law1 (2)
TRANSCRIPT
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 1/73
INDIAN CONTRACT ACT,
1871
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 2/73
CONTRACT
Contracts –
Contract sec2(h)- An agreement enforceable
by law is a contract.
Agreement sec 2(b)- Every promise and every
set of promise forming the consideration for
each other.
Promise – an accepted proposal. Proposal – A proposal when accepted becomes
a promise.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 3/73
AGREEMENT
All agreements are contracts if they are made by the free consent of parties competent to
contract, for a lawful consideration and with a
lawful obect, and are not hereby e!pressly
declared to be void.
"onditions of valid contract-
#) "onsideration
2) $arties competent to contract %) &ree consent
') bect lawful
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 4/73
ESSENTIAL ELEMENTS OF A
VALID CONTRACT
1. Proposal & Acceptance.
2. Consideration.
3. Capacity of parties to contract.
4. Free Consent.5. Agreement should not be epressly declared
!oid.
". #riting & $egistration% if so reuired by la'.
(. )egal $elationship.
*. Certainty.
+. Possibility of Performance.
1,. -nforceable by la'.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 5/73
PROPOSAL
Proposal #hen one person signi/es toanother his 'illingness to do or to abstainfrom doing anything% 'ith a !ie' to obtainingthe assent of that other to such act orabstinence% he is said to ma0e a proposal.
An oer 'hich is epressed by conduct is calledan implied oer and the one 'hich is epressedby 'ords 'ritten or spo0en% is called an epressoer.
Promises are also epress or implied. Case pton $ural istrict Council !. Po'ell
Communication of proposal is complete'hen it comes to the 0no'ledge of person
to 'hom it is made. )alman !. auri utt
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 6/73
IMPLIED
OFFER
EXPRESS
OFFER
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 7/73
INTENTION TO MAKE CONTRACT
-nglish la' to create a contract there must bea common intention of the parties to enter intoa legal obligation. o pro!ision in the 6CA.
Case 7alfour !. 7alfour
6ntention of parties is naturally to beascertained from the terms of the agreementand surrounding circumstances.
#hat matters is not 'hat the parties had inmind % but 'hat a reasonable person 'ould
thin0% in the circumstances% their intention tobe.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 8/73
OFFER AND INVITATION eneral oer an oer can be made to 'orld at
large.
Case Carlill v. Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.
Invitation to ofer #here a party% 'ithout
epressing his /nal 'illingness% proposes
certain terms on 'hich he is 'illing tonegotiate% he does not ma0e an oer% but onlyin!ites the other party to ma0e an oer onthose terms.
Case Harvey v. Facey 8hop0eeper9s catalogue of prices is only an
in!itation to oer.
Announcement of auctions.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 9/73
ESSENTIALS OF PROPOSAL
1. :er must be such as in la' capableof being accepted and gi!ing rise tolegal relationship.
2. ;erms of oer must be de/nite%unambiguous and certain.
3. An oer may be distinguished from<
a= A declaration of intention and an
announcement.b= An in!itation to ma0e an oer or do
business.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 10/73
CONTINUED
4. :er must be communicated.
)alman utta >. auri 8hu0la
5. :er must be made 'ith a !ie' of
getting assent.". A statement of price is not an oer.
?ar!ey >. Facey
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 11/73
ACCEPTANCE
#hen one person to 'hom the proposalis made signi/es his assent thereto% theproposal is said to be accepted.
Proposal 'hen accepted becomespromise.
;he person ma0ing the proposal iscalled the Promisor and person
accepting the proposal becomesPromisee.
Case- Brogden v.Metropolitan RailwayCo.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 12/73
.
ESSENTIALS OF ACCEPTANCE
1. Acceptance must be absolute and unuali/ed.
2. 6t must be epressed in some usual &reasonable manner.
3. @ental Acceptance is not sucient in )a'.
4. Acceptance must be communicated to theoeror.
5. Acceptance must be by a certain person.
". Acceptance must be gi!en 'ithin a reasonable
time.Case Adam v. indsell
(. Acceptance must be gi!en before the oerlapses or is re!o0ed or is 'ithdra'n.
*.Acceptance of proposal is acceptance of allterms.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 13/73
COMMUNICATION OF AN ACCEPTANCE
;he communication of an acceptance iscomplete%
as against the proposer% 'hen it is put in acourse of transmission to him% so as to beout of the po'er of the acceptorB
as against the acceptor% 'hen it comes tothe% 0no'ledge% of the proposer.
