leaders versus managers

40
Chapter 14 Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 1 Leaders versus Managers MANAGERS Do things right Status quo Short-term Means Builders Problem solving LEADERS Do the right thing Change Long-term Ends Architects Inspiring & motivating Adapted from Exhibit 14.1 1.1

Upload: muriel

Post on 10-Jan-2016

37 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Leaders versus Managers. MANAGERS Do things right Status quo Short-term Means Builders Problem solving. LEADERS Do the right thing Change Long-term Ends Architects Inspiring & motivating. 1.1. Adapted from Exhibit 14.1. Leaders versus Managers. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 1

Leaders versus Managers

MANAGERS

Do things rightStatus quoShort-term

MeansBuilders

Problem solving

MANAGERS

Do things rightStatus quoShort-term

MeansBuilders

Problem solving

LEADERS

Do the right thingChange

Long-termEnds

ArchitectsInspiring & motivating

LEADERS

Do the right thingChange

Long-termEnds

ArchitectsInspiring & motivating

Adapted from Exhibit 14.1

1.11.1

Page 2: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 2

Leaders versus Managers

1.11.1

American organizations (and probably those in much of the rest of the industrialized world) are under led

and over managed. They do not pay enoughattention to doing the right thing, while theypay too much attention to doing things right.

--Warren Bennis

American organizations (and probably those in much of the rest of the industrialized world) are under led

and over managed. They do not pay enoughattention to doing the right thing, while theypay too much attention to doing things right.

--Warren Bennis

Page 3: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 3

Doing the Right Thing

1.11.1

The Three M’s: Mission, Mentor, and Mirror

Business leaders can develop personal ethics by focusing on their mission, a mentor, and the mirror

1. Develop a personal mission statement.

2. Take care in choosing a mentor.

3. Stand in front of the mirror to assess yourethical performance as a business leader.

The Three M’s: Mission, Mentor, and Mirror

Business leaders can develop personal ethics by focusing on their mission, a mentor, and the mirror

1. Develop a personal mission statement.

2. Take care in choosing a mentor.

3. Stand in front of the mirror to assess yourethical performance as a business leader.

Page 4: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 4

Substitutes for Leadership

Leadership substitutes subordinate, task, or organizational characteristics

that make leaders redundant or unnecessary

Leadership neutralizers subordinate, task, or organizational characteristics

that interfere with a leader’s actions

Leaders don’t always matter Poor leadership is not the cause of every

organizational crisis

1.21.2

Page 5: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 5

Who Leaders Are and What Leaders Do

Leadership Traits

Leadership Traits

LeadershipBehavior

LeadershipBehavior

22

Page 6: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 6

Leadership Traits

LeadershipTraits

Desireto Lead

Honestyand

Integrity

Drive Self-Confidence

EmotionalStability

CognitiveAbility

Knowledgeof the

Business

2.12.1

Adapted from Exhibit 14.3

Page 7: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 7

Leadership Behaviors

2.22.2

Initiating Structure

The degree to which a leader structures the roles of followers by setting goals, giving directions, setting deadlines, and assigning tasks.

Consideration

The extent to which a leader is friendly, approachable, and supportive and shows concern for employees.

Page 8: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 8

Blake/Moulton Leadership Grid

1,9 Country Club Management

9,9 Team Management

1,1Impoverished Management 9,1

Authority-Compliance

5,5Middle of the

Road5,5

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 91

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

Adapted from Exhibit 14.4

2.22.2

Co

nce

rn f

or

Peo

ple

Concern for Production

High

Low

Low High

Page 9: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 9

Putting Leaders in the Right Situation:Fiedler’s Contingency Theory

33

GroupPerformance

GroupPerformance =

LeadershipStyle

LeadershipStyle

SituationalFavorableness

SituationalFavorableness

Page 10: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 10

Putting Leaders in the Right Situation:Fiedler’s Contingency Theory

Least Preferred CoworkerLeast Preferred Coworker

Situational FavorablenessSituational Favorableness

Matching Leadership Stylesto Situations

Matching Leadership Stylesto Situations

33

Page 11: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 11

Leadership Style:Least Preferred Coworker

Leadership style is the way a leader generally behaves toward followers seen as stable and difficult to change

Style is measured by the Least Preferred Co-worker scale (LPC) relationship-oriented task-oriented

3.13.1

Page 12: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 12

Leadership Style:Least Preferred Coworker Scale

3.13.1

Page 13: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 13

Situational Favorableness

3.23.2

Situational Favorableness

The degree to which a particular situation either permits or denies a leader the chance to influence the behavior of group members.

