leader development institute october 27, 2010 robin largue [email protected] janet...

48
Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue [email protected] Janet Pilcher [email protected] m

Upload: hunter-norris

Post on 27-Mar-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Leader Development Institute

October 27, 2010

Robin Largue

[email protected]

Janet Pilcher

[email protected]

Page 2: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

2011

1. Leading organizations will step up to accept responsibility for preventing the preventable and never events truly becoming never.

2. Reputations will be earned by performance not publicist.

3. Inconsistency will be more noticeable.

4. Transparency will increase.

Page 3: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

2011

5. Those organizations who already have solid employee relationships will have trust needed to build structure for changing evaluation and payment systems. Those that have relationship issues will have performance issues

6. Pay for Performance will improve quality as measured by student achievement measures.

7. Schools are under the microscope with Differentiated Accountability. Teachers are under more pressure to make sure students show academic growth. Student achievement depends on effective teaching.

Page 4: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

8. Accountability systems will improve.

9. Improving quality in school districts means improving student achievement. This depends on principals spending time developing effective teachers whose students show academic growth. To do so, principals must establish relationships with teachers.

Page 5: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

In this environment of very rapid change, we have had to evolve

quickly.

Page 6: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

ALIGNMENT +

ACTION +

ACCOUNTABILITY__________________________

ALWAYS

Always

Page 7: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

NeverNever SometimesSometimes UsuallyUsually AlwaysAlways

Always

Page 8: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Nine Principles ®

Commit to excellence

Build a culturearound service

Measure theimportant things

Create and developgreat leaders

Focus on employeesatisfaction

Build individualaccountability

Recognize andreward success

Communicateat all levels

Align behaviorswith goals and values

Page 9: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Execution FrameworkEvidence-Based LeadershipSM

Standardization AcceleratorsMust Haves®

Performance Gap

Objective Evaluation

System

Leader Development

Foundation Breakthrough

STUDER GROUP®:

Aligned Goals Aligned Behavior Aligned Process

Rev 9.1.10

Page 10: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Barriers to Change

Denial

Rationalization

Blame

Uniqueness

Unwillingness

Not Skilled

Page 11: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Phases of Change

PHASE 1:

The Honeymoon

PHASE 2:

Reality Sets In

PHASE 3:

The Uncomfortable Gap

PHASE 4:

Consistency

What to expect: Sense of

excitement Right “to do” list Things will get

better (hope) Quick fixes are

implemented Skeptics

What to expect: We/they Inconsistency Bigger than I

thought This will impact

me Some are getting

it Some are not

What to expect: The performance

gap is evident Tougher decisions

must be made Process

improvement increases

Inconsistencies become obvious

What to expect: High performing

results Everyone

understands the keys to success

Disciplined people and disciplined processes

Proactive leadership

Page 12: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Manage UP (Harvard Business Press)

Managing up is a conscious approach to working with your supervisor toward mutually important goals.

Through managing up, you build a better relationship with your boss and also deliver value to your school district.

Page 13: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Manage UP (Harvard Business Press)

In particular you

Cultivate a beneficial relationship with your manager.

Take advantage of expertise and resources to solve problems.

Negotiate win/win solutions to challenges.

Page 14: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Manage UP (Harvard Business Press)

People who manage up understand that they and their bosses are mutually dependent on one another. Your boss needs cooperation, reliability, and honesty from you. And you need your boss to forge links to the rest of your organization, to set priorities and to obtain critical resources.

Page 15: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Example—Managing Up

A principal provides the following information to employees at a faculty meeting.

The district budget was reduced by 15% due to a decrease in tax revenues. The Superintendent was committed to retaining as many instructional personnel as possible. In order to do this some difficult decisions had to be made. But the Superintendent showed a strong commitment to our employees and to the well being of our students and their families.

Page 16: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Being silent is another form of We/They.

Page 17: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

“People wish to be settled; but only as far as they are unsettled, is there any hope for them.”

Ralph Waldo Emerson

Page 18: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Phases of Competency

Page 19: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

EBL and Challenges

“You may encounter many defeats, but you must not be defeated. In fact, it may be

necessary to encounter the defeats, so you can know who you are, what you can rise from, how you can still come out of it.”

Maya Angelou

Page 20: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

What are your “Take Aways”?

Page 21: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Four Steps to Solutions

Page 22: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Areas of Strength to Leverage (Parent Survey)

The major strengths of the Santa Rosa County School District are:

Academic achievement of students

Safe schools

Source of pride for the community

Page 23: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Parent Satisfaction Survey September 2010

The district mean: 3.95

Highest Scored Items

My child’s learning is a high priority at this school.

