law presentation (q 1,2,3,4,5)
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
1/26
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
2/26
CHAPTER 6REMEDIES
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
3/26
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
4/26
The two organs in a company :
Members at general meeting
The board of directors
Companies Act 1965 required certain businessescan be conducted by the members at general meeting.
However, calling of general meeting are usually
left to the board of directors, and if the directors are also
holding the majority shares in the company, thedirectors will be in control.
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
5/26
Section 131B reinforces the role of the directors byproviding that the board of director is to manage
the companys business and affairs subject to theAct and the companys MA and AA.
This makes a director is primarily responsible forthe management of the company.
What happens if directors conduct are not alignedwith the wishes of the members?
>>Members may remove the director
>> Members may take steps to alter MA and AA tocurb the power of the directors.
**but they only can do this if they are in control.
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
6/26
Most of the time, minority shareholders are not incontrol, if the wrongdoers is in control, the
likelihood of the wrongdoer being sued is very small. Reasons:
>> Their limited votes do not allow them to effect of
the aforementioned changes.>> Doctrine of separate legal entity and doctrine ofprivity allow only the company institute legal action.
>> Proper plaintiff rule: which means where a wrong
is done to the company, the company is the properplaintiff in any legal proceedings, not individualshareholders.
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
7/26
However, the majority is unlikely to bring an action on
an irregularity if the irregularity works to theiradvantage.
The rule in Foss v Harbottle is abused, wrongdoer maycause the company and members to suffer losses.
It is disadvantageous and oppressing the minorityshareholders rights.
Therefore, minority shareholders need remedies so that
can take actions against the wrongdoer in certainsituations.
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
8/26
Question 2
Identify the differing remedies
available to minority
shareholders under the
common law
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
9/26
a)Personal Action(action taken personal capacity)
-If the majority shareholders, violate a personal right of a
minority shareholder, then he can file a personal actionagainst the wrongdoers to rectify such a violation
-allowed to take action if he is deprived of his rights as a
member
(i.e. violation of the articles of association of theCompany or of the terms of any shareholder agreement
etc.).
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
10/26
b)Representive action (Taken on behalf of himself and
other members)
-Personal right to take action against the company and
majority.
-Represent himself and other affected members,for therights of members generally affected.
-Representative action will avoid multiplicity of actions
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
11/26
c)
Derivative Action(company named as defendant/guilty
members pay damages to company and no further
action taken for wrongdoers)
-Wrongdoers can be shareholders and directors of the
Company, as well as third parties.
-The wrong was committed against the company bythose control,the chance of the company taking action
against the wrongdoers is slim.
-The court allows minority member to commence actionagainst wrongdoers.
-As the company victim it alllows it has to be made
party to the action
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
12/26
Question 3
Differentiate between the
derivative suit from representativeaction and personal action.
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
13/26
The action is taken by the member in his personalcapacity to enforce his personal rights against thecompany.
When a person is deprived of his rights as a memberor if is property is expropriated, the member is theproper plaintiff and may commence proceedings inhis or her own name.
Case: Brown v British Abrasive Wheel Co
Personal action
D i i A i
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
14/26
Derivative ActionThe plaintiff shareholders do not sue on a cause of actionbelonging to themselves as individuals. Instead, they sue
in a representative capacity on a cause ofaction that belongs to the corporation.
The real party in interest is the corporation, and theshareholders are suing on its behalf.
As the company is the proper plaintiff, any benefitstemming from successful proceedings will be enjoyed bythe company
It is allowed only if the wrongdoers are in control of thecompany and thus have prevented the company fromtaking action
Examples: the directors have abused their powers or
expropriated the companys assets.
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
15/26
Representative action
The action is taken by a member on behalf ofhimself as well as other members. He representshimself and other affected members, for the rightsof members generally are affected.
a member may sue on behalf of himself and othermembers who have the same personal right. Thus,the representative action will avoid multiplicity of
actions in respect of the same matter.
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
16/26
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
17/26
Section 181 provides a remedy for a member in the
event the affairs of the company are conducted in amanner which is:
a) Oppressive
b) Discriminatory
c) Prejudiciald) Contrary to his interest as a member
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
18/26
S218(1)(f)
- Where directors act in their own interest or mannerthat appears to be unfair or unjust, court can wind upthe company.
S218(1)(i)
- Court can wind up the company where it is just andequitable to do so.
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
19/26
S181(2)
- Provides that the court may with a view to bringing anend or remedying the complaint, make such orders asthe court deems fit.
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
20/26
- Some of the orders which may be made by the courtare:
a)Direct or prohibit the wrongful act
b)Cancel or vary the transaction or resolution
c)Regulate the conduct of the companys affairs
d)Order other shareholders or debenture holders or the
company itself to purchase the interests of the affectedminority
e)Wind up the company
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
21/26
S181A(4)
- Provides that the following persons may apply to thecourt to commence, intervene or defend an action onbehalf of the company. They are known ascomplainant.
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
22/26
Complainants are:
a)Member of the company or a person who is entitled to
be registered as a memberb)Former member provided the application relates to
circumstances in which the member ceased to be amember
c)Director of the companyd)Registrar of companies
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
23/26
Question 5
Which party has the right to commence
legal action on behalf of the company?
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
24/26
1) A complainant may, with the leave of the Court, bring, intervene in or
defend an action on behalf of the company.
2) Proceedings shall be brought in the companys name.
3) The right of any person to bring, intervene in, defend or discontinue any
proceedings on behalf of a company at common low is not abrogated.
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
25/26
Section 181A(4)provides that the following persons may apply to the
court to commence, intervene or defend an action on behalf of the
company, they are known as complainants:
A member of a company, or a person who is entitled to be the registered as member of
a company;
A former member of a company if the application relates to circumstances in which the
member ceased to be a member;
Any director of a company;
The Registrar of Companies, in a case where the company is subject to investigation
under part IX of the Companies Act 1965.
Besides Section 181B(2) provides that the complainant shall give 30
-
8/10/2019 Law Presentation (Q 1,2,3,4,5)
26/26
Besides, Section 181B(2)provides that the complainant shall give 30
days notice in writing to the directors of his intention to apply for a
leave of Court to take proceedings on behalf of the company.
After the lapse of 30 days and no satisfactory response from the
directors, the complainant may apply to the court for leave.
To ensure that the complainant is serious in filling and conducting the
derivative action, Section 181C reads that any derivative actions once
commenced shall not be discontinued, compromised or settled except
with the leave of Court.