law objective questions part 1

7/28/2019 Law Objective Questions Part 1

1/15


2/15

7.

8.

3. the presence of any person, whoparticipated in the prearranged plan, isnot; necessary at the time of actualcommission of the crime.

4. privity ofmind of all the accused is anessential ingredient for the commissionof a crime.

Of these statementsa I, 2 and 4 are correctb. I, 2 and 3 are correctc. 2, 3 and 4 are correctd. I, 3 and 4 are correct'A ' surgeon knowing fully well that excepta miracle, nothing can save X, who isailing from a disease. In good faith, if the

s ~ g e o n operated on X, but as aconsequence of that operation X died, thenwhich one of the following would becorrect?a A is held guilty of ~ d e r for knowingb.

c.

d.

2.

consequence.Item B: For defence ofpropertyI. While the trespasser is engaged m

house breaking during day time.2. Against a th ief who reasonably causes

the defender to believe that he wouldlose his property.

9.

10.

3. Against a person who commitsmischief under such circumstances asmay reasonably cause apprehensionthat grievous hoo would be aconsequence.

Select the correct answer from the codesgiven below:a I and 3 ofboth itemsb. 2 and 3 ofboth itemsc.d.

b.c.d.'A ' entered into an agreement with B toobtain undue f a v o ~ from a member of theGovernment on the promise that A willpay, Rupees one I akh to B, who willdeliver the same to that member. A paidthe amount to B, who in tum paid it to C, amember of Government for the saidpurpose as reward. C subsequently refusedto do any favour.On the basis of above factsa B alone is responsible for his actionsb. both B and C are liable as 'there was

an abetment by conspiracyc. C alone ts responsible as hemisappropriated the money for his ownused. A has no ground to bring prosecutionagainst C, because at the time ofagreement C' s name was not known to

Bwww.examrace.co


3/15


4/15

d. In theft there is taking of property b. V. R Krishna Iyer, J.whereas in extortion there is delivery c. P.N. Bhagwati. C.J.of property. d. Lord Atkin.

17. X obtains property from Z by saying that 22. A patient is brought to a hospital"your thud is in the hands of my gang and maintained by B. The patient is to bewill be put to death unless you send us ten operated up on. If as a result of faultylac rupees". X commits oxygen supply: machine, 'the patient diesa criminal breach of trust on the operation table, thenb. robbery a B would not be liable,c. extortion surgeon was negligent.d. theft b. B would not be liable be therWhich one of the following statement no master and servant ela shipcorrectly defines the offence of "criminal between E and theabreach oftrusn c. B would he liabl beca e hospitala Whoever IS entrusted with the staff were ne n . :.ceeping thedominion of property, elishonestly hospital equip ent, 1 proper orderconverts it as his property is guilty of d. B would not cariously liable

18.

criminal breach of trust b e c a0 ~ is a highly skilledb. Whoever dishonestly misappropriates wor .en B would have 'noany property for his own use, is guilty :3of criminal breach of trust 23. e of the following is anc Who ever uses any movable property m ~ statement?v1olat1on of Iaw or legal contract Innocent pnnc1pal 1s h able for thecomm1ts cnrrunal breach of trust ~ aud ofh1s agent

d None of the above ~ An mnocent pnnc1pal1s not !table forThe mam supporter of the theorythat"1t1s the fraud ofh1s agenta law ofTort" and "not law ofTorts" 1s c An Innocent agent 1s !table for all hisa Wmfield pnnc1pals' torts mclucling fraudb Salmond flj d None of the abovec. Fleming ~ 24. Two dogs belonging to two differentd. Heuston owners acting in concert attacked a flockDue to the collapse ofr ; ,.er in of sheep and injured several sheep. In anthe main ': r of the y, n b er of action for damages brought agamst thepersons died. The clo c r elonged to owners of the dogs, if one of them put inthe Municipal orpor and was defence claiming that he was liable for oneexclusively un er ts ~ t r o L It was 80 half only of the damage, then which one ofyears old bu ormal life of the the followmg statements IS legally

~ ' l r ! ; J ~ C I ' i n g which had fallen sustainable in the above case?y t orty "five years having a Each owner of the dog was liable for~ ~ ~ k i n d of mortar used. If one the whole of the damage

19.