The school provides a safe environment for my child to learn.

The school is clean and well maintained.

Page 24: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Areas with Most Opportunity for Improvement

Santa Rosa County School District has the most opportunity to improve these major areas:

Perception of effective leadership at all levels of the school district

More opportunities for positive communication with parents

Better ways for school staff to communicate with parents about student performance

Page 25: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Parent Satisfaction Survey September 2010

Lowest Scored Items

Superintendent is an effective leader.

The principal is an effective leader.

I receive positive phone calls and notes about my child from this school.

Page 26: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Areas of Strength to Leverage (Employee Survey)

The major strengths of the SRCSD are:

The highest scored item on the survey indicates that staff has confidence in the value of the education that students receive in schools in the district.

Leaders show genuine concern for the welfare of employees.

Good work and high performance are recognized by leaders in the school district

Page 27: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Employee Engagement Survey September 2010

The district mean: 3.81

Highest Scored Items

My principal/supervisor demonstrates a genuine concern for my welfare.

My principal/supervisor recognizes good performance.

The expectations for judging my performance are clear.

Page 28: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Areas with Most Opportunity for Improvement

In regard to staff engagement, SRCSD has the most opportunity to improve these major areas:

Be more transparent in communicating why particularly difficult decisions (financial) are being made.

Provide tools and equipment that staff needs to meet their work objectives.

Leaders need to engage with employees in very specific ways to gain their input and to provide feedback to help them improve their performance.

Page 29: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Employee Engagement Survey September 2010

Lowest Scored Items

The Superintendent manages district finances effectively.

The Superintendent makes informed decisions based on the best interest of the district.

The Superintendent has integrity and is honest.

Page 30: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Managing Up

Stopping the WE/THEY

Take a look in the mirror

Managing Up-Communicating Effectively Exercise

Page 31: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Employee Engagement Survey September 2010

Lowest Scored Items

without Superintendent Items

My principal/supervisor consults me on decisions that affect my job.

I have the materials and supplies to do my job.

My principal/supervisor provides the support needed to accomplish my work objectives.

Page 32: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Parent and Employee Surveys

Responses to open ended questions will be sent soon.

What is working well?

What could be improved?

Who should be rewarded and recognized for good work?

Page 33: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Debrief Survey Roll Out

What worked well?

What questions do you still have?

Page 34: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Leader Rounding

Connecting to Staff

Page 35: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

How do we explain things…

WHAT

WHY

HOW

WHAT

HOW

WHY

Page 36: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Instead…

WHAT

WHY

HOW

WHY

WHAT

HOW

Page 37: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Purpose

Purpose of Rounding – to build relationships and improve processes

Page 38: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Rounding for Outcomes - Employees

Align Questions to fit Desired Outcomes of the Organization

Concern and Care

What is Working Well

People to Recognize

Systems to Improve

Tools and Equipment

Follow-up

Page 39: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Why do we do leader rounding?

Process Improvement – execution and consistency

Reward and Recognition

92% of people respond to reward and recognition

What gets rewarded gets repeated

Communicate things that are right

Be specific

Senior leaders write notes; direct supervisors say it personally

Page 40: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

NegativeNegative1 compliment1 compliment1 criticism1 criticism

1 to 11 to 1

NeutralNeutral2 2 complimentscompliments1 criticism1 criticism

2 to 12 to 1

Positive!Positive!3 3 complimentscompliments1 criticism1 criticism

3 to 13 to 1

Source: Tom Connellan, “Inside the Magic Kingdom”, pgs 91-95

Page 41: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Sample Rounding Stoplight Report

Page 42: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Monthly Brief

Message from Principal

What’s Working Well

Areas to Improve

Special Recognition

Page 43: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Rounding Process Survey

Page 44: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Leader Rounding

How did you explain “why” you are rounding?

Page 45: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Debrief Leader Rounding Process

Debrief using Rounding Survey

Page 46: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Questions and Comments on Leader Rounding

Where are the gaps?

Page 47: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Take Aways

What is your take away from this last segment on managing up or leader rounding?

Page 48: Leader Development Institute October 27, 2010 Robin Largue Robin.largue@educatorready.com Janet Pilcher Janet.pilcher@educatorready.com

Tools in the Toolbox

• Support Card—11-1; 2-1; 5-1

• Calling 3 to 5 parents a week with positive news

• Parent Newsletters (monthly, quarterly)

• Rounding on all employees every 30 days

• Rewarding and recognizing employees

• Employee Engagement Survey —12-1

• Roll out the data—January

• Parent Survey—April

• LDI—2-8 or 2-9