leaving no one behind - resource centre · countries, billions of people across the world are being...
TRANSCRIPT
By 2030, we could live in a world free from extreme poverty in which all children have equal chances to survive and reach their full potential in life. For this to happen, mechanisms to ensure that disadvantaged groups are not left behind by progress must be embedded in the post-2015 global development framework.
Stepping stone equity targets are one such mechanism. These would serve as interim benchmarks across all goal areas to ensure that disadvantaged groups are on track to achieve final targets and are catching up with more advantaged groups.
By 2030, no post-2015 target should be considered met unless it is met for all.
leaving no one behindEmbedding equity in the post-2015 framework through stepping stone targets
2
• Billions of people are being excluded from global progress, a significant proportion of whom are children.TheblindspotoftheMillenniumDevelopmentGoalstoinequalitiesmustbecorrected;itwillnotbepossibletoendextremepovertyunderthepost-2015frameworkifpeoplecontinuetobeleftbehind.
• Inequalities are not an inevitable outcome of development progress.PositivestoriesfromcountriesincludingIndonesia,BeninandPerudemonstratethatgovernmentscantakestepstoensurethatdisadvantagedchildrencatchupwiththeirmoreadvantagedpeers.
• The process to define a post-2015 sustainable development framework offers an opportunity to change the course of human history.Thenewframeworkmustincludeconcretemechanismstoensurenooneisleftbehindunderanygoal,including:– Anexplicitcommitmentthat,in2030,no target will be considered met unless
met for all groups.– Stepping stone equity targets to incentivise equitable progress across all
goal areas.Thesewouldbesetforinterimpointsbetween2015and2030,andwouldhelpensurethatdisadvantagedgroupsarecatchingupandareontracktomeet2030targets.
– Additionalmeasurestopromoteequity,including:goalstoachievegender equalityandensureopen, inclusive and accountable governance;targetstoreduce income inequality,implement policies that reduce inequalities,andhalt environmental degradation;andmechanismstomonitorequitableprogressthroughdisaggregated data,linkedtoaccountabilityandplanningprocesses.
KEy mEssagEs
Diene, age eight, crosses the dangerous border between Uganda and DRC to go to school.
Pho
To
:Jon
AT
hA
nh
yAM
s/sAv
eTh
eCh
IlDr
en
3
Thepast25yearshaveseenunprecedentedprogressinpovertyreduction.Thenumberofpeoplelivinginabsolutepovertyhashalved,nearly50millionmorechildrenareinschool,and14,000morechildrensurviveeveryday.1however,whileaverageratesofprogresshavebeenimpressiveinmanycountries,billionsofpeopleacrosstheworldarebeingleftbehind.
Manyofthosebeingleftbehindarechildren,withastaggering66%ofchildrenindevelopingcountrieslivingonlessthan$2adayandoneineightchildreninoeCDcountrieslivinginrelativepoverty.2
Fewwouldarguethatachild’slifechancesshouldbedeterminedbeforetheyareborn.Butacrosstheworld,inhigh-andlow-incomecountriesalike,children’sprospectsinlifeareinlargepartdeterminedbyfactorsoutsideoftheircontrol–theirbirthplace,gender,ethnicity,socioeconomicgroup,andwhetherornottheyhaveadisability.Asaresult,significantgapsremainbetweentheworld’shavesandhave-nots,withpovertyanddisadvantagepassedfromgenerationtogeneration.
ThePosT-2015FrAMework:AwInDowoFoPPorTunITy
wecouldseeanendtoextremepovertywithinourlifetime,includinganendtopreventablechilddeaths,theeradicationofextremeincomepoverty,andensuringallchildrenareinschoolandlearning.3
Butthisvisionwillnotbeachievedifpeoplecontinuetobeleftbehind.endingextremepovertywillhingeonshiftingthetrajectoryofglobaldevelopmentontoamoreequitablepathway,ensuringthatallchildrenhaveequalchancestosurviveandthriveinlife.
Theongoingprocesstodefineanewpost-2015frameworktosucceedtheMillenniumDevelopmentGoals(MDGs)presentsanextraordinarywindowofopportunitytodrivethischange.leavingnoonebehindunderthenewframeworkwillrequireprogressforthosefurthestbehindtoaccelerateagainstabackdropofimprovementforall.systematicdisparitiesinchildren’slifechancesacrosshealth,educationandotherhumandevelopmentspheresmustclose.
sTePPInGsToneTArGeTsTosPurequITABleProGress
Toachievetheseobjectives,thepost-2015frameworkmustincludeconcretemechanismstoincentiviseshiftsinpolicyandpracticesothattheneedsofthosewhoarefurthestbehindaremetfirst,andgapsbetweenadvantagedanddisadvantagedgroupsclose.
Thisbriefingfocusesononesuchmechanism–steppingstoneequitytargets.steppingstonetargetsareinterimbenchmarksfordisadvantagedgroups,andshouldaccompany2030targetsacrossallgoalareasinthepost-2015framework.Theywouldspecifytheprogressthatdisadvantagedgroupsmustbemakingintherun-upto2030toensuretheyareontrackforachievingthefinaltargetsandarecatchingupwithmoreadvantagedgroups.By2030,notargetshouldbeconsideredmetunlessitismetforall.
steppingstonetargetswouldhelptoembedequityacrosstheentirepost-2015framework,addressinggroup-basedinequalitiesacrossalldimensionsofhumandevelopment.Assuch,theywouldcomplementadditional2030targetstodirectlytackleinequalitiesthatareparticularlydamagingtochildren,includingatargettotackleincomeinequalityandagoaltoadvancegenderequality.Together,thesemechanismswouldgearthepost-2015frameworkfirmlytowardsthepromotionofequity,helpingtorealiseourvisionofaworldinwhichnooneisleftbehind.
