lab 5
TRANSCRIPT
Page 1 of 10
Department of Electrical EngineeringCity CollegeThe City University of New York
Electrical Engineering Laboratory IEE221
Fall 2011
Lab Report: Experiment #5
RC Circuit Frequency and Time Response
Student Last Name: Vazquez First Name: Juan ID #: 6503
Partner’s name: Adrian Encalada
Due: November 14 2011
Prof. Orhan Celebi
Page 2 of 10
Aim: To introduce the student to simple elementary concepts of circuit response in the frequency
and time domain.
Pre-lab: The pre-lab asked us to find the expressions for gain, G(jω), in polar form as a function
of ω for figures one and two. (ωπf)
Where: G(jω) = |Vout/Vin| ∠tan-1(imaginary/real)
Figure 1:Low Pass Filter
Figure 2: High Pass Filter
Page 3 of 10
Calculations for Pre-lab:
For figure 1: Low Pass Filter
|Vout| = ZC = 1/(j ωC) = 1 = sqrt(1 2 ) = 1 _
|Vin | ZR + ZC R + 1/(jωC) jωCR – 1 sqrt(12 + ωCR2) 1 + ωCR
∠tan-1(imaginary/real) = ∠tan-1(0/1) - ∠tan-1(ωCR /1) = -∠tan-1(ωCR)
For Figure 2: High Pass Filter
|Vout| = ZR = R = j ωCR = sqrt(0 2 + ωCR 2 ) = ωCR _
|Vin | ZR + ZC R + 1/(jωC) jωCR – 1 sqrt(12 + ωCR2) 1+ ωCR
∠tan-1(imaginary/real) = ∠tan-1(ωCR /0) - ∠tan-1(ωCR /1) = 90˚ - ∠tan-1(ωCR)
Laboratory (and simulations) Procedure: My partner Adrian and I used MATLAB program to
plot the magnitude versus frequency of the above equations for both figures over a range of 10Hz
to 10 MHz. We then continued the laboratory and simulation and we plotted the phase angle
versus the above range of frequency.
The above figures show the magnitude of gain and phase angle, versus frequency for pre-lab.
Page 4 of 10
Next we marked the cutoff frequency, fc= 1/(2πRC), on all the figures. And lastly we ran an AC
analysis using Multisim program for the third figure and using MATLAB we plotted the
magnitude versus the frequency, 10 Hz to 10MHz.
Figure 3: Band-Pass Filter
Time Domain Response: For the circuit in figure one, Adrian and I simulated it with Multisim,
using the transient analysis and using the square wave given below.
We performed three calculations with the period equal to 4RC, 2RC and RC. We repeated the
same procedure for figure two except that we used periods equal to 4RC, RC and RC/2.
Laboratory Measurements
Page 5 of 10
Frequency Domain Response Procedure: Adrian and I constructed figure one on our
protoboard with the same given values of the resistor and the capacitor. For the voltage source
we set our function generator to give a 1 VPP sinusoidal waveform with variable frequency. The
oscilloscope was then connected to the output voltage on our protoboard using channel one and
input voltage on channel two. Step two we made sure that our circuit was attached correctly by
measuring the gain at the following frequencies, 100 Hz, 300 Hz, 1 KHz, 10 KHz, 100KHz,
300KHz, and 1 MHz, and comparing with the laboratory (and simulations) procedure. Step three
we used the custom VI, “Frequency Response”, which sweeps the function generator over the
range of fifty hertz to two megahertz. After the VI recorded the gain directly from the
oscilloscope, we saved the records in an ASCII file for later analysis. Step four was to repeat
steps one, two and three for the high-pass filter and step five was to repeat steps one, two and
three for the band-pass filter.
Time Domain Response Procedure: This procedure was repeated for figure one and figure two.
The first step was setting up the function generator to give a square pulse train such that the low
voltage was equal to zero and the high voltage was equal to one. The periods were the same as
described by the simulation in the Time Domain Response one page back. The oscilloscope
measured the output voltage on channel one and the input voltage on channel two. The last step
was comparing the oscilloscope traces to the results obtained using Multisim. This time we used
the LabVIEW VI “Save the Oscilloscope Data: time, ch1 and ch2” and we saved both of the
output waveforms as ASCII files.
