lee j. achenbach sr. it analyst october 19, 2007 arc - a case study 2007 joint payment conference

36
Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

Upload: maximillian-parrish

Post on 28-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

Lee J. AchenbachSr. IT Analyst

October 19, 2007

ARC - A Case Study

2007 Joint Payment Conference

Page 2: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

2

PGE Quick Facts

• 790,000 total customers • 668,830 Residential customers • 93,008 Commercial customers• 52 cities served – Largest are Portland

and Salem• 4,105 square-mile service area • 1,975 MW of generation • 2,700 employees

Page 3: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

3

SCE Quick Facts

• 13 million people • 430 cities and communities in 50,000

square miles of service area, encompassing 11 counties in central, coastal and Southern California

• Commercial industrial and nonprofit customers, including: 

• 5,000 large businesses  • 280,000 small businesses• 13,000+ employees

Page 4: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

4

What is ARC?

• ARC stands for Accounts Receivable Conversion

• ARC is a process that converts a consumer checks from a paper deposit to an electronic ACH deposit.

• Available in 2002, PGE & SCE are a few of the utilities in the U.S. to have implemented ARC.

Page 5: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

5

Eligible ARC Checks

• Contains a pre-printed serial number

• No Auxiliary On-Us Field in the MICR line

• $25,000 or less

• Completed and signed

Page 6: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

6

On-Us

Courtesy of Electronicpayments.org

Page 7: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

7

Ineligible for ARC

• Checks that contain an Auxiliary On-Us Field in the MICR line

• Checks greater than $25,000

• Third-party checks, Money Orders, Travelers, cashier’s, and official checks

Page 8: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

8

Auxiliary On-Us

Courtesy of Electronicpayments.org

Page 9: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

9

Opt Out Option:

• NACHA rules require that customers be given an opt-out choice from having their checks processed through ARC channels

• PGE & SCE informed customers by placing a message on the bill

• Each bill displays a message that payments by check authorizes a conversion to electronic debit

Page 10: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

10

Opt Out Option cont.

• Customer’s that opt-out are marked in the Customer Information System (CIS)

• A nightly notification file is sent and loaded into a Cash Remittance Opt Out table

• As checks are process they are identified as either OPT Out or ARC payments

Page 11: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

11

Opt Outs Cont.

• PGE Opt Out:– Multiple checks & one payment stub– Multiple payment stubs & one check

Page 12: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

12

SCE Opt Out

• Opt out profile on customer account• Indicator in scanline for customers who opt

out• Indicator is read and check is sorted to opt

out pocket and sent to bank as paper• Check only and other ineligible items are

processed under Check 21 law

Page 13: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

13

PGE’s ARC

• ACH file is electronically transmitted to the bank of deposit via the EDI IT group

• PGE doesn’t ARC multiples or online cashiering payments due to our automatic reversal process

Page 14: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

14

SCE’s ARC

• Business checks are processed as paper in separate job – clearing house discount fees and some same day availability

• All others are sorted in Job 2 where decisioning is made and 2 files are created – ARC and Image (50% of ARC file is same day availability)

• CheckFree processes ARC file and sends to bank – handles Admin returns and NOCs

• Image file sent directly to bank

Page 15: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

15

PGE Check Retention

• Checks are securely stored on-site and then destroyed within the month

• An electronic image of each check will remain in the company’s records for at least 7 years.

Page 16: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

16

SCE Check Retention

• Checks are securely stored on site for up to 14 days

• Double cut shred on site by vendor• 2 year online archive of images• 7 year DVD back up of images

Page 17: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

17

System Flow

Cash Remittance

Bank

Customer Information

System

Payment

Opt Out Notification

Opt Out Remittance

ARC Remittance

ARC ACH Payments(Includes Adjusted)

ARCACH Returns(Automated)

Balancing

Page 18: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

18

Cash Remittance System

• Unisys NDP 500 Transports

• Access Database

• Application Server

• Data Server

• Windows Operating System based

• 2 Pass Process 1st Capture, 2nd Encode

Page 19: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

19

Customer Information System

• Ventyx Banner® 2.2.2.1 heavily customized (formally Indus, SCT)

• Oracle forms 5

• Oracle 9i database

• AIX Operating System

• 3 IBM P570 servers (A,B,C)

• AppWorx 6.1 Enterprise Job Scheduler

Page 20: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

20

SCE Operational Environment

• Agissar Extraction Equipment1. 1 Mail Sorter – envelopes are sorted according to contents –