1 introduction
4
IthaslongbeenacknowledgedthattoomanypeoplehavebeenleftbehindundertheMDGframework,particularlypoorandmarginalisedchildren.4
Monitoringprogressthroughaverageratesofchangehasmaskedinequalitiesbetweendifferentgroups.Forexample:• Ifrecenttrendsineducationcontinue,boysfrom
richfamiliesinsub-saharanAfricawillreachuniversalprimaryschoolcompletionby2021.Thepoorestgirlswillnotreachthisgoaluntil2086.5
• InequalitiesinchildmortalityratesbetweenthepoorestandrichestsectionsofsocietyhaveremainedhighindevelopingcountriesovertheMDGperiod,increasinginmorethanathirdofcountriesincludedinrecentresearch.6
• Fornutrition,improvementsinstuntingratessince1990havegenerallybeenaccompaniedbyhighandpersistinginequalities.whileahandfulofcountrieshaveachievedfasterratesofprogressforthe
poorestsectionsofsociety,anequalnumberhaveseenconsiderablyfasterprogressformoreaffluentgroups,resultingingrowinginequalities.7
Inequalityinchildren’slifechancesisnotaproblemconfinedsolelytodevelopingcountries.Intheuk,forexample,progressinreducingchildpovertyhasstalledinrecentyears,with3.5millionchildrenlivinginrelativepovertyin2012.8Ineducation,progressinlearningoutcomesfordisadvantagedchildreninbothearlyyearsandsecondaryeducationhasincreasedconsiderablysince2005.however,gapsinlearningoutcomesbetweenthesegroupshavebeenpersistent,reducingbyonlytwopercentagepointsforearlyyearsandonepercentagepointforsecondaryeducationbetween2005and2012.9
Thesetrendsareamajorcauseforconcern.Incountriesacrosstheworld,particulargroupsofchildrenarebeingexcludedfromdevelopmentprogress(seeBox1).
2 LooKing bEnEath nationaL avEragEs to EnsurE no onE is LEft bEhind
Box1:whoAreTheChIlDrenThATAreBeInGhelDBACk?
Childrenarebeingleftbehindincountriesacrosstheworldsimplybecausetheyhavebeenbornintoaparticulardisadvantagedgroup,definedbysocioeconomicbackground,gender,region,disability,orethnicorotheridentitygroup.suchinequalitiesoftenstemfromhistoricalpatternsofdiscriminationthathavesystematicallydeprivedparticulargroupsofeconomic,socialandpoliticalopportunitiesovertime.10Inmanycases,theseinequalitiesarebeingexacerbatedbyclimatechange
andenvironmentaldegradation,towhichpoorandmarginalisedgroupsareparticularlyvulnerable.11
Thosewhoarefurthestbehindtendtobemembersofmorethanonedisadvantagedgroupandsufferfrommultiple,overlappingformsofdisadvantage.Duetopervasiveanddeeplyrootedsocialnorms,womenandgirlsareoftenamongthemostdisadvantagedinanygroup,andfacethegreatestbarrierstofulfillingtheirpotential.Forexample,inBeninandPeru,asinmanycountries
continued opposite
2loo
kIn
GB
eneA
Th
nA
TIo
nA
lAv
erA
GesT
oen
sur
eno
on
eIsleFTB
ehIn
D
5
acrosstheworld,genderdisadvantageoverlapswithregionaldisparitiesinaccesstoeducationandlearningoutcomes.AsFigure1shows,84%oftherichestyoungmeninthelittoralregionofBeninhadcompletedprimaryschoolin2006,comparedwithonly1%ofthepoorestwomenintheAliboriregion.12InPeru,20%ofthepoorestgirlscompletedprimaryschoolinruralareaswithabasicunderstandingofmathematics,comparedwith90%oftherichestmalesinurbanareas.13
vulnerablechildrenlivingonthemarginsofsocietyareoftentheveryfurthestbehindintermsofhealth,educationandotherdimensionsofhumandevelopment,andfaceadditionalbarriersofstigmaanddiscrimination.Theseincludechildrenlivingonthestreetorininstitutions,andwhoareengagedinhazardouslabour.orphanedchildren,forexample,are12%lesslikelytogotoschoolthantheirpeers.14Childrenwithdisabilitiesareparticularlyvulnerable,beingmorelikelytobeplacedinharmfulinstitutionalcareandtosufferfromabuse.15
whileincomepovertyisnotaninnatecharacteristicinthesamewayasbirthplaceorsex,thesocioeconomicgroupthatachildisbornintooftenhassignificantimpactsontheirlifechances.societieswithhighlevelsofincomeinequalitytendtohavelowerlevelsofsocialmobilitybecauseparentswholackdisposableincomearenotabletoinvestasmuchinchildren’shealthandeducation,orgivethemaccesstovaluablesocialnetworksandopportunities.16Inthisway,economicinequalitiesamongadultscantranslateintounequallifechancesforchildren,furtherentrenchinginequalitiesbetweengroupsthroughtheintergenerationaltransferofpoverty.
Disadvantageinearlychildhoodcanhaveknock-onimpactsthroughoutanindividual’slife–forexample,childrenwhomissoutoneducationarelesslikelytoaccessthesameeconomicopportunitiesastheireducatedpeerswhentheygrowup.17ensuringallchildrenhaveanequalstartinlifeisthereforecriticalforendingpoverty.
FIGure1:DIFFerenTIAlsInPrIMArysChoolCoMPleTIonBeTweenreGIonAl,GenDerAnDweAlThGrouPsInBenIn,2006
source:unesCoworldInequalityDatabaseoneducation
Box1continued
Alibori
0% 100%
Region
+ Gender
Alibori
Littoral
+ Wealth
Alibori, female
Alibori, male
Littoral, female
Littoral, male
littoral
Female Male
Female Male
rich
richest
richest
richest
Poorest
rich
rich
Poorest
leA
vIn
Gn
oo
ne
Beh
InD
6
oPTInGForequITABleProGress
whiletoomanypeoplehavebeenleftbehindunderthepost-2015framework,theglobalpictureisnotwhollynegative.Progresshasnotalwaysbeenaccompaniedbygrowinginequalities.Forexample,intheuk,innerlondonhasrisenfromthesecond-worstperformingregionforsecondaryeducationinenglandtothesecondbestoverthepastfiveyears,andalsoachievedthelowestgapinlearningoutcomesbetweenadvantagedanddisadvantagedstudentsofallregions.18whileBangladeshiandblackAfricanstudentswerepreviouslytrailingbehindtheirwhitepeersintheenglisheducationsystem,Bangladeshistudentsarenowoutperformingwhitestudents,whileblackAfricanstudentsareachievingsimilargradestowhitestudents.19
Casesofdisadvantagedgroupsofchildrencatchingupwiththeirpeerscanalsobefoundindevelopingcountries.Forexample,Figure2showschangesinunder-fivechildmortalitysince1994intworegionsofIndonesia–lampung,arelativelybetterperformingregion,andwestnusaTenggara,aregionthatisfurtherbehind.20Figure2illustrateshowgapsbetweentheseregionshavevariedovertime,increasingatsomejuncturesanddecreasingatothers.Positively,thegaphasbeenreducinginrecentyearsandshouldcloseifrecentprogressismaintained.whereas,in1994,81morechildrenweredyinginwestnusaTenggarathaninlampungoutofevery1,000born,thisgaphasnowreducedto32.
