lawrence livermore national laboratory physical sciences recent results from hotqcd and experimental...
TRANSCRIPT
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Physical Sciences
Recent Results from HotQCD and Experimental Benchmarks for Hydrodynamnics
or the story of how I got here ...
Ron Soltz
2Physical SciencesOption:UCRL# Option:Directorate/Department Additional Information
In The Beginning ...
Why is HBT so hard?•Freeze-out•EOS•Initial State
HBT is just last step in hydro and physicsHBT puzzle is really a hydro observable puzzle•renaming problem doesn’t solve it•HBT puzzle sounds better
Lisa, Pratt, Soltz Wiedemann, Ann. Rev. 55:xxx (2005) and ref.
It’s enough to drive some to the bottle ... and others to the lattice !
3Physical SciencesOption:UCRL# Option:Directorate/Department Additional Information
The prescription - for solving the puzzle
Fix Freeze-Out• Cascade Afterburner - UrQMD/JAM
• Important for HBT, but v2 not immune
Calculate/Constrain Inputs• Equation of State - no 1st order for HBT• Initial Conditions• Transport Coefficients
Aspects begun by most participants (later slides & talks)
4Physical SciencesOption:UCRL# Option:Directorate/Department Additional Information
Schematically looks like
also
Resemblance to certain computers not coincidental
5Physical SciencesOption:UCRL# Option:Directorate/Department Additional Information
In the meantime...
LLNL (64+40 racks), BNL, SDSC, Argonne, Julich, KEK, MIT, etc.
Delivery of 64 racks in Fall ‘06 added means to motivation... ability to run calculations on N=8 lattices
6Physical SciencesOption:UCRL# Option:Directorate/Department Additional Information
The Birth of HotQCD
HotQCD = MILC + RBC-Bielefeld + LLNL + LANL
Computing without experience would have been insufficient
7Physical SciencesOption:UCRL# Option:Directorate/Department Additional Information
HotQCD timeline (politics and physics)
Feb 2006, LLNL Workshop• http://physci.llnl.gov/Conferences/qcdeos06/
May 2006, Proposal to NNSA/ASC Program Office• extend staggered action to Nt=8, domain wall ls=96
Oct 2006, first accounts - Polyakov Loop at QM06 July 2007, 8 rack x 4w - Tc at Lattice 2007 Jan 2008, 72 rack x 3w - EOS QM08 & BNLHydro08 Apr-Jun 2008, 8 rack x 6w - finish and publish
May 2-3, Lattice Strong Dynamics Workshop• http://www.yale.edu/LSD/workshop.html Contact [email protected]
physics goals = N=8 Tc/EOS continuum corrections improved stag.... and domain wall fermion action
8Physical SciencesOption:UCRL# Option:Directorate/Department Additional Information
Transition Temperature - Deconfinement
Polyakov Loop and Strange Quark Number Susceptibility
€
χ(l ,s) /T2 =
1
VT
∂ 2 log(Z)
∂μ(l ,s)2
€
Lren = exp[−F∞(T) /(2T)
Lines at 185,195 MeV to set range of N=8 transition
HotQCD Preliminary
9Physical SciencesOption:UCRL# Option:Directorate/Department Additional Information
Transition Temperature - Chiral
Subtracted Chiral Condensate and Total Chiral Susceptibility
€
Δ l,s(T) =ψ ψ
l ,T−
ml
ms
ψ ψs,T
ψ ψl ,0−
ml
ms
ψ ψs,0
€
χm =∂
dmq
ψψ
Same lines at (185,195 MeV) set range for chiral N=8 transition
HotQCD Preliminary
10Physical SciencesOption:UCRL# Option:Directorate/Department Additional Information
Chiral vs. Deconfinement
10 MeV range can accommodate both Nt8 transitions for both actions Aoki et al., PLB 643:46 (2006) report Tc
chiral - Tcdeconf
= 24(4) MeV
•different normalization for chiral susceptibility
Chiral symmetrytransition at peak
Deconfinmenttransition at inflection
€
ml2[χ sin glet (T) − χ sin glet (T)]/T
4
HotQCD Preliminary
11Physical SciencesOption:UCRL# Option:Directorate/Department Additional Information
Renormalized Chiral Susceptibility
Renormalization shift could be as large as 10 MeV HotQCD not yet ready to quantify transition difference, but
Experimental Observables depend on Equation Of State
€
ml2[χ sin glet (T) − χ sin glet (T)]/T
4
HotQCDPreliminary
12Physical SciencesOption:UCRL# Option:Directorate/Department Additional Information
Back to hydrodynamics, EOS
∂
puu gp
13Physical SciencesOption:UCRL# Option:Directorate/Department Additional Information
Current Status of Hydro
Kolb, et al.• azhydro, 2+1, 1st order EOS, sudden freeze-out
Huovinen• 2+1, vary EOS
Bass, Nonaka, et al.
• 3+1, vary TC , UrQMD afterburner, EOS (in progress)
Hirano, et al.• 3+1, PCE freeze-out, JAM afterburner
Teany• w/ viscous effects
Molnar• work in progress
14Physical SciencesOption:UCRL# Option:Directorate/Department Additional Information
HotQCD EOS and Hydro
Working to implement HotQCD EOS into azhydro• grateful for help from P. Huovinen• not ready, perhaps by end of workshop
For HotQCD EOS see talks by • Ludmilla Levkova - asqtad EOS• Michael Cheng - p4 EOS and comparisons
15Physical SciencesOption:UCRL# Option:Directorate/Department Additional Information
Future Plans (to benchmark)
1. Finish and publish HotQCD p4/asqtad EOS
2. Insert EOS into azhydro w/ statistical and systematic errors compare to primary soft observables
spectra, flow, HBT
3. Vary initial conditions
4. Modify sudden freeze-out
- requires moving beyond azhydro
Emphasis will be on mapping errors in soft signatures
16Physical SciencesOption:UCRL# Option:Directorate/Department Additional Information
Future Plans (to collaborate)
Grateful for help (past, present, future)•Pasi Huovinen & Denes Molnar•build on azhydro work•test out FLASH hydrodynamic code
Obvious value in running multiple hydro codes w/ same conditions•through direct communication•... or in larger context (i.e. TECHQM08)
Can provide cpu cycles and ability to use them
17Physical SciencesOption:UCRL# Option:Directorate/Department Additional Information
Future plans (broad context)
More to be done on EOS• finite baryon density• physical quark mass• closer to continuum• spectral fns, and transport coeff.• chiral symmetric fermion actions
And Hydrodynamics• viscous effects
• soft probes - /K/p spectra + v2 + 2 HBT not exhaustive
• hard probes - energy quenching, and speed of sound
Looking forward to a productive workshop !