laser shock processing of ni-base superalloy and high cycle fatigue properties
TRANSCRIPT
Laser Shock Processing of Ni-base Superalloy and High Cycle Fatigue
Properties
L. Zhoua*, Y.H. Li, W.F. He, X.D. Wang and Q.P. Li
Engineering Institute of Air Force Engineering University, Xi’an 710038, Shanxi, China
a*Corresponding author: [email protected]
Keywords: Lsaer shock processing, High cycle fatigue life, Ni-base superalloy
Abstract. A plasma sound wave detection method of laser shock processing (LSP) technology is
proposed. Speciments of Ni-base superalloy are used in this paper. A convergent lens is used to
deliver 1.2 J, 10 ns laser pulses by a Q-switch Nd:YAG laser, operating at 1 Hz. The influence of the
laser density to the shock wave is investigated in detail for two different wavelength lasers. Constant
amplitude fatigue data are generated in room environment using notch specimens tested at an
amplitude of vibration 2.8 mm and first-order flextensional mode. The results show that LSP is an
effective surface treatment technique for improving the high cycle fatigue performance of Ni-base
superalloys having a factor of 1.62 improvement in fatigue life.
Introduction
Ni-base superalloy is a key material for turbine engine blades, and further important of its anti-high
cycle fatigue (HCF) ability has been a very important subject in recent decades.
Laser shock processing (LSP) is a surface treatment technology, which consists of irradiating a
metallic target with a short and intense laser pulse in order to generate, through high-pressure surface
plasma, a plastic deformation and a surface strengthening. Particular benefit is achieved for
improving the fatigue behavior[1]. By now, the theoretical aspects of LSP are well elaborated and are
widely presented in many publications, which describe physical processes of laser driven shock wave
generation[2], models of pressure generation[3]. For the past few years, current studies have focused
on improvement of the general system design of LSP equipment for yieding the most reliable
performance.
In this paper the results are presented on LSP technology application to improve the high fatigue
life in Ni-base superalloy. LSP shock waves were measured with a PVDF sensor and microphone in
order to monitor the process, which allows detailed analysis of the generated waves.
Experiments
Material. The materials used in this work was a K417 superalloy, its chemical compositions
contain(mass,%) Ni-balance , Co-14~16 , Cr-8.5~9.5 , Al-4.8~5.7 , Ti-4.5~5.0 , V-0.6~0.9,
Zr-0.05~0.09. The sample was a 120mm×20mm plate with thickness of 7mm.The treated area was
40mm×20mm as shown in Fig. 1.
R20
Fig. 1 Geometry of sample
Materials Science Forum Vols. 697-698 (2012) pp 235-238Online available since 2011/Sep/21 at www.scientific.net© (2012) Trans Tech Publications, Switzerlanddoi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.697-698.235
All rights reserved. No part of contents of this paper may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the written permission of TTP,www.ttp.net. (ID: 128.143.23.241, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, United States of America-04/12/13,16:33:18)
Principle and experimental procedure of LSP. The experimental setup of LSP process is shown in
Fig.2. The sample surface was mechanically polished with no particular treatment. The sample was
immersed in a water jacket with 2-5 mm water thckness. As a laser source the Nd:YAG Q-swithed
oscillator and amplifier were used to produce a laser pulse of 10 ns pulse duration with an energy of
1.2J at a repetition rate of 1 Hz. The diameter of the sigle shot area was 1 mm.
Fig. 2 The experimental setup of LSP
Measurements of shock wave pressure. A scheme of the experimental set-up is shown in Fig.3. In
our experiments a polyvinylidene flouride (PVDF) pressure sensor was used to measure shock wave
pressure. Laser
50Ω
Oscilloscope
Confining
layerAbsorbing
layer
Bed platePVDF
Pressure
sensor
Fig. 3 Schematically principle of PVDF pressure test
Plasma sound wave detection method of LSP. A plasma sound wave, generated during the laser
shock processing, was observed, as shown in Fig.4. The microphone passed sloping to the sample
surface at 35 mm from the surface, and was connected to an oscilloscope. The waveform from the
oscilloscope was collected by a PC via a GPIB interface card. For the time of generation of the wave
we set the onset of the laser pulse, wheres the time of arrival was the time of transition of the wave
front through the probe beam. We took the arrival of the first signal peak as the time of arrival of the
wave.
1111
2222
33334444
6666
5555
77778888
9999 10
1-Robot 2-Sample 3- Absorbing layer 4-Probe beam 5-Laser 6- Plasma sound wave 7-Microphone
8- Oscilloscope 9-Data acquisition controller 10-Computer
Fig. 4 The experimental setup of plasma sound wave test
236 Advances in Materials Manufacturing Science and Technology XIV
Fatigue test. Fatigue testing of the samples was carried out unden first-order flextensional vibration
tests, constant amplitude (CA) method loading in servo-hydraulic fatigue test machines, as shown in
Fig.5. The test frequency for all CA tests was 300 Hz in a laboratory air environment.