Eg : 7 accepts As proposal by a letter sentby post. ;he communication of theacceptance is complete% as against A 'henthe letter is posted as against 7% 'hen theletter is recei!ed by A.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 14/73
REVOCATION OF PROPOSALS
AND ACCEPTANCES
Revocation of proposals and acceptances.
A proposal may be revoed at any time before thecommunication of its acceptance is complete as againstthe proposer, but not afterwards.
An acceptance may be revoed at any time before the communication of the acceptance is
complete as against the acceptor, but not afterwards
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 15/73
REVOCATION HOW MADE
7y the communication of notice of re!ocationby the proposer to the other partyB
7y the lapse of time prescribed in such proposalfor its acceptance or% if no time is so prescribed%
by the lapse of a reasonable time% 'ithoutcommunication of the acceptanceB
7y the failure of the acceptor to ful/ll acondition precedent to acceptanceB or
7y the death or insanity of the proposer% if thefact or death comes to the 0no'ledge of theacceptor before acceptance.
Case Hent!orn v. Fraser
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 16/73
REVOCATION OF ACCEPTANCE
6n -nglish )a' acceptance once made isirre!ocable% applies to postal acceptance.
6n 6ndian )a'% acceptance is generallyre!ocable.
?ence the communication of re!ocation mustreach earlier than the acceptance.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 17/73
CONSIDERATION An agreement 'ithout consideration is !oid%
8ec25 6CA.
8ec 2Ed= #hen a the desire of thepromisor% the promisee or any other personhas done or abstained from doing or does
or abstains from doing% or promises to do orto abstain from doing% something% such actor abstinence or promise is called aconsideration for the promise.G
A= at the desire of the of the promisorH Case la' "#rga Prasad v. Baldeo
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 18/73
CONSIDERATION Pri!ity of contract promisee or any other
person.
"#tton v. Poole
$weddle v. Atkinson
"#nlop Pne#matic $yre Co. v. Sel%ridge &Co.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 19/73
EXCEPTIONS TO PRIVITY OF CONTRACT
1=7ene/ciaries under ;rust or Charge or otherarrangements.
'!wa(a M#!ammad '!an v. H#ssaini Beg#m
)regory and Parker v. *illiams
2= @arriage settlement% partition or other familyarrangements.
"aropati v. +aspat Rai
3=Ac0no'ledgement by estoppel
"evara(a ,rs v. Ram 'ris!naia!
Co!enants running 'ith land
Smit! & Snipes Hall Farm td v. River "o#glasCatc!ment Board
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 20/73
PAST CONSIDERATION
Past consideration is no consideration.
-ceptions
1= Past !oluntary ser!ice
2= Past ser!ice at reuest
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 21/73
EXCEPTIONS TO CONSIDERATION 8ec 25
1= atural lo!e and aection
2= Past !oluntary ser!ice
3= ;ime barred debt
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 22/73
CAPACITY OF PARTIES TO
CONTRACT
An agreement becomes a contract if it isentered bet'een the parties 'ho arecompetent to Contract.
8ec. 11 -!ery person is Competent tocontract
1. #ho is of the age of maIority according
to the la'.2. #ho is of sound mind.
3. #ho is not disuali/ed by any la'.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 23/73
Capacity of parties
isuali/edPersons
Persons of nsound@ind
@inor
6ntoicate
d Persons
run0ard
s
)unatics or
6nsanePersons6diots
Corporations
6nsol!ent
@arried
#ome
n
Con!icts
Foreign8o!ereigns
&
Ambassadors
Allien-nemie
s
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 24/73
CAPACITY TO CONTRACT @inor Esec.11=
A. Agreement void-ab-initio . Mo!oribibi v. "!armodas )!os!
7. @inor may be a Promisee or 7ene/ciary
. S!ara% Ali v. oor Mo!d.
C. A minor can al'ays plead minority
. eslie v. S!eill
. o $ati/cation
. Arm#gan v. "#raisinga
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 25/73
Contract 'ith @inor9s uardian
@inor as an Agent
@inor a partner
8urety for a minor 6nsol!ency
Position of @inor9s Parents.