ThereductionofdisparitiesinchildmortalityacrosssomeregionsofIndonesiareflectsexplicitcommitmenttointegratedchildhealthandprotectionwithinnationaldevelopmentplans.Thishasbeensupportedbyeffortstoachieveuniversalhealthinsuranceand,insomecases,thedecentralisationofbudgetsanddecision-making,andinitiativestoreachdisadvantagedregionsandgroups.21Thereisstillsomewaytogotoeliminatepreventablechildmortalityandinequalitiesinchildren’ssurvivalchancesinIndonesia,bothwithinandbetweenregions,andtoimprovetheimplementationofpoliciestoachievethesegoals.however,progressinsomeregionsinrecentyearshasbeensubstantial,withsomedisadvantagedchildrenstartingtocatchupwiththeirpeers.
Beninisanexampleofalow-incomecountrywhereaverageprogresshasmaskedsignificantvariationbetweenrelativelymoreandlessadvantagedsocialgroups,butwheredisadvantagedgroupsaremakingrapidprogress.Thecountryasawholehasachievedimpressivereductionsinchildmortalityinrecentdecades,from166deathsper1,000livebirthsin1996to70in2012.22however,disparitiesbetweenregionsandethnicgroupsremainhigh.Forexample,childrenintheDendiethnicgrouparestillnearlythreetimesmorelikelytodiebeforereachingtheirfifthbirthdaythanyorubachildren,with133Dendichildrendyingper1,000livebirthscomparedwith49yorubachildren(seeFigure323).
source:Dhsdata,savetheChildrencalculations24
FIGure2:TrenDsInunDer-FIveChIlDMorTAlITyInlAMPunGAnDwesTnusATenGGArA,InDonesIA
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Ch
ild M
ort
alit
y R
ate
(per
1,0
00
live
bir
ths)
1994
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
West Nusa Tenggara
Lampung
Country (average)
2loo
kIn
GB
eneA
Th
nA
TIo
nA
lAv
erA
GesT
oen
sur
eno
on
eIsleFTB
ehIn
D
7
Morepositively,theDendiethnicgroupisontracktoeliminatepreventablechilddeathsby2030.Figure3showsthetargetthresholdforlow-incomecountriesatwhichitislikelythatchildrenarenolongerdyingunnecessarilyfrompreventablecauses–25deathsper1,000livebirths.25Ifaverageratesofprogresssince1996continue,theDendiethnicgroupcouldreachthistargetby2026.Thiswouldbearemarkableachievementforadisadvantagedgroupinalow-incomecountry.however,yorubachildrencouldreachthistargettenyearsearlieriftheyalsomaintainaverageprogress.ThechallengeforBeninistofurtheraccelerateprogressforgroupsthathavehistoricallybeenleftbehindinordertoensurethatallchildrenhavegoodandequalchancesinlife.
Theseexamplesareillustrativeofthemixedglobalpictureofdifferentialsinchildren’slifechancesacrosstheworld,andthesignificantamountofworkthatremainstobedonetoensurethatnochildisleftbehindby2030.however,thefactthatgapsarestartingtoclosebetweensomegroupsdemonstratesthatrisinginequalitiesinchildren’slifechancesarenotanecessaryby-productofprogress.equitableprogressispossible.Itiswithinthepowerofgovernmentstomakepolicychoicestopursueprogressive,moreequitabledevelopmentpathways,andofdevelopmentpartnerstosupporttheseeffortsintheworld’spoorestcountries(Box2).
source:Dhsdata,savetheChildrencalculations
First-time mother, Tia, holds her newborn son at a health centre in Indonesia.
Pho
To
:DA
vID
wA
rD
ell/sAv
eTh
eCh
IlDr
en
FIGure3:TrenDsInunDer-FIveChIlDMorTAlITyAMonGTheyoruBAAnDDenDIeThnICGrouPsInBenIn
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Ch
ild M
ort
alit
y R
ate
(per
1,0
00
live
bir
ths)
1996
1998
2000
2002
2004
2006
2008
2010
2012
2014
2016
2018
2020
2028
2024
2022
2030
2026
Dendi ethnic
Yoruba
National average
Target for ending preventable deaths
Maintaining average rates of progress
leA
vIn
Gn
oo
ne
Beh
InD
8
Box2:shAPInGPolICIesToensureequAllIFeChAnCesForChIlDren
Theexactpoliciesrequiredtoadvanceequallifechancesforchildrenarecontext-andsector-specific,andvaryaccordingtotheprofileanddriversofinequalityineachcountryandforeachdisadvantagedgroup.however,inallcountriesitiscriticaltoensurethatdisadvantagedgroupscanaccessandusegood-qualitypublicservicesandsocialprotectionsystemsthatmeettheirneeds.
Thefocusmustbeonpursuinguniversalcoverageofessentialservicesviaequitablepathwaysthatmeettheneedsofdisadvantagedgroupsfirst.researchshowsthatlow-incomecountriesthathaveachievedrapidchangesinchildhealthundertheMDGframeworkhavedonesothroughimprovingthecoverageandqualityofessential,cost-effectiveservicesandsocialprotectionforthepoorestpeople.26Inmanycountriesthiswillrequireincreasesinthelevelandqualityofpublicinvestmentinessentialservicesandfinancialriskprotectionforserviceusers.Insomecountries,thereissignificantscopetoraisenecessaryresourcesthroughstrengthenedandmoreprogressivetaxsystems;inothers,supportforgovernmentbudgetsfromdonorswillhaveacontinuingroletoplay.27
reachingthosewhoarefurthestbehindwillalsorequiresocialnorms,discriminationandotherbarriersthatsystematicallydisadvantageparticulargroupstobetackled.stepsmustadditionallybetakentobolsteraccountabilitytothepoorestthroughimprovementsintransparency,accesstojusticeandparticipationofmarginalisedgroupsindecision-making,includingforwomenandchildren.28
Post-2015steppingstonetargetsshouldhelptoincentiviseanationalprocessnotonlytoidentifygroupsthatarebeingleftbehind,butalsotoidentifythepolicyapproachesthatwillberequiredtoensurethattargetsaremet.