20.

...,.lfmlse husband died due to the b. Each owner was responsible for onese f the clock tower filed the 'suit halfof the damageam ages against the Municipal. c. Neither of the owners is liable forrp oration, then which one of the damage done by his dogo lowing maxims is applicable? d. The owners themselves are not jointa Damnum sine injuria tortfeasors

b. Injuria sine damno 25. Which of the following statements arec. Res Ipsa loquitur NOT correctd. Valenti non fit injuria I. Res ipsa I oquitur is used for the

21. The "Absolute liability" theory as the basis purpose of fixing liability based onfor liability in, tort for industrial injuries strict liability.was propounded by 2. Inference of negligience could propet1ya Blackburn J. be drawn in res ipsa loquitur.www.examrace.co


5/15

30.

3. Res ipsa loquitur dispenses with takingof evidence.

4. Res ipsa loquitur mostly favours thedefendant.

d. noneofthe aboveThe branch of a tree growing on thedefendant's I and hung on the highway at aheight of about I 0 metres above theground. A branch of the tree suddenlybroke and fell up on the pi aintiff' s vehiclewhich was passing along the highway.If the pi aintiff sues the defendant for thedamage of the vehicle on the ground of

33.

nuisance, then which one of the followingconclusions is correct in the above suit?a The defendant was liable for nuisanceb. The defendant was not liable for

A B c Da 2 4 3b. 4 3 2c. 3 4 2d. 4 2 3Kelsen's theory of law is called puretheory because, Kelsena purely discussed jurisprudence onlyb. defined law In accordance with

morality and purity

www.examrace.co


6/15

34.

35.

36.

37.

38.

c. separated I aw from religion, ethics,sociology and history

d. discussed lawpurely in terms of ustice"Law as such is found and not made. It isto be found in popular faith, commonconvictions customs, traits, habits,traditions which in course of time grow 39.into legal rules."This, concept of lawwas propounded bya Thibautb. Henry Mainec. Savignyd. SalmondMatch List I with List II and select thecorrect answer:List IA. Thomas AquinasB. John .AustinC. KelsenD. RawlsList III. Normative order2. Command Theory3. Dictates of reasoning4. Theory of Justice5. System of RulesCodes:

A B c

40.

a laws made by state legislatureb. laws dec! ared by the Judges in judicialdecisionsc. administrative adjudicationd. rules, bye Laws and regulations made

by virtue of statutory powersWhich of the following are sub ordinatelegislations?I. Parli arnentary legislation2. Coloniallegislation3. Judiciallegislation4. Executive legislationgiven below:a 2,3 and4 r ~b. 1,2and3 ~c. I, 2 and4d. ~ Tort c tr occurs wherea o o e persons combine to Injurearty by unlawful means

~ ~ l ' f more persons combine to injure rd party by Iawful means. . ,-'b.,,o or more persons combine to help a

third party by lawful meansd. two or more persons, combine not toinjure a third party by unlawful means'A ' was carelessly driving his carat 50

a 2 3 km!hr, at a bus street in the city and hit 'B '4 2 5 ~ injuring his leg. On these facts thec. 3 4 Supreme Court of India he! d that 'A ' isd. 3 2 ~ liable to pay compersation to. 'B'. ItThe most important i t of legal means that the Supreme Court laid downb.

reform is the I aw that the injured parts, is enti tiedfor compensatrion in all cases ofa I egislation + a car accidents at a busy place, if theb. driver was negligent

Select the correct answer using the codesgiven below:a 1,2 and3b. I and 2c. 2 and 3d. land3Delegated legislation means

42.

