lean: project management · claudia black,mindfulness based meditation based on emotional...
TRANSCRIPT
LEAN: PROJECT MANAGEMENT
Create a Veteran Centered
Model of Spiritual Care
Chaplain Fellow Eddie ColfVoiceover Enabled
Initiate
Group Logistics
� Locations: Brooklyn VAMC 15W
� When: Tuesdays (July 21- August 25)
� Time: 2:15PM – 3:15pm
� Scheduled Event on the Ward (Attendance is Voluntary)
� Facilitator = Chaplain
Stumbled Across the Voice of the Veteran
Veteran Responses:
• “Something I can accept.”
• “A better understanding of the chaplain's practice.”
• “A better sense of self.”
My Observations:
• Each Veteran approaches spirituality differently.
• Chaplain might be able to model Spirituality for the Veterans.
• A negative sense of self contributes to relapse and costs V.A. money.
“What do I want out of my spirituality group?”
Interventions for Spirituality
• Reflective Practice, “Formation and Supervision in Ministry” Vol. 33, pages 62-65.
• Moral Injury as Shame. • 3 specific interventions proposed.
• An intervention for Courage. • An intervention for Compassion. • An intervention for Connection.
Reflection on what is needed
Not one of the manualized (evidence based) treatments for PTSD was initially validated on Veterans. (neither was A.A.) What is needed:
Combat Trauma, Moral Injuries, and Suicide: April 13, 2015
What Works in the Trenches? By Shane Eynon, Ph.D.
• Real emotional connection. • Appreciation of cultural & economic factors. • Listen to what Veterans say they need.• And Data.
Old Process for Group
Plan
Business Case / Problem Statement Opportunity Statement
• There is much waste in the form of time and energy both on the part of the Veterans and chaplains in addressing topics that are both unnecessary and ineffective in the area of spiritual care.
• Chaplains’ efforts, like the efforts of other clinicians, are tied to their own perceptions of the needs of Veterans.
• There is no formalized method to capture the voice of the Veterans’ for group process model of spiritual care.
• Project may create a Veteran centered model of care. • Veterans’ voice may create a more effective group process.• Providers may use active engagement for delivery of care.• Veterans may receive better care as a result.
• Method may become a model of self supervision.
• Process Model may itself be a spiritual intervention.
Goal Statement Scope
• Create a Veteran centered model of spiritual care. • Success will be measured by:
(1) Receive data that reflects Veterans voice. (2) Use the data to make changes in the group process to better
meet the needs of Veterans.(3) Create method that can be spread to other areas of Hospital.
• In Scope –V.A.M.C. Brooklyn Ward 15W Spirituality Group. • Out of Scope – All Other Areas of the Hospital, all other Chaplain
Services.
Project Plan / Timeline Core Team Members
MilestonesInitiatePlanExecuteMonitor/ControlClose/Spread
Planned Dates AprilMayJuneJulyAugust
Actual Dates AprilMayJulyJuly/AugustAugust/September
NameEddie ColfMartin MontonyeJulie Shahroudi Martin Montonye
DepartmentChaplain CPE Supervisor Quality Mgt.CPE Supervisor
RoleProject LeadChampionCoachSubject Matter Expert
V.A.M.C. Brooklyn
Create a Veteran Centered Model of Spiritual Care
Surveys: Capture Veterans’ Voice
• Purchase Intent: Measures the intent of a consumer’s intent to “purchase” a product or service. Marketing.
• 5 Point Likert Scale
• Modified to ask if the material presented in class is useful.
Surveys: Moral Injury Event Scale
• Wm. Nash Moral Event Scale, 2013. Validated with Active Duty Marines Returning from Iraq. Used at San Francisco VAMC.
• 6 Point Likert Scale
• Measures impact of violating one’s own morals & witnessing moral violations of others.
Strongly Moderately Slightly Slightly Moderately Strongly
Agree Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Disagree
Execute
Facilitation Tool: Group Three
Denial: Stuffing Our Feelings.
Self Judgment: Perfectionist Tendencies.
Int. for Courage: Tools For Talking About The Truth.