Thisprocessmustbeopen,participatory,andlinkedtoglobalpost-2015accountabilitymechanismstohelpguardagainstthecontinuedexclusionofgroupssufferingfrommarginalisationanddiscrimination.The2014replenishmentoftheGlobalPartnershipforeducationprovidesagoodexampleoflinkingnationalpolicyprocessestointernationalaccountabilitymechanismstospurequitableprogress.Thisprocesssaw30governmentscommittoaddressingequityissuesandensuringthattheirbudgetsarespentinwaysthatbettermeettheeducationalneedsofthepoorestandmostmarginalisedchildren.29
Luzmila, 12, and Norma Lucy, 14, run to school, 20 kilometres from their home in Huancavelica, Peru.
Pho
To
:AleJA
nD
ro
kIr
Ch
uk
/sAv
eTh
eCh
IlDr
en
9
recognitionhasgrownoverthecourseofthepost-2015processthatthenewglobaldevelopmentframeworkthatreplacestheMDGswillneedtogobeyondnationalaveragesandensurenooneisleftbehind.30
InJuly2014,thefinaloutcomeDocumentofrecommendationsfromtheunopenworkingGroup(owG)onsustainableDevelopmentGoalsidentifiedthereductionofinequalitywithinandbetweennationsasapriorityarea,withsupportfromasignificantproportionofitsmembers.31AsBrazilandnicaraguastressedintheirstatementtothe11thsessionoftheowG,thepromotionofequality“mustbecomeanacknowledgedpriorityandastructuraldimensionofthepost-2015developmentagenda”.32
Previously,inits2013reporttotheunsecretary-General,thehighlevelPanelonthepost-2015agendaidentified‘leave no one behind’asoneoffivestructuraltransformationsthatwillbenecessaryforovercomingobstaclestosustainedprosperity.ThePanelrecommendedthattargetsshouldbemonitoredusingdatadisaggregatedbyincomequintileandbyothergroups.Importantly,targetsshouldonlybeconsideredachievediftheyaremetforallrelevantincomeandsocialgroups.33
ThehighlevelPanel’srecommendationthatnotargetshouldbeconsideredmetunlessmetforallwouldhelptoestablishthepromotionofequityasapost-2015objective,andmustbeadoptedaspartofthefinalpost-2015agreement.however,byitself,thisno target met unless met for allcriterionwouldnotprovidesufficientpolicyincentivesforgovernments
tomaketheurgentchangesinpolicyandpracticethatwillberequiredtoensuredisadvantagedgroupsachieve2030targets.34As2030isalongtimeawayandwilllikelyseedifferentadministrationsincharge,thereisadangerthatcurrentgovernmentswillcontinuetotaketheeasierrouteofservinggroupsthatareeasiesttoreach,ratherthanthemoredifficultrouteofservingtheneedsofthosewhoarehardesttoreach.Thisposestheriskthatdisadvantagedgroupswillcontinuetobeleftbehind.
Moreover,theno target met unless met for allcriterioncouldalsobesatisfiedunderascenarioofgrowinginequalityinchildren’slifechances.Thisistrueforfractionaltargetsthatdonotaimforthecompleteeliminationofdimensionsofpovertyby2030(forexample,atargettoreducestuntingby50%).Itisalsotruefortargetstoreducedisadvantagebeloworaboveminimumglobalthresholds,suchastheminimumglobalthresholdforendingpreventablechildmortality(25childdeathsper1,000livebirths),orthresholdsforminimumlearningoutcomesineducation.evenifallgroupsmetthesethresholds,gapsbeloworabovethemwouldcontinuetogrowifdisadvantagedgroupsarenotmakingsufficientprogresstocatchupwiththemostadvantagedgroups.
Asthepost-2015processreachesitsfinalstages,thechallenge,then,isnotonlytocontinuetobuildconsensusontheneedforastrongfocusonequity,butalsotodefineconcretemechanismstotranslatethisconsensusintoactionacrossallgoalareasofthenewframework.savetheChildrenpresentedanumberofsuchmechanismsinFramework for the Future,ourproposalsforpost-2015goals,targets,indicators(seeBox3).35
3 stEpping stonE targEts: a mEchanism to EnsurE no onE is LEft bEhind
leA
vIn
Gn
oo
ne
Beh
InD
10
oneproposalthathaspotentialforsignificantimpactandthatwouldmainstreamthepromotionofequityacrossallgoalareasofthepost-2015frameworkisforinterimequity,dubbedsteppingstonetargets.Initiallyproposedbywatkins(2014),thesetargetscouldbesetforinterimtimeperiodsbetween2015and2030andwouldaimtonarrowdisparitiesinbasiclifechancesbetweendifferentsocialandeconomicgroups.36watkinsproposes,forexample,thatinterimtargetscouldbesettohalvethedeathrategapbetweentherichestandthepoorest,ornarrowlearninggapsbetweenruralgirlsandurbanboys.
Throughfocusingimmediateandongoingattentionontheprogressofthosewhoarefurthestbehind,suchtargetswouldhelptostrengthenthepost-2015highlevelPanel’srecommendationthatnotargetshouldbeconsideredmetunlessmetforallrelevantsocialandeconomicgroups.
Gapreductionisimportant,notleasttoensureallchildrenhaveequalchancesinlife.however,itmustbepursuedinwaysthathelptomaintainoverall
progressandensuretheattainmentof2030goalsforallgroups.Itshouldnotbeachievedthroughmoreadvantagedgroupsgoingbackwards.Forthisreason,steppingstonetargetsshouldhavethreeinterconnectedobjectives:37
1) Maintainfastaverageprogressatthenationallevel.
2) ensurethatdisadvantagedgroupsareontracktoachieve2030targets.
3) reducegapsinhumandevelopmentoutcomesthatstemfromsystematicdifferencesinlifechancesbetweengroupsofchildren.Thisshouldresultfromfasterprogressbydisadvantagedgroups,ratherthanregressionbymoreadvantagedgroups.
steppingstonetargetsshouldbedefinedatthenationallevelfordisadvantagedandmarginalisedgroupsthatarethefurthestbehind,identifiedthroughanopenandparticipatoryprocess(seeBox4).Theyshouldbesetforsocial,economicandenvironmentalgoalareas,takingintersectingformsofdisadvantageintoaccount.
