lecture 2b more prob

Upload: zoha-ahmed

Post on 04-Jun-2018

217 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    1/40

    Geostatistics for ReservoirCharacterization

    Lecture 2b More probability

    Geostatistics for ReservoirCharacterization

    Lecture 2b More probabilityIn this section we will continue covering the

    following topics ...

    Combination of Events

    Basic Operations

    Conditional Probabilities

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    2/40

    Definitions . . .

    Experiment - using equipment to measure asample under given conditions (T)

    Hassler cell for gas perm; density log; drill-stem test

    Sample space - all possible values that the

    measurement might give 0 < kplug

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    3/40

    Example 1

    Net Pay and Core Data

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    100

    0 5 10 15 20

    Per

    meability,mD

    Porosity, %

    86 pts

    86 experiments, = {0 < kplug 1 md is an event E1

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    4/40

    Example 2

    Net Pay and Core Data

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    100

    0 5 10 15 20

    Per

    meability,mD

    Porosity, %

    86 pts

    86 experiments, = {0 10% is an event E2

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    5/40

    Combining Events . .

    Intersection

    E1 E2 x x E1and x E2

    the symbol means is an element of

    E1

    E2

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    6/40

    Example 3

    Net Pay and Core Data

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    100

    0 5 10 15 20

    Per

    meability,mD

    Porosity, %

    86 pts

    86 experiments, = {0 < kplug 10% is an event E2

    E1

    E2

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    7/40

    Example 2 from textIntersection & Logging Tool

    Responses

    E1 E3 Facies 3

    Facies 1 Facies 2

    Facies 3

    Porosity

    GR

    GR

    GR

    GR1

    2

    3

    4

    1 2 4 3

    E

    E

    E E

    1

    2

    3 4

    -

    -

    -

    -

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    8/40

    Basic Operations . .Union

    E1 E2x x E1 or x E2}

    E1

    E2

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    9/40

    Example 2, textUnion & Logging Tool Responses

    E1

    E3

    Facies 1 and Facies 3

    Facies 1 Facies 2

    Facies 3

    Porosity

    GR

    GR

    GR

    GR1

    2

    3

    4

    1 2 4 3

    E

    E

    E E

    1

    2

    3 4

    -

    -

    -

    -

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    10/40

    Basic Operations . .Complement

    AE

    Ec

    = {x: x E}

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    11/40

    Basic Operations . .Null Set

    E1 E2 E1and E2are disjoint or mutuallyexclusive

    AB

    E1E2

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    12/40

    Probability . . .

    Define an event E

    Make n measurements (T)

    Suppose m measurements satisfy E

    We define the probability of E to be:

    Prob(E) = limn (m/n)

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    13/40

    Probability - Examples Procedure consists of two parts

    An identifiable event E, e.g.,

    E = Facies A at a particular location

    E = 100 < k < 300 md for a core plug

    A number p expressing event likelihood e.g.,

    Of 300m gross pay in a well, 240m is productive

    E = One meter of productive or net payp = Prob(E) = 240/300 = 0.80

    Eighteen of thirty well tests had k > 100 md

    E = well test with k > 100 mdp = Prob(E) = 18/30 = 0.6

    Interpret probability as a frequency

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    14/40

    Probability Example

    Assessing Net Pay from Core Data

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    100

    0 5 10 15 20

    Permeability,mD

    Porosity, %

    86 pts

    Let E1 = {k | k > 1 md}

    Prob(E1) = 47/86 = 0.55

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    15/40

    Probability Example

    Assessing Net Pay from Core Data

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    100

    0 5 10 15 20

    Permeability,mD

    Porosity, %

    86 pts

    Let E2 = { | > 10%}

    Prob(E2

    ) = 38/86 = 0.44

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    16/40

    Key Point . . .

    If areas on Venn Diagram are

    proportional to m(E1) and m(E2),they represent probabilities, e.g.

    Prob(E1c) = 1- Prob( E1)

    Leads to fundamental algebraof probabilities

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    17/40

    Fundamental Law of Addition . . .

    Prob(E1 E2 (and)

    Prob(E1)+ Prob(E

    2)-Prob(E1E2Prob(E1 E2 Prob(E1)+ Prob(E2)

    for E1 ,E2 mutually exclusive(probabilities add)

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    18/40

    Conditional Probability . . .

    Prob(E1E2) = Conditionalprobability (probability of E1 given

    than E2 has occurred)

    Pr ob(E1

    | E2

    )Pr ob(E1 E2 )

    Pr ob(E2 )

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    19/40

    Schematic of Conditional Probability . . .

    E1 E2

    Prob(E 1| E 2) =

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    20/40

    In terms of Prob definition . . .

    E2

    E1 E2

    Prob(E 1 | E2) =P(E1 E2)

    P(E2)

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    21/40

    Probability Example 6, text

    Assessing Net Pay from Core Data

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    100

    0 5 10 15 20

    Per

    meability,mD

    Porosity, %

    86 pts

    Recall E1 = {k | k > 1 md} and E2 = { | > 10%}

    Prob(E1) = 0.55 and Prob(E2) = 0.44

    Prob(E1 E2) = 36/86 = 0.42 so

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    22/40

    Probability Example

    Assessing Net Pay from Core Data

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    100

    0 5 10 15 20

    Per

    meability,mD

    Porosity, %

    86 pts

    Prob(E1 | E2) = Prob(E1 E2)/Prob(E2) = 0.42/0.44 = 0.96so IF > 10%, we have a 96% chance of having net pay

    On the other hand...

