learner support: the key to quality learning environments thomas hülsmann, ph.d jane e. brindley,...

Learner Support: The Key to Quality

Learning Environments

Thomas Hülsmann, Ph.DJane E. Brindley, Ph.D.Christine Walti, M.D.E.

Beijing, ChinaMay 12 -14, 2008

Learner Support: An Overview and

Development of a Model

Jane E. Brindley, Ph.D.

Beijing, ChinaMay 12 -14, 2008

3SLIDE / 15

Workshop Content

• Introduction: Objectives, Methodology, Outcomes

• Defining Learner Support

• Designing Learner Support Systems• Critical Factors• Issues in Planning and Implementation

• Defining the Critical Factors at CCRTVU

• Learner Support at UMUC and Oldenburg

• Faculty Support: An Important Element of Learner Support

• Cost Analysis: Implications for Learner Support

• Defining a Learner Support Model for CCRTVU

• Exploring new Approaches: Web 2.0

• Closing

Learner Support: The Key to Quality Learning Environments

4SLIDE / 15

Workshop Objectives

• Develop a common understanding of the role of learner support in education

• Examine various types of learner support: consider the choices

• Identify the factors that determine the type of learner support needed

• Identify and analyze issues in planning and implementing learner support systems

• Critically analyze and describe the context and learner needs at CCRTVU

• Review some examples of practice at other institutions

• Consider the economic aspects of learner support: cost analysis

• Discuss some new approaches of learner support: Web 2.0

• Develop and discuss models of learner support for CCRTVU


5SLIDE / 15

Workshop Methods

• Large group discussion and brainstorming

• Small group work; case studies

• Presentations by leaders and participants


6SLIDE / 15

Workshop Outcomes

The workshop is intended to help you do the following:

• Describe the rationale for learner support in distance education

• Identify the critical factors that determine the most important elements of learner support for a specified

• Analyze learner needs and other critical factors at CCRTVU

• Design an effective learner support system including an evaluation plan


7SLIDE / 15

Discussion: What is Learner Support?

What examples can you give of learner support from CCRTVU and other institutions?

Why should we plan and implement learner support? Why is it important?

What learner needs and issues do you have at your institution that learner support might address?


8SLIDE / 15

What is Learner Support?

All interactions and resources which assist learners in their studies from point of inquiry through completion and beyond:

• Teaching and tutoring (course content related support)

• Advising and counselling (non-content related support)

• Administrative and technical support


9SLIDE / 15

Contexts for Learner Support?

•K – 12

•Post-secondary/higher education

•Corporate and public sector training


10SLIDE / 15

A Short History of Learner Support

• Response to high attrition rates in correspondence education

• Tutoring and other services added on to already complete model (first to be cut)

• Rise of dual mode institutions (services often uneven)

• Changing view of learner and learning

• More integrated models of learner support suited to context--linked to institutional mission and strategic objectives

• Requires rethinking and transformation of student support services – from public utility to integral part of the learning process


11SLIDE / 15


History of Learner Support (Simpson, 2002)

StudentTeaching Materials

Successful Student

StudentTeaching Materials

Successful Student

Learner Support

12SLIDE / 15

Why is Learner Support Important?

FOR THE INSTITUTION:

• Learner retention and loyalty - achievement of enrolment and graduation targets - cost savings in recruitment of new students- cost savings in fees not refunded

• Improved learning outcomes (deeper learning)

• Improved graduation rates

• Enrolment and resource management

• Revenue generation/ growth

• Academic planning/ better information

• Clear performance standards identified by articulating goals and strategies

• Enhanced reputation

• Ability to compete/ marketing


13SLIDE / 15

Why is Learner Support Important?