Box3:sAveTheChIlDren’sProPosAlsForADvAnCInGequITyThrouGhThePosT-2015FrAMework
Thisbriefingfocusesonsteppingstoneequitytargetsasanessentialmechanismforpromotingequitableprogressunderthepost-2015framework.ThisisoneofseveralproposalsforadvancingequitythatsavetheChildrenpresentedinFramework for the Future.othermechanismsinclude:• A standalone goal to achieve gender
equality,withtargetstoendgender-basedviolence,realisesexualandreproductivehealthandrights,advancewomen’sandgirls’economicempowerment,andensureequalparticipationandinfluenceinprivateandpubliclife.
• A standalone goal to ensure open, inclusive and accountable governancetoeliminateinequitiesinpublicparticipation,bolsteraccountabilitytomarginalisedgroupsandensureeffectiveinstitutionsthatprovideequalaccesstogood-qualitypublicservices.
• A target to reduce income inequality and relative poverty.
• Goals and targets to drive forward action on policy areas that are known to reduce inequalities,includinguniversalhealthcoverage,education,socialprotection,childprotectionanduniversalregistrationatbirth.
• Data disaggregation,attheminimumbyage,ethnicity,gender,geography,disabilityand,socioeconomicgrouptoimproveunderstandingofwhichgroupsarebeingleftbehindandtobolsteraccountability.
• Targets to reduce international inequalities,includingthroughactiontoendillicitfinancialflowsandreforminternationalinstitutions.
Forfurtherdetail,seesavetheChildren(2014)Framework for the Future.
3sTePPIn
GsT
on
eTAr
GeT
s:AM
eCh
An
IsMT
oen
sur
eno
on
eIsleFTB
ehIn
D
11
IllusTrATInGThesTePPInGsToneConCePT
sowhatshouldasteppingstoneequitytargetlooklikeinpractice?Forpurposesofillustration,Figure4showsregionaldifferentialsinmalnutritionratesinPeru,measuredthroughthepercentageofchildrenagedunderfivewhoarestunted.Itisclearfromthisgraphthattheaveragerateofprogressmasksconsiderableregionalinequalities.huancavelica,theregionwiththehigheststuntingrates,isoneofPeru’smostremoteregionsintheAndeanmountains,withalargeindigenouspopulation.Incontrast,limaregionhousesthecountry’scapitalcity,togetherwithasignificantproportionofthecountry’smostaffluentgroupsandgoodcoverageofhealthandsocialservices.38Peru’snationalaveragestuntingrateamongchildrenunderfivewas18%in2012.however,inhuancavelicastuntingrateswereashighas47%,comparedwith6%inlima.
ThesetrendsarerootedinahistoryofhighandpersistentregionalinequalitiesinPeru.however,Figure4showsthefruitsofrecenteffortsbythePeruviangovernmentandsocietytoreversedecadesofneglectandmarginalisationofcommunitiesinremoteAndeanregions.reductionsinthestuntingrateinhuancavelicaaccelerateddramaticallybetween2006and2012,falling11percentagepoints
comparedwithareductionofonlytwopercentagepointsthepreviousdecade,andkeepingpacewithaverageratesofchange.Thiswasachievedthroughimprovementsinthecoverageandqualityofhealth,nutritionandsocialprotectionservices,driventhroughincreasedinvestment;measurestostrengthencoordinationacrosssocial,financialandagriculturalsectors;andresults-basedfinancingfordecentralisedprogrammes.39
whilerecenttrendsinstuntingratesarepositive,thereisstillsomewaytogotoensurethatchildreninPeruhaveequallifechances,nomatterwheretheylive.Achildinhuancavelicaisstillnearlyeighttimesmorelikelytobestuntedthanachildinlima,andisovertwiceaslikelytodiebeforetheirfifthbirthdaythananaveragePeruvianchild.
savetheChildrenhasproposedthatatargetofatleasthalvingstuntingratesshouldbeincludedinthepost-2015framework.40Thistargetwouldbeachievedby2030atthenationallevelinPeruthroughmaintainingtheaveragerateofprogressachievedsince1996,bringingthestuntingratedownfrom18%to3%.Incontrast,a50%reductiontargetwillbemoreofachallengeforhuancavelica.here,meetingthetargetwouldrequirestuntingratestofallfromthecurrentlevelof47%to24%by2030.AsFigure4illustrates,iftheregionsimplymaintainstheaverageprogressithasachievedsince1996,itwillmissthis
FIGure4:TrenDsInsTunTInGInThereGIonsoFhuAnCAvelICAAnDlIMA,Peru
source:Dhsdata,savetheChildrencalculations
Per
cen
tage
mal
nu
trit
ion
pre
vale
nce
in s
tun
tin
g
(hei
ght
for
age)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
1996
2000
2006
2012
2022
2030
2030 national target
2030 target for Huancavelica
Maintainingaverageprogresssince2006
Maintainingaverageprogresssince1996
Huancavelica Region (disadvantaged group)
Lima Region (advantaged group)
Peru (average)
2022 stepping stone target for Huancavelica
FIGure5:IllusTrATIvesTePPInGsToneTArGeTForChIlDMorTAlITyInBenIn
leA
vIn
Gn
oo
ne
Beh
InD
12
targetbyeightpercentagepoints.however,ifthemorerapidratesofprogressachievedsince2006aremaintainedthetargetwouldbemetaheadofschedulearound2025.
Countriesmustsetsteppingstonetargetscarefullyaccordingtolocalcontext,takingintoaccountwhyparticulargroupsarebeingleftbehind,historicaltrends,andtheprogressthatwillbeneededforallgroupstoachieve2030targets.TheaimofinterimsteppingstonetargetsinthisexamplefromPerushouldbetohelpmaintainthemomentumofprogressinhuancavelica,andensurethatthefinal2030targetismetontime.Inordertostrikeabalancebetweenambitionandfeasibility,areasonablesteppingstonetargetfor2022inhuancavelicamightbeset,forexample,atamaximumstuntingrateof34%.Thiswouldallowforsomedecelerationofprogressduetopeoplewhoareyettobecoveredbynutritionandotherservicesandprogrammesbeingthehardesttoreach.41however,itwouldstillensurethattheregionisontrackforachievingthe203050%reductiontarget,andwouldlikelyseehuancavelicacatchingupwithmoreadvantagedregions.
