larc 158/mapld 2004 robert f. hodson, nasa larc kevin somervill, nasa larc mark jones, nasa larc guy...
TRANSCRIPT
LaRC158/MAPLD 2004
Robert F. Hodson, NASA LaRCKevin Somervill, NASA LaRC
Mark Jones, NASA LaRCGuy Gibson, Northrop Grumman
Actel Compact PCI Signal Integrityfor RTSXS & SXA devices
LaRCHodson - 2 158/MAPLD 2004
Initial simulations
These initial simulation performed by Northrop Grumman raised questions and concerns that prompted this study.
LaRCHodson - 3 158/MAPLD 2004
Actel Datasheet info (continued)
LaRCHodson - 4 158/MAPLD 2004
Datasheet info (continued)
What about 3.3V operation?
LaRCHodson - 5 158/MAPLD 2004
Datasheet info (continued)
LaRCHodson - 6 158/MAPLD 2004
Datasheet info (continued)
LaRCHodson - 7 158/MAPLD 2004
PCI Specifications
• PCI and Compact PCI designed for commercial systems
• Puts the onus on manufacturers to tolerate a broad range of operating conditions
• The following should be use to evaluate long term device reliability
Appears to contradict the maximum ratings of
Actel’s devices
LaRCHodson - 8 158/MAPLD 2004
cPCI Driver Simulations
• The following slides show HyperLynx simulations performed at NASA LaRC to simulate an Actel device (in slot 3) driving another Actel device (in slot 7).
• 3.3V PCI I/O is used• 20 degrees C• The simulation is done for both the RTSXS devices
and SXA commercial devices• Simulations with Spartan and Vertex II IBIS models
are also shown for comparison.
LaRCHodson - 9 158/MAPLD 2004
HyperLynx Schematic
LaRCHodson - 10 158/MAPLD 2004
RTSXS Model – slot 3 driving slot 7
Note: datasheet maximums exceeded
LaRCHodson - 11 158/MAPLD 2004
Non-monotonic signal in transition region
LaRCHodson - 12 158/MAPLD 2004
Sxacom Model – slot 3 driving slot 7
Note: datasheet maximums exceeded
LaRCHodson - 13 158/MAPLD 2004
Spartan model – slot 3 driving slot 7
Note: similar undershoot, cleaner signal.
LaRCHodson - 14 158/MAPLD 2004
Vertex II – slot 3 driving slot 7
LaRCHodson - 15 158/MAPLD 2004
Lab Test Setup
• Actel source board (Actel 3.3V PCI I/O) in slot 3– A54SX32A device with Actel PCI core
• Actel destination board (Actel 3.3V PCI I/O) in slot 7– A54SX32A device with Actel PCI core
• Commercial PCI bus• Commercial processor board in slot 1• 33 MHz operation
LaRCHodson - 16 158/MAPLD 2004
Data line showing under/overshhoot
LaRCHodson - 17 158/MAPLD 2004
Non-Monotonic signal at receiver
LaRCHodson - 18 158/MAPLD 2004
Actel Responses 8/18/04
• Actel has performed experiments on the PCI clamp diodes of the RTSXS device.
– In the 3.3V PCI configuration, the Power Clamp diode effectively clamps any incoming voltage (up to 7.1V) to about 4.6V. This is within Actel’s maximum rating (5.75V).
– The Ground Clamp diode clamps any incoming undershoot (up to -3.5V) to –1.2V. This clamped voltage is outside the maximum rating specified by Actel (-0.5V)
• PCI Reliability (260+ hour stress test)– Actel is performing a reliability experiment on the RTSXS IO buffer in the
PCI configuration to test the effect of input voltage excursions outside the normal operating rage. In this experiment the RTSXS device with the IO buffers configured as 3.3V PCI inputs are stressed continuously to a switching signal that conforms to PCI requirements (VIH=7.1V and VIL=-3.5V with a pulse width of 11ns each). Preliminary pre and post stress measurements were taken for Leakage and VIH/VIL. The maximum IIL/IIH delta was of the order of a few nanoamps and maximum VIH/VIL delta of about 50mV.
• Based on the reliability results so far, we don’t believe there is any issue with input voltages switching beyond the rails, as long as it is within PCI specifications. Upon completion of the reliability testing the datasheet will be updated.
– The experiment was done on a MEC device. The same experiment is being repeated on a UMC device (RTSX-SU).
LaRCHodson - 19 158/MAPLD 2004
Summary
• There appear to be inconsistencies between the Actel data sheets and the PCI specification
• Overshoot and undershoot in the simulations and the lab appear to exceed maximum rating for Actel 3.3V PCI I/O
• Non-monotonic behavior observed in simulations and the lab. Did not affect operation in this single test case, effect on other vendor devices unknown.
• Initial Actel over/undershoot testing has not uncovered reliability issues with PCI
• Actel plans to continue testing and update data sheets