Fig. 5 The experimental setup of vibration fatigue test
Results and Discussion
It is found that for shock wave surge pressure shows a nonlinear behavior with laser power density. As
shown in Fig.6, the shock wave surge pressure first increases slightly and sturates at greater-than
match 7GW/cm2 laser power density. The nonlinear growth of the shock wave surge pressure with
rising laser power density is caused by the water transparent confining layer. The water transparent
confining layer is used to prevent the laser generated plasma from expanding rapidly away from the
surface. The hydrodynamic expansion of the heated plasma in the confined region between the sample
and the water transparent confining layer creates a high-amplitude and short-duration pressure
pulse.The energy generated due to the expansion of the plasma partially propagates as a shock wave
into sample[5]. The shock wave surge pressure, that depends also on the applied laser fluence, grows
first, tends to oscillate and keeps constant after a specific laser power density. In the
linear-slope-range wave pressure generated with a lower laser power density, which agrees very well
with the R Fabbro’s theory(Eq. 1)[6].
IscmgZGPaP ⋅⋅⋅+
=−− )(
301.0)( 12
α
α (1)
When the laser power density is greater than 7 GW/cm2, the shock wave pressure is not increased.
Because in this power density water transparent confining layer is breakdown by laser. Under the
same power density, 532 nm laser-induced shock wave pressure is higher than 1064 nm laser-induced
shock wave pressure.
Fig. 6 Effect of laser power density to shock wave surge pressure
Laser induced shock waves are rapidly attenuated and dispersed as they propagate through water
and air. They turn into plasma sound wave. The time behavior of plasma sound wave and its relation
to the confining layer or absorbing layer is illustrated in Fig.7. It is clear that the waveform is not
controlled by water confining layer. But the signals change considerably throught the absorbing layer.
Mechanical
shaker
Power amlifier
Displacement sensor
Sample
Strain gauge Strain gauge tester
Materials Science Forum Vols. 697-698 237
During the absorbing layer undumage the measured signal is wide, having a symmetrical profile with
only one maximum. Signal from damage absorbing layer considerably is varied. The signal is
triangular, with small amplitude and lots of peaks. If absorbing layer is damaged, LSP system can be
stopped to protect sample by using plasma sound wave detection method.
1.3m 1.4m 1.5m 1.6m 1.7m-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
Voltage/V
time/ms0.5 0.75 1 1.25 1.5
-1.5
-1.0
-0.5
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
TimeTimeTimeTime////msmsmsms
VV VVoo ooll ll tt ttaa aagg ggee ee// // VV VV
Absorbing layer
undamageAbsorbing layer
damage
Fig. 7 Sound wave signal comparison in two conditions
Average fatigue strength values for baseline and LSP processed samples are summarized in Table
1. Date for fatigue test show a dramtic difference in fatigue life between the two groups. While the
fatigue life of LSP is increased by roughly 62%. Once cracking was observed in the baseline samples,
failure generally resulted in relatively few additional cycles. Crack propagation life was estimated on
the order of a few percent of total life at best. For the LSP samples, however, the crack propagation
life was considerably longer. In fact, it was not uncommom for a crack to initiate in the LSP sample,
grow a short distance, then arrest. Nearly 100% of the sample life was spent propagating the crack.
Table 1 Experimental results of fatigue test
Baseline LSP
Amplitude of vibration[mm] 2.77 2.8 2.78 2.75 2.82 2.84 2.81 2.81
Life cycle[106N] 1.63 0.97 1.99 1.99 2.81 2.64 2.74 2.53
Fatigue life[N] 1.65×106 2.68×10
6
Conclusions
1. The nonlinear growth of the shock wave surge pressure with rising laser power density is caused by
the water transparent confining layer. The threshold value of laser power density for the most
shock wave surge pressure saturation was determined with 7 GW/cm2.
2. Optoacoustic detection method is considered as one of the most effective techniques in terms of its
ability to rapid test for sound wave which can reflect situation of absorbing layer and confining
layer.
3. LSP improved the fatigue life of Ni-base alloy from 1.65×106 to 2.68×10
6.
References
[1] P. Peyre, R. Fabbro: Materials Science and Engineering. Vol. A210 (1996), p.102
[2] P. Molian, R. Molian and R. Nair: Applied Surface Science. Vol. 255 (2009), p.3859
[3] I. Nikitin, B. Scholtes and H. J. Maier: Scripta Materialia. Vol. 50 (2004), p.1345
[4] C. R. Gonzălez, J. L. Ocańa: Mater Science Engineering A. Vol. 386 (2004), p.291
[5] Y. K.Zhang, J.Z.Lu,X.D.Ren: Maters and Design. Vol. 30 (2009), p.1697
[6] R. Fabbro, J. Foumier and P. Ballard: Applied Physics. Vol. 68 (1990), p.775
238 Advances in Materials Manufacturing Science and Technology XIV
Advances in Materials Manufacturing Science and Technology XIV 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.697-698 Laser Shock Processing of Ni-Base Superalloy and High Cycle Fatigue Properties 10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.697-698.235
DOI References
[1] P. Peyre, R. Fabbro: Materials Science and Engineering. Vol. A210 (1996), p.102.
doi:10.1016/0921-5093(95)10084-9 [2] P. Molian, R. Molian and R. Nair: Applied Surface Science. Vol. 255 (2009), p.3859.
doi:10.1016/j.apsusc.2008.10.070 [3] I. Nikitin, B. Scholtes and H. J. Maier: Scripta Materialia. Vol. 50 (2004), p.1345.
doi:10.1016/j.scriptamat.2004.02.012 [4] C. R. Gonzălez, J. L. Ocańa: Mater Science Engineering A. Vol. 386 (2004), p.291.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.msea.2004.07.025 [5] Y. K. Zhang, J.Z. Lu,X.D. Ren: Maters and Design. Vol. 30 (2009), p.1697.
doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2008.07.017