land values, conservation and the absentee landowner

30
Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner Agricultural Outlook Forum Washington, DC Michael Duffy Director, Iowa State University Beginning Farmer Center February 24, 2011

Upload: raziya

Post on 20-Jan-2016

25 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

DESCRIPTION

Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner. Agricultural Outlook Forum Washington, DC Michael Duffy Director, Iowa State University Beginning Farmer Center February 24, 2011. Outline. Background information Nature of the study Results Conclusions and discussion. Erosion costs. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner

Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner

Agricultural Outlook ForumWashington, DCMichael Duffy

Director, Iowa State University Beginning Farmer Center

February 24, 2011

Page 2: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner

Outline

• Background information• Nature of the study• Results• Conclusions and discussion

Page 3: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner
Page 4: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner

Distribution of Iowa Farmland by Age of Owner and Year

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

30%

< 25 25-34 35-44 45-54 55-64 65-74 > 75

1982 1992 2002 2007

Page 5: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner

Percent of Iowa Farmland by Residence of Owner

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Iowa Resident Non-Iowa Resident

1982 1992 2002 2007

Page 6: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner
Page 7: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner
Page 8: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner
Page 9: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner
Page 10: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner

Erosion costs• Three groups experience increased

costs due to erosion;– Farmer; lost fertilizer, seed and other

inputs, decrease in water holding capacity, decrease in organic matter, etc.

– Society; water quality, water treatment, siltation, …

– Land owner; decreased land value and decreased rental value

Page 11: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner

External Costs

• Benefit per ton of soil erosion prevented was $6.42

• In the Corn Belt there was 3.9 T/acre water erosion and .2 T/acre wind erosion

• Approximately $26 an acre• Tegtmeier/Duffy estimates from $14.09

to $45.68 for all external costs

Page 12: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner

WATER EROSION – WINNESHIEK COUNTY(LOOKING RIGHT AT HARVEST)

Page 13: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner

WATER EROSION – CHICKASAW COUNTY

Page 14: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner

WATER EROSION – WINNESHIEK COUNTY(LOOKING CENTER)

Page 15: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner

BREMER COUNTY 1999

Page 16: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner

ROOT RIVER AFTER 2” RAIN

THE MISSISSIPPI RIVER

Page 17: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner

Impact of Erosion on Land Values

• Study uses Iowa Soil Properties And Interpretations Database; Version 7.3, Sept. 2010

• Use the change in corn yield or the change in the Corn Suitability Rating index when the soil goes from no or slight erosion to moderately eroded or severely eroded

Page 18: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner

Erosion Class• None or Slight

– More than 7 inches of A or A plus E Horizon

• Moderately Eroded– 3-7 inches

• Severely Eroded– Less than 3 inches

• Overwash– 8-18 inches of recently deposited material

above A Horizon

Page 19: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner

Impact of Erosion on Land Values

• The value of a change in CSR rating is determined by the average CSR per county and the ISU county land survey price

• Corn valued at $5.15 per bushel and the costs of production are from the Iowa State University Estimated Costs of Crop Production, FM 1712

Page 20: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner

Selected Iowa Counties

Adair

Adams

Allamakee

Appanoose

Audubon

Benton

Black Hawk

Boone

Bremer

Buchanan

Buena Vista Butler

Calhoun

Carroll

Cass

Cedar

Cerro Gordo

Cherokee

Clarke

Clay

Crawford

Dallas

DavisDecatur

Delaware

Dickinson

Fayette

Franklin

Greene

Grundy

Guthrie

Hamilton

Hancock

Harrison

Henry

Howard

Ida

Iowa

Jackson

Jasper

Jefferson

Johnson

Jones

Keokuk

Kossuth

Lee

Linn

Louisa

Lucas

Madison MahaskaMarion

Marshall

Mitchell

Monona

MonroeMontgomery

Muscatine

O'Brien

Osceola

Palo Alto

Plymouth

Poweshiek

Ringgold

Sac

ScottShelby

Sioux

Tama

Union

Van Buren

Wapello

Warren Washington

Wayne

Webster

Winnebago

Winneshiek

Worth

Chickasaw

Clayton

Clinton

Des Moines

Dubuque

Emmet

Floyd

Fremont

Hardin

Humboldt

Lyon

Mills

Page

Pocahontas

Polk

Pottawattamie

Story

Taylor

Woodbury

Wright

Page 21: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner
Page 22: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner
Page 23: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner
Page 24: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner
Page 25: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner
Page 26: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner
Page 27: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner
Page 28: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner
Page 29: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner

Conclusions• Percent range in value loss per

acre from 2 to 17%• Average loss per acre was 5%• Three different methods to

estimate loss fairly consistent • Currently loss in productivity not

really factored in price; more factored into rent

Page 30: Land Values, Conservation and the Absentee Landowner

Thank-you

Mike Duffy478 Heady Hall, ISU

Ames, IA [email protected]

www.extension.iastate.edu/agdmwww.econ2.econ.iastate.edu/faculty/duffy

www.extension.iastate.edu/bfc