lecture6(rockmassclassification)

Upload: chouszesze

Post on 04-Jun-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    1/75

    1

    Lecture 6

    Rock Mass Classification

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    2/75

    2

    Terzaghi's rock mass classification (1946)

    Rock loads (gravity being driving force), carried by steel sets, are estimated on the

    basis of a descriptive classification.

    Intact rock contains neither joints nor hair cracks. Hence, if it breaks, it breaks across sound

    rock. On account of the injury to the rock due to blasting, spalls may drop off the roof

    several hours or days after blasting. This is known as aspallingcondition.

    Hard, intact rock may also be encountered in thepopping condition involving the

    spontaneous and violent detachment of rock slabs from the sides or roof.

    Stratified rock consists of individual strata with little or no resistance against separationalong the boundaries between the strata. The strata may or may not be weakened by

    transverse joints. In such rock the spalling condition is quite common.

    Moderately jointed rock contains joints and hair cracks, but the blocks between joints are

    locally grown together or so intimately interlocked that vertical walls do not require lateral

    support. In rocks of this type, both spalling and popping conditions may be encountered.Blocky and seamy rock consists of chemically intact or almost intact rock fragments which

    are entirely separated from each other and imperfectly interlocked. In such rock, vertical

    walls may require lateral support.

    Crushedbut chemically intact rock has the character of crusher run. If most or all of the

    fragments are as small as fine sand grains and no recementation has taken place, crushedrock below the water table exhibits the properties of a water-bearing sand.

    Squeezing rock slowly advances into the tunnel without perceptible volume increase. A

    prerequisite for squeeze is a high percentage of microscopic and sub-microscopic particles

    of micaceous minerals or clay minerals with a low swelling capacity.

    Swelling rock advances into the tunnel chiefly on account of expansion. The capacity to

    swell seems to be limited to those rocks that contain clay minerals such as montmorillonite,

    with a high swelling capacity.

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    3/75

    3

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    4/75

    4

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    5/75

    5

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    6/75

    6

    Concept of Stand-up Time

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    7/75

    7

    Rock quality designation index (RQD) (Deere et al 1967)

    RQD is defined as the percentage of intact core pieces longer than 100 mm (4 inches) in the

    total length of core. The core should be at least NW size (54.7 mm or 2.15 inches in diameter)

    and should be drilled with a double-tube core barrel.

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    8/75

    8

    RQD = 115 3.3Jv Palmstrm (1982), when no core is available

    Jv is the sum of the number of joints per unit length for all

    joint (discontinuity) sets known as the volumetric joint count.

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    9/75

    9

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    10/75

    10

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    11/75

    11

    Rock Structure Rating (RSR) Wickham et al (1972)

    RSR =A +B + C.

    1.Parameter A, Geology: General appraisal of geological structure on the basisof:

    a. Rock type origin (igneous, metamorphic, sedimentary).

    b. Rock hardness (hard, medium, soft, decomposed).

    c. Geologic structure (massive, slightly faulted/folded, moderatelyfaulted/folded, intensely faulted/folded).

    2.Parameter B, Geometry: Effect of discontinuity pattern with respect to the

    direction of the tunnel drive on the basis of:

    a. Joint spacing.

    b. Joint orientation (strike and dip).

    c. Direction of tunnel drive.

    3.Parameter C: Effect of groundwater inflow and joint condition on the basis of:

    a. Overall rock mass quality on the basis of A and B combined.

    b. Joint condition (good, fair, poor).

    c. Amount of water inflow (in gallons per minute per 1000 feet of tunnel).

    Favorable

    Unfavorable

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    12/75

    12

    Rock Structure Rating (RSR) Wickham et al (1972)

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    13/75

    13

    Rock Structure Rating (RSR) Wickham et al (1972)

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    14/75

    14

    Rock Structure Rating (RSR) Wickham et al (1972)

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    15/75

    15

    Geomechanics Classification or the Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system. Bieniawski (1976)

    Also known as the South African Council for Science and Industrial Research (CSIR) system

    Six parameters are used to classify a rock mass using theRMR

    system:

    1. Uniaxial compressive strength of rock material.

    2. Rock Quality Designation (RQD).

    3. Spacing of discontinuities.

    4. Condition of discontinuities.

    5. Groundwater conditions.

    6. Orientation of discontinuities.

    Ratings are summed to give a value ofRMR.

