language and coordination. convention in the theory of meaning
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Language and Coordination
![Page 2: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Convention in the Theory of Meaning
![Page 3: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Mind Idea of a Dog Dog
ConnotesDog
![Page 4: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Mind Idea of a Dog Dog
Conventional RelationDog
![Page 5: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
The Absurdity of Fit
The “convention” that associates an idea with a word can’t just be due to the person using the word.
This is because you can use a word wrongly, even if it’s in accord with your idea.
![Page 6: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Mind Idea of a Dog Dog
Personally AssociatesDog
![Page 7: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Mind Idea of a Dog Dog
Still MeansDog
![Page 8: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Mind Experience of a wound
Dagger
“Dagger”
Connotes
![Page 9: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Mind Experience of a wound
Dagger
“Dagger”
Conventional Relation
![Page 10: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Mind Experience of a wound
Dagger
“Dagger”
Personally Associates
![Page 11: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Mind Experience of a wound
Dagger
“Dagger”
Still Means
![Page 12: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Mind Definition of “Dog”
Dog
ConnotesDog
![Page 13: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Mind Definition of “Dog”
Dog
Conventional RelationDog
![Page 14: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Mind Definition of “Dog”
Dog
Personally AssociatesDog
Dog. n. A deer, a female deer.
![Page 15: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Mind Definition of “Dog”
Dog
Still MeansDog
Dog. n. A deer, a female deer.
![Page 16: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
The Causal-Historical Theory
Even in the case of the causal-historical theory (where there is no denotation), it seems as though what the community calls things is important.
![Page 17: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Let’s call that place ‘Mogadishu’
MadagascarMadagasceirMadagascuMadagishu
Denotation
![Page 18: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
The Use Theory
What about the use theory? Doesn’t Horwich explicitly argue that meaning is not a conventional relation, but rather a natural one?
![Page 19: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Indication
Smoke means (indicates the presence of) fire.
![Page 20: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
The Use Theory
and
ANDmeans
![Page 21: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Horwich Is Wrong
But Horwich is wrong: the connection between smoke and fire is grounded in the laws of the universe.
The connection between a word and the concept it expresses is wholly conventional.
![Page 22: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
The Use Theory
gift
GIFT
gift
POISON
![Page 23: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Game Theory
![Page 24: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Decisions
Sometimes what happens to us depends entirely on what we do, and not on what other people do.
This doesn’t mean that decision making in such cases is easy or trivial. For example, suppose someone’s life is on the line, and it is my job to decide whether to convict or acquit them.
![Page 25: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Decision under Risk
Innocent Guilty
Conviction Very Bad Good
Acquittal
Good Bad
![Page 26: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Decision Theory
A number of factors are relevant here:• How likely do I think it is that the person committed the crime?• How much worse is it to convict an innocent person than to let a
guilty one go?
Decision theory is devoted to telling us how to act when we must make decisions under risk.
![Page 27: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Games
Sometimes what happens to us does depend on what others do as well.
• Whether I have a good time tonight depends not just on whether I go to the party, but on whether other people come too.• Whether I win a chess match depends not just on the moves I make,
but the moves my opponent makes as well. • Whether nuclear disarmament is good depends on whether my
enemies disarm as well.
![Page 28: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
The Disarmament Game
Country 2
Country 1
Disarm Don’t Disarm
Disarm
Great
Great
Amazing
Terrible
Don’t Disarm
Bad
Good
Acceptable
Acceptable
![Page 29: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Numbers
In game theory we usually use numbers to represent the value of an outcome.
I won’t go into how we assign the numbers… let’s say we just make them up.
![Page 30: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
The Disarmament Game
Country 2
Country 1
Disarm Don’t Disarm
Disarm
10
10
15
-15
Don’t Disarm
-5
5
0
0
![Page 31: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Equilibria
An equilibrium point is a square on the grid where no player can improve his position through unilateral deviation.
