la county transportation - long range plan issues survey ... · los angeles county transportation...

220-4101

Survey Conducted:

March 17-29, 2015

Los Angeles County Transportation Long Range Plan Issues Survey

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

1

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Key Findings

Support for both measures is initially strong and the

intensity of support – those saying definitely yes – increases

for both measures after education.

Self-reported likely November 2016 voters are less

supportive of the measures and many of their individual

features than all County residents. However, support

among self-reported likely November 2016 voters appears

relatively strong.

The Augmentation/Extension Measure is susceptible to

a simple explanation of what the measure actually does,

after which support drops to below two-thirds.

2

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Key Findings Continued

To be successful, a measure must include funds for a

package of local roads, freeways and public

transportation improvements.

Specifically: freeway improvements; traffic congestion

relief; keeping fares low for seniors, the disabled and

students; earthquake retrofitting bridges and tunnels;

and pothole repairs and local street paving top the list

of many important features.

Selecting voter-preferred individual regional projects

can make a difference in passing the measure.

3

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Key Findings Continued

Concern about the growing population of drivers and the

desire for traffic congestion relief are top reasons why

all residents and self-reported definite voters would be more

inclined to vote yes on a measure.

Metro continues to have more favorable ratings among

all residents and self-reported likely November 2016 voters

than the Los Angeles County Metropolitan

Transportation Authority.

4

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Methodology

Conducted a Random Digit Dial Survey by telephone (landlines and cell phones) between March 17th – March 29th, 2015

Interviews with 1,414 Los Angeles County residents ages 18 years or older

Survey was available in English and Spanish

Some percentages may not sum to 100% due to rounding

Margin of error for the full sample is +/- 2.6% and half the sample is +/-3.3%

Margin of error for each Metro Planning Area is +/-6.9% and half sample is +/-9.8%

5

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Methodology Continued

Margin of error for self-reported registered voters likely to vote in the November 2016 General Election (n=863) is +/-3.4% and half sample is +/-4.8%

Note: This sample of self-reported registered likely Nov 2016 voters is different from a typical voter population, which is based on actual registration information and voter history.

6

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

METRO Planning Areas

Planning Area Largest Cities in the Area Sample

Size

Actual %

of County

Westside City of Los Angeles, Santa Monica,

West Hollywood, Culver City and Beverly Hills 200 13%

South Bay City of Los Angeles, Torrance, Carson,

Inglewood, Redondo Beach and unincorporated sections of Los Angeles County

201 14%

Central City of Los Angeles 204 10%

San Gabriel Valley Pasadena, Pomona, West Covina, Alhambra,

Arcadia, Diamond Bar, El Monte, Glendora and unincorporated sections of Los Angeles County

201 19%

San Fernando Valley Burbank, Calabasas, Glendale,

La Canada/Flintridge, City of Los Angeles, San Fernando, Unincorporated

202 18%

North County Lancaster, City of Los Angeles,

Palmdale, Santa Clarita, Unincorporated 205 7%

Southeast

Long Beach, Downey, Lakewood, Norwalk, Compton, Cerritos, Bellflower, Pico Rivera, South Gate, Whittier and

unincorporated sections of Los Angeles County

201 19%

Total 1414 100%

8

Shall voters authorize continuing to advance and improve

the Los Angeles County transportation system, provide traffic

congestion relief, and economic and job growth by: extending

light rail, subway, neighborhood shuttles and bus systems in

Los Angeles County; improving connections to jobs, schools

and local airports; improving freeway and local street traffic

flow and safety; repairing potholes; synchronizing local

signals; and keeping seniors, disabled and student fares low;

approval augments by one-half cent and extends the existing

County sales tax, with independent financial audits, and

citizen oversight; all funds controlled locally?

Ballot Summary for the ½-cent Sales Tax Augmentation/Extension Measure

Q7. If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it?

9

In 2008, Los Angeles County voters approved a

one-half cent traffic relief sales tax for 30 years.

The measure I just described would make that

sales tax permanent and increase the county

transportation sales tax by one-half cent.

Brief Explanation of the Augmentation/Extension Measure


10

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

46%

36%

49%

20%

22%

25% 5%

7%

10%

6%

15%

19%

9%

5%

6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Initial Vote

Vote After Explanation

Final Vote After Information

Def. Yes Prob. Yes Und./ Lean Yes Und./Lean No Prob. No Def. No Und.

Seventy percent of self-reported likely voters initially say they would vote yes on the augmentation/extension measure. While support drops to below the two-thirds

threshold after receiving a brief explanation of the measure, support exceeds initial vote after more education.

