laskin et al. “reactions at interfaces as a source of sulfate formation in sea-salt particles”...
TRANSCRIPT
Laskin et al.“Reactions at interfaces as a source of sulfate formation in
sea-salt particles”
Science, 301, 340 – 344, 2003
Roland von Glasow
• Idea of paper
• Sulfur cycle and sea salt aerosol
• History of the paper
• The paper and the comments to it
Outline
• OH reacts with Cl- at surface of sea salt aerosol:
2(OH + Cl-) Cl2 + 2 OH-
• additional OH- keeps sea salt pH high
• high pH favors aqueous S(IV) + O3 and therefore increases nss-SO4
2- in sea salt but decreases SO2 in the gas phase
Idea of paper
• Idea of paper
• Sulfur cycle and sea salt aerosol
• History of the paper
• The paper and the comments to it
Outline
Some terms
DMS dimethyl sulfide biogenic S from ocean
S(IV) sum of: SO2, HSO3-, SO3
2- intermediate product
S(VI) sum of: H2SO4, HSO4-, SO4
2- final products; important aerosol constituent
MSA methyl sulfonic acid semi-final product; important aerosol constituent
nss-SO42- non-sea-salt sulfate “S(VI)”
Sulfur cycle
volcanoes industry, traffic
SO2
H2SO4
CCN
radiation
aqueous phase oxidation S(IV) S(VI):
H2O2, O3, HOBr, HOCl
cloud albedo
nss-SO42-
DMS
DMSO, SO2, H2SO4 sea salt
pH dependence of S(IV) oxidation
production of nss-SO4
2-:
• O3 + S(IV): only above pH ~ 6, but then very fast
• H2O2 + S(IV)
• HOCl + S(IV)• HOBr + S(IV)
Seinfeld and Pandis, 1998
pH of sea salt• definition: pH = - log10[H+]• surface ocean water: pH ~ 8.1• sea salt pH buffer:
– HCO3- + H+ CO2 + H2O
– this consumes all acidity (H+) until HCO3- is depleted, only then
the aerosol pH starts changing
• uptake of acids like HNO3, H2SO4, HCl decrease pH rapidly• sea salt pH function of particle age and size• “auto-acidification” of young sea salt by old sea salt via HCl• additionally “acid displacement”:
– H2SO4 + Cl- HSO4- + HCl
– HNO3 + Cl- NO3- + HCl
pH determinations• indirect (acid balance):
– Bermuda, “moderately polluted”, pH of super-micron aerosol: 3.5 – 4.5– Hawaii, “clean”, pH of sub-micron aerosol: 2.6 – 5.3, super-micron aerosol:
4.5 – 5.4– East Coast of US, “moderately polluted – polluted”, sub-micron aerosol: 1.5
– 2, super-micron aerosol 2 – 3.5
• direct (on minimally diluted filter extracts):– East Coast of US, “moderately polluted – polluted”, sub-micron aerosol:
(2.5), super-micron aerosol 3 - 4
• however: analytics require sampling times of >12h
Keene and Savoie (1998,1999), Pszenny et al. (2004), Keene et al. (2004)
• Idea of paper
• Sulfur cycle and sea salt aerosol
• History of the paper
• The paper and the comments to it
Outline
• Oum, Lakin, DeHaan, Brauers, Finlayson-Pitts, Science, 1998, 279, 74-77
• lab study: “molecular chlorine is generated from the photolysis of ozone in the presence of sea salt”
O3 + hv + sea salt … Cl2• Cl potentially important in atmosphere for oxidation of CH4
and many NMHCs• however: the proposed mechanism cannot work under
atmospheric conditions• see e.g. the rejected comment by Rolf Sander
Oum et al.
• Knipping, Lakin, Foster, Jungwirth, Tobias, Gerber, Dabdub, Finlayson-Pitts, Science, 2000, 288, 301-306
• lab study, molecular dynamics modeling, and kinetic modeling
• only detection of gas phase products• new mechanism proposed:
2 (OH + Cl-) Cl2 + 2 OH- (on surface)
• “daytime Cl conc are in good agreement with estimates based on NMHC destruction…”
Knipping et al.
++
++
Formation of Hydroxyl Radicals
Formation of Hydroxyl Radicals
Ozone: O3
Ozone: O3
Molecular
Oxygen: O2
Molecular
Oxygen: O2
Excited Oxygen Atom: O(1D)
Excited Oxygen Atom: O(1D)
Water Vapor:
H2O
Water Vapor:
H2OHydroxy
l Radical:
OH
Hydroxyl
Radical: OH
Hydroxyl
Radical: OH
Hydroxyl
Radical: OH
•Add NaCl particles to chamber
•Add humid air to a relative humidity above NaCl deliquescence point
•Add NaCl particles to chamber
•Add humid air to a relative humidity above NaCl deliquescence point
CEMMC
T
water regulated temperature
control
CPC
DMA
gas inlet
P, T, %RH
560L Stainless Steel and Aluminum Chamber
FTIR
Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (DOAS)
Aerosol Generation and Measurement
Atmospheric Pressure Ionization Mass Spec (API-MS)
Spectrometer
Q1 Q3
Xelamp
photolysis lamps
Spectrometer
Aerosol Chamber
(Top View)
Aerosol Chamber
(Top View)
•Add ozone•Photolyze at 254 nm (generate OH radicals)•Measure gaseous reactants and products using FTIR, DOAS, and API-MS.
•Add ozone•Photolyze at 254 nm (generate OH radicals)•Measure gaseous reactants and products using FTIR, DOAS, and API-MS.