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    23/40

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    24/40

    Probability Example

    Assessing Net Pay from Core Data

    In summary, based on core data given,

    > 10% is reliable indicator of net pay (96% correct)

    < 10% is less reliable non-pay (1 - 0.23 = 77% correct)

    0.01

    0.1

    1

    10

    100

    0 5 10 15 20

    Permeability,mD

    Porosity, %

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    25/40

    Cond. Prob. . . . Special cases

    E2

    E1

    Prob(E1E

    2)

    Prob(E1)

    Prob(E2)

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    26/40

    Cond. Prob. . . . Special cases

    E1

    E2

    Prob(E1|E2 ) = 1

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    27/40

    Cond. Prob. . . . Special casesNull Event (ME events)

    E1 E2

    Prob(E1E2) = 0Prob(E1cE2) = 1

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    28/40

    Multiplication Law

    Conditional probability definitionmore commonly written as . . .

    Prob(E1E2) = Prob(E1E2) Prob(E2)

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    29/40

    An Important Special Case. . .

    For E1 and E2 independent

    Prob(E1 | E2) = Prob(E1) . . . then

    Prob(E1 E2 ProbE1 ProbE2(or)

    (probabilities multiply)

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    30/40

    Example . . . Probability of Rolling a Seven

    with two dice

    Prob(16) = (1/6)(1/6) = 1/36Multiplication Law . . . Die independent

    Prob(16)+ Prob(25) + Prob(34) + . . . =1/36 + 1/36 + 1/36 + . . .= 1/6

    Addition Law . . . Each outcome mutually exclusive

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    31/40

    Conditional Probabilities Uses . . .

    Evaluating independence Probability trees

    Bayes theorem

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    32/40

    Evaluating Independence . . .

    Example 7, Text

    Let A, B, C be facies in 5 vertical wells

    Posi ti on Well 1 Well 2 Well 3 Well 4 Well 5

    Top C B A B AMiddle A A B A B

    Bottom B C C C C

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    33/40

    Evaluating Independence . . .

    Let E1 = A is middle facies

    E2 = C is bottom facies

    Are E1 and E2 independent?

    Prob(E1) = 3/5

    Prob(E2) = 4/5 , and

    Prob(E1E2 . . . henceProb(E1) Prob(E2) = 12/25 Prob(E1E2 E1 and E2 are not independent (i.e. there is a

    characteristic sequence in the facies data)

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    34/40

    Probability Tree for Exploration . . .

    F4 F4F4F4 F4 F4

    F4 F4 S4S4S4 S4

    S4S4S4S4

    Prob( 2 successes)X10 4: 144 108 72 64164872 128 96 64-

    0.20.40.6 0.80.80.8 0.80.9 0.20.2 0.20.4 0.40.60.60.1

    F3F3F3F3 S3 S3 S3 S3

    0.2 0.20.80.8 0.6 0.40.10.9

    F2F 2 S2S2

    0.9 0.1 0.8 0.2

    F1S1

    Start

    162

    0.10.9

    Want to drill four wells with initial 0.1 prob of successSuccess prob doubles with previous success

    What are probabilities of various outcomes?

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    35/40

    Bayes Theorem . . .Can express Prob(E1E2) two ways Prob(E1E2) = Prob(E1E2) Prob(E2)

    or

    Prob(E1E2) = Prob(E2E1) Prob(E1) Equating above gives cond prob formula

    Prob(E 1|E 2) =Prob(E 2|E 1) Prob( E 1)

    Prob( E 2)

    E l E i i N P i h

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    36/40

    Example - Estimating Net Pay with

    GRLet

    E1 = k > 1 mD (ie net)

    E2 = GR < 30 API

    -The field NTG is 0.7

    -Core GR showsGR < 30 for 60% of the time when k > 1

    GR > 30 for 90% of time when k < 1

    -New well shows GR < 30 for 80% of interval

    -What is best NTG estimate for the new well?

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    37/40

    Example - Estimating Net Pay with GR E1 = k > 1 mD (ie net) E2 = GR < 30 API

    -Probabilities BEFORE new well is measured

    Field NTG is 0.7: Prob(E1) = 0.7

    Core GR < 30 for 60% when k > 1: Prob(E2

    |E1

    ) = 0.6

    Core GR > 30 for 90% of time when k < 1: Prob(E2c|E1

    c) = 0.9

    -Probabilities AFTER new well is measured

    GR < 30 for 80% of interval: Prob(E2) = 0.8

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    38/40

    Example - Estimating Net Pay with

    GR-Field NTG is 0.7: Prob(E1) = 0.7-Core GR < 30 for 60% when k > 1: Prob(E2|E1) = 0.6

    -Core GR > 30 for 90% when k < 1: Prob(E2c|E1

    c) = 0.9

    -So, BEFORE the new well is measured,

    93.03.01.00.76.0

    7.06.0)|(obPr

    )(obPr)|(obPr)(obPr)|(obPr

    )(obPr)|(obPr)|(obPr

    21

    11211211221

    EE

    EEEEEE

    EEE

    EE cc

    51.03.09.00.74.0

    7.04.0

    )|(obPr

    )(obPr)|(obPr)(obPr)|(obPr

    )(obPr)|(obPr)|(obPr

    21

    1111

    11

    1

    22

    2

    2

    EE

    EEEEEE

    EEE

    EEcccc

    c

    c

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    39/40

  • 8/13/2019 Lecture 2B More Prob

    40/40

    Key Points . . .

    Definitions:

    Null set, complement, mutually

    exclusive, independent, union,

    intersection, a priori, a posteriori Fundamental laws: addition and

    multiplication

    Conditional probabilities

    Bayes theorem