TAIlorInGTArGeTsToConTexT
Asimilarapproachcouldbefollowedtoidentifysteppingstoneequitytargetsinothercountries,includingtheexamplesofBeninandIndonesiadiscussedearlierinthispaper(seeFigure5foranillustrativesteppingstoneinBenin).Inthese
examples,theaimofsteppingstonetargetswouldbetoensurethatrecentratesofprogressaremaintainedinordertoachieve2030targets.however,indifferentcountriesandsectors,steppingstoneswillneedtobesettoaccelerateprogress.Forexample,reductionsinstuntingratesacrosstheworldhaveonthewholebeenslowerthanforchildmortalityduetothecomplexdriversofmalnutritionanditsrelativeneglectwithindevelopmentpolicyandpractice.42InIndonesia,stuntingratesactuallyincreasedinthepoorestquintileofthepopulationbetween2007and2010againstabackdropofoverallnationalimprovement.43Beninsawaveragestuntingratesincreasebetween1996and2006,accompaniedbyanincreaseinthegapbetweenthepoorest40%andrichest10%ofninepercentagepoints.44
Insectorsandcaseslikethese,steppingstonetargetswillneedtobemoreambitious,usheringastepchangeinprogressforthemostdisadvantagedgroups.Donorsanddevelopmentpartnershaveparticularresponsibilitytosupportdevelopingcountrygovernmentstoachieveambitioustargets.ensuringnooneisleftbehindunderthepost-2015frameworkisasharedglobalresponsibility.
Toensurethatsteppingstonetargetsareaseffectiveandfeasibleaspossible,anumberofpracticalandtechnicaldetailswillneedtobeworkedthrough(seeBox4).however,dataandinstitutionsarecurrentlystrongenoughinmanycountriestocommencetheprocessofdefiningsteppingstones,andincorporatingthemintonationaldevelopmentplans.
Benin (ethnic groups)
Dendi: 133/1,000
Yoruba: 49/1,000
Child mortality has fallen to no more than 70 deaths per 1,000 live births among Dendi children, and the gap between Dendi and Yoruba children has narrowed.
Child mortality is no more than 25 deaths per 1,000 live births in any group and gaps between groups have closed.
Post-2015 target: End preventable child deaths (Preventable mortality threshold for developing countries: 25 deaths per 1,000 live births)
2012 child mortality rates
2022 stepping stone
2030: No target met unless met for all
3sTePPIn
GsT
on
eTAr
GeT
s:AM
eCh
An
IsMT
oen
sur
eno
on
eIsleFTB
ehIn
D
13
Box4:DeFInInGAnDIMPleMenTInGsTePPInGsTones–soMePrACTICAlConsIDerATIons
• Poor-quality data and a lack of disaggregationmakeitdifficulttoidentifygroupslaggingbehind,particularlythosesufferingfromintersectinginequalitiesandfromsocialexclusion.Governments,donorsandinternationalinstitutionsmustinvesturgentlyinthepost-2015‘datarevolution’toensurethatprogressforallgroupscanbemonitoredandreportedassoonaspossible.
• For purposes of illustration the examples of stepping stone targets in this briefing focus on a single mid-point date of 2022.however,steppingstonescouldbesetforadditionaldatesbetween2015and2030tostrengthentheircontributiontopost-2015monitoringandaccountability,potentiallyatthree-tofive-yearintervalstoalignwithpoliticalcycles.
• Reporting on progress for disadvantaged groups is highly politicalinmanycontexts,particularlywhereinequalitiesstemfromdeeplyrootedsocialnormsorentrenchedpatternsofexclusionthatarekeepingcertaingroupslockedinpoverty.Insomecases,themostmarginalisedgroupsinsocietyarenotpubliclyrecognisedorcountedwithincensuses,effectivelyrenderingtheminvisible.
• Processes to define and monitor stepping stones should therefore be open, inclusive and participatory,includingrepresentationfromabroadcross-sectionofcivilsociety.Theyshouldalsobelinkedtobothnationalandinternationalpost-2015monitoringandaccountabilitysystems,workinginsynergywithinternationalhumanrightsmechanisms.
• Work will be required to identify the most appropriate baselines, metrics and benchmarks for defining stepping stonesatnationallevels,andtoassessoptionsforglobalsteppingstonesandmonitoring.
Marco Antonio, age eight, lighting a candle in his house in Huancavelica, Peru.
Pho
To
:AleJA
nD
ro
kIr
Ch
uk
/sAv
eTh
eCh
IlDr
en
14
Thepost-2015frameworkpresentsasignificantopportunitytoputtheworldonamoreequitableandsustainablepathwaytodevelopmentandprosperityforall.worldleadersmustseizethisopportunity,makinguseofeverytoolattheirdisposaltoensurethatthenewframeworkcreatesincentivesforgovernmentsandthewiderdevelopmentcommunitytoreachthosebeingleftbehind.
steppingstoneequitytargetsareacriticalpartofthispost-2015equitytoolset.Theywouldplaceimmediatefocusongapsinprogressbetweenadvantagedanddisadvantagedchildrenacrossallgoalareas,andestablishclearcommitmentstoaccelerateprogressforgroupsthatarefurthestbehindacrossthemultipledimensionsofhumandevelopment.
Tomaximisethecapacityofthenewframeworktoadvanceequityandprosperityforall,steppingstonesmustalsobeaccompaniedbytargetstotackle
inequalitiesthatcutacrossgroupsandsocieties,andtoaddressbarrierstoequallifechancesforchildren.Theseincludeextremeincomeinequality,whichrestrictspoorfamilies’abilitytoinvestintheirchildren;discriminationagainstgirlsandwomen;andenvironmentaldegradationthatunderminesthelivelihoods,healthandwell-beingoftheworld’spoorestpeople.Inaddition,agoalmustbeincludedinthenewframeworktofosteropen,inclusiveandaccountablegovernance;aworldinwhichnooneisleftbehindwilldependongovernmentsbeingaccountableandresponsivetotheneedsofthepoorestandmostmarginalisedpeople.
