lecture 3: measuring the occurrence of disease reading: gordis – chapter 3 lilienfeld and stolley...

37
Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Upload: daisy-hicks

Post on 15-Jan-2016

230 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Lecture 3:Measuring the Occurrence of

Disease

Reading:Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Page 2: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Counting cases

• One’s knowledge of science begins when he can measure what he is speaking about and express it in numbers Lord Kelvin (1824-1907)

• To examine the transmission of disease in human populations, we need to be able to measure the frequency of disease occurrence and of deaths from the disease.

Page 3: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Measures

• How do we express the extent of morbidity and mortality resulting from disease?– Counts– Ratio

• a fraction with no specified relationship– Proportions

• what fraction of the population is affected

– Rates• how fast things are occurring

Page 4: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Measures

• Measures of morbidity– Prevalence: a proportion– Cumulative incidence: a rate– Incidence density: a rate

• Measures of mortality– Mortality rate: a rate– Standardized mortality (SMR)

Page 5: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Defining case

Natural course of disease

Exposure onset symptoms dx outcome

Incubationperiod

SubclinicalStage

ClinicalStage

RecoveryDeath

Chronic disease

Page 6: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Counts

• Prerequisite for epidemiologic investigation• Simplest measure of disease frequency

– Frequency of affected individuals• Useful for planning adequacy of health care

allocation at a particular level • For example:

– Number of West Nile virus cases

Page 7: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Ratio

• A fraction with no specified relationship between numerator and denominator

• Range: 0 to • A/B• Examples

– sex ratio (M:F)

Page 8: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Ratio

• Number of men with syphilis, 19912,412

• Number of women with syphilis. 19912,314

• Ratio of male to females2,412/2,314 = 1.04

(The numerator is not included in the denominator)

Page 9: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Proportion

• Type of ratio• Numerator included in denominator• May be expressed as percentage

Percentage = proportion x 100 %• Range: 0 to 1• A/(A+B)• Example

– Prevalence

Page 10: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Prevalence

• All individuals with a disease at a given point in time

• Dimensionless - should not be described as a rate - may be described as a percent

number of cases (A) todayP =

total population (A+B) today

Page 11: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Prevalence

• Proportion of individuals in a population who have the disease or condition of interest at a specific time period

• Utility– Describe health burden of a population– Status of disease in a population– Estimate the frequency of exposure– Project health care needs of affected

individuals

Page 12: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Types of prevalence

• Point prevalence – proportion of all cases at a specific point in time

• Period prevalence – proportion of all cases during a period of time

Page 13: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Point and period prevalence• Point prevalence

– Do you currently have asthma?• Period prevalence

– Have you had asthma during the last five years?• Every person in the numerator had the

disease at some time during the period specified.

• Period prevalence consists of the point prevalence at the beginning of a specified period of time plus all new cases that occur during that period.

Page 14: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Rate

• A special type of proportion• Unit of time in denominator• A/(A+B) per time interval• Always two components:

– New cases and time

Page 15: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Incidence• Incidence is an important rate…

– It is the proportion of people (at risk) who develop diseased during a specific time period.

• Three key elements:– Only new cases included in numerator– Total population at risk in the denominator– Time element – period over which new

cases developed

• Two main types of Incidence:

– Cumulative Incidence

– Incidence Rate (a.k.a. incidence density)

Page 16: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Cumulative Incidence

• One of the most widely used measures of disease risk.

• Estimate of probability (risk) that an individual will develop disease during a specified period of time

• Cumulative Incidence =

No. of new cases in a given period of time

No. of people at risk during that time

Page 17: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Incidence rate (incidence density)

• Cumulative Incidence gives each individual equal weight, but different people stay in the study for different length- having different contribution.

• Measure of the true rate of disease development

• Incidence rate =No. of new cases in a given period of time

total person-time of observation

Page 18: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Person-time

ID 1/95 1/96 1/97 1/98 1/99 1/00 Total

A 3

B 3

C 5

D 1

E 4

Total years at risk

• = enter the study, X = having disease,

loss to follow-up

16

x

x

5-year (1/95-1/00) Incidence rate = 2/16 = 12.5/100 person-years of observation

x

x

Page 19: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Prevalence vs. incidenceID 1/95 1/96 1/97 1/98 1/99 1/00

A

B

C

D

E

• = enter the study, X = having disease,

loss to follow-up, disease developing

x

x

x

x

1/97-1/00 cumulative incidence cases: A, E1/97-1/00 period prevalence cases: A, D, E1/98 point prevalence: A, D

Page 20: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Relationship between prevalence and incidence

• Incidence is a proxy for “risk”, whereas prevalence is best for assessing disease burden or case load in a geographic area.

• There is a well known relationship between them, namely –

Prevalence = Incidence x Duration of disease

P = I x D

Page 21: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Prevalent cases

+ Incident cases

Whole population at time t

Prevalent cases

Prevalent cases

Prevalent cases

Minus

cures or deaths due to disease

Whole population at time t +1

Page 22: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Examples of P = I x D • If the incidence of diabetes mellitus is 1% per

year and its approximate duration is 5 years, then what is its expected point prevalence?

