late episodic memory (em) effects (and their possible association with weak memory traces)
DESCRIPTION
Late Episodic Memory (EM) effects (and their possible association with weak memory traces). and Age-related effects. Doreen Nessler. David Friedman Ray Johnson, Jr. Michael Bersick Letecia Latif. right frontal EM effect. AF8. 500. 1000. 1500. FPz. FP. FP. 2. 1. AF. AF. 7. 3. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
Late Episodic Memory (EM) effects
(and their possible associationwith weak memory traces)
Doreen Nessler David Friedman
Ray Johnson, Jr.
Michael Bersick
Letecia Latif
andAge-related effects
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
Post-retrieval processes(Allan et al., 1998; Mecklinger, 2000)
Monitoring and verification processes(Rugg et al., 2000)
AF3
OZ
CPZ
C1 C5 C3 C2 C4 C6
AF4
F1
FC1FC3FC5
F3 F5
CP1 CP3 CP5 TP7
F7
FT7
AF7 FP1 FPz
F2
FP2AF8
F4 F6 F8
FT8FC2 FC4 FC6
CP2 CP4CP6TP8
P1 P3 P5
CZ
FCZ
FZ
AFz
P2 PZ P4 P6 P7 P8
PO3 PO7
PO4 PO8
O1 O2
LM RM
POZ
Episodic memory (EM) effects
AF8500 1000 1500
right frontal EM effectHits
Correct Rejections
Retrieval success(Wilding & Rugg, 1996, 1997; Mecklinger & Meinshausen, 1998)
Retrieval effort/ Retrieval attempt(Trott, Friedman et al. 1999; Rugg, Otten, & Henson 2002)
Late
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
Late Parietal Negativity
Pz500 1000 1500
HitsCorrect Rejections
Late Episodic memory (EM) effects (2)
AF3
OZ
CPZ
C1 C5 C3 C2 C4 C6
AF4
F1
FC1FC3FC5
F3 F5
CP1 CP3 CP5 TP7
F7
FT7
AF7 FP1 FPz
F2
FP2AF8
F4 F6 F8
FT8FC2 FC4 FC6
CP2 CP4CP6TP8
P1 P3 P5
CZ
FCZ
FZ
AFz
P2 PZ P4 P6 P7 P8
PO3 PO7
PO4 PO8
O1 O2
LM RM
POZ
Response-related(Wilding & Rugg, 1997)
Sensory-specific source search and/or retrieval(Cycowicz, Friedman et al., 2001; Wegesin et al, 2002; Johansson et al., 2002)
Late parietal negativity can also reflect action monitoring(Johansson & Mecklinger, 2003)
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
Late Episodic memory (EM) effects (3)
Late EM effects signs of Re-encoding?
Late right frontal effect:post-retrieval processes
Late parietal negativity:retrieval of attribute conjunction, action monitoring
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
Aging andLate Episodic memory (EM) effects
Elderly no right frontal effect(Senkfor and VanPetten, 1996; Trott, Friedman et al., 1996, 1997; Wegesin et al. 2002)
Elderly with good memory performance show left frontal negativity(Fabiani, Friedman et. al. 1999, see Friedman, 2003)
10 μV
800 1600 2400
Frontal negativity
+
-
Left frontalelectrode
Young
Old LowOld High
Adapted from Friedman, 2003
Late parietal negativity stronger for the elderly than for the young(Trott, Friedman et al., 1997; Wegesin et al. 2002; Li, Morcom and Rugg, 2004)
Young and Elderly similar right frontal effects(Mark and Rugg, 1998; Li, Morcom and Rugg, 2004)
Age-related frontal lobe deficit
The eldery rely more on perceptual information
Successful compensation
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
Questions and Hypotheses
If late EM effects reflect post-retrieval processes that strengthen the memory trace they are expected to be smaller in a repetition of the recognition test.
2.) Late left frontal negativity for the elderly:reflection of compensation?