8ec "4 and "5 do not applyE!oidagreement=
@inor as a 8hareholder of a company
-mploymentJ8er!ice Agreement for
@inor
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 26/73
-ect of minor9s agreement<
1=o estoppel against minor. 2= o liability in contract or tort arising out
of contract.
3= octrine of restitution.
eslie v. S!eill
'!an )#l v. ak!a Sing!
)iability for necessaries Esec. "*=
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 27/73
CAPACITY TO CONTRACT
nsound mind
-nglish la' C:;$AC; 68 >:6A7)- 6ndian la' E8-C. 12= C:;$AC; 68
>:6 nder Sing! v. Parmes!wari Sing!
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 28/73
28
FREE CONSENT
"Free onsent! #e$ 1%& ' Consent issai( to )e *ree +en it is not a-se(). /
1= coercion%
2= undue inKuence
3= fraud%
4= misrepresentation%
5= mista0e. Consent is said to be so caused 'hen it
'ould not ha!e been gi!en but for theeistence of such coercion% undueinKuence% fraud% misrepresentation ormista0e.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 29/73
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 30/73
30
COERCION
8ec. 15 Coercion is the committing% orthreatening to commit% any act forbiddenby the 6ndian Penal Code% or the unla'fuldetaining% or threatening to detain% anyproperty% to the preIudice of any person
'hate!er% 'ith the intention of causingany person to enter into an agreement.
-g A% on board an -nglish ship on the highseas% causes 7 to enter into anagreement by an act amounting tocriminal intimidation under the 6ndianPenal Code.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 31/73
COERCION ;echniues
1= committing or threatening to commitany act forbidden by the 6PCB or
2= unla'fully detaining or threatening to
detain any property. Aksari Mir/a v. Bibi +ai 'is!ore
C!ikam Amira(# v. C!ikam Ses!amma
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 32/73
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 33/73
33
UNDUE INFLUENCE
Sec. 16- A contract is said to be induced by
Lundue inKuenceG 'here the relationssubsisting bet'een the parties are suchthat one of the parties is in a position todominate the 'ill of the other and uses
that position to obtain an unfairad!antage o!er the other.
-g A had gi!en ad!ance money to his son 7during his minority% upon 7s coming ofage obtains% by misuse of parental
inKuence% a bond from 7 for a greateramount than the sum due in respect ofthe ad!ance. ?ere A employs undueinKuence.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 34/73
CONTINUED 6llustrations
Eb= A% a man enfeebled by disease or age% is induced%by 7s inKuence o!er him as his medical attendant%to agree to pay 7 an unreasonable sum for hisprofessional ser!ices. 7 employs undue inKuence.
Ec= A% being in debt to 7% the moneylender of his
!illage% contracts a fresh loan on terms 'hich appearto be unconscionable. 6t lies on 7 to pro!e that thecontract 'as not induced by undue inKuence.
Ed= A applies to a ban0er for a loan at a time 'henthere is stringency in the money mar0et. ;he ban0er
declines to ma0e the loan ecept at an unusuallyhigh rate of interest. A accepts the loan on theseterms. ;his is a transaction in the ordinary course ofbusiness% and the contract is not induced by undueinKuence.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 35/73
UNDUE INFLUENCE *illiams v. Bailey
$eal or apparent authority
Fiduciary relation
@ental distress
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 36/73
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 37/73
37
FRAUD
8ec. 1( LFraudL means and includes anyof the follo'ing acts committed by a partyto a contract% or 'ith his conni!ance% or by
his agent% 'ith intent to decei!e anotherparty thereto of his agent% or to inducehim to enter into the contract M
1= the suggestion% as a fact% of that 'hichis not true% by one 'ho does not belie!e itto be trueB
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 38/73
38
CONTINUED
2= ;he acti!e concealment of a fact byone
ha!ing 0no'ledge or belief of the fact.
3= A promise made 'ithout any intentionof performing.
4= Any other act /tted to decei!eB
5= Any such act or omission as the la'
specially declares to be fraudulent.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 39/73
CONTINUED 6llustrations Ea= A sells% by auction% to 7% a horse
'hich A 0no's to be unsound. A says nothing to 7about the horses unsoundness. ;his is not fraud inA.
Eb= 7 is As daughter and has Iust come of age.?ere% the relation bet'een the parties 'ould ma0e
it As duty to tell 7 if the horse% is unsound. Ec= 7 says to A L6f you do not deny it% 6 shall
assume that the horse is sound.L A says nothing.?ere% As silence is eui!alent to speech.
