laser-based monitoring of uf6 cylinders - iaea.org · iaea international atomic energy agency...
TRANSCRIPT
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency
Laser-based Monitoring of UF6 cylinders
V. Sequeira, G Bostroem
Institute for the Protection and the Security of the Citizen, European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Ispra, Italy
S. Poirier, D. Langlands, B. Chesnay, M. Burmester, C.Liguori, M. Moeslinger International Atomic Energy Agency, Vienna, Austria
IAEA 2
Acknowledgement:
System developed for the IAEA
Under
a Support Task
with the European Commission
Joint Research Centre of Ispra,
Institute for the Protection and Security of the
Citizen.
IAEA 5
Monitoring the UF6 Cylinder flow
The IAEA SG needs:
Cost & inspection effort saving solutions,
Minimize intrusiveness to the plant operation.
The Technical needs:
• Uniquely identify UF6 cylinders,
• Operational in unattended mode,
• Confirm that the cylinders movement as declared,
• Meet safety standards of the plant,
• Cost-effectiveness.
IAEA 6
2005-2007
Several technical solutions were evaluated
• Stand alone surveillance,
• Identification tags,
• Radio Frequency (RF) IDs,
• Reflective tags and reflective particle tags
• Intrinsic identification: a) Laser surface authentication (Ingenia)
b) Laser surface mapping (JRC)
IAEA 7
Evaluated possible solution:
1-Surveillance-based
identification
Insufficient uniqueness as the two-dimensional “identity” of the cylinder
Screwed, welded or riveted plates...
Variations in shape, material, surfaces and text layout
No Optical Character Recognition ( OCR) possible.
IAEA 8
Evaluated possible solution:
2-Identification Tags were difficult to qualify for
all criteria
Easy-quick- application
Tamper-resistance/indicating
Resistant to process environment tags,
Low cost (important given the number of cylinders
involved)
No Tags / Label relying solution could be qualified.
IAEA 9
Evaluated possible solution:
3-Passive radio frequency tags (RF IDs) • Difficult to attach in a reliable manner that would
guarantee authentication
• May not remain intact throughout the process
4-Reflective particle tags • Operators resistant to the application of any kind of
chemical paint or glue to cylinders
Nothing should be applied on the containers…
IAEA 10
Evaluated possible solution:
5-Laser-based intrinsic
authentication:
cylinder’s own microscopic
structure
fingerprinting can both deter and
combat deception
Two techniques were
retained and evaluated
Cylinder side
surface to be
scanned.
Figure 1: UF6 cylinder front valve side
IAEA 11
2006 Feasibility Studies
of both techniques:
Laser Surface Authentication (LSA) technology
from INGENIA Ltd (UK)
Laser beam producing speckle light from microscopic surface.
3-D Laser Surface Mapping (3D-LSM)
from the EC Joint Research Center, Ispra (Italy)
Uses triangulation to build a precise 3D model of a container’s
surface.
IAEA 12
2006 Feasibility Studies
Results LSA technique could not cope with the unusual
optical properties of the surfaces but would work on short distance, e.g. metal seal identification possible.
3D-LSM yielded good results with dully painted as
well as shiny surfaces at various distances.
IAEA adopted 3D-LSM technology for the Laser Item Identification System (L2IS)
IAEA 13
L2IS based on the 3D LSA technology
The technical solution proposed by EC/IPSC from the JRC Ispra is based on a 3 dimensional Laser Authentication Surface scanning: to be referred as 3D-LSA.
The 3D-LSA Solution is - based on the triangulation technique, - using an off the shelf line scanner which projects a laser beam onto the object. The “illuminated” fraction of the object is captured by a camera positioned in a way that the scene is recorded with a specific angle. The recorded line-picture features the cylinder surface granularity. (EC/ISPC)
(V SEQUIERA/ EC/IPSC)
Figure 2: 3D-LSA technique
IAEA 16
Laser Item Identification System ( L2IS)
The system would be based on:
1.An attended initial scan of the cylinder:
establishes the “Cylinder Surface Identity”, stored in a
database.