43.

b. causmg InJUry m accidents bynegligent driving of any vehiclec. inflicting physical. InJUry bynegligenced. negligent causing of damage of anotherIf the jural co-relative of "Right" is"Duty", then the co -reiative of"Liberty" isa Powerb. Disabilityc. Liabilityd. No claimRight in re aliena means a right overa his own propertyb. a property of someone elsec. a property situated in a foreign country

www.examrace.co


7/15


8/15


9/15


10/15

71. Assertion (A): A minor is liable for d. (A) is fa! se but (R) is truenecessaries supplied to him. 75. Assertion (A): A, a boy of the age of sixReason (R): A minor's estate is liable for and a halfyears intentionally murders B. Areimbursement of the expenses incurred on is no t liable to be convicted.supply of necessaries. Reason (R): A child up to the age of 7a Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the years is immune from criminal liability.correct explanation of (A) a Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is theb. Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not correct explanation of (A)the correct explanation of (A) b. Both (A) and (R) are true but (c. (A) is true but (R) is false the correct explanation of (Ad. (A) is fa! se but (R) is true c. (A) is true but (R) is false

72. Assertion (A) If any part of a single d. (A) is fa! se but (R) is trueconsideration for one or more objects, or 76. Assertion (A): There isany one or any part of any one of several attempt to commit an iconsiderations for a single object, is Reason (R): Nolawful, then the agreement is void. incurred under. SReason (R): An agreement not enforceable Penal Code for an pt to do an actby law is said to be void. which, r a ~ be an offence.a Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the a Both (R) are true and (R) is the

correct explanation of (A) a ation of (A)b. Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is not b. ) and (R) are true but (R) is notthe correct explanation of (A) fli ect explanation of (A)c. (A) is true but (R) is false ) is true but (R) is falsed. (A) is fa! se but (R) is true A) is fa! se but (R) is true73. an act or omission of the offerer. dacoity unless he has committed,

Reason (R): The communication of attempted to commit or aided inproposal is complete, when it com!fj committing robbery.knowledge of the person, to wh 1 Reason (R): When two persons conjointlymade. commit robbery, then every person soa Both (A) and (R) are e committing robbery is said to commitcorrect explanation of dacoity.b. Both (A) and (R) is not a Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is thethe correct correct explanation of (A)c. (A) is true bu R) is b. Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is notd. (A) is fa! s ) i!J4.1le the correct explanation of (A)

74. ) . the sister of X was c. (A) is true but (R) is false

Reason (R): The word 'abducting' inSection 100 I.P.C. includes 'abductionsimpliciter'.a Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is thecorrect explanation of (A)b. Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is notthe correct explanation of (A)c. (A) is true but (R) is false

d. (A) is fa! se but (R) is true78. Assertion (A) : Precedent is like a gold in anune.

79.

Reason (R) : It has to be searched in I awreports.a Both (A) and (R) are true and (R) is the

correct explanation of (A)b. Both (A) and (R) are true but (R) is notthe correct explanation of (A)c. (A) is true but (R) is falsed. (A) is fa! se but (R) is trueAssertion (A): International Law is unlikemunicipal law.Reason (R): There is no world legislature,no international police arid no

www.examrace.co


11/15


12/15


13/15

2. Pith and substance The validity of d. It is a breach o ffamily responsibilities,I egislation is detennined by the degree so specific performance order is calledof invasions into the field. for

3. Colourable legislation: You cannot do 103. "A ' offers to sell his car to "B" for Rs.indirectly, what you cannot do directly. 50,000/-. 'B ' agrees to buy the car offering4. Repugnancy Conflicting results are Rs. 45.000/-. The reply ofB amounts tonot produced where both the laws are a offer

applied to the same facts. b. counter offerSelect the correct answer from the codes c. invitation to an offergiven below: d. standing offera I, 2 and 4 104. Which one of the following c ~b. 2, 3 and 4 offer in a self-service store? ~c. I, 3 and 4 a Display ofgoods at G dowd. I, 2 and 3 b. When the custom ask for some

100. The Article of the Constitution which goods ~automatically becomes suspended on c. There is no of in s casesproclamation of emergency is: d. Picking up an e and approachinga Article 14 the c!a . or paymentc. Article21 lett cetoAb. Article 19 105 B posal of A by posttng ad. Article 32 Th bov ceptance