Ed= A and 7% being traders% enter upon a contract. Ahas pri!ate information of a change in prices 'hich'ould aect 7s 'illingness to proceed 'ith thecontract. A is not bound to inform 7.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 40/73
CONTINUED Acti!e concealment
@ere silence no fraud
1= duty to spea0
2= 'here silence is decepti!e
3= change of circumstances
4= half truths
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 41/73
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 42/73
42
MISREPRESENTATION
8ec.1*L@isrepresentationL means andincludes M
1= the positi!e assertion% in a manner not'arranted by the information of the person
ma0ing it% of that 'hich is not true% thoughhe belie!es it to be true.
2= any breach of duty 'hich% 'ithout anintent to decei!e% gains an ad!antage to
the person committing it% or any oneclaiming under him% by misleading anotherto his preIudice or to the preIudice of anyone claiming under him.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 43/73
43
CONTINUED…3= causing% ho'e!er innocently% a party to an
agreement to ma0e a mista0e as to thesubstance of the thing 'hich is the subIect ofthe agreement.
;ypes1= n'arranted statements 7ombay Case
2= 7reach of duty
3= 6nducing mista0e about subIect matter
8uppression of !ital facts of material facts
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 44/73
0OIDAI2IT3 OF A4REE5ENT#
1+ >oidability of agreements 'ithout free consent M #hen
consent to an agreement is caused by coercion% fraud ormisrepresentation% the agreement is a contract !oidable atthe option of the party 'hose consent 'as so caused. Aparty to a contract 'hose consent 'as caused by fraud ormisrepresentation% may% if he thin0s /t% insist that thecontract hall be performed and that he shall be put in the
position in 'hich he 'ould ha!e been if the representationsmade had been true.
-ception. 6f such consent 'as caused bymisrepresentation or by silence% fraudulent 'ithin themeaning of section 1(% the contract% ne!ertheless is not
!oidable% if the party 'hose consent 'as so caused had themeans of disco!ering the truth 'ith ordinary diligence.-planation. A fraud or misrepresentation 'hich did notcause the consent to a contract of the party on 'hom suchfraud 'as practiced% or to 'hom such misrepresentation'as made% does not render a contract !oidable.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 45/73
CONTINUED 6llustrations Ea= A% intending to decei!e 7% falsely
represents that /!e hundred mounds of indigo are made
annually at As factory% and thereby induces 7 to buy thefactory. ;he contract is !oidable at the option of 7. Eb=A% by a misrepresentation% leads 7 erroneously to belie!ethat% /!e hundred mounds of indigo are made annually atAs factory. 7 eamines the accounts of the factory% 'hichsho' that only four hundred mounds of indigo ha!e been
made. After this 7 buys the factory. ;he contract is not!oidable on account of As misrepresentation. Ec= Afraudulently informs 7 that As estate is free fromincumbrance. 7 thereupon buys the estate. ;he estate issubIect to a mortgage. 7 may either a!oid the contract% ormay insist on its being carried out and the mortgage debtredeemed. Ed= 7% ha!ing disco!ered a !ein of ore on theestate of A% adopts means to conceal% and does conceal%the eistence of the ore from A. ;hrough As ignorance 7 isenabled to buy the estate at an under!alue. ;he contractis !oidable at the option of A. Ee= A is entitled to
succeed to an estate at the death of 7B 7 dies< C% ha!ingrecei!ed intelligence of 7s death% pre!ents the
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 46/73
CONTINUED 1+A. Po'er to set aside contract induced by undue
inKuence M #hen consent to an agreement is caused
by undue inKuence% the agreement is a contract !oidableat the option of the party 'hose consent 'as so caused.Any such contract may be set aside either absolutely or%if the party 'ho 'as entitled to a!oid it has recei!ed anybene/t there under% upon such terms and conditions asto the Court may seem Iust.
6llustrations Ea= As son has forged 7s name to apromissory note. 7% under threat of prosecuting As son%obtains a bond from A for the amount of the forged note.6f 7 sues on this bond% the Court may set the bond aside.