FOR THE STUDENT: ENHANCED ACCESS AND QUALITY

• Access to opportunity to succeed

• Access to opportunity to become a better learner

• Access to quality learning experience


14SLIDE / 15

Learner Support Reflects a Philosophy and Values

• Accessibility/ Openness/ Flexibility:-beyond admissions policies/ beyond “delivery methods”-open door v. revolving door

• Diversity: policies and practices reflect a desire for a broad range of learners

• Learner-centredness: learner at centre of teaching-learning process -from point of inquiry through completion and beyond


15SLIDE / 15

Characteristics of Effective Learner Support

• Learner driven/ not provider driven

• Should be seen as functions/ not organizational units- organized according to functional effectiveness

• Integrated/ not silos (seamless for the learner)

• Flexible—adaptable to change

• Purposeful in terms of academic mission and goals- support that contributes to facilitation of academic progress, quality learning environments, graduation and retention rates


16SLIDE / 15

Elements of Learner Support

• Teaching and tutoring (course content related)

• Counselling and advising (non-content related)

• Administrative and technical support


17SLIDE / 15

Teaching and Tutoring

• Providing Content Expertise

• Instructional Design

• Mentoring/ Guiding

• Facilitating Interaction and Purposeful Discussion

• Creating Learning Communities

• Individual and Group Feedback on Performance and Progress

• Assessment


18SLIDE / 15

Advising and Counselling

• Information

• Orientation

• Self-assessment/ Readiness for distance learning

• Academic advising

• Credit coordination/ Prior Learning Assessment

• Career counselling/ Career laddering

• Personal counselling

• Study skills

• Job search/ placement

• Student advocacy

• Facilitating peer/ peer interaction


19SLIDE / 15

Administrative and Other Support

• Admissions

• Registration/ Records

• Financial Aid/ Bursar/ Accounts

• Library Services

• Technical Support

• Course Materials/ Bookstore

• Alumni Support


20SLIDE / 15

Who are your learners?

What are their needs?

What are the most important issues at your institution?

A model of learner support should be driven by an institutional vision

and have the active support of senior leadership.


DEVELOPING A MODEL OF LEARNER SUPPORT

21SLIDE / 15

What is a Model of Learner Support?

• A strategic plan for providing support—sets direction and rationale

• Locates learner support in larger context

• Sets priorities—now and future

• Facilitates and guides planning, resource allocation, and evaluation

• Provides a map which can be revised to accommodate changes as they occur


22SLIDE / 15

Developing a Model

Values/Philosophy of EducationContextual Factors

Research Data

Goals of Support

Support ModelStrategies/Services Offered

Evaluation

theory

theory

23SLIDE / 15

Critical Factors to Consider When Developing a Model

1) Values/ Educational Philosophy/ Mission 2) Contextual Factors

3) Research Data/ Evaluation


24SLIDE / 15

Developing a Model

Critical Factors: 1) Values/ Educational Philosophy/ Mission

• View of Education and/ or Training

• View of Teaching/ Learning Process

• View of Learner; Rights/ Responsibilities

• Role of Teaching, Advising, Counselling, and all other Services

• Desired Learning Outcomes

• Assessment Methods

• Measures of Success


25SLIDE / 15

Developing a Model

Critical Factors: 2) Context

• Larger context: country, type of funding, political system, target market, competitionfrom other providers, challenges and opportunities

• Type of educational provider

• Type of program and courses

• Learner characteristics and needs

• Resources: $$, staff, facilities, technology


26SLIDE / 15

Current Contextual Factors

•Education as a service industry; learner as consumer/ high expectations

•Increasing competition for students among universities/ educational providers

•Accountability to stakeholders/ expectations from funding sources

•Pressure for accessibility

•Expectations for use of information and communication technologies; online learning

- Institutions feeling pressure from students, employers, governments to offer onlineand web-based courses and programs

- Corporate and public sector employers increasingly turning to e-learning for staff development and training


27SLIDE / 15

The Online Environment

New opportunities:

• more frequent and higher quality interaction: instructor/student; student/student; content/student; institution/student

• blurring between course development/ design and learner support—better opportunity to shape teaching and learning in progress

• automated services for routine interactions (using human intervention where it makes the most difference)

• better turnaround times


28SLIDE / 15

The Online Environment

Challenges:

• Myth of cost savings

• Costs: start-up, content development, staff development, infrastructure

• Serving an ever widening variety of learners

• Expectations have risen; complexity greater

• ACCESS (scalability) v. QUALITY


29SLIDE / 15

Developing a Model

Critical Factors: 3) Research Data/ Evaluation

• Learner Characteristics and Needs

• Learner Behaviour/ Learning Outcomes

• Attrition/ Persistence/ Graduation Rates

• Effects of Teaching/ Course Design/ Services/ Interventions


30SLIDE / 15

Developing a Model

Values/Philosophy of EducationContextual Factors

Research Data

Goals of Support

Support ModelStrategies/Services Offered

Evaluation

theory

theory

31SLIDE / 15

An Example – Athabasca University, Canada

Values:

• Education as continuous lifelong process

• Most people can succeed in right environment

• Goal is to help learners become increasingly responsible for their own learning – to help them to develop as active, versatile (able to learn in a variety of ways for a variety

of purposes), independent and collaborative learners

• Teaching/ learning is interactive and facilitates change and self action

• Open access means more than open admissions and implies institutional responsibility


32SLIDE / 15


Context:

• Publicly funded open university with strong values of access and quality

• Increasingly in competition with well resourced campus-based institutions offering online programs

• Conservative government/results oriented

• Learners: working adults, varied backgrounds, mostly urban with some remote, 75% women, some educationally disadvantaged, few with online/d.e. experience

• University programs: liberal arts and professional schools

• Main technology is web-based/online with some print materials/telephone tutoring


33SLIDE / 15


Research data:• Learners appear to enter with misconceptions about ease of learning at a distance

• Learners often are not prepared for the unique demands of d.e. -- may not have assessed their learning needs, goals, learning style, personal support systems to see if there is a match

• Dropout rates of concern--usually occurs early in first course

• Decision to persist is complex, multi-factorial and interactive process—learner/ learner environment/ institution (not just based on personal circumstances)

• Institutional support likely to have no effect on a certain portion of students who will persist or drop out regardless BUT can be a critical factor in persistence for the others who are in the middle

• Institutional support can respond to learner characteristics: abilities, learning style, gender, culture, academic preparedness, personal support, and expectations (e.g. learning versatility)

•Trend is to greater diversity in the student population, e.g younger learners

•Students want interaction/ encouragement/ feedback—contact with instructor ismost important


34SLIDE / 15

Moving from Critical Factors to Theory and Action:

Step One: Identifying Goals -- What Will Help These Learners?

1. Make the Development of Learners an Explicit Institutional Goal (vision/strategic plan)

2. Engage Learners Early On and Facilitate Connectedness (social support)

3. Empower Students (encourage and teach skills for active participation; scaffolding)

4. Personalize the Environment (work against isolation)

5. Democratize the System (encourage and respond to diversity; equal opportunity for success)


35SLIDE / 15


Step Two: Identifying Strategies – How Can the Goals be Achieved?

Goal 1. Make the Development of Learners an Explicit Institutional Goal

- may require review of institutional mission, strategic plan, and departmental operational plans—consistency/ alignment

- building climate and culture

- faculty and staff development is essential

- strategies built into teaching and all services that encourage learner independence through skill building

- continually evaluate impact of services based on specific targets and goals


36SLIDE / 15



Goal 2. Engage Learners Early/Facilitate Connectedness

- invest in front end services/proactive contact by institution

- information/ referral for prospective learners

- orientation to d.e. with assessment and opportunities for remediation

- aids to getting started (tips/advice/self-help tools) / links to specific kinds of help

- early instructor-initiated contact/ instructor training and development

- newsletters/ chat rooms/ FAQ sites

- study groups/ learning communities / Web 2.0 (blogs/wikis)


37SLIDE / 15



Goal 3. Empower Learners – facilitate and encourage learner independence and active engagement in the learning process

- make skill building (scaffolding) integral to all teaching, instructional design, and support services: e.g. online learning skills, research/ library skills, collaborative learning

skills,critical thinking skills, decision-making skills, leadership skills, problem-solving skills