Deployedtogether,thesemechanismswouldhelptoembedequityattheveryheartofthepost-2015framework,spurringprogresstowardstheultimategoal:aworldfreefrompovertyinwhichallchildrenhaveequalchancestothriveandreachtheirfullpotentialinlife.
4 concLusions
reCoMMenDATIons
Asgovernmentsacrosstheworldworktogethertobuildthepost-2015framework,theymustmaintainastrongfocusonequityandensurethatconcretemechanismstospurequitableprogressareestablishedwithinthenewframework.Thesemustinclude:• An explicit commitment that no target
will be considered met unless met for all groups.
• Stepping stone equity targets to incentivise equitable progress across all goal areas.Thesewouldbesetforinterim
pointsbetween2015and2030,andwouldhelpensurethatdisadvantagedgroupsarecatchingupandareontracktomeet2030targets.
• standalonegoalstoachievegender equalityandensureopen, inclusive and accountable governance,plustargetstoreduce income inequality,implement policies that reduce inequalities,andtackle environmental degradation.
• Mechanismstomonitorequitableprogressthroughdisaggregated data.
15
1un(2014)The Millennium Development Goals Report 2014.newyork:un.2relativepovertydefinedaschildrenlivinginhouseholdswithaverageincomesbelow50%ofthemedianincome.unICeF(2014)Child Poverty in the post-2015 Agenda.newyork:unICeF.3savetheChildren(2013)Getting to Zero: How we can be the generation that ends poverty.london:savetheChildren.4see,forexample,Minujin,A.andDelamonica,e.(2003)‘Mindthegap!wideningchildmortalitydisparities’,Journal of Human Development4(3),november2003;MillenniumProject(2005)Investing in Development: A practical plan to achieve the Millennium Development Goals.newyork:unDP;unICeF(2010)Progress for Children: Achieving the MDGs with equity.newyork:unICeF;savetheChildren(2010)A Fair Chance at Life: Why equity matters for child mortality.london:savetheChildren.5educationForAllGlobalMonitoringreport(2014)Teaching and Learning: Achieving quality for all.Paris:unesCo6wagstaff,A,Bredenkamp,C.andBuisman,l.(2014)‘ProgressonGlobalhealthGoals:arethePoorBeingleftBehind?’The World Bank Research Observer,vol.29(2),p1–26.AdvanceAccesspublishedJuly28,2014.Thisstudyfoundthat,whileprogressonMDGinterventionindicatorshasbeenonthewholepro-poor,relativeinequalityinunder-fivechildmortalityrateshasincreasedin39%ofcountriesincludedintheresearch,andinfantmortalityin51%.7Bredenkamp,C.,Buisman,l.andvandePoel,e.(2014)‘Persistentinequalitiesinchildundernutrition:evidencefrom80countries,from1990totoday.’International Journal of Epidemiology,2014,1–8.8Afterhousingcostshavebeenpaid.Childpovertyisdefinedintheukaschildrenlivinginhouseholdswithlessthan60%ofmedianincome.DepartmentforworkandPensions(2013)Households Below Average Income: 1994/95 to 2011/12.9Datareferstochildreninengland.‘secondaryeducation’referstoGCseexaminationgrades(studentsaged15–16),andearlyyearseducationreferstoeducationforchildrenunderagefive.FiguresfromoFsTeD(2013).Unseen children: Access and achievement 20 years on: Evidence report.london:oFsTeD.10kabeer,n.(2010)Can the MDGs provide a pathway to social justice? The challenges of intersecting inequalities.newyork/Brighton:unMDGAchievementFundandInstituteofDevelopmentstudies.
stewart,Frances(2011)Approaches towards Inequality and Inequity: Concepts, measures and policies.InnocentiworkingPaperno.2013-10.Florence:unICeF.11unDP(2011)Human Development Report: Sustainability and Equity: a better future for all.newyork:unDP.12youngpeopleaged15–24whohavecompletedprimaryschool.unesCowIDedata.unesCo(2014)worldInequalityDatabaseoneducation,www.education-inequalities.org/13unesCowIDedata.unesCo(2014)worldInequalityDatabaseoneducation,www.education-inequalities.org/14west,A.andDelap,e.(2012)Protect My Future: The links between child protection and equity.FamilyforeveryChildandendorsingagencies.15Ibid.16see,forexample,Greenstone,M.,looney,A.,Patashnik,J.andyu,M.(2013)Thirteen economic facts about social mobility and the role of education.ThehamiltonProjectPolicyMemo,June2013;Corak,M.(2013),‘Inequalityfromgenerationtogeneration:Theunitedstatesincomparison’inrycroft,r.(ed)The Economics of Inequality, Poverty, and Discrimination in the 21st Century,ABC-ClIo.Forin-depthanalysisoftheimpactsofincomeinequalityonchildrenseesavetheChildren(2012)Born Equal: How reducing inequality could give our children a better future.17savetheChildren(2013)Food for thought: Tackling child malnutrition to unlock potential and boost prosperity.london:savetheChildren.18AssessedthroughGCseexaminations(keystage4,studentsaged15–16).Allfiguresareforengland.oFsTeD(2013)op.Cit.seeChapter5foradiscussionofpolicyinitiativesthathavehelpedtospurmoreequitableprogressinsomeregions,includingarea-basedinitiativessuchasthelondonChallengeprogramme.19oFsTeD(2013)op.Cit.20savetheChildrenanalysisusingDhsdata.regionsthatarethefurthestaheadandbehindintermsofchildmortalityrateshavechangedovertimeinIndonesia.Theseregionswereselectedforcomparisonastheyhaveconsistentlybeenamongthebestandworstperformingregions.Forfurtherdiscussionofdataissuesandthetechnicalconstructionofsteppingstonetargetsseekite,G.,roche,J.M.andwise,l.(2014)‘Buildingapost-2015frameworkthatleavesnoonebehind:Aproposaltoincentiviseinclusiveprogress’.21sMeru(2010)Child Poverty and Disparities in Indonesia: Challenges for inclusive growth.Jakarta:sMeru,unICeFandBAPPenAs;Thomas,D.andyusran,s.(2013)Social Development Analysis to Support the Design of a Future Maternal and Newborn Health Program in Indonesia, PERMATA.Canberra:AusAIDhealthresourceFacility.22AllfiguresfromsavetheChildrenanalysisofDhsdata.seenote24.23savetheChildrenanalysisofDhsdata.notethattheslopeofthegraphbetween1996and2006fortheDendiethnicgrouprepresentsasmoothedlinebetweenDhsdatapointsowingtoadiscrepancyintheDhsdatafor2001,likelycausedbythesamplesizebeingtoosmallforthatyear.Thenationalaverageisbelowthatfortheyorubagroupin1996as
