lecture 17 2011a - university of british columbiatchandy/lecture_17.pdf · lecture 17 • proxemics...
TRANSCRIPT
Lecture 17Lecture 17
•• ProxemicsProxemics
•• Interpersonal distance (or IPD)Interpersonal distance (or IPD)
•• Effects of gender and culture Effects of gender and culture
•• Effects of gender identity Effects of gender identity
•• Violations of personal space Violations of personal space
•• Effects of gender and gazeEffects of gender and gaze
•• Neural regulation of IPD Neural regulation of IPD
•• Another role for the amygdala Another role for the amygdala
Social SpacingSocial Spacing
ProxemicsProxemics
The study of theThe study of thethe spatial separation individualsthe spatial separation individualsnaturally maintain in social andnaturally maintain in social and
interpersonal situations, and howinterpersonal situations, and howthis separation relates to variousthis separation relates to variousenvironmental, personal, social,environmental, personal, social,
and cultural factorsand cultural factors
A definition
ProxemicsProxemics
The Zones of Personal Space
IPD and Gender/CultureIPD and Gender/Culture
Sussman (1982)
Proxemic theory emphasizes cultural uses of interpersonal distance(or IPD) to regulate intimacy via sensory exposure. However,research has not considered whether gender and language may alsoplay a role in IPD. This study assessed interpersonal distancebetween seated conversants from each of three cultures varying inpurported contact norms. Thirty-five Japanese, 31 Venezuelan foreignstudents (assigned to speak either their native language or English),and 39 Americans had a 5-minute conversation on a common topicwith a same-sex, same-nationality confederate. We found: (a) Whenspeaking their native languages, Japanese will sit farther apart thanVenezuelans, with Americans at an intermediate distance; (b)females will sit closer than males; and (c) foreign subjects, whenspeaking English, will more closely approximate Americanconversational distance than when speaking their native languages.
How do they affect IPD?
Sussman (1982)
Plotted is IPD ofconversants, as afunction of male(left) vs. female
(right) dyads, andJapanese (circles),
American (triangles)and Venezualan(squares) dyads
IPD and Gender/CultureIPD and Gender/Culture
How do they affect IPD?
Sussman (1982)
Plotted is IPD ofconversants, as a
function of Japanese(circles), andVenezualan
(squares) dyads,and whether the
dyads werespeaking their
native langauge(left) vs. english
(right).
IPD and Gender/CultureIPD and Gender/Culture
How do they affect IPD?
An important distinction between sex and identity
In considering the effect of gender on interpersonaldistance, we argue for an important distinction tobe made between biological sex vs. gender identity.In this study, we found that gender identityaccounts for more of the variation in IPD than theconventionally reported gender variable, sex. Ourfindings suggest that a more sophisticatedconceptualization of the impact of gender on IPD iswarranted than can be accounted for by biologicalsex differences alone.
Uzzell (2006)
Gender Identity and IPDGender Identity and IPD
Uzzell (2006)
Gender Identity and IPDGender Identity and IPD
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Masculine Neutral Feminine
MaleFemale
Intr
erp
ers
on
al
dis
tan
ce (
In)
Gender identity
IPD of conversantsvaried more as a
function of genderidentity than of actual
sex of participants
Violations of Personal SpaceViolations of Personal Space
From Borat
Bailenson (2003)
Maintaining Interpersonal DistanceMaintaining Interpersonal Distance
walk to the front or back of the virtual human
Your startingposition
Shown is top down viewof actual room you walkin, with location of thevirtual human you needto walk towards/around
Virtualhuman
Bailenson (2003)
Maintaining Interpersonal DistanceMaintaining Interpersonal Distance
We keep greaterinterpersonaldistance when
facing vs. behinda person
Distancefrom back
of “human”
Your walkingpaths
walk to the front or back of the virtual human
Distance fromfront of
“human”
Bailenson (2003)
Maintaining Interpersonal DistanceMaintaining Interpersonal Distance
Gender and Gaze manipulated
Bailenson (2003)
Maintaining Interpersonal DistanceMaintaining Interpersonal Distance
Gender, Gaze, and stepping aside
Avoidancemagnitude: how
much do you moveover to let the
“avatar” or “agent”pass, and is thatdistance affected
by the A/A’sgender and gaze?!
An “avatar” or“agent”, whostarts to walktowards you
Your startingpoint
Maintaining Interpersonal DistanceMaintaining Interpersonal Distance
Bailenson (2003)
Gender, Gaze, and stepping aside
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Females Males Females Males
GazeNo Gaze
Avo
idan
ce m
ag
nit
ud
e (
CM
)
MaleVirtual Human
FemaleVirtual Human
Direct gaze from virtualmales increased the
avoidance magnitude infemale participants. In
contrast, direct gazefrom female virtualhumans decreased
avoidance magnitude inmales
Neural Regulation of IPDNeural Regulation of IPD
Another role for the amygdala
Adolphs (2009)
Neural Regulation of IPDNeural Regulation of IPD
Adolphs (2009)
Neural Regulation of IPDNeural Regulation of IPD
Adolphs (2009)
Synopsis of patient
Neural Regulation of IPDNeural Regulation of IPD
Adolphs (2009)
“normal” participants wereplaced in an fMRI scanner,and an experimenter was
either standing close next tothem, or on the far side of
the scanner room. Amygdalaactivation increased for the“close” condition (plotted is
amydala activation in “close”condition minus “far
condition)
Right Amygdala
Act
ivati
on
clo
se -
far
Amygdala response in “normals”