- emphasize self-help and make assistance readily available(e.g. self-assessment tools and skills remediation in self-help format)

- provide sufficient quality information so that learners can make decisions about their education

- facilitate learner/ learner communication (encourage peer consultation)

- decentralization of responsibility and authority(e.g. access to records)

- provide a student charter or publish minimum standards so that learners know what they can expect

- experiment with learning contracts (learners setting goals and strategies for themselves)


38SLIDE / 15



Goal 4. Personalize the Learning Environment – work against isolation

- proactive early contact--introductory messages to learners with photos/ welcome week

- ensure ease of contact with institution/ ease of problem-solving for learners

- review policies and regulations (institutional attitude of respect for learners)

- recognize connection between motivation and turnaround, inconsistencies, red tape

- appropriate technical support

- provide opportunities for learner/learner contact – e.g. assign study partners, design study group projects into courses, initiate blogs, cafes, bulletin boards, provide student directories


39SLIDE / 15



5. Democratize the System - provide equal opportunity for success (the open door v. revolving door)

- ensure that institutional methods/ policies encourage and support diversity (admissions, teaching, assessment methods, remediation)

- recognize relevance of learner experience (prior learning assessment)

- offer opportunities for students to assess their own readiness for learningand need for skill development

- offer opportunities for students to get informed, make good decisions, improve their skills (advising, counselling, assessment, remediation, financial aid, library, special needs)

- publicize all services and opportunities so that students know what is available


40SLIDE / 15

Integrating Strategies Into a Model

• Review critical factors for your institution (values, context, research)

• Look at experience of learner from first contact through completion

• Consider how to strategically invest for greatest impact

• Consider what technologies/ methods of interaction are possible and desirable

• Build a flexible model that can be adapted to changing circumstances over time


41SLIDE / 15

An Example of a Model – Athabasca University

Admitted Student

Prospective Student

InformationServices

(institutional information)

Out

Orientation/Self-assessment

Student Advocacy/Personal Counselling/

Special Needs

Academic Advising

Credit CoordinationPrior Learning Assessment

Financial Aid AdvisingLibrary Services

Bookstore/Course Materials

Registration Services/Exams/Records

Learning and Study Skills Assistance

Career PlanningJob Placement

Technical Support

Teaching and Tutoring

42SLIDE / 15

Issues in Planning and Managing Learner Support

• Instilling learner support as institutional culture

• Universality v. targeted support

• Finding the right balance between learner support v. program growth

• Learner autonomy v. appropriate support

• Organizational structures – what structure works best?

• Centralized v. decentralized systems & services


43SLIDE / 15

Issues in Planning and Managing Learner Support

• Staff training/ development - instilling a culture- ensuring quality and consistency of service

• Recruitment/marketing v. student advocacy

• Appropriate use of technology -Accessibility and flexibility-Balancing efficiency with personalized services/ human contact-Providing technical support

• Quality assurance/ measuring success

• Ensuring resources for evaluation and research


44SLIDE / 15

Evaluation/Applied Research

Different types of evaluation/measures:

- student feedback - needs, satisfaction, perceptions

- impact studies (change in student behaviour)- user rates for services- retention, re-enrolment, graduation rates

- learning outcomes- grades, gain in knowledge/ skills- employment of graduates

- staff performance evaluation


45SLIDE / 15

Benefits of Evaluation/Research

• Measure of goal attainment

• Challenging assumptions

• Informed planning and priority setting

• Rationale for resource allocation

• Identification of learners with unmet needs

• Identification of need for new competencies/ changes in procedures

• Better working relationships (shared understanding of practice outcomes)

• Ability to contribute to and share practice and theory with colleagues


learner support: the key to quality learning environments thomas hülsmann, ph.d jane e. brindley,...

Documents

ccrtvu learner support

learner support model

participants learner

closing learner support

role of learner support

models of learner support

type of learner support

oldenburg faculty support