Unilateral deviation is when one player changes strategy and all the other players do not.
![Page 32: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
The Disarmament Game
Country 2
Country 1
Disarm Don’t Disarm
Disarm
10
10
15
-15
Don’t Disarm
-5
5
0
0
?
![Page 33: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
The Disarmament Game
Country 2
Country 1
Disarm Don’t Disarm
Disarm
10
10
15
-15
Don’t Disarm
-5
5
0
0
?
![Page 34: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
The Disarmament Game
Country 2
Country 1
Disarm Don’t Disarm
Disarm
10
10
15
-15
Don’t Disarm
-5
5
0
0
![Page 35: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
The Disarmament Game
Country 2
Country 1
Disarm Don’t Disarm
Disarm
10
10
15
-15
Don’t Disarm
-5
5
0
0?
![Page 36: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
The Disarmament Game
Country 2
Country 1
Disarm Don’t Disarm
Disarm
10
10
15
-15
Don’t Disarm
-5
5
0
0?
![Page 37: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
The Disarmament Game
Country 2
Country 1
Disarm Don’t Disarm
Disarm
10
10
15
-15
Don’t Disarm
-5
5
0
0
![Page 38: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
The Disarmament Game
Country 2
Country 1
Disarm Don’t Disarm
Disarm
10
10
15
-15
Don’t Disarm
-5
5
0
0
?
![Page 39: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
The Disarmament Game
Country 2
Country 1
Disarm Don’t Disarm
Disarm
10
10
15
-15
Don’t Disarm
-5
5
0
0
?
![Page 40: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
The Disarmament Game
Country 2
Country 1
Disarm Don’t Disarm
Disarm
10
10
15
-15
Don’t Disarm
-5
5
0
0
![Page 41: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
The Disarmament Game
Country 2
Country 1
Disarm Don’t Disarm
Disarm
10
10
15
-15
Don’t Disarm
-5
5
0
0?
![Page 42: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
The Disarmament Game
Country 2
Country 1
Disarm Don’t Disarm
Disarm
10
10
15
-15
Don’t Disarm
-5
5
0
0Equilibrium
![Page 43: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Dominance
A dominant strategy is one where a player gets a better outcome, regardless of what the other player does.
![Page 44: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
The Disarmament Game
Country 2
Country 1
Disarm Don’t Disarm
Disarm
10
10
15
-15
Don’t Disarm
-5
5
0
0
Dominant
![Page 45: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
The Disarmament Game
Country 2
Country 1
Disarm Don’t Disarm
Disarm
10
10
15
-15
Don’t Disarm
-5
5
0
0
Dominant
![Page 46: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
The Disarmament Game
Country 2
Country 1
Disarm Don’t Disarm
Disarm
10
10
15
-15
Don’t Disarm
-5
5
0
0
Dominant
![Page 47: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
The Disarmament Game
Country 2
Country 1
Disarm Don’t Disarm
Disarm
10
10
15
-15
Don’t Disarm
-5
5
0
0Not Dominant
![Page 48: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
The Disarmament Game
Country 2
Country 1
Disarm Don’t Disarm
Disarm
10
10
15
-15
Don’t Disarm
-5
5
0
0Not Dominant
![Page 49: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Equilibria as Solutions
An equilibrium strategy is a “solution” to a game. It’s what we predict will happen, and it’s what “rational” players will choose.
John Nash proved that there’s always an equilibrium (if we allow mixed strategies).
![Page 50: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
The Prisoner’s Dilemma
Two people are arrested for a crime. The police do not have enough evidence to convict them of that crime, but they can convict them of a lesser crime, and send them to prison for a year.
![Page 51: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
The Prisoner’s Dilemma
However, they are offered the chance to confess to the more serious crime:• If Prisoner 1 confesses and Prisoner 2 does not, 1 goes free and 2 gets
a long prison sentence.• If Prisoner 2 confesses and Prisoner 1 does not, 2 goes free and 1 gets
a long prison sentence.• If both confess, each gets a 5 year sentence.• If neither confess, both get a 1 year sentence.
