language access, electoral administration, and americans of asian descent presentation before the...

31
Language Access, Electoral Administration, and Americans of Asian Descent Presentation before the Presidential Commission on Election Administration Philadelphia, PA Taeku Lee 4 September 2013 UC-Berkeley

Upload: kathryn-daniel

Post on 17-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Language Access, Electoral Administration, and Americans

of Asian Descent

Presentation before the Presidential Commission on Election Administration

Philadelphia, PA Taeku Lee

4 September 2013 UC-Berkeley

1. Asian Americans are arguably the most rapidly growing segment of the US population.

18 Million and Growing

1940 1950 1960 1970 1980 1990 2000 2010

255K 259K878K 1.4M

3.5M

7.3M

11.9M

17.3M

Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Highest Growth Rate from 2000 to 2010

Total popu-lation

White alone

Black alone

AI/AN alone

Asian Alone

NHPI alone

Other race alone

Two or more alone

Hispanic /Latino

10%6%

12%

18%

43.3%

35%

24%

32%

43.0%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau

Prior to 2005

2005 to 2007

2008 or later

26.9

30.4

40.3

37.8

38.8

25.2

9.5

7.6

9.4

12.8

8.0

9.1

3.5

6.2

6.6

6.9

6.7

6.1

Asia Mexico & Central Am Caribbean Europe Africa South America Other

Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2011

Largest Contributor to Migration Today

2. Asian Americans are heavily foreign-born and linguistically diverse.

Source: U.S. Census Bureau 2011

A Heavily Immigrant Population

Adults All Residents

80%

67%

55%

40%

10% 8%7% 5%5% 4%

% foreign-born

AsianHispanicBlackAmerican IndianWhite, non-Hispanic

“Other Asians” includes Laotians (1.9%), Pakistanis (1.7%), Cambodians (1.6%), Hmong (1.4%), Thai (1.1%), Taiwanese (0.6%), Indonesian (0.4%), Bangladeshi (0.4%), among others.

Ethnically and Linguistically Diverse

Asian Languages:Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Mon-Khmer/Cambodian, Hmong, Thai, Lao, Vietnamese, Tagalog-Pilipino, Dravidian (Tegulu, Tamil, Malayam)

Indic Languages:Hindi, Urdu, Gujarati, Punjabi, Bengali, Marathi

Chinese; 23%

Asn Indian; 19%

Filipino; 17%

Viet-namese; 11%

Korean; 10%Ja-

panese; 5%

All others; 15%

Language Other than English at Home

Whites Blacks Asians Latinos TOTAL

6% 8%

77% 75%

21%

% Speaking Language “Other than English" at Home, 2011

Source: 2011 ACS Source: 1980, 1990, 2000 Census; 2010 ACS

Vietn Chinese Korean Tagalog Japanese Spanish ALL

599%

345% 327%

232%

32%

233%

158%

Change in Non-English Language at Home, 1980-2009

Limited English Proficiency*

Vietn

Thai

Chinese

Korean

Cambo

Lao

Hmong

Japanese

Tagalog

Gujarati

Urdu

Hindi

Spanish

TOTAL

60%

57%

56%

56%

53%

49%

43%

43%

33%

36%

30%

23%

44%

42%

* % in who report speaking a language other than English at home and who English less than “very well”)

Whites Blacks Asians Latinos TOTAL

28%

34%

47% 46%

42%

Speaking English "less than very well"

3. Asian Americans are underrepresented in US elections (especially in voter registration) and language is a factor.

A Growing Share of the Electorate

Data: Current Population Survey Voting and Registration Supplements.

1996 2000 2004 2008 2012

2.1%2.5%

3.2%3.4%

3.8%

1.7% 1.8%2.2%

2.6%2.9%

Eligible electorate Voting population

But Underrepresented Among Voters

1996 2000 2004 2008 2012

61%62%

67% 66%

64%

53% 57%60%

65%

66%

45%43% 44%

48% 47%45% 45%47%

50%48%

White Black Asian Latino

Data: Current Population Survey Voting and Registration Supplements.

The Registration Gap

Whites Blacks Asians Latinos

Citizen (among adults) 98 94 68 63

Registered (among citizen) 74 70 55 59

Turnout (among registered) 90 93 86 84

Data: Current Population Survey Voting and Registration Supplements.

Language as a Barrier to Registration

Data: 2004, 2008, 2012 Current Population Survey Voting and Registration Supplements.

White Black Latino Asian TOTAL

0.5%0.1%

2.6%

6.2%

1.0%0.5% 0.7%

3.0%

9.3%

1.4%

0.4% 0.3%

3.2%

9.8%

1.5%

% Not Registered Due to "Difficulty with English"

2004 2008 2012

Language Compared to All Barriers

Not interested/involved

Registration deadlines

Not eligible

Difficulty with English

DK where or how to reg

Perm illness / disability

Vote would not make diff.

