lbnl 9/15/06 limiting factors in solar cell efficiency - how do they apply on the nano-scale ? d.g....
TRANSCRIPT
LBNL 9/15/06
Limiting factors in solar cell efficiency - how do they apply
on the nano-scale ?
D.G. Ast
Cornell University
LBNL 9/15/06
Giant Single Molecule Cell (bulk collection)
record =24. 7 %
1-D “nano” cell
(depleted collection)
record = 13%
(triple - UniSolar)
3-D “nano” cell (dye or QM sensitized)
record= 12.6%
(Graetzel, wet)
From Macro to Nano
LBNL 9/15/06
Jsc
1. Incident energy flux reduction
Reflection (Si ~ 10%)
Contact shading
Insufficient absorption ( d < )
LBNL 9/15/06
Jsc 2. Failure to generate electron hole pairs
Sub bandgap photons (excluding two photon processes*)
Bulk free carrier absorption, “Auger”
Free carrier absorption due to V across
cell
Frank Keldysh effect
* investigated in Si for two photon processes
LBNL 9/15/06
3. Failure of e-h to contribute to current
Bulk recombination (impurities, structural defects, )
Surface recombination
Non-contacted surface
Contacted surface
Jsc
LBNL 9/15/06
Jsc 4. Remedies
Bulk Losses:
Clean Starting Materials
Gettering
Thin bulk ! => Light trapping design !
Collecting from fully depleted
layers with uniform (!) electric
fields. (No “hang through” !)
LBNL 9/15/06
Surface Recombination
a. Non contacted area
Small Area ! (Implication for “nano” !)
Factors influencing S:
Capture cross section of surface states (in Si >>for
electrons than holes)
Hole and electron concentration at surface (Voutput
dependent as cminority increases with Vout)
Charge of passivating layer
Jsc
LBNL 9/15/06
Jsc
Contact Areas:
Small area ! (Nano, again )
Heavy doping => “ Back surface field”
(Graetzel Patents on TiO2)
LBNL 9/15/06
Voc
1ln
o
loc I
I
q
kTV
Dh
ih
Ae
ie
NL
nqD
NL
nqDAI
22
0
Small ni , Long lifetimes (Diffusion distance)
1. “ Junction Leakage “
LBNL 9/15/06
Green , semi-empirical
Kiss & Rehwald (thermodynamic)
Voc
Good a:Si-H (Roca, Meillaud et al.)
LBNL 9/15/06
Additional contribution(s) to Jo
1. Generation current due to bulk “midgap” states
2. Generation current to due surface states.
Voc
n, diode ideality factor, function of operating conditions.
Sum over exponentials commonly expressed as
LBNL 9/15/06
2. Junction Defects (shorts, partial shorts, more general: Spatial inhomogeneity)
1. Scale with junction area (nano !)
2. Difficult to diagnose
3. The bane of the multicrystalline cell
LBNL 9/15/06
FFEmpirical relation (Green)
1
72.0ln
oc
ococ
V
VVFF
Additional Effects
Series Resistance : Contacts & Leads
Parallel Resistance : Shunts !
LBNL 9/15/06
Module EfficiencyCdTe modules are much less efficient than CdTe cells !
Cells must be uniform !
Cost
Not just materials but processing (CIS)
Stabilitya-Si:H, DSC ..
LBNL 9/15/06
PERL cell
= 24 %
PERL => Passivated Emitter, Rear contact Locally diffused
GIANT SINGLE MOLECULE DEVICE
LBNL 9/15/06
200 nm 100 nm
M. Schmidt, A. Schoepke, O. Milch, Th. Lussky, W. Fuhs
A-Si:H
1-D “NANO”
N(E) as d
LBNL 9/15/06
A(luminum) Induced C(rystallization) I(on) A(ssisted)
D(eposition) poly-Si cell (M.Green) 9…12%
(Pinnacle of optical engineering)
Si reappears via M. Green
LBNL 9/15/06
NANO CELLS:
Insufficient absorption => Multiple stacking
large surface area => junction leakage
increased lead length =>resistance, recombination
Contact shading => transparent electrodes e.g.TiO2 surface recombination, parasitic resistance,
E drops !
n mismatch => multiple bounce
LBNL 9/15/06
QD dots sensitized
Higher absorption than dyes.
More corrosion resistant.
Layer 3 is the insulator (TiO2) between organic p conductor and layer 2, the F doped SnO contact layer. Potential large area problem.
LBNL 9/15/06
Jsc
Jsc at QD size below optimal optimum.
Monochromatic Light
max ~ 10%
Trade off between coverage (1x), QM size tuning, and transport loss.
LBNL 9/15/06
Summary
Challenges:
Transition from single giant molecule cell to nano cell
1. Large increase in junction area .. junction defects.
2. Surface states
2. Transparent conductors…. bandgap matching.
3. Large contact area … shunts
Rewards :
1. Bandgap tuning
2. Easier implementation of “sub bandgap” and “hot carrier” . . . ; .. Conversion.
3. Large area for “in situ” chemical conversion !