Int. for Compassion: Listening To Inner Voice.
Int. for Connection: 10 Minute Meditation: Emotional Connection.
Source Material: ACoA Step Workbook , “The One Thing You Need To Overcome Perfectionism.” Erin Dougherty, A Poem by Claudia Black, Mindfulness Based Meditation based on Emotional Awareness.
WEEK THREE H
ANDOUT
Veterans’ Voice: Week Three
N = 7I Definitely
Would Use It
I Probably
Would Use It
I Might
Use It
I Probably Would
Not Use It
I Definitely
Would Not Use It
Q1. Discussion of Denial
#
%
2
28.5%
3
42.8%
2
28.5%
Q2. Discussion of Self-Judgment
#
%
2
33.3%
3
50%
1
16.6%
Q3. Intervention for Courage
#
%
1
14.2%
3
42.8%
3
42.8%
Q4. Intervention for Compassion
#
%
1
16.6%
3
50%
2
33.3%
Q5. Intervention for Connection
#
%
1
16.6%
2
33.3%
2
33.3%
1
16.6%
Veterans’ Voice: Week Five
N = 10I Definitely
Would Use It
I Probably
Would Use It
I Might
Use It
I Probably Would
Not Use It
I Definitely
Would Not Use It
Q1. Affectionate Breathing
Meditation
#
%
7
70%
3
30%
Q2. Discussion of Patience
#
%
5
50%
4
40%
1
10%
Q3. Intervention for Courage
#
%
4
40%
6
60%
Q4. Intervention for Compassion
#
%
6
60%
3
30%
1
10%
Q5. Intervention for Connection
#
%
4
40%
4
40%
2 20%
Veterans’ Voice: Week Six
N = 10I Definitely
Would Use It
I Probably
Would Use It
I Might
Use It
I Probably Would
Not Use It
I Definitely
Would Not Use It
Q1. Loving Kindness Meditation
#
%
5
50%
2
20%
2
20%
1
10%
Q2. Discussion Real Hope in
Balance
#
%
5
50%
1
10%
1
10%
3
30%
Q3. Intervention for Courage
#
%
5
50%
3
30%
1
10%
1
10%
Q4. Intervention for Compassion
#
%
6
60%
1
10%
3
30%
Q5. Intervention for Connection
#
%
6
60%
1
10%
2
20%
1
10%
Intervene Loop Facilitate Loop
Post Group Process:
Reflection and Change
Monitor & Control
Monitor and Control
� Second Announcement increases Attendance.
� Meditation changed the group dynamics.
� Passing out Surveys has better return. 16.25 (%)
� Guided interventions with newly created tools based on Veteran information leads to a seemingly more dynamic group.
� Veterans receive documents/information on Meditation and topics.
Attendance and Surveys
� Date On Ward Attended Respondents Response Rate
� 7/21 23 19 10 52 %
� 7/28 24 16 7 43 %
� 8/4 24 16 7 43 %
� 8/11 19 13 4 31 %
� 8/18 20 16 10 62 %
� 8/25 24 18 10 55 %
� 6 Sessions
Close & Spread
Close and Spread
� 6 new tools were created based on Group Session and gathering information about Veteran preferences.
� Speak with 15W team on 9/16/2015 about project and preferences from data.