Residency requirements

Other

DK/refused

46%

15%

9%

1%

4%

6%

4%

4%

6%

6%

36%

12%

12%

9%

7%

3%

3%

6%

6%

6%

Reasons for Not Registering to Vote in 2008

Asian Americans TOTAL

Data: 2004 and 2008 Current Population Survey Voting and Registration Supplement.

4. Needs assessment in a data-poor environment: evidence from two 2012 surveys.

Two Representative Surveys

• 2012 National Asian American Survey:

• 6,257 interviews from late-July to early October 2012

• 9 Asian languages, English, and Spanish.

– 48% chose a non-English interview language.

– 87% of those reported speaking English less than “very well.”

• 2012 AAPI Post-Election Survey

• 6,609 interviews in Nov. and Dec. 2012.

• 9 Asian languages, English, and Spanish.– 46% chose a non-English

interview language.

– 82% of those reported reported speaking English less than “very well.”

English Proficiency and Registration

LEP Not LEP

39%

60%

Voter Registration, by LEP

LEP Not LEP

41%

50%

Intent to Register, by LEP

Source: 2012 National Asian American Survey

Language and Electoral Participation

Source: 2012 AAPI Post-Election Survey

LEP Not LEP

74%

84%

Voter Turnout, by LEP

LEP Not LEP

28%

36%

Contact during Election, by LEP

Accuracy of English-only Polling

English

Asian Language

Total

72

65

68

27

35

31

Obama Other Romney

Source: 2012 AAPI Post-Election Survey

Need for In-Language Materials

79% of AAPI

citizens who are

LEP would make

use of in-language

election materials if

made available to

them.

Source: 2012 National Asian American Survey

Cambodian

Chinese

Hmong

Korean

Vietnamese

61%

84%

76%

84%

82%

Gaps in Section 203 Compliance

55%

45%

Voted In Person

Language Assistance AvailableNot Available

69%

31%

Voted by Mail

Language Assistance AvailableNot Available

Source: 2012 AAPI Post-Election Survey

5. Monitoring Compliance: the 2012 Advancing Justice project.

2012 AAAJ Compliance Study

Source: Asian Americans Advancing Justice 2012 report

Missing or Poorly Placed Translations

Jurisdictions% Precincts with at least one missing or poorly displaced translated material

MEAN (all precincts) 45%

Quincy, MA 100%

Hamtramck, MI 100%

Harris County, TX 83%

Los Angeles County, CA 57%

Orange County, CA 29%

Alameda County, CA 27%

San Francisco County, CA 9%

King County, WA 0%

Source: Asian Americans Advancing Justice 2012 report

Gaps in Bilingual Assistance

Jurisdictions% missing 1> Asian

language-speaking poll worker

% with bilingual poll workers missing

badges

MEAN (all precincts) 23% 43%

Hamtramck, MI 67% 100%

Harris County, TX 45% 88%

Alameda County, CA 45% 5%

Orange County, CA 38% 47%

San Diego County, CA 13% 18%

San Mateo, CA 17% 5%

San Francisco Co, CA 1% 3%

King County, WA 0% 0%

Source: Asian Americans Advancing Justice 2012 report

Poll Workers’ Interaction

Jurisdictions Cordial to LEP VotersWaited for LEP Voters

to Approach

MEAN (all precincts observed)

61% 35%

Hamtramck City, MI 0% 100%

Orange County, CA 88% 46%

San Diego County, CA 80% 44%

San Mateo County, CA 77% 41%

San Francisco Co, CA 70% 23%

Quincy City, MA 40% 20%

King County, WA 55% 18%

Alameda County, CA 40% 12%

Source: Asian Americans Advancing Justice 2012 report

Access to Provisional Ballots

Jurisdictions% where option of provisional

ballots not offered with missing names

MEAN (all precincts) 14%

Cook Co/Chicago, IL 47%

Quincy City, MA 40%

Santa Clara County, CA 26%

San Mateo County, CA 17%

Harris County, TX 5%

Orange County, CA 5%

San Francisco County, CA 4%

San Diego County, CA 3%

LA County, CA 2%Source: Asian Americans Advancing Justice 2012 report

Summary

• Asian Americans are a rapidly growing population.

• They are underrepresented in elections.

• Language access is a factor in this under-participation, especially with vote registration.

• There is a demand for in-language materials.

• There are significant gaps in accommodation and wide variance across Section 203 precincts in compliance.

Recommendations

• Establish minimum federal standards inclusive of language access.

– e.g., accurate and full translation, adequate recruitment and training of poll workers.

• Monitor compliance of standards.

• Gather and analyze better data: standardized, tracking, reporting.

• Create outreach and education programs in the community.

• Collaborate with community organizations and crowdsource to identify flashpoint precincts.