The ExperimentsThe Experiments Eladio Knipping
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of NaCl / H2O
Molecular Dynamics Simulations of NaCl / H2O
Possibility for Surface Chemistry?Possibility for Surface Chemistry?
Snapshot of the open surface of an infinite “slab” consisting of 96 NaCl and 864 water molecules per unit cell.
Snapshot of the open surface of an infinite “slab” consisting of 96 NaCl and 864 water molecules per unit cell.
Model predicted surface coverage:
•11.9% Cl-
•<0.2% Na+
Model predicted surface coverage:
•11.9% Cl-
•<0.2% Na+
Picture Courtesy of Pavel Jungwirthand Douglas Tobias
Picture Courtesy of Pavel Jungwirthand Douglas Tobias
Eladio Knipping
O3 , H2O2O3 , H2O2 OHOH
O3 , H2O2O3 , H2O2
OH + Cl– OH + Cl–
Known Aqueous
Phase Chemistry
Known Aqueous
Phase Chemistry
Cl2Cl2 Cl2Cl2
Potential Surface Reactions
Potential Surface Reactions
OH•Cl–
+ OH•Cl–
OH•Cl–
+ OH•Cl–
Cl– Cl– OHOHO3O3
2 OH– 2 OH– Cl2Cl2
Proposed Mechanism for Cl2 ProductionProposed Mechanism for Cl2 Production
OH•Cl– + Cl–
→ Cl2– + OH–
OH•Cl– + Cl–
→ Cl2– + OH–
Eladio Knipping
• Jungwirth and Tobias, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2000, 104, 7702-7706
2001, 105, 10468-10472 2002, 106, 6361-
6373
• more detailed molecular dynamics modeling• polarizability of halides is reason for surface
segregation
Jungwirth and Tobias
Jungwirth and Tobias
J&T, 2001
J&T, 2002
• Knipping and Dabdub, J. Geophys. Res., 2002, 107, paper no. 4360
• very detailed modeling of lab experiment: current knowledge not enough to explain lab results, proposed reaction:
2 (OH + Cl-) Cl2 + 2 OH- (on surface)
• “contribution of interfacial mechanism to chloride deficits measured in the atmosphere is minimal”
Knipping and Dabdub
• Idea of paper
• Sulfur cycle and sea salt aerosol
• History of the paper
• The paper and the comments to it
Outline
• Laskin, Gaspar, Wang, Hunt, Cowin, Colson, Finlayson-Pitts, Science, 2003, 301, 340-344
• lab studies of deliquesced NaCl that was deposited on a filter, 3800 ppm O3, 81% rh, several hours reaction time
• only detection of particulate products• proposed reaction:
2 (OH + Cl-) Cl2 + 2 OH-
surface mechanism as source of alkalinity
• “back of the envelope” calculations and speculations about atmospheric implications
Laskin et al.
Laskin et al.
unreacted NaCl
reacted NaCl
Laskin et al.
unreacted NaCl
reacted NaCl
Cl : Na
O : Na
esp. small but also supermicron particles lose Cl and gain O:
• “in the MBL the NaOH generated in this reaction will provide a previously unrecognized buffering mechanism”
• buffering more nss-SO42- formation
in sea salt
rapid deposition of sea salt
smaller climate effect of SO2
Laskin et al.: main idea
• regarding unexplained large Cl- depletion in measurements of sea salt aerosol: “ an alternative explanation is the mechanism proposed here, in which chlorine is displaced from the interface as Cl2..”
• however: Knipping and Dabdub, 2002: “contribution of interfacial mechanism to chloride deficits measured in the atmosphere is minimal”
Laskin et al.: other idea
• “However, measurements indicate that acidification rates are greater and pHs lower than those inferred and, consequently, the influence on S(VI) production was substantially overestimated.”
• HNO3 is more important than H2SO4 in acidifying sea salt in clean areas
• none of their samples ever indicated alkalinity production in sea salt aerosol (from polluted to clean environments)
Keene and Pszenny: comment
Sander, et al.: comment• “Their extrapolation to atmospheric conditions,
however, neglected to include gas-phase diffusion limitations. The proposed reaction is not important for regulating sea-salt aerosol pH and sulfate production in the marine troposphere.”
• neglect of gas phase diffusion limitations for OH uptake in “back of the envelope” calculations: 10x too fast
• model runs– base (--)– base with 2 (OH + Cl-) Cl2 + 2 OH- – base with 2 (OH + Cl-) Cl2 + 2 OH- and without kinetic
limitations for uptake (--)
Sander, et al.: comment
base run
including surface reactionwithout gas-phase diffusion
Laskin et al.: reply
• pH: measurements often not in clean air, their idea doesn’t affect final pH only its temporal evolution
• NO3- is also enriched at interface and its
photolysis might be an important OH source without gas phase limitations
Summary of paper history
Knipping et al., 2000: lab (only detection of gas phase), MD model, kinetic model:2 (OH + Cl-) Cl2 + 2 OH- surface mechanism as source of Cl
Knipping and Dabdub, 2002: more kinetic modeling
Jungwirth and Tobias, 200x: more MD modeling
Laskin et al., 2003: lab (only detection of particulate phase)2 (OH + Cl-) Cl2 + 2 OH- surface mechanism as source of alkalinity2 comments: i) pH of aerosol
ii) kinetics, model results
Oum et al., 1998: lab, O3 + hv + sea salt … Cl2
Conclusions
• there is still a lot to do to understand sea salt pH• surface reactions have a great potential• oxidation of S(IV) in sea salt does decrease gas
phase SO2 and formation of new CCN via:– S(IV) + H2O2
– S(IV) + O3
– S(IV) + HOBr– S(IV) + HOCl
and the deposition of sea salt particles