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    16/75

    16

    Geomechanics Classification or the Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system. Bieniawski (1976)

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    17/75

    17

    Geomechanics Classification or the Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system. Bieniawski (1976)

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    18/75

    18

    Geomechanics Classification or the Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system. Bieniawski (1976)

    Bieniawski (1989) published a set of guidelines for the selection of support in tunnels

    Guidelines have been published for a 10 m span horseshoe shaped tunnel, constructed using drill and blast methods, in a

    rock mass subjected to a vertical stress < 25 MPa (equivalent to a depth below surface of

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    19/75

    19

    Geomechanics Classification or the Rock Mass Rating (RMR) system. Bieniawski (1976)

    Estimate of the support load (kN) = B100

    RMR100P

    = Unal (1983)

    B = tunnel width (m)

    = rock density (kg/m3

    )

    50)2(RMRE = Bieniawski (1978)

    E = modulus of deformation of rock mass

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    20/75

    20

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    21/75

    21

    Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q, Barton et al (1974) of the NGI

    Q varies on a logarithmic scale from 0.001 to a maximum of 1,000 and is defined by:

    SRF

    Jx

    J

    Jx

    J

    RQDQ w

    a

    r

    n

    =

    where,

    RQD Rock Quality Designation

    Jn Joint Set Number

    Jr Joint Roughness NumberJa Joint Alternation Number

    Jw Joint Water Reduction Factor

    SRF Stress Reduction Factor

    R k T lli Q li I d Q B l (1974) f h NGI

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    22/75

    22

    Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q, Barton et al (1974) of the NGI

    The first quotient (RQD/Jn) represents the structure of the rock mass or a

    measure of the rock block size.

    The second quotient (Jr/Ja) represents the roughness and frictional

    characteristics of the joint walls and filling materials.

    The third quotient (Jw/SRF) represents the total stress state of the rock mass

    which is affected by the presence of weaknesses and water inflow in the joints.

    Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q, Barton et al (1974) of the NGI

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    23/75

    23

    Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q, Barton et al (1974) of the NGI

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    24/75

    24

    Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q, Barton et al (1974) of the NGI

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    25/75

    25

    Rock Tunnelling Quality Index Q Barton et al (1974) of the NGI

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    26/75

    26

    Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q, Barton et al (1974) of the NGI

    Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q, Barton et al (1974) of the NGI

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    27/75

    27

    Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q, Barton et al (1974) of the NGI

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    28/75

    28

    Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q, Barton et al (1974) of the NGI

    Barton et al (1974) defined an additional parameter called the

    Equivalent Dimension,De, of the excavation. This dimension isobtained by dividing the span, diameter or wall height of the

    excavation by a quantity called theExcavation Support Ratio,ESR.

    Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q, Barton et al (1974) of the NGI

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    29/75

    29

    g Q y , Q, ( )

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    30/75

    30

    Barton (1989)

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    31/75

    Rock Tunnelling Quality Index, Q, Barton et al (1974) of the NGI

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    32/75

    32

    Barton et al (1980) provide additional information on rockbolt length, maximum unsupported spans and roof

    support pressures to supplement the support recommendations

    The length L of rockbolts can be estimated from the excavation widthB and the Excavation Support

    RatioESR:

    The maximum unsupported span can be estimated from:

    Grimstad and Barton (1993) suggest that the relationship between the value ofQ and the permanent roof

    support pressureProof is estimated from:

    Correlation between Q and RMR systems:

    44Q9lRMRn +=

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    33/75

    33

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    34/75

    34

    The use of at least two rock massclassification schemes is advisable.