therankingofgroupshaschangedovertime.Forfurthermethodologicaldiscussion,seetechnicalpaper(detailsinnote24).24ThechildmortalityrateestimateswereobtainedfromdirectdataprocessingofDemographichealthsurveysusingthefullbirthhistorymethod.Finalestimatescorrespondtofiveyearsprecedingthesurvey.Projectionsarebasedonalinearextrapolationofcurrenttrendsforillustrativepurposes.Inrealityratesofchangewouldlikelyslowdownaschildmortalityratesdiminish.(see,forexample,klasen,s.andlange,s.(2012)Getting Progress Right: Measuring progress towards the MDGs against historical trends.CourantresearchCentreDiscussionPaperno.87,February2012.)Forfurtherdiscussionofdataissuesandthetechnicalconstructionofsteppingstonetargetsseekite,G.,roche,J.M.andwise,l.(2014)‘Buildingapost-2015frameworkthatleavesnoonebehind:Aproposaltoincentiviseinclusiveprogress’.25This2030targethasbeenproposedbythePartnershipforMaternal,newbornandChildhealth.Ifachieved,itwouldputcountriesontracktoachievetheestablishedinternationalChildsurvivalCalltoActiontargetforanationalchildmortalityrateofnomorethan25deathsper1,000livebirthsby2035.seehttp://www.who.int/pmnch/about/governance/partnersforum/communique/en/26Countdownto2015(2013)Accountability for Maternal, Newborn and Child Survival: 2013 update.Forexample,onestudyfoundthatmoreequitablefinancingofhealthservicescouldallow13additionalcountriestoachieveMDG4onchildmortality.seerockefellerFoundation,savetheChildren,unICeFandwho(2013)Universal Health Coverage: A commitment to close the gap.london:savetheChildren.27CenterforeconomicandsocialrightsandChristianAid(2014)A Post-2015 Fiscal Revolution – A Human Rights Policy Brief.newyork:Cesr;savetheChildren(2014)Tackling Tax.london:savetheChildren.28Forfurtherdiscussion,seesavetheChildren(2013)Getting to Zero: How we can be the generation that ends poverty.london:savetheChildren.29GlobalPartnershipforeducation(2014)Pledge Report from GPE Replenishment Conference,June2014.30seeunsystemTaskTeam(2013)A New Global Partnership: Eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development.newyork:unitednations;unDG(2013)A Million Voices: The world we want.newyork:unDG;highlevelPanelonthePost-2015DevelopmentAgenda(2013)A New Global Partnership: Eradicate poverty and transform economies through sustainable development.newyork:un;openworkingGrouponsustainableDevelopmentGoals(2014)outcomeDocument.newyork:un.31outcomeDocumentoftheopenworkingGrouponsustainableDevelopmentGoals,July2014.Availableathttp://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/focussdgs.html(accessed29July2014).32statementbynicaraguaandBrazil–11thsessionoftheopenworkingGrouponsustainableDevelopmentGoals,5–9May,2014.Availableathttp://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/8750brazil2.pdf(accessed20July2014).33highlevelPanelonthePost-2015DevelopmentAgenda(2013)op.Cit.34watkins,k.(2014)‘leavingnoonebehind:anagendaforequity’.The Lancet,earlyonlinePublication,9May2014.35savetheChildren(2014)Framework for the Future.london:savetheChildren.seealsoMelamed,C.(2012)Putting Inequality in the Post-2015 Picture.london:oDI.36watkins,k.(2014)‘leavingnoonebehind:anagendaforequity’.The Lancet,earlyonlinePublication,9May2014.othershavealsosuggestthatspecifictargetscouldbesetunderthepost-2015frameworkforprogressamongthepoorest,butdonotbuildagap-reductioncomponentintotheirproposals.seeMelamedop.cit.andunICeF/unwomen(2013)Addressing Inequalities: Synthesis report of global public consultation.37ThemethodologypresentedherefollowsproposalspresentedinsavetheChildren(2014)Framework for the Future.seealsoproposalsfromthewho/unICeFJointMonitoringProgrammeforwatersupplyandsanitation:unICeF/whoJMP(2013)Post-2015 WASH targets and indicators: outcomes of an expert consultation.38Franke,P.(2013)Peru’s comprehensive health insurance and new challenges for universal coverage.unICostudiesseries11.washingtonDC:worldBank.39unICeF(2013)Improving Child Nutrition: The achievable imperative for global progress.newyork:unICeF.40Thisisinlinewiththeworldhealthorganizationtargettoachievea40%reductionby2025–anambitious,stretchtarget.seesavetheChildren(2012)Global stunting reduction target: Focus on the poorest or leave millions behind.london:savetheChildren;savetheChildren(2014)op.Cit.41questionsoffeasibilityshouldbeconsideredaspartoftheprocesstodefinesteppingstonetargets.researchshowsthatratesofreductiontendtoslowascountriesmakeprogress.see,forexample,klasen,s.andlange,s.(2012)Getting Progress Right: Measuring progress towards the MDGs against historical trends.CourantresearchCentreDiscussionPaperno.87,February2012.42seeThe Lancet Child and Maternal Nutrition Series,6June2013,availableat:http://www.thelancet.com/series/maternal-and-child-nutrition(accessed20July2014).43IndonesianationalBasichealthsurvey(rIskesDAs)data,citedinsavetheChildren(2012)op.Cit.44savetheChildrencalculationsusingDhsdata.
rEfErEncEs
Co
ver
Pho
To
:heD
Inn
hA
llDo
rsso
n/sA
veT
heC
hIlD
ren
savethechildren.org.uk
Save the Children works in more than 120 countries. We save children’s lives. We fight for their rights. We help them achieve their potential.
savetheChildren1stJohn’slanelondoneC1M4ArTel:+44(0)2070126400Fax:+44(0)2070126963
©ThesavetheChildrenFund2014
ThesavetheChildrenFundisacharityregisteredinenglandandwales(213890)andscotland(sC039570).registeredCompanyno.178159