Three factors: Leader-member relations Task structure Position power

Page 14: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 14

Situational Favorableness

Exhibit 14.7

3.23.2

Page 15: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 15

Matching Leadership Styles to Situations

Exhibit 14.8

3.33.3

Page 16: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 16

Path-Goal Theory

44

Path-Goal Theory

A leadership theory that states that leaders can increase subordinate satisfaction and performance by clarifying and clearing the paths to goals and by increasing the number and kinds of rewards available for goal attainment.

Page 17: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 17

Basic Assumptions of Path-Goal Theory

Adapted From Figure 14.9

44

Clarify paths to goalsClarify paths to goals

Clear paths to goals by solving problems and removing roadblocks

Clear paths to goals by solving problems and removing roadblocks

Increase the number and kinds of rewardsavailable for goal attainment

Increase the number and kinds of rewardsavailable for goal attainment

Do things that satisfy followers today or will lead to future rewards or satisfaction

Do things that satisfy followers today or will lead to future rewards or satisfaction

Offer followers something unique and valuablebeyond what they’re experiencing

Offer followers something unique and valuablebeyond what they’re experiencing

Page 18: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 18

Path-Goal Theory

Adapted From Figure 14.10

Subordinate Contingencies• Perceived Ability• Locus of Control• Experience

Subordinate Contingencies• Perceived Ability• Locus of Control• Experience

Environmental Contingencies• Task Structure• Formal Authority System• Primary Work Group

Environmental Contingencies• Task Structure• Formal Authority System• Primary Work Group

Outcomes• Subordinate satisfaction• Subordinate performance

Outcomes• Subordinate satisfaction• Subordinate performance

Leadership Styles• Directive• Supportive• Participative• Achievement-Oriented

Leadership Styles• Directive• Supportive• Participative• Achievement-Oriented

44

Page 19: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 19

Adapting Leader Behavior:Path-Goal Theory

LeadershipStyles

LeadershipStyles

Subordinateand

EnvironmentalContingencies

Subordinateand

EnvironmentalContingencies

OutcomesOutcomes

44

Page 20: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 20

Leadership Styles

Directive clarifying expectations and guidelines

Supportive being friendly and approachable

Participative allowing input on decisions

Achievement-Oriented setting challenging goals

4.14.1

Page 21: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 21

Path Goal Theory:When to Use Leadership Styles

Directive Leadership Supportive Leadership Unstructured tasks Inexperienced workers Workers with low perceived ability Workers with external locus of

control Unclear formal authority system

Structured, simple, repetitive tasks

Stressful, frustrating tasks When workers lack confidence Clear formal authority system

Participative Leadership Achievement-Oriented Leadership Experienced workers Workers with high perceived ability Workers with internal locus of

control Workers not satisfied with rewards Complex tasks

Unchallenging tasks

Adapted from Exhibit 14.11

4.24.2

Page 22: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 22

Subordinate and Environmental Contingencies

Perceived ability

Locus of control

Experience

Perceived ability

Locus of control

Experience

Subordinate Environmental

Task structure

Formal authority system

Primary work group

4.24.2

Page 23: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 23

Adapting Leadership Behavior

WorkerReadiness

WorkerReadiness

LeadershipStyles

LeadershipStyles

55

Hersey and Blanchard’s Situational Leadership Theory

Page 24: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 24

Worker Readiness

The ability and willingness to take responsibility for directing one’s behavior at work

Components of worker readiness: Job readiness Psychological readiness

5.15.1

Page 25: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 25

Worker Readiness

R4R4

R3R3

R2 R2

R1R1

confidentwilling able

confidentwilling able

insecurenot willingable

insecurenot willingable

confidentwilling not able

confidentwilling not able

insecure not able not willing

insecure not able not willing

5.15.1

Page 26: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 26

Leadership Styles

Telling(R1)

Telling(R1)

Selling(R2)

Selling(R2)

Participating(R3)

Participating(R3)

Delegating(R4)

Delegating(R4)

high task behaviorlow relationship behavior

high task behaviorlow relationship behavior

high task behaviorhigh relationship behavior

high task behaviorhigh relationship behavior

low task behaviorhigh relationship behavior

low task behaviorhigh relationship behavior

low task behaviorlow relationship behavior

low task behaviorlow relationship behavior

5.25.2

Page 27: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 27

Normative Decision Theory

DecisionStyles

DecisionStyles

Decision Quality and Acceptance

Decision Quality and Acceptance

66

Page 28: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 28

Decision Styles

Adapted from Exhibit 14.12

6.16.1

Solve the problem yourself

Solve the problem yourself

Obtain information.Select a solutionyourself.

Obtain information.Select a solutionyourself.

Share problem,get ideas fromindividuals.Select asolution yourself.

