MELANIE F. LEMOINE, PH.D.CO-DIRECTOR

MONICA K. BALLAY, M.ED.EVALUATOR

WWW.LASIG2.ORG

“LaSIG 2: Sustaining Practice through Goal

Setting and Data”

Project Background

Continuation of LaSIGFocus on scaling up and sustainability

Move from school level to district level

14 Districts throughout the stateFramework for district & school improvement

5/05

WestFeliciana

Washington

St. Tammany

Tangipahoa

St.Helena

Livingston

CoupeePt.

East

Avoyelles

EBRWBR

Iberville RSD St.

John

St. Charles

St. Charles

St. Bernard

Plaquemines

Jefferson

AscensionSt.

JamessAssumption

LafourcheSt.Mary

Terrebonne

BeauregardAllen

Calcasieu

Cameron

JeffersonDavis

Evangeline

St. Landry

Acadia

Vermilion

Lafayette

St.Martin

Iberia

VernonRapides

Winn

Grant

LaSalle Catahoula Concordia

Caldwell

Natchitoches

Caddo

Bossier

RedRiverDeSoto

Sabine

Webster

Bienville

Claiborne

Lincoln

Jackson

Union Morehouse

OuachitaRichland

FranklinTensas

Madison

CarrollWest East Carroll

LaSIG 2 Districts 2008-2009

14 Districts

Assumption

EBR Rapides

Livingston

Caddo

Calcasieu

DeSoto

Vermilion

Plaquemines

RSD

Jefferson

Catahoula

EastCarroll

District & School Support

Annual Allocation to support initiatives Schools and Districts ID improvement initiatives Districts develop 5 year plan to participate

Site Liaison assigned to each district Provide on-going support Link to resources

Family Facilitator assigned to each district Goodwill Ambassador to build partnerships between

school and families

District 5 Year Plan

Identify improvement initiative based on current data

Must include in the plan: Tiered interventions Universal accessibility Family initiative Disproportionality Job Embedded PD Data

Logic Model

Ensuring SustainabilityChange in PracticeGoal Attainment Scale

Each district plan includes measurable goals Progress reviewed twice a year 5 Year plan and GAS used to guide the districts

Data Collection Quarterly data collected

LRE, Attendance, Behavior (by general ed, special ed, and ethnicity)

Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)

GOAL 1-STATE LEVEL

OBJECTIVE:

ANTICIPATED OUTCOME:

Degree of Attainment

Current Status

-2 -1 0 1 2

Objective 1.1 Coordinate key professional development initiatives.

Meet 90% of identified anticipated outcomes for the objective’s activities.

80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 75%

1.1.1 Invite representatives from each initiative to annual planning meeting. Establish quarterly meetings to review progress and adjust efforts.

90% of invited initiatives participate in planning and quarterly meetings.

80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 64.7%

Tool to measure the degree of attainment based on goals, objectives, and activities of 5 year plan.

Scale range from -2 to 2: 0 = goal has been met -2, -1 goal has not been met 1, 2 goal has been exceeded

Four LaSIG GoalsState, District, School, Individual levels

17 objectives and 71 different activities LaSIG GAS is measured quarterly and

annually

5 Year District Plan = District GAS

1st step – the districts wrote a 5 year plan with goals, objectives, activities based on the needs of district.

2nd step – create a goal attainment scale tool for district based on 5 year plan to assess progress. The plan is assessed at mid-term and end of year by district level leadership team.

3rd step – evaluate the outcome of plan at end of the year.

(see example of district 5 year plan and GAS)

District Example of GAS

Data-Driven DecisionsTraditionally schools/districts view data at the

endof the school year.

Online Data Reporting System

Proactive approach utilizing dataSchools/districts are analyzing data quarterlyQuarterly data used at monthly meetings (SIT,

PBS, etc.) to drive decisions.

Online LaSIG Data Reporting System

Annually – Demographic ReportMonthly – Activity ReportQuarterly

Placement Discipline Attendance

www.lasig2.org