Q7/Q8/Q15 (Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it? Split Sample

Total Yes

Total No

70% 25%

63% 31%

79% 18%

11

Shall voters authorize continuing to advance and improve the

Los Angeles County transportation system, provide traffic

congestion relief, and economic and job growth by: extending

light rail, subway, neighborhood shuttles and bus systems in

Los Angeles County; improving connections to jobs, schools

and local airports; improving freeway and local street traffic

flow and safety; repairing potholes; synchronizing local

signals; and keeping seniors, disabled and student fares low;

approval increases the County sales tax by one-half cent, with

independent financial audits and citizen oversight; all funds

controlled locally?

Ballot Summary for the ½-cent Sales Tax Increase Measure


12

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

42%

48%

26%

23%

5% 7%

5%

13%

17%

7%

5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Initial Vote

Final Vote After Information

Def. Yes Prob. Yes Und./ Lean Yes Und./Lean No Prob. No Def. No Und.

Seventy-two percent of self-reported likely November 2016 voters initially support the ½-cent sales tax increase

measure, and overall support remains stable after education, with “definitely yes” voters increasing by 6%.

Q9/Q16 (Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). If the election were held today on this measure, do you think you would vote yes in favor or no to oppose it? Split Sample

Total Yes

Total No

72% 21%

73% 23%

13

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

32%

30%

25%

10%

1%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

(B) Local street and roadimprovements

(C) Freeway and highwayimprovements

(A) Local and regional lightrail and bus transportation

improvements

Both A and B, A and C,B and C/All

None of them/Other/DK/NA

35%

27%

24%

12%

3%

0% 10% 20% 30% 40%

All three major areas of transportation investment are considered the top priority by between roughly

one-quarter to one-third of respondents, respectively.

Q10 (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). I am going to read you three uses of existing transportation funding in LA County. Please tell me which one is your top priority for transportation funding.

Self-Reported Likely November 2016 Voters

All Residents

14

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Potential Transportation Features by Metro Planning Area

(Ranked by All Residents % Very Important to be included in the measure - 6 or 7 rating)

Q12 (All Residents/Planning Area). I want to return to the transportation sales tax measure we were discussing earlier. I am going to mention some features of the proposed Los Angeles County Measure. Regardless of your opinion of the measure, after I mention each one, please tell me how important it is to you that the feature be included as part of the measure. We will use a scale of one to seven, where one means NOT AT ALL IMPORTANT to you that the feature or provision is included in the measure and seven means it would be VERY IMPORTANT. ^Not part of Split Sample

Features All

Residents Westside

South

Bay Central SGV SFV

North

County Southeast

Earthquake retrofitting bridges, tunnels and overpasses

81% 81% 81% 77% 83% 83% 75% 83%

Improving freeway traffic flow on the 5, 10, 14, 60, 101, 110, 138, 210, 405,

605 and the 710 freeways 80% 78% 78% 78% 83% 83% 70% 79%

Keeping seniors, disabled and student fares low

79% 70% 79% 78% 84% 80% 84% 81%

Preventing polluted toxic roadway runoff from entering storm drains and flowing into creeks, rivers and coastal waters

and onto County beaches

79% 83% 82% 84% 77% 72% 80% 83%

Repairing potholes and repaving local streets

79% 78% 76% 86% 77% 76% 81% 83%

Improving freeway traffic flow 78% 80% 77% 80% 73% 75% 85% 82%

Continuing to advance and improve the Los Angeles County transportation

system to provide traffic congestion relief 75% 77% 69% 81% 79% 66% 86% 76%

15

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Continued


Features All

Residents Westside

South

Bay Central SGV SFV

North

County Southeast

Widening freeways to improve traffic flow 75% 62% 71% 83% 82% 75% 82% 73%

Improving connections to jobs, schools and local airports

72% 77% 72% 77% 71% 61% 63% 80%

Improving safety on buses and light rail lines, and at bus stops and rail stations

70% 73% 80% 79% 73% 49% 71% 72%

Improving van service for seniors, the disabled and veterans

70% 57% 64% 75% 73% 68% 75% 79%

Improving freeway safety 70% 53% 82% 73% 68% 63% 71% 79%

Adding and upgrading crosswalks and sidewalks to improve

student and pedestrian safety 70% 64% 64% 78% 69% 68% 73% 74%

Synchronizing signals in every area of the County

68% 63% 68% 65% 65% 68% 63% 79%

Reducing diesel emissions from trucks and trains

67% 60% 66% 80% 72% 53% 61% 78%

Continuing to advance and improve the Los Angeles County transportation system

to help economic and job growth 66% 63% 61% 73% 68% 61% 67% 73%

(Ranked by All Residents % Very Important to be included in the measure 6 or 7 rating)

16

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Continued


Features All

Residents Westside

South

Bay Central SGV SFV

North

County Southeast

Improving safety at rail crossings 65% 58% 59% 78% 65% 58% 76% 71%

Improving the flow and safety of truck traffic on freeways and roads near the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach

64% 59% 58% 66% 63% 65% 71% 71%

Connecting public transit to LAX, Burbank, Long Beach

and Palmdale airports 64% 61% 57% 80% 55% 70% 73% 65%

Upgrading freeway on- and off-ramps to improve traffic flow

64% 66% 49% 78% 60% 56% 72% 73%

Synchronizing local signals 64% 60% 69% 71% 58% 64% 56% 71%

Upgrading and redesigning local streets to balance motorist concerns with better

and safer access for pedestrians, bicycles and bus travel

63% 64% 60% 72% 63% 56% 64% 68%

Extending light rail, subway and bus service in Los Angeles County

63% 59% 63% 71% 68% 51% 55% 69%

^Extending the light rail system to more places in the County

62% 59% 61% 65% 68% 51% 66% 65%

Improving and expanding Metrolink service

61% 54% 58% 73% 65% 48% 66% 67%


17

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

Continued


Features All

Residents Westside

South

Bay Central SGV SFV

North

County Southeast

^Improving opportunities for getting from public transportation stops and stations to your final destination, by improving

pedestrian, bike and neighborhood shuttle services

61% 61% 60% 72% 65% 52% 63% 61%

^Creating a safe network of bicycle paths, physically separated

from motor vehicle traffic 61% 62% 54% 73% 62% 52% 59% 67%

Adding carpool lanes on local freeways 58% 55% 52% 53% 53% 58% 61% 74%

Expanding bus service, including adding more Rapid Buses

58% 46% 57% 63% 59% 63% 58% 59%

Improving frequency of and connections to bus service

57% 50% 56% 77% 60% 45% 60% 59%

Establishing and improving Express Bus Service on freeways

56% 43% 67% 64% 65% 49% 55% 52%

Establishing and improving neighborhood shuttles

55% 51% 58% 59% 56% 53% 63% 51%

Building more Park and Ride lots at transit stations

48% 42% 49% 58% 43% 48% 50% 52%


18

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

44%

42%

47%

44%

29%

29%

27%

35%

5%

5%

18%

21%

18%

13%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents

Self-Reported LikelyNov 2016 Voters

All Residents


Much More Lkly. Smwt. More Lkly. Smwt. Less Lkly. Much Less Lkly. No Diff. DK/NATotal More Lkly.

Total Less Lkly.

74% 5%

71% 6%

73% 7%

79% 7%

West Los Angeles residents and self-reported likely November 2016 voters are more likely to vote for the measure if the Crenshaw LAX Light

Rail Line is extended and traffic flow on the 10 freeway is improved.

Q13 a-e (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now like to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will be funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 1 – West Los Angeles County)

(Ranked by All Residents Total More Likely Vote for the Measure)

Extending the Metro

Crenshaw LAX Rail Line,

which is currently under

construction, to the Metro

Purple Line on Wilshire and

through West Hollywood to the

Metro Red Line in Hollywood

Improving the traffic flow along

the 10 freeway between the

405 freeway and downtown LA

by widening the road at key

bottlenecks and upgrading the

on- and off-ramps

19

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

38%

37%

35%

35%

24%

16%

26%

19%

27%

25%

28%

38%

8%

13%

6%

11%

7%

11%

15%

26%

27%

30%

27%

21%

21%

5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents


All Residents


All Residents


Much More Lkly. Smwt. More Lkly. Smwt. Less Lkly. Much Less Lkly. No Diff. DK/NA

Total More Lkly.

Total Less Lkly.

64% 8%

56% 16%

62% 5%

60% 10%

52% 22%

54% 22%

West Los Angeles Continued

Q13 a-e (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now like to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will be funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 1 – West Los Angeles County)


Connecting LAX to the San Fernando Valley by a subway

line under the Sepulveda Pass

Extending the Metro Purple Line Subway, currently under

construction, beyond UCLA and Westwood toward Santa Monica

Connecting LAX to the San Fernando Valley by a subway line

under the Sepulveda Pass. This would be funded partially by a

new toll Express Lane travelling along the 405 from LAX to the

Valley in both directions

20

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

54%

53%

51%

47%

55%

56%

44%

42%

25%

24%

27%

28%

20%

17%

25%

20%

5%

6%

7%

6%

5%

6%

7%

14%

12%

16%

15%

13%

13%

14%

23%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents


All Residents


All Residents


All Residents



Total Less Lkly.

78% 5%

77% 8%

78% 4%

75% 6%

75% 8%

73% 10%

69% 12%

62% 12%

South Bay residents and self-reported likely November 2016 voters are more probable to vote for the measure if it improves traffic flow on major streets in the area, and local street maintenance and traffic flow along the 405 freeway.

Q13 f-i (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now like to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will be funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 2 – The South Bay)


Improving street maintenance,

such as pothole repair, on

major streets throughout the

South Bay

Removing key bottlenecks and

improving traffic flow on Pacific

Coast Highway, Hawthorne and

Crenshaw Boulevards, and

Western Avenue

Improving traffic along the 405

freeway between the 105 and

the 110 freeways by widening

the road at key bottlenecks and