Eb= A% a moneylender% ad!ances $s.1,, to 7% an
agriculturist% and% by undue inKuence% induces 7 toeecute a bond for $s. 2,, 'ith interest at " per cent. permonth. ;he Court may set the bond aside% ordering 7 torepay the $s. 1,, 'ith such interest as may seem Iust.Agreement !oid 'here both parties are under mista0e asto matter of fact.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 47/73
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 48/73
MISTAKE #here both the parties to an agreement are under a
mista0e as to a matter of fact essential to theagreement the agreement is !oid.
-planation.HAn erroneous opinion as to the !alueof the thing 'hich forms the subIectmatter of theagreement% is not to be deemed a mista0e as to a
matter of fact. Ill-strations
Ea= A agrees to sell to 7 a speci/c cargo of goodssupposed to be on its 'ay from -ngland to 7ombay.6t turns out that% before the day of the bargain the
ship con!eying the cargo had been cast a'ay andthe goods lost. either party 'as a'are of thesefacts. ;he agreement is !oid.
Eb= A agrees to buy from 7 a certain horse. 6t turnsout that the horse 'as dead at the time of the
bargain% though neither party 'as a'are of the fact. ;he a reement is !oid.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 49/73
CONTINUED
Ec= A% being entitled to an estate for thelife of 7% agrees to sell it to C% 7 'as dead atthe time of agreement% but both parties'ere ignorant of the fact. ;he agreement is!oid.
CO55ENT#
@ista0e
;here can be a mista0e of identity only'hen a person bearing a particular identityeists 'ithin the 0no'ledge of the plaintiand the plainti intends to deal 'ith himonlyB Ning9s ortan @etal Co. !. -dridge%@errett & Co.% E1*+(= 14 ;)$ +* ECA=.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 50/73
CONTINUED
61$ Efet o* istae as to la+
A contract is not !oidable because it 'ascaused by a mista0e as to any la' in force in6ndiaB but mista0e as to a la' not in force in
6ndia has the same eect as a mista0e of fact.
Ill-stration
A and 7 ma0e a contract grounded on theerroneous belief that a particular debt isbarred by the 6ndian )a' of )imitationB thecontract is not !oidable.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 51/73
CONTINUED
66$ Contrat a-se( ). istae o*one part. as to atter o* *at
A contract is not !oidable merelybecause it 'as caused by one of theparties to it being under a mista0e as toa matter of fact.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 52/73
CONTINUED @ista0e as to identity
a= Assumption of false identity
+aggan at! v. Secretary
b= @ista0e caused by ta0eo!er of business
Bo#lten v +onesc= @ista0e of identity caused by fraud
Hardman v Boot!
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 53/73
CONTINUED @ista0e as to subIectmatter
a= oneistent subIect matterCo#t#rier v Hastie0S!ip cast away1
b= @ista0e as to title of rights
Sole v. B#tc!er0tenancy case1
c=ierent subIectmatters in mind
Ra2es v *ic!el!a#s0 Peerless s!ip case1
d= @ista0e as to substance of subIectmatter
Seik! Bros. td v 3c!ener0sisal man#%act#re1
@ista0e as to uality of subIectmatter Smit! v H#g!es0oats case1
@ista0e as to nature of promise
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 54/73
CONTINUED )imitations
1. @ista0e of both parties
2. -rroneous opinion
3. @ista0e of fact and not of la'
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 55/73
VOID AGREEMENTS 8ec.2Eg= An agreement not enforceable by la'
is !oid.1. Agreements of 'hich consideration and
obIects are unla'ful in part E8.24=
2. Agreements 'ithout consideration E8.25=
3. Agreements in restraint of marriage E8.2"=4. Agreements in restraint of trade E8.2(=
5. Agreements in restraint of legal proceedingsE8.2*=
".
nmeaning agreements E8.2+=(. #agering agreements E8.3,=
*. Agreements to do impossible acts E8.5"=
OF THE CONSEQUENCES OF BREACH OF
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 56/73
OF THE CONSEQUENCES OF BREACH OF
CONTRACT 73- Compensation for loss or damage caused by breac of contract !
#en a contract as been bro$en% te party &o suffers by sucbreac is entitled to recei'e% from te party &o as bro$en te
contract% compensation for any loss or damage caused to im
tereby% &ic naturally arose in te usual course of tings from
suc breac% or &ic te parties $ne&% &en tey made te
contract% to be li$ely to result from te breac of it. Suc
compensation is not to be gi'en for any remote and indirect loss ordamage sustained by reason of te breac.