![Page 52: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
The Prisoner’s Dilemma
Prisoner 2
Prisoner 1
Confess Stay Silent
Confess
-5
-5
-10
0
Stay Silent
0
-10
-1
-1
![Page 53: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Confessing is Dominant
Player 1 can reason as follows:
If 2 confesses, I’m better off confessing, because 5 years in prison is better than 10.If 2 doesn’t confess, then I’m better off confessing, because 0 years in prison is better than 1.Therefore, I should confess.
![Page 54: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
The Prisoner’s Dilemma
Prisoner 2
Prisoner 1
Confess Stay Silent
Confess
-5
-5
-10
0
Stay Silent
0
-10
-1
-1
Equilibrium
![Page 55: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
The Prisoner’s Dilemma
Prisoner 2
Prisoner 1
Confess Stay Silent
Confess
-5
-5
-10
0
Stay Silent
0
-10
-1
-1
Equilibrium
Clearly Better!
![Page 56: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
The Evolution of Morality
Some philosophers have suggested that the point of moral rules is to avoid rational-but-worse outcomes. Cases where it’s good for you if you do X, but bad if everyone does X.• Don’t rat out your friends.• Put trash in the garbage cans.• Let passengers alight first.• Wait your turn in line.• Don’t steal.• Don’t kill people over disagreements.
![Page 57: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Coordination Problems
![Page 58: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Example 1: Meeting
Suppose two people want to meet, but they have no way of communicating with each other.
It does not matter where they go, as long as they go to the same place.
![Page 59: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Example 2: Driving
Cars have just come to our country. We have plenty of roads to drive on, but sometimes they are winding and we cannot see who is coming.
It doesn’t matter what side of the street we drive on– right or left– as long as everyone drives on the same side.
![Page 60: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Example 3: Searching
Suppose we are camping and need firewood. It would be bad if any of us searched places that others have already looked. Thus we each want to cover different ground.
It doesn’t matter to any person which direction he goes in, as long as he goes in a direction no one else goes in.
![Page 61: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Example 4: Dressing/ Fashion
We are all going to a party. It would be bad to dress in suits if everyone at the party is wearing blue jeans and t-shirts. Similarly, it would be bad to wear jeans and a t-shirt to a party where everyone was wearing suits.
It doesn’t matter to us what we wear as long as we are wearing what everyone else is wearing.
![Page 62: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Example 5: Money
Throughout history, people have used different things as money: gold, silver, sea shells, salt (whence ‘salary’), goats, cigarettes (in prison), coins and paper currency.
It doesn’t matter to me what I accept in exchange for my goods and labor as long as it’s what everyone else accepts (as long as I can spend it).
![Page 63: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Example? Language
Suppose I want to talk about dogs.
It doesn’t matter what word I use, so long as it’s the word everyone else uses to talk about dogs.
![Page 64: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Suggestion
Maybe language is a coordination problem and can be understood through game theory! Here are some thoughts about what’s similar in these cases:• The solutions to all our problems are equilibrium points. (For
example: no one benefits by unilaterally deviating from the rule “drive on the left”).• There are multiple equilibrium points. (Example: drive on the left OR
drive on the right).
![Page 65: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
The Meeting Game
Person 2
Person 1
Place 1 Place 2
Place 1
1
1
0
0
Place 2
0
0
1
1
![Page 66: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
The Meaning Game
Person 2
Person 1
“Dog” “Chien”
“Dog”
1
1
0
0
“Chien”
0
0
1
1
![Page 67: Language and Coordination. Convention in the Theory of Meaning](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/56649cf85503460f949c873e/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Conventions
The problem here is different from the Prisoner’s Dilemma. There we had to move people away from an equilibrium point to a different point.
In coordination problems we have to get everyone to the same equilibrium. Next time we’ll talk about how conventions are used to solve coordination problems