Share problem,get ideas fromindividuals.Select asolution yourself.

AI AII CI

Share problemwith group,get ideas.Make decision,which may ormay not reflectinput.

Share problemwith group,get ideas.Make decision,which may ormay not reflectinput.

Share problemwith group.Together triesto reach a solution. Leader acts asfacilitator.

Share problemwith group.Together triesto reach a solution. Leader acts asfacilitator.

CII GII

Leader solves the problemor makes the decision

Leader accepts any decisionsupported by the entire group

Page 29: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 29

Decision Quality and Acceptance

Using the right amount of employee participation: improves decision quality improves acceptance

Decision tree helps leader identify

optimal level of participation

6.26.2

Page 30: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 30

Quality Rule If the quality of the decision is important, then don't use

an autocratic decision style

Leader Information Rule If the quality of the decision is important, and if the leader

doesn't have enough information to make the decision on his or her own, then don't use an autocratic decision style

Subordinate Information Rule If the quality of the decision is important, and if the

subordinates don't have enough information to make the decision themselves, then don't use a group decision style

6.26.2

Normative Theory Decision Rulesto Increase Decision Quality

Page 31: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 31

Normative Theory Decision Rulesto Increase Decision Quality

Goal Congruence Rule If the quality of the decision is important, and

subordinates' goals are different from the organization's goals, then don't use a group decision style

Problem Structure Rule If the quality of the decision is important, the leader

doesn't have enough information to make the decision on his or her own, and the problem is unstructured, then don't use an autocratic decision style

6.26.2

Page 32: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 32

Normative Theory Decision Rulesto Increase Decision Acceptance

Commitment Probability Rule If having subordinates accept and commit to the decision

is important, then don't use an autocratic decision style

Subordinate Conflict Rule If having subordinates accept the decision is important

and critical to successful implementation and subordinates are likely to disagree or end up in conflict over the decision, then don't use an autocratic or consultative decision style

Commitment Requirement Rule If having subordinates accept the decision is absolutely

required for successful implementation and subordinates share the organization's goals, then don't use an autocratic or consultative style

6.26.2

Page 33: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 33

Visionary Leadership

CharismaticLeadership

CharismaticLeadership

TransformationalLeadership

TransformationalLeadership

77

Page 34: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 34

Charismatic Leadership

Creates an exceptionally strong relationship between leader and follower

Charismatic leaders: articulate a clear vision, based on values model values consistently with vision communicate high performance expectations display confidence in followers’ abilities

7.17.1

Page 35: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 35

Kinds of Charismatic Leaders

Ethical Charismatics provide developmental opportunities open to positive and negative feedback recognize others’ contributions share information concerned with the interests of the group

Unethical Charismatics control and manipulate followers do what is best for themselves only want positive feedback motivated by self-interest

7.17.1

Page 36: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 36

Ethical and Unethical Charismatic Leaders

Exercising Power Power is used to serve others

Creating the vision Followers help develop the vision

Communicating with followers

Two-way communication

Accepting feedback Open to feedback

Want followers to think and to questions the status quo

Stimulating followers

Developing followers Focus on developing followers

Living by moral standards

Three virtues: courage, sense of fairness, integrity

Charismatic Leader Behaviors

Ethical Charismatics

7.17.1

Adapted from Exhibit 14.15

Page 37: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 37

Ethical and Unethical Charismatic Leaders

Charismatic Leader Behaviors

Unethical Charismatics

Exercising Power Power is used to dominate others

Creating the vision Vision comes solely from the leader

Communicating with followers

One-way communication, not open to input from others

Accepting feedback Prefer yes-men, punish candid feedback

Don’t want followers to think, prefer uncritical acceptance of own ideas

Stimulating followers

Developing followers Insensitive to followers’ needs

Living by moral standards

Follow standards only if they satisfy immediate self interests

7.17.1

Adapted from Exhibit 14.15

Page 38: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 38

Reducing Risks of Unethical Charismatics

1. Have a clearly written code of conduct

2. Recruit, select, and promote managers with high ethical standards

3. Train leaders how to value, seek, and used diverse points of view

4. Celebrate and reward those who exhibit ethical behaviors

7.17.1

Page 39: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 39

Transformational Leadership

Generates awareness and acceptance of group’s purpose and mission

Gets followers to accomplish more than they intended or thought possible

7.27.2

Page 40: Leaders versus Managers

Chapter 14Copyright ©2007 by South-Western, a division of Thomson Learning. All rights reserved 40

Components of Transformational Leadership

1. Charisma or idealized influence

2. Inspirational motivation

3. Intellectual stimulation

4. Individualized consideration

7.27.2