Compensation for failure to discarge obligation resembling tose
created by contract - #en an obligation resembling tose created
by contract as been incurred and as not been discarged% any
person in(ured by te failure to discarge it is entitled to recei'e
te same compensation from te party in default% as if suc personad contracted to discarge it and ad bro$en is contract.
)*planation - +n estimating te loss or damage arising from a breac
of contract% te means &ic e*isted of remedying te
incon'enience caused by te non-performance of te contract must
be ta$en into account.
ILLUSTRATIONS
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 57/73
ILLUSTRATIONS Ea= A contracts to sell and deli!er 5, maunds of
saltpeter to 7% at a certain price to be paid on
deli!ery. A brea0s his promise. 7 is entitled torecei!e from A% by 'ay of compensation% the sum% ifany% by 'hich the contract price falls short of theprice for 'hich 7 might ha!e obtained 5, mounds ofsaltpeter of li0e uality at the time 'hen the
saltpeter ought to ha!e been deli!ered. Eb= A hires 7s ship to go to 7ombay% and there ta0e
on board% on the /rst of Oanuary% a cargo 'hich A isto pro!ide and to bring it to Calcutta% the freight tobe paid 'hen earned. 7s ship does not go to
7ombay% but A has opportunities of procuringsuitable con!eyance for the cargo upon terms asad!antageous as those on 'hich he had charteredthe ship. A a!ails himself of those opportunities% butis put to trouble and epense in doing so. A isentitled to recei!e compensation from 7 in respectof such trouble and epense.
ILLUSTRATIONS
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 58/73
ILLUSTRATIONS Ec= A contracts to buy of 7% at a stated price% 5,
maunds of rice% no time being /ed for deli!ery. Aafter'ards informs 7 that he 'ill not accept the riceif tendered to him. 7 is entitled to recei!e from A% by'ay of compensation% he amount% if any% by 'hichthe contract price eceeds that 'hich 7 can obtainfor the rice at the time 'hen A informs 7 that he 'ill
not accept it. Ed= A contracts to buy 7s ship for ",%,,, rupees% but
brea0s his promise. A must pay to 7% by 'ay ofcompensation% the ecess% if any% of the contractprice o!er the price 'hich 7 can obtain for the ship
at the time of the breach of promise.
74- COMPENSATION FOR BREACH OF
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 59/73
CONTRACT WHERE PENALTY
STIPULATED FOR #hen a contract has been bro0en% if a sum is named in the contract
as the amount to be paid in case of such breach% or if the contractcontains any other stipulation by 'ay of penalty% the party complainingof the breach is entitled% 'hether or not actual damage or loss ispro!ed to ha!e been caused thereby% to recei!e from the party 'hohas bro0en the contract reasonable compensation not eceeding theamount so named or% as the case may be% the penalty stipulated for.
-planation. A stipulation for increased interest from the date ofdefault may be a stipulation by 'ay of penalty.Q
-ception. #hen any person enters into any bailbond% recogni Ranceor other instrument of the same nature% or% under the pro!isions of anyla'% or under the orders of the 1SCentral o!ernmentQ or of any 8tateo!ernment% gi!es any bond for the performance of any public duty or
act in 'hich the public are interested% he shall be liable% upon breachof the condition of any such instrument% to pay the 'hole summentioned therein.
-planation. A person 'ho enters into a contract 'ith o!ernmentdoes not necessarily thereby underta0e any public duty% or promise todo an act in 'hich the public are interested.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 60/73
ILLUSTRATION
Ea= A contracts 'ith 7 to pay 7 $s.1%,,,% if he fails to pay 7 $s. 5,, on agi!en day. A fails to pay 7 $s. 5,, onthat day. 7 is entitled to reco!er from Asuch compensation% not eceeding $s.1%,,,% as the Court considersreasonable.
Eb= A contracts 'ith 7 that% if Apractices as a surgeon 'ithin Calcutta%he 'ill pay 7 $s. 5%,,,. A practice as asurgeon in Calcutta. 7 is entitled to suchcompensation% not eceeding $s. 5%,,,%as the Court considers reasonable.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 61/73
ILLUSTRATION
Ec= A gi!es a recogniRance binding him in a
penalty of $s. 5,, to appear in Court on acertain day. ?e forfeits his recogniRance. ?eis liable to pay the 'hole penalty.