I 0 I. The President's Rule under Article 35 6 tt j be revoked by B as he hasperiod of e I etter ofacceptanceremains valid in a state for the maximum ~ eady accepted the offer and droppeda one year ~ b can be revoked by B as soon as theb. two years letter ofacceptance reached Ac. three years c. can be revoked by B before the I etterd. four years 9i of acceptance reaches AI 02. Ramesh and Geetha were husb a d. can be revoked by B at any time afterwife living in Bangalore. Rajles the I etter ofacceptance reaches AIncome Tax Officer and ~ f h a 106. A daughter promises to give maintenanceschool teacher. T h e y ~ o sons to her uncle in consideration ofher motherstudying in schools in r Parents making a gift of certain properties to her.of Ramesh were also n h them. The daughter pleads lack of considerationRamesh was tran rred t " adras and he when the uncie seeks to enforce thehad to leav fatily behind at contract. She says that the uncle is aBangalore. H sed to send every stranger to the consideration and so hemonth ee thousand to meet cannot enforce the contract. The daughterf a m i l ~ _ditti e, to his wife. Ramesh a will succeed because the uncle being aeli ov y money from Madras. If stranger to the consideration cannotled a suit for specific enforce itmance of the contract, then which b. will not succeed because the uncle is a

the following is correct? near relative and in such casesamily agreements are not contracts consideration is not necessaryand hence, no order for specific c. cannot succeed because according toperformance can be ordered the Indian Contract Act considerationb. It is a valid contract. Specific might move from any personperformance is to be ordered d. will succeed because the uncle is ac. This being an agreement without stranger to the contractconsideration, it is not an enforceable I07. A person enjoying the benefit of non-contract gratuitous acta is under an obligation to makecompensation for this benefit

www.examrace.co


14/15


15/15

116.

117.

receiving consideration for it and so d. a substitute contract withoutthe wife cannot enforce the agreement considerationagainst the husband 119. 'A ' a singer enter into a contract with 'B',c. The wife can enforce the agreement the manager of a theatre, to sing at theagainst the husband because the theatre two nights every week during theagreement 1s supported by next two months, and 'B ' engages to payconsideration her Rs. 1000/- for each night'sd. The wife can enforce the agreement performance. If on the sixth night 'A 'against the husband because the wilfully absents herself from the theatre,agreement is not one for stifling then which one of the followingi ct?prosecution as the offence is one a 'B ' is at liberty to putcompoundable with the p ennission of contract by virtue of Se'X ' contracted with a tent house for b. 'B ' is not at liberty put e d to thethe court and has been so compounded Inelian Con ract Acte

erecting a shamiana for performing the contract by via n 3 9 of themarriage of his daughter. On the day of Inelian Contra Actmarriage, a curfew was clamped in the c. 'B ' is at Iibert> t an end to thearea preventing the celebration of the c o n t r ~ v i r t ~ of a recent ruling ofmarriage. If the shamiana owner claimed the S n O'llrt of Indiathe charges agreed to be paid by X, then d.s .rty to put an end to thea X has to pay the contracted charges ontr' t t only when 'it becomesb. X need not pay the agreed charges but ~ ~ by virtue of Section 11 of theon!y reasonable damages an Con ract Actc. X need not pay anything as the 5:. List I with List II and select thecelebration of the marriage was ct answer:

impossible due to the curfew ~ List Id. X can require the State to bear th (Parties)claim for damages A Hadley Vs. BaxendaleThe basis of the doctrine of frustrrlf B. Simpson Vs. London & N.W. Railthat the Company

a performance IS excueed he C. Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Vs. Newfundamental assumpt:l ~ n g Garage & Motor Company Limitedthe contract has be:epo 1ble D. Norden Felt Vs. Maxim Norden Feltb substantial obJect p es had Company Ltd.1n 111 ew1s no I nger a. Ie List IIc. literal p erfon ance may still be (Types of cases)poss1ble, wtn not fu1 fil the 1. Injunction

b.

on design of the 2. Damages contemplated by the parties

contract

and

at the time of the contract3. Remoteness of damages4. Specific performance5. Liquidated damages and penaltyCodes: Aa 2b. 2c.d. 3

B4334

c3545

D

52

law objective questions part 1

Documents