through building materials, storefront displays, signage, etc. Appropriate transition between new development •
and the historic buildings, grounds, and adjacent lower scale residential neighborhoods.
Government Uses
North Campus(Commercial Office, Government Office, Neighborhood Retail, Hotel/Conference, Residential)
Maple Quad (Institutional,Educational, Community Amenities, Neighborhood Retail)
Town Square(Neighborhood Retail, Community Amenities)
CT Village(Residential)
Transit Village(Residential, Commercial Office, Government Office, Neighborhood Retail, Community Amenities)
DEVELOPMENT USES
Development Uses
BUILDING HEIGHTS
P U B L I C M E E T I N G
Logo revision study, Option A1
CENTERED LOCKUP
DRAFT 04/29/2011
LEFT-ALIGNED LOCKUP
M
Marti
n Lu
ther
Kin
g, Jr
. Blvd
Congress Heights Metro StationProject Boundary
ResidentialLow Density Moderate DensityMedium Density
CommercialLow DensityModerate DensityMedium Density
Public and InstitutionalFederalLocal Public FacilitiesInstitutionalParks, Recreation and Open Space
Mixed Land Use
Source: DC Office of Planning, June 2007.DC’s Comprehensive Plan specifies general land uses for future development in and around Saint Elizabeths. Feet0 50 100 200 400 500
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Alabama Ave SE
Malcolm X Ave SE
Marti
n Luth
er Kin
g Jr. B
lvd
Suitland Parkway
Logo revision study, Option A1
CENTERED LOCKUP
DRAFT 04/29/2011
LEFT-ALIGNED LOCKUPP U B L I C M E E T I N G
Logo revision study, Option A1
CENTERED LOCKUP
DRAFT 04/29/2011
LEFT-ALIGNED LOCKUP
MASTER PLAN ALTERNATIVES
•CreatesNeighborhoodCentersonMLKandnearMetro•ExtendMLKMainStreetRetailtoEastCampus•CreatesaMajorSpineofActivitythroughtheSitebetweenMLKandMetro
• PedestrianFriendlyBoulevardthatConnectsMetrototherestoftheEastCampusDevelopment
•ChangestheCTOvalStreettoAllowLargerOpenSpacesatCorners
•ProvidesVehicularConnectionfromMartinLutherKing,Jr.AvenueintotheMapleQuadrangle
•PreservestheMajorityoftheHistoricCampus•MaintainsLowDensityBehindCTCampusasitTransitionstotheNeighborhood
•CreatesNeighborhoodCentersonMLKandnearMetro•ExtendMLKMainStreetRetailtoEastCampus•CreatesseveralDifferentAreasofPublicActivity/OpenSpace
•ConnectstoCongressHeightsatNorth-SouthExtensionof8thStreet
•PreservesCTOvalStreetAroundCTVillage•CreatesaPedestrianParkinMapleQuadrangle•ConnectstheMetrotoMartinLutherKing,Jr.AvenuebyPedestrianPathsThroughCTVillage
•PreservestheMajorityoftheHistoricCampus•MaintainsLowDensityBehindCTCampusasitTransitionstotheNeighborhood
AERIAL ALTERNATIVE1 ALTERNATIVE2
FUTUREFEMASITE FUTUREFEMASITE
FUTU
REDHS
SITE
FUTU
REDHS
SITE
AlabamaAveSE
AlabamaAveSE
Martin
Luthe
rKing
Jr.B
lvd
Martin
Luthe
rKing
Jr.B
lvd
Logo revision study, Option A1
CENTERED LOCKUP
DRAFT 04/29/2011
LEFT-ALIGNED LOCKUPP U B L I C M E E T I N G
Logo revision study, Option A1
CENTERED LOCKUP
DRAFT 04/29/2011
LEFT-ALIGNED LOCKUP
Feet0 50 100 200 400 500
ALTERNATIVE 1
Logo revision study, Option A1
CENTERED LOCKUP
DRAFT 04/29/2011
LEFT-ALIGNED LOCKUP
AlabamaAveSE
CongressHeightsMetro
MAPLECAMPUS
NewSaintElizabethsHospital
FutureWaterTower
SuitlandParkway
Martin
Luthe
rKingJr.Blvd
MalcolmXAveSE
FUTUREDHSSITE
Above-groundParkingUndergroundParkingHistoricBuildingsNewDevelopment
CTCAMPUS
13thStreet
CypressStreet
8thStreet
Dogwoo
dStreet
FUTUREFEMASITE
ILLUSTRATIVEPLAN
PossibleEnergyPlantSite
PossibleConnectiontoSuitlandParkway
•CreatesNeighborhoodCentersonMLKandnearMetro
•ExtendMLKMainStreetRetailtoEastCampus
•CreatesseveralDifferentAreasofPublicActivity/OpenSpace
•ConnectstoCongressHeightsatNorth-SouthExtensionof8thStreet
•PreservesCTOvalStreetAroundCTVillage
•CreatesaPedestrianParkinMapleQuadrangle
•ConnectstheMetrotoMartinLutherKing,Jr.AvenuebyPedestrianPathsThroughCTVillage
•PreservestheMajorityoftheHistoricCampus
•MaintainsLowDensityBehindCTCampusasitTransitionstotheNeighborhood
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
Logo revision study, Option A1
CENTERED LOCKUP
DRAFT 04/29/2011
LEFT-ALIGNED LOCKUPP U B L I C M E E T I N G
Logo revision study, Option A1
CENTERED LOCKUP
DRAFT 04/29/2011
LEFT-ALIGNED LOCKUP
Feet0 50 100 200 400 500
Above-groundParkingUndergroundParkingHistoricBuildingsNewDevelopment
Logo revision study, Option A1
CENTERED LOCKUP
DRAFT 04/29/2011
LEFT-ALIGNED LOCKUP
Logo revision study, Option A1
CENTERED LOCKUP
DRAFT 04/29/2011
LEFT-ALIGNED LOCKUP
ALTERNATIVE 2
AlabamaAveSE
CongressHeightsMetro
MAPLECAMPUS
NewSaintElizabethsHospital
SuitlandParkway
Martin
Luthe
rKingJr.Blvd
MalcolmXAveSE
FUTUREFEMASITE
FUTUREDHSSITE
ILLUSTRATIVEPLAN
CTCAMPUS
13thStreet
CypressStreet
DogwoodStreet
FutureWaterTower
PossibleConnectiontoSuitlandParkway
PossiblePowerPlantSite
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
PP
•CreatesNeighborhoodCentersonMLKandnearMetro
•ExtendMLKMainStreetRetailtoEastCampus
•CreatesaMajorSpineofActivitythroughtheSitebetweenMLKandMetro
•PedestrianFriendlyBoulevardthatConnectsMetrototherestoftheEastCampusDevelopment
•ChangestheCTOvalStreettoAllowLargerOpenSpacesatCorners
•ProvidesVehicularConnectionfromMartinLutherKing,Jr.AvenueintotheMapleQuadrangle
•PreservestheMajorityoftheHistoricCampus
•MaintainsLowDensityBehindCTCampusasitTransitionstotheNeighborhood
P U B L I C M E E T I N G
Logo revision study, Option A1
CENTERED LOCKUP
DRAFT 04/29/2011
LEFT-ALIGNED LOCKUP
Feet0 50 100 200 400 500
LAND USE POTENTIALAlternative1 Alternative2
Martin
Luthe
rKing
Jr.B
lvd
Martin
Luthe
rKing
Jr.B
lvd
AlabamaAve
AlabamaAve
MAPLE QUADAlt.1 Alt.2EducationCampus
MixedUses
CT VILLAGEAlt.1 Alt.2InnovationHubandEmpowermentCampusEmpowerment
MixedUses
13TH STREETAlt.1andAlt2MixofResidentialandOffice
NEIGHBORHOOD EDGEAlt.1andAlt2LowerBuildingsofResidentialandOfficeUses
Below-groundParkingAbove-groundParkingOffice
LandUseLegend
HotelResidentialEducation
CivicInnovationHubRetail
Below-groundParkingAbove-groundParkingOffice
LandUseLegend
HotelResidentialEducation
CivicInnovationHubRetail
P U B L I C M E E T I N G
Logo revision study, Option A1
CENTERED LOCKUP
DRAFT 04/29/2011
LEFT-ALIGNED LOCKUP
Feet0 50 100 200 400 500
HISTORIC IDENTITYPRINCIPLE1:CAPTURETHEUNIQUEIDENTITYTOCREATEASENSEOFPLACEPRINCIPLE3:PRESERVEANDCELEBRATEHERITAGERESOURCES
Alternative1 Alternative2
BUILDINGS 115/116Alt.1 Alt.2IncorporatedinNeighborhoodCenter
RemovedtomakelargerNeighborhoodCenter
HISTORIC VIEWS Alt.1andAlt2Viewsfromneighborhoodintohistoriccampus
HISTORIC PRIMARY LANDSCAPESAlt.1andAlt2ReinforceMapleQuadandCTVillage
HISTORIC SECONDARY LANDSCAPEAlt.1andAlt2Historicgreenspacesmaintainedandenhanced
Martin
Luthe
rKing
Jr.B
lvd
Martin
Luthe
rKing
Jr.B
lvd
AlabamaAve
AlabamaAve
P U B L I C M E E T I N G
Logo revision study, Option A1
CENTERED LOCKUP
DRAFT 04/29/2011
LEFT-ALIGNED LOCKUP
Feet0 50 100 200 400 500
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTERPRINCIPLE2:REINVIGORATETHECAMPUSASANIMPORTANTNEIGHBORHOODCENTERPRINCIPLE5:CREATEASTRONGPUBLICREALM
Alternative1 Alternative2
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER AT MLKAlt.1 Alt.2PrimaryCenter Secondary
Center
NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER AT METROAlt.1 Alt.2SecondaryCenter
PrimaryCenter
PUBLIC REALMAlt.1andAlt2Allopenspace,parks,plazasandstreetswillbepublic
Martin
Luthe
rKing
Jr.B
lvd
Martin
Luthe
rKing
Jr.B
lvd
AlabamaAve
AlabamaAve
P U B L I C M E E T I N G
Logo revision study, Option A1
CENTERED LOCKUP
DRAFT 04/29/2011
LEFT-ALIGNED LOCKUP
Feet0 50 100 200 400 500
SUSTAINABILITYPRINCIPLE4:EMBODYTHEDISTRICT’SDESIGNANDSUSTAINABILITYGOALS
Alternative1 Alternative2
SOCIAL SUSTAINABILITYAlt.1andAlt2ProvidesaVarietyofHousingTypesThroughoutCampus
ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITYAlt.1andAlt2:PotentialGreenRoofsonnewConstructionPotentialSolarPanelsonParkingGaragesandRoofsofNewBuildingsGreenSpacetoServeasCollectionAreasforStormwater
Martin
Luthe
rKing
Jr.B
lvd
Martin
Luthe
rKing
Jr.B
lvd
AlabamaAve
AlabamaAve
P U B L I C M E E T I N G
Logo revision study, Option A1
CENTERED LOCKUP
DRAFT 04/29/2011
LEFT-ALIGNED LOCKUP
Feet0 50 100 200 400 500
ROADS & TRANSPORTATIONPRINCIPLE6:IMPROVECOMMUNITYCONNECTIVITYANDOPENUPACCESSTOTHECAMPUSPRINCIPLE7:ENHANCEMULTI-MODALTRANSPORTATIONNETWORKS
Alternative1 Alternative2
ROAD CONNECTIONSAlt.1 Alt.2SycamoreStreetConnectsto8thStreet
InternalStreetConnectiontoMetro.
DogwoodStreettoMetro
MULTI-MODAL TRANSPORTATIONAlt.1andAlt2EnhanceMetro,Bus,BikeandPedestrianNetworks
ACCESS TO CAMPUSAlt.1andAlt2ConnectNeighborhoodStreetstoCampus
Martin
Luthe
rKing
Jr.B
lvd
Martin
Luthe
rKing
Jr.B
lvd
MalcolmXAveMalcolmXAve
PecanStPecanSt
CypressStCypressSt
Sycamo
reSt
Sycamo
reSt
8thSt
8thSt
AlabamaAve
AlabamaAve
DogwoodSt
DogwoodSt
13thSt(Extension)
13thSt(Extension)
P U B L I C M E E T I N G
Logo revision study, Option A1
CENTERED LOCKUP
DRAFT 04/29/2011
LEFT-ALIGNED LOCKUP
Feet0 50 100 200 400 500
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTPRINCIPLE8:SUPPORTWIDERECONOMICDEVELOPMENTINITIATIVES
Alternative1 Alternative2
RETAIL DEVELOPMENTAlt.1andAlt2ContinueretailalongMLKandcreatenewretailcentersonthecampus
EMPOWERMENT CENTERAlt.1 Alt.2CentralizedLocation
MultipleLocations
INNOVATION HUBAlt.1 Alt.2CentralizedatCTVillage
DistributedoverCampus
EDUCATIONAlt.1 Alt.2CentralizedLocation
MultipleLocations
Martin
Luthe
rKing
Jr.B
lvd
Martin
Luthe
rKing
Jr.B
lvd
AlabamaAve
AlabamaAve