    Estimation of TBM Advance Rate and Penetration Rate based on modified Q

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    35/75

    35

    Q

    index (QTBM) by Barton (1999)

    Penetration Rate (PR) : Rate of cutting and breaking the rock into fragment bythe cutter head of TBM (m/hr)

    Advance Rate (AR) : Rate of advancing the TBM that include changing cutter

    head, gripper advance, support installed and much removal etc. (m/hr)

    Extremely weak rock (squeezing rock, clay, fault zone etc. where Q=0.001)

    require extensive support and slow down TBM advance

    Extremely sound rock (unjointed hard massive rock where Q=1000) require

    frequent cutter head changes, also unfavorable to TBM advance

    Barton (1999), based on case records, back calculate and modify the Q

    index (call QTBM) for predicting the PR and AR taking into account of:

    Average cutter force

    Rock mass strength

    Orientation of fabric or joint structure in the direction of tunnel

    Compressive and point load strength index of the rock

    Cutter life index

    Rock stress level

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    36/75

    36Barton (1999)

    x

    qx

    20x

    SIGMAx

    Jx

    Jx

    RQDQ wr0=

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    37/75

    37

    5x

    20x

    CLIx

    /20Fx

    SRFx

    Jx

    JQ

    910

    an

    TBM=

    RQD0 = RQD in the tunnelling direction

    Jn, Jr, Ja, Jw and SRF same as those used in the Q index

    F = average cutter load (ton force)

    SIGMA = rock mass strength (MPa)take the lesser of SIGMACM (compression) or SIGMATM(tension) where,

    c = uniaxial compressive strength = density (gm/cm3)

    I50 = point load strength index

    CLI = cutter life index (e.g. 4 for quartzite, 90 for limestone)

    q = quartz content in percentage terms

    = induced biaxial stress on tunnel face (MPa)

    3

    1

    503

    1

    tTM

    3

    1

    c3

    1

    cCM

    4

    I5Q5SIGMA

    100

    Q5Q5SIGMA

    ==

    ==

    Based on 145 Tunnels (total length more than 1000 km) in hard

    rock soft rock faulted rock etc the following relationship is

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    38/75

    38

    rock, soft rock, faulted rock etc., the following relationship is

    empirically established:

    0.25me,performancexcep.poor

    0.21me,performancpoor

    0.19me,performancfair0.17me,performancgood

    0.17to0.13me,performancbest

    hourintimeTTxPRAR

    m

    =

    =

    ==

    =

    ==

    m is further correlated to cutter wear (cutter life index CLI, abrasiveness of rock),

    quartz content (q), porosity (n) of rock, tunnel diameter (D), support needed

    0.050.100.150.20

    12n

    20q

    CLI20

    5Dmm

    -0.21-0.19-0.17-0.22-0.5-0.7-0.9m1

    10001001010.10.010.001Q

    where, m1 is given below

    Approximate values of m in relation to Q

    Finally use with caution the following prediction:

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    39/75

    39

    ( )

    ( )

    m

    PR

    LT

    +

    =

    1

    1

    m0.2

    TBM

    0.2

    TBM

    LlengthwithtunnelpenetratetoTTime

    TQ5AR

    Q5PR

    Engineering Rock Mass Classification in China

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    40/75

    40

    (China Planning Publication No. GB 50218-94)Basic Quality (BQ) of a Rock Mass

    BQ = 90 +3Rc+250Kv

    where,

    Rc = Uniaxial compressive strength of intact rock (in MPa)

    2

    pr

    pm

    V

    V

    Kv = Intactness index of a rock mass =

    Vpm = Velocity of longitudinal elastic wave in rock mass (km/s)

    Vpr = Velocity of longitudinal elastic wave in intact rock (km/s)

    Engineering Rock Mass Classification in China

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    41/75

    41

    Table 1 Strength Description of a Rock Mass based on Uniaxial Compresssive Strength Rc

    Rc (MPa) > 60 60 30 30 15 15 5 < 5

    Strength

    Description

    Hard

    Rock

    Relatively

    Hard Rock

    Relatively

    Weak Rock

    Weak

    Rock

    Extremely

    Weak Rock

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    42/75

    Engineering Rock Mass Classification in China

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    43/75

    43

    Engineering Rock Mass Classification in China

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    44/75

    44

    Basic Quality (BQ) of a Rock Mass (Amended so as to consider stress conditions,

    groundwater and joint orientation

    [BQ] = BQ - 100 (K1+ K2+ K3)