40%
53%
43%
31%
27% 27%
20%
16%18%
7%4%
11%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
Intervention for Courage Intervention for Compassion Intervention for Connection
Six Week Average of Veteran Preference for Interventions Utilized ( 7/21 – 8/25)
(N = 48)
Definitely Use
Probably Use
Might Use
Probably NotUse
48.6%45.5%
60.0%
27.1%29.1%
25.0%
14.0%
17.9%
10.0%9.3%7.5%
5.0%
0.9% 0.0% 0.0%0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
Discussion Intervention Meditation
Definately Use
Probably Use
Might Use
Probably Not Use
Definately Not Use
Six Week Average of Veteran Preference for Style of Interventions Utilized
( 7/21 – 8/25)
N = 18N = 14 N = 2
45%
15% 16%
8%
3%
14%
44%
13% 13%10%
4%
17%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
35%
40%
45%
50%
1 2 3 4 5 6
Moral Injury: Violations of Others(7/21 – 8/25)
(N = 48)
Negative
Positive
Strongly Moderately Slightly Slightly Moderately Strongly
Agree Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Disagree
44%
13% 13%10%
4%
17%
53%
21%
17%
2% 2%4%
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
1 2 3 4 5 6
Moral Injury: Violations of Self(7/21 – 8/25)
(N = 48)
NEGATIVE
POSITIVE
Strongly Moderately Slightly Slightly Moderately Strongly
Agree Agree Agree Disagree Disagree Disagree
Importance/Satisfaction Tool
0102030405060708090
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
USEFULNESS
M
O
R
A
L
I
N
J
U
R
Y
SIX WEEK USEFULNESS/MORAL INJURY PAIRED SCORES
( 7/21 – 8/25)
(N = 44)
Usefulness: Median: 85%
Mode: 100%
Moral Injury: Median: 65%
Mode: 82%
0102030405060708090
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
USEFULNESS
M
O
R
A
L
I
N
J
U
R
Y
SIX WEEK USEFULNESS/MORAL INJURY OTHERS’ BEHAVIOR PAIRED SCORES
( 7/21 – 8/25)
(N = 44)
Moral Injury, Others’ Behavior:
Median: 70%
Mode: 83%
0102030405060708090
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
USEFULNESS
M
O
R
A
L
I
N
J
U
R
Y
SIX WEEK USEFULNESS/MORAL INJURY OWN BEHAVIOR PAIRED SCORES
( 7/21 – 8/25)
(N = 44)
Moral Injury Own Behavior:
Median: 60%
Mode: 80%
No Discernable Cluster.
Difficult to read. 0
102030405060708090
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
USEFULNESS
M
O
R
A
L
I
N
J
U
R
Y
Motivational Interviewing Tool
0102030405060708090
100
0 20 40 60 80 100
L.U./H.I. H.U./H.I.
L.U./L.I. H.U./L.I.
Usefulness/Importance
H.U./H.I. “I don’t have this problem & the intervention was not helpful?”
H.U./L.I. “I have this problem & the intervention was not helpful?”
L.U./H.I. “I don’t have this problem & the intervention was helpful?”
H.U./H.I. “I have this problem & the intervention was helpful?”
Style: Empathic Normalization. We’re all messy.
47.9%
28.0%
15.7%
8.0%
0.4%0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
1 2 3 4 5
Cumulative Responses for Usefulness
3 Common Types of Likert Scale Bias:
Institutional:
Positive Bias
People Pleasing:
Middle Bias
Wary or On Guard:
Negative Bias
Definitely Probably Maybe Probably DefinitelyUse Use Not Not
� Including a Veteran in preparation for group could become a standardized process.
� The “institutional bias” on slide 34 helps make sense of what may be an error in reporting or awareness on the part of the Veteran on slide 28.
� Dissociation is characteristic of early recovery, our veterans may have limited awareness.
� Meditation seems to influence Veteran perception in other ways.
� I don’t know what caused the linear diagonal grouping on slide 31.
� There is no single model for spread at the end of this project although it seems some intuitive changes were made in the group process leading to an overall more useful group for the veterans.
� Just because interventions for Courage and Connection ranked lower than those of Compassion on the whole, it doesn’t mean that courage and connection are unimportant topics, it may mean that we need a different M. I. communication style.
� Data may not represent the Voice of the Veterans. It may represent the way that one group of Veterans encounters that particular chaplain. For example, the highest rated item is a form of meditation that I practice regularly.
� Breaking down the data into any smaller components based on source is possible with a longer project.
Final Comments
Special Thanks
� Martin Montonye for his helping me to see the Veterans.
� Andrew Sioleti for encouraging me to make positive changes in the group process.
� Julie Shahroudi for working with me in the detailed and at times messy process of trying to listen to Veterans.
� Staff Chaplains, Fellows and Residents at the NYHHS.
Vox vetores, vox Dei