A late frontal negativity is expected for conditions that elicited similar recognition performance in the young and the elderly.
3.) Late EM effects:Re-encoding of items that were difficult to
recognize?
1.) Late parietal negativity:more prevalent in the data of the elderly?
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
Encoding High Selection
S1 500ms
ISI 500ms
Low Selection
heavyheavy
FEATHERFEATHER
old/new Recognition
300ms OLD: Low Selection
NEW
ACORNACORN
CATCAT
FEATHERFEATHEROLD: High Selection
S2 300msACORNACORN
match?
Paradigm
ACORNACORN
LS match LS no match
Repetition of concept
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
DesignEncoding 1
120 words 60 words High Selection 60 words Low Selection120 OLD words120 NEW words
Recognition 1
Repetition
Encoding 2
Second encoding for the120 words from Study 1
120 OLD words120 NEW words
Recognition 2
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
Participants
YOUNG(N=16)
ELDERLY (N=16)
Mean age22.8 (18 to
29)71.6 (62 to
86)
Female 11 7
Years of Education
15.9 15.9
Mini Mental Exam
55.6 54.1
Verbal IQ(WAIS III)
118 127
Pictorial IQ(WAIS III)
122 117
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
EEG Methods
62 sintered Ag/AgCl ElectrodesOffline re-referred to linked mastoidsRecording: DC - 100 Hz500 Hz sampling rate
AF3
OZ
CPZ
C1 C5 C3 C2
C4 C6
AF4
F1
FC1 FC3 FC5
F3 F5
CP1 CP3 CP5 TP7
F7
FT7
AF7
FP1 FPz
F2
FP2
AF8
F4 F6 F8
FT8 FC2 FC4 FC6
CP2 CP4 CP6 TP8
P1 P3 P5
CZ
FCZ
FZ
AFz
P2 PZ P4 P6 P7 P8
PO3 PO7
PO4 PO8
O1 O2
LM RM
POZ
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
Behavioral Results: RecognitionTest 1
73.483.2
63.157.3
78.5
41.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
High selection Low selectionmatch
Low selection no-match
corr
ecte
d h
it r
ates
Young
Elderly* *
n.s.
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
Correct rejectionHits, HS condition
Young Elderly
Recognition Test 1
Late parietal negativity
Late right frontal EM effect
High Selection
trend
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
Left frontalnegativity
Correct rejectionHits, LS match condition
Young Elderly
Recognition Test 1Low Selection match
Late right frontal EM effect
Parietal negativity
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
Correct rejectionHits, LS no-match condition
Young Elderly
Parietal negativity
Left frontalnegativity
Recognition Test 1Low Selection no-match
Late right frontal EM effect
Parietal negativity
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
Late EM effects for the young and the elderlyTest 1
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
91.489.3 85.279
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
HS LS
corr
ecte
d hit
rat
es
Behavioral Results: Recognition
73.483.2
63.157.3
78.5
41.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
High selection Low selectionmatch
Low selection no-match
corr
ecte
d h
it r
ates
Young
Elderly* *
n.s.Test 1
Test 2
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
Young Elderly
Correct rejectionHits, HS condition
Recognition Test 2High Selection
Left frontalnegativity
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
Recognition Test 2Low Selection
Correct rejectionHits, LS condition test 2
Young Elderly
Left frontalnegativity
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
Late EM effects for the young and the elderlyTest 2
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
Late frontal negativity does not always seem to reflectsuccessful compensation.
The elderly seem to post-process physical features,while the young seem to work more with abstract information.
Discussion
2.) Late left frontal negativity for the elderly:reflection of compensation?
3.) Late EM effects:Re-encoding of items that were difficult to
recognize?
1.) Late parietal negativity:more prevalent in the data of the elderly?
Late parietal negativity: Reflection of action monitoring?
Late EM effects seem to reflect re-encoding processes.
Doreen Nessler, CEPL April, 2005
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION!
Last Slide!