    BQ = Basic Quality from Equation above

    K1 = Correction Factor for Groundwater Conditions

    K2 = Correction Factor for Joint Plane Orientation

    K3 = Correction Factor for In-situ Stress Conditions

    [BQ] = Amended Basic Quality Value

    Engineering Rock Mass Classification in China

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    45/75

    45

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    46/75

    Host Rock Rating (HRR) for Underground Excavation Projects in China

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    47/75

    47

    A national standard that has been specifically designed for underground excavation related to

    water resources and hydropower projects in China (Ministry of Water Resources and Ministry ofElectric Power)

    HRR = A + B + C + D + E

    where,

    A = Rating Factor related to Rock Strength (provided in Table 5)

    B = Rating Factor related to Rock Intactness (provided in Table 6)

    C = Rating Factor related to Joint Conditions (provided in Table 7)D = Rating Factor related to Groundwater Conditions (provided in Table 8)

    E = Rating Factor related to Joint Plane Orientation (provided in Table 9)

    Host Rock Rating (HRR) for Underground Excavation Projects in China

    Table 5 Rating Factor A related to Rock Strength

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    48/75

    48

    Table 5 Rating Factor A related to Rock Strength

    Description of Rock Strength

    Hard Rock Moderately HardRock

    Relatively WeakRock

    Weak Rock

    Uniaxial

    Compressive

    Strength of

    Saturated Rock

    (MPa)

    100 60 60 30 30 15 15 5

    Rating Factor A 30 20 20 10 10 5 5 0

    For Uniaxial Compressive Strength Rc > 100 MPa, Rating Factor A is 30

    Host Rock Rating (HRR) for Underground Excavation Projects in China

    T bl 6 R i F B l d R k I

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    49/75

    49

    Table 6 Rating Factor B related to Rock Intactness

    Description of Intactness

    Intact Relatively

    Intact

    Poor

    Intactness

    Relatively

    Fractured

    Fractured

    Intactness

    Factor Kv

    1.0 0.75 0.75 0.55 0.55

    0.35

    0.35 0.15 < 0.15

    Rating

    Factor

    B

    Hard

    Rock

    40 30 30 22 22 14 14 6 < 6

    Weak

    Rock

    25 19 19 14 14 9 9 4 < 4

    Host Rock Rating (HRR) for Underground Excavation Projects in China

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    50/75

    50

    Host Rock Rating (HRR) for Underground Excavation Projects in China

    Table 8 Rating Factor D related to Groundwater Conditions

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    51/75

    51

    Table 8 Rating Factor D related to Groundwater Conditions

    Sum of Rating

    Factors

    (A + B + C)

    State Wet, Dripping Small inflow Large Inflow

    Flow Rate

    (l/min/m)

    or

    Water Head (m)

    < 25

    or

    < 10

    25 125

    or

    10 - 100

    > 125

    or

    > 100

    100 - 85 Rating Factor (D) 0 0 -2 to -6

    85 - 65 0 to -2 0 to -2 -6 to -10

    65 - 45 -2 to -6 -2 to -6 -10 to -14

    45 - 25 -6 to -10 -10 to -14 -14 to -18

    < 25 -10 to -14 -14 to -18 -18 to -20

    Host Rock Rating (HRR) for Underground Excavation Projects in China

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    52/75

    52

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    53/75

    53

    Design Applications of HRR

    E(x 104MPa)C (MPa)f

    Support

    Requirements

    Rock PropertiesStrength vs

    Stress Ratio

    (S)

    Host

    Rock

    Rating

    Rock Mass StabilityRock

    Type

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture6(RockMassClassification)

    54/75

    54

    E(x 10 MPa)C (MPa)f

    0.2 - 0.020.3 - 0.050.55 - 0.40< 25Very unstable, could not stand

    up; severe deformation/failure

    V

    Bolts and shotcrete,

    with re-bar mesh

    and concrete lining

    0.5 - 0.20.7 - 0.30.8 - 0.55Downgrade

    to V for S