Page 6 of 10
Analysis (Post-Lab):
This figure compares the gain
versus the frequency for the
low-pass filter as shown in
the figure 1 circuit. Both are
in decibels and I did this by
taking the log of the absolute
gain and multiplying by
twenty. They are both similar
because at high frequencies the magnitude drops, but at about ten thousand hertz the rate of
change is constant for the LabVIEW simulation and is declining for the Multisim simulation.
Some of the sources of errors are the input voltages. For the Multisim input voltage we have 120
VRMS and for the LabVIEW input voltage we have 1VPP. This explains why the magnitude is
different in both graphs but it still does not explain why the rate of change in gain versus
frequency is different. Those sources of errors may come from faulty lab equipment, faulty
protoboard circuit, faulty lab measurements given from LabVIEW, and not using the correct
capacitor and resistor values.
Page 7 of 10
High Pass Filter
The high-pass filter simulations are very similar since they look very much alike. The only
difference is the magnitude of the gain has been shifted down and this is most likely due to the
fact that the input voltages
were different for both
simulations. The frequency
range shows that both circuits
act in the similar manner.
Band Pass Filter
For the band pass filter we
can see that the two simulations are
not a like at all. Similarly the sources
of error from the low-pass filter
apply to the band pass filter. Another
thing that did not make sense to me
was that the input voltage reading of
the band pass filter circuit was 9.9 x 1037 volts. This is clearly an error and it is most likely due to
the fact that the oscilloscope was not getting a correct reading. Another source of error is that
LabVIEW and the oscilloscope were not configured correctly.
Time Domain Response: Doing the Multisim simulation we arrived at correct results, but
Adrian and I doing the LabVIEW VI simulations proved to be much harder. We were unable to
get similar traces. The possible errors were that the rise time of the input waveform was not
Page 8 of 10
smaller than the rise time of the entire circuit. This could have caused the output of the circuit to
behave the way it did, because the output of the circuit resembled very close to the pulse
waveform. Another mistake is that the output voltage of LabVIEW dips below 0 volts and that is
another error. It could have been caused by a faulty oscilloscope connection and also human
error by using the LabVIEW program incorrectly. The LabVIEW program seemed confusing to
use.
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
x 10-3
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Time
Vol
tage
Time Domain Response of a Low Pass Filter with RC period
Multisim
LabView
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
x 10-3
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Time
Vol
tage
Time Domain Response with a 2RC period
High time domain response: The same goes for these graphs. They seem to have the same
sources of errors as the above graphs. I am sure that after finishing this lab report we could
probably do the experiment again and receive better traces of these graphs since doing the lab
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 2
x 10-3
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Time
Vol
tage
Time Domain Response of a Low Pass Filter at 4RC period
Multisim
LabView
Page 9 of 10
helped my understanding of the time domain response. The weird thing about these graphs is that
the voltage changes very rapidly from positive and negative, very similar to a unit impulse. I
can’t really explain too much of the sources of errors but I believe it came from us when we
carried out the experiment. It is possible that some of our parameters may have been off and we
did not take into consideration the rise and fall time of the input waveform.
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
x 10-3
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Time
Vol
tage
Time Domain Response High Pass Filter at RC period
Multisim
LabView
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
x 10-3
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Time
Vol
tage
Time Domain Response of High Pass Filter at RC/2
Multisim
LabView
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
x 10-3
-1
-0.8
-0.6
-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
Time
Vol
tage
Time Domain Response of a High Pass Filter at 4RC period
Multisim
LabView
Conclusion: Phasors are very useful in some cases for circuit analysis. They help by skipping
the first order differential equations that prove to be very tedious to students and engineers
during calculations. Therefore the phasor method is a quick way of analyzing a circuit and
comparing it to the frequency response of that circuit. It is easier to see the magnitudes of the
voltages and gain if we convert voltage to decibel form. The logarithmic formula also helps us to
Page 10 of 10
present the graphs more nicely. The time response of the circuit also helps visualize and analyze
how the circuit works best. The time domain shows how the circuit reacts to the input voltage
and in our case to the impulse of 1 volts and then back down to zero volts. The low pass filter
will reach a peak and then go down little by little until another impulse of one volt is given to the
circuit. The high-pass filter has an even more interesting affect because it dips below zero and
gives off a negative voltage. What happens is that when the input waveform gives a one volt
impulse the output is also 1 volt and then slowly declines and when the input waveform goes
from one volt to zero volts then the output waveform also spikes down but to a negative voltage
and slowly increases in voltage as the input waveform stays at zero and then it repeats again at
input square waveform peak.