2.Unattended scan of all entering and exiting cylinders from and to the processing area,
records the “Cylinder Surface Identity” , and comparing it
to the other records of the database.
IAEA 17
Laser Item Identification System
L2IS SCANNER UNIT 1: Used to record all cylinders “declared” to be used in the coming year, by inspectors.
The technical solution proposed by IPSC from the JRC Ispra is based on a 3 dimensional Laser Authentication Surface scanning.
IAEA/SGTS/M.Lang
Figure 5-a and 5-b: Laser scanner scanning a UF6 cylinder
IAEA 18
Laser Item Identification System
L2IS SCANNER UNIT 2: Permanent unattended “surveillance” of all “ passing” cylinders that are entering or exiting the process area.
L2IS + SDIS
Surveillance
server Transported
UF6 Cylinder.
IAEA/SGTS/M.Lang
Figure 6: L2IS Unattended unit in situ
IAEA 19
L2IS and Surveillance
L2IS unit2 is coupled to IAEA SG standard surveillance system,
L2IS data review is performed under the surveillance interface program GARS.
This reduces the training effort for the system usage.
Standard video
surveillance
(SDIS camera)
L2IS + SDIS
Surveillance
server
Standard video
surveillance
(SDIS camera)
Standard video
surveillance
(SDIS camera)
IAEA/SGTS/M.Lang
Figure 7: L2IS + SDIS surveillance
IAEA 20
2007-2008 Field Testing of very first
prototypes
Scan of static cylinders to establish best power level of lasers (UK, December,2006).
Scan during cylinder movement (France, July, 2007).
Scan under actual field conditions with stop and go (Japan, September 2007).
Scan to determine aging/heating impacts (France, May 2008).
Twelve month trial on “one type of cylinder” scanner (Japan, September 2007-August 2008) .
IAEA 21
2009-2010 Field Testing of L2IS version2
New Features:
• Automatically scan cylinders
• While in motion
• Without any required action from the operators,
• Cope with all three type of existing cylinders,
• New Laser class for both unit 1 & 2 : Class 3R.
Under test since March 2009.
To automate the scanning has required to add one more laser scanner in charge of the detection and safety functions,
To recognize and cope with three different geometries required to have one scanner per type of cylinder.
Figure 8: L2IS unit2 beam shield
IAEA 22
L
Cylinder scanning Area
Active Measurement Area
Identification Area
L2IS Unit 2 version 2
Transfer hall is virtually divided in areas of interest.
Each area is monitored by a specific part of the scanning system:
1.for the recognition of the type of transported cylinder:UF6 cylinder Recognizer,
2. the trolley supervision: Trolley Supervisor,
3.And the cylinder scanning:
UF6 cylinder range–data collector sub-
system .( Note that during the current field test
this module is switched On/Off by the operator by the mean of a key)
Figure 9: L2IS Unit 2-v2 Definition of active areas (IPSC.)
L2IS unit 2 v2 + SDIS cabinet
Transfer
Hall
Class 3R laser beaming < 10 seconds
IAEA 23
Achievements
2010 results:
All types of cylinders can be perfectly recognized,
The system is robust to speed variations ( trolley’s)
The system is now able to “record” cylinders that
were passed several times without having ever
been referenced.
The system can now indicate the presence of
cylinder (in the hall) while laser scanning is Off.
IAEA 26
Future Expansion of L2IS
Integrated System to characterize and quantify NM in
monitored cylinders
• Laser Identification
• Surveillance
• Weighing
• NDA: Uranium mass and enrichment
Scan of cylinders at conversion facility and/or
manufacturer
• Remote identification of the cylinders at any location with a
laser tracking device
IAEA 27
Conclusions
The L2IS system provides the IAEA with an automated system to uniquely identify and thus monitor the complete flow of UF6 cylinders in enrichment plants in an effective and efficient manner.
Short development cycle through the joint development and testing efforts of the IAEA, JRC and facility operators.
The system is non-intrusive and to a large extent automated.
L2IS system can be complemented with additional systems capable of quantifying the nuclear material contained within UF6 cylinders.
L2IS is expected to reduce in-field IAEA inspection resources while at the same time maintaining credible safeguards implementation.