Ed= A gi!es 7 a bond for the repayment of
$s. 1%,,, 'ith interest at 12 per cent at theend of si months% 'ith a stipulation that% incase of default% interest shall be payable atthe rate of (5 per cent from the date of
default. ;his is a stipulation by 'ay ofpenalty% and 7 is only entitled to reco!erfrom A such compensation as the Court
considers reasonable.
7' PART3 RI4;TF<223
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 62/73
7 PART3 RI4;TF<223RE#CINDIN4 CONTRACT ENTIT2EDTO CO5PEN#ATION /
A person 'ho rightfully rescinds a contract isentitled to compensation for any damage 'hichhe has sustained through the nonful/llment ofthe contract.
6llustration A% a singer% contracts 'ith 7% themanager of a theatre% to sing at his theatre fort'o nights 6n e!ery 'ee0 during the net t'omonths% and 7 engages to pay her 1,, rupeesfor each nights performance. :n the sith night%
A 'illfully absents herself from the theatre% and7% in conseuence% rescinds the contract. 7 isentitled to claim compensation for the damage'hich he has sustained through the nonful/llment of the contract.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 63/73
PERFORMANCE OF CONTRACTS #o can demand performance,
#o must perform contracts,
1. romisor imself
2. y te promisor or is agent3. y te legal representati'es
4. y a tird person
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 64/73
ORDER OF PERFORMANCE /utual and +ndependent
/utual and ependent
/utual and Concurrent
Conseuences if a party pre'entsperformance
ime and place of performance
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 65/73
DISCHARGE OF CONTRACTS ctual erformance
ttempted performance or tender
a. nconditional
b. roper time and placec. #ole obligation
d. 5easonable opportunity
e. Competent person
f. o proper person
g. )*act amount
. oint promises
DISCHARGE BY MUTUAL
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 66/73
DISCHARGE BY MUTUAL
CONSENT o'ation
lteration
5ecission
5emission #ai'er
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 67/73
DISCHARGE BY IMPOSSIBILITY Subseuent or Super'ening impossibility
1. estruction of sub(ect matter
2. ailure of ultimate purpose
3. eat or personal incapacity of promisor4. Cange of la&
9. :utbrea$ of &ar
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 68/73
CASES NOT COVERED ifficulty of performance
Commercial +mpossibility
+mpossibility due to default of tird person
Stri$es and loc$-outs ailure of one of te ob(ects
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 69/73
iscarge by lapse of time
iscarge by operation of la&
a. eat
b. +nsol'encyc. /erger
d. nautorised material alteration
DISCHARGE BY BREACH OF
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 70/73
DISCHARGE BY BREACH OF
CONTRACT nticipatory breac
a. )*pressly
b. +mpliedly
. ctual reac
REMEDIES FOR BREACH OF
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 71/73
REMEDIES FOR BREACH OF
CONTRACT #en one of te parties to te contract
ma$es a breac of te contract te follo&ing
remedies are a'ailable to te oter party.
. D!"!#$% & 5emedy by &ay of damages is
te most common remedy a'ailable to te
in(ured party. is entitles te in(ured party
to reco'er compensation for te loss
suffered by it due to te breac o;f
contract% from te party &o caused tebreac. Section 73 to section 79 incorporate
pro'isions in tis regard.
REMEDIES FOR BREACH OF
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 72/73
REMEDIES FOR BREACH OF
CONTRACT
'. Q(!)*(" "$+(,* & #en te in(ured party asperformed a part of is obligation under tecontract before te breac of contract as
occurred% e is entitled to reco'er te 'alueof &at e as done% under tis remedy.
. S$/,0,/ P$+01+"!)/$ !)2 I)3()/*,1) &
Sometimes a party to te contract instead ofreco'ering damages for te breac may a'erecourse to te alternati'e remedy of specificperformance of te contract% or an in(unctionrestraining te oter party from ma$ing abreac of te contract. ro'isions regardingtese remedies a'e been contained in teSpecific 5elief ct% 1;63.
7/23/2019 Law1 (2)
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/law1-2 73/73
TYPES OF DAMAGES :rdinary
Special
)*emplary or puniti'e or 'indicti'e
a. reac of contract to marryb. isonour of ceue.
. ominal damages