• Assuming equal incidence of disease, which is more prevalent: pancreatic cancer or brain cancer?

Average duration of pancreatic cancer = 3 months

Average duration of brain cancer = 1.5 years

Page 23: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Measures of mortality

• Annual mortality rate from all causes =

Total no. of death from all causes in 1 year

No.of people in the population at midyear• Case-fatality rate =

No. of individuals dying during a specified period of time after disease onset

No. of individuals with the specified disease

Page 24: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Three common forms of rates

• Crude rates

e.g. crude birth rate, crude death rate

• Specific rates

e.g. sex-specific, age-specific, race-specific

• Adjusted rates

e.g. age-adjusted

Page 25: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Crude rate: exampleSuppose County B recorded 4000 births and 1500 deaths in 1999. Using U.S. Census data, we find that the population size is 200,000.

Crude birth rate =

No. of live births in time interval T

Total population

= 4,000/200,000 = 20 births per 1,000

Crude death rate =

No. of deaths in time interval T

Total population

= 1,500/200,000 = 7.5 deaths per 1,000

Page 26: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Specific Rates for Mortality in Older Adults

Rates for selected leading causes of death among older adults, by sex, and race -- United States, 1996*

Sex Race Cause of death† Total Male Female White BlackHeart disease 1,808 1,983 1,686 1,820 1,937(612,199)Malignant neoplasms 1,131 1,442 915 1,125 1,338(382,988) Cerebrovascular diseases 415 374 443 412 479(140,448)

* MMWR Dec 17, 1999 / 48(SS08);7-25

Page 27: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

How do we compare rates across populations?

Crude rates are not helpful because …

Populations differ in their age distributions

Populations differ in their racial distributions

Populations differ in their SES distributions

Page 28: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

How do we compare rates across populations?

We compare rates across populations by putting them on an even playing field -

that is, we either standardize one population on another or

we use an outside standard and adjust our populations to that standard.

Page 29: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

For our purposes, the most important is age-adjustment

Two types of age-adjustment

Direct Method

Indirect Method (SMR = standard mortality ratio)

Page 30: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Direct method: example

Population A Population B

AGE N Risk Cases N Risk Cases

<20 100 .1 10 500 .1 5021-50 200 .2 40 200 .2 40>50 500 .4 200 100 .4 40 800 250 800 130

CRUDE RISK = 250/800 = 31% 130/800 = 16%

• Crude risk indicates different risks of disease between populations.

• But age-specific rates indicate similar risks.

Page 31: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Direct method: example

Using the total of the two populations as the standard population

Population A Population B

AGE Std. Risk Cases Std. Risk Casespop. pop.

<20 600 .1 60 600 .1 6021-50 400 .2 80 400 .2 80>50 600 .4 240 600 .4 240

1600 380 1600 380

AGE-ADJUSTED RISK = 24% 250/800 = 24%

Page 32: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Direct method: exampleApply risks in population B to population A (using population A as the standard population.

Population A Population B

AGE Std. Risk Cases Std. Risk Casespop. pop.

<20 100 .1 10 100 .1 1021-50 200 .2 40 200 .2 40>50 500 .4 200 500 .4 200

800 250 800 250

AGE-ADJUSTED RISK = 31% 250/800 = 31%

Page 33: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Direct method• What information is needed to calculate age-

adjusted death rate, using the direct method?– Standard population distributed by age– Age-specific death rates in study

populations• The actual value of an age-adjusted rate is

meaningless because it depends on the choice of the standard population.

• It is only meaningful in comparison to other rates which have been adjusted by the same method and the same standard population.

Page 34: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Indirect method

• Apply rates from a standard population

to each age stratum in the study population

to obtain expected number.• This adjusted rate interpreted as:

the rate that would have been experienced by the study population if their rates had been similar to the standard population.

Page 35: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

Standardized mortality ratio (SMR)• SMR =

Observed number of cases per timeExpected number of cases per time

• SMR = 0 – indicates observed is not unusual

• SMR > 1.0 – indicates morbidity (or mortality) exceeds

expected• SMR = 2.0 indicates two-fold increase

• SMR < 1.0– indicates morbidity (or mortality) is less

than expected

Page 36: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

SMR: example- death in white miners

Est. pop. of white miners

Death rate in general pop.

Expected death

Observed death

Age (1) (2) (3)=(1)X(2) (4)

20-24 74598 12.26 9.14 10

25-29 85077 16.12 13.71 20

30-34 80845 21.54 17.41 22

35-44 148870 33.96 50.55 98

45-54 102649 56.82 58.32 174

55-59 42494 75.23 31.96 112

Total 534533 181.09 436

SMR = 436/181.09 = 2.41

Page 37: Lecture 3: Measuring the Occurrence of Disease Reading: Gordis – Chapter 3 Lilienfeld and Stolley – Chapter 4 Chapter 6, pp. 101-105, 109-117

SMR disadvantage

• SMR produces a ratio instead of a rate. It gives relative information but does not describe the mortality in the population.

• SMR depends on the choice of the standard population.