40,000 items per hour2. 2 ACE TRIOs – correctly oriented, single doc, single stub

auto extractor. 9,000 items per hour per Trio3. 6 RVs – low speed auto extractor – multis, metal (coin,

staples, paperclips). 1,000 items per hour per RV4. 1 Omation mail opener (used strictly for business mail)

• Banctec Image Processing1. 2 E-Series Transports2. ReadFirst OSA software3. ARC with PayCourier Archive w/2 yr online storage4. CheckFree decisioning5. HP Server6. 24 keying stations7. Integrated with SCE customer information database

Page 21: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

21

Automatic Reversals

• ACH Returns go directly into the CIS System

• How the return is processed is determined by a systems rule table

• Notice of Change (NOC) returns are ignored by the system but manually changed in the Unisys decisioning table

Page 22: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

22

System Level Rules

Page 23: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

23

Auto Reverse cont.

• Two files – ACH & Remittance each carry the same reversal key.

• ACH File the key is stored on Individual Named Field on Type 6 Record

• Remit File key is stored as a composite of three fields

• Key Stored with the payment record in CIS

Page 24: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

24

Auto Reverse cont.

• Return process uses key to find the payment, reverse it, and charges a fee

• Updates credit history when a fee is charged

• Generates a returned payment letter to the customer

Page 25: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

25

$$ Savings $$

• Decreased bank fees for paper items being processed through ARC

• Decreased bank fees for current ACH items

• Averaging 82% of paper checks processed converted to ARC (Target 75%)

Page 26: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

26

Savings cont.

• Elimination of courier fees (PGE special deal with our bank)

• Priority ACH posting helps decrease return activity and float time

• Typically the lowest cost per payment

Page 27: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

27

Savings cont.

• Electronic payments allow for 3 re-presentments Over 50% of checks re-presented 2nd time clear (3rd try)

• ½ FTE Savings to date (Auto Reverse)

Page 28: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

28

$$ SCE Savings $$

• Retained clearing house discounted bank fees and availability for paper items – business checks

• Decreased bank fees for ARC items

• 45% savings in supplies

• Averaging 82% of paper checks processed converted to ARC (Target 85%)

• Increased availability by approximately 23%

Page 29: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

29

Lessons Learned

• Adjustments (encoding/keying corrections) need to be resent as an ACH

• Use multiple sample check amounts for testing

• Find out if you are the bank’s guinea pig

Page 30: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

30

Lessons Learn cont.

• The description of “Lockbox” was showing up on customers bank statements which caused confusion. ( Bank was able to change description quickly to PGE PYMT)

• Get key players in joint meetings early and often in the process

Page 31: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

31

Lessons Learn cont.

• Lots of time spent up front pays off on a better product

• Better prep Customer Service Reps (CSR) on what questions to expect and answers to give to customers

• Have subject matter experts attend the CSR training meetings with the trainers

Page 32: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

32

SCE Challenges & Lessons Learned

• Unbundled RFP lengthened contract review process• Not allowing concurrent contract negotiations caused delays in

moving project forward • Test docs/checks – order far in advance, use vendor for

assistance to ensure checks meet micr requirements for decision testing

• Automated transmissions – tight timelines make file failure resolution difficult

• Invalid transactions (out of sequence transaction in single batch type – automatic rejects – have to be physically pulled)

• Assumptions made by SCE and Financial Institution regarding handling imperfect image files (Upside down/backward images, corrupted images, foreign drawn items)

• 5000 item per file/hour limitation on Image file

Page 33: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

33

Summary

• Very complex especially the auto reversal piece but worth the effort

• 17 separate internal and external groups involved in the project

• Significant short term and long term cost savings

• Reduced staffing hours that have been

redeployed to other critical areas

Page 34: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

34

Testimonial

PGE Manager of Revenue Collection & Community Offices – Wes Friesen

"ARC has been a great project for PGE. Opt-outs have been less than .02%, and our conversion rate has exceeded 80%.”

“ It's been seamless to our customers, and is saving PGE over $125,000 annually".

Page 35: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

35

Questions?

Page 36: Lee J. Achenbach Sr. IT Analyst October 19, 2007 ARC - A Case Study 2007 Joint Payment Conference

36

Contacts

• Lee’s Email [email protected]

• Phone: (503) 612-3726

• Yeun's Email: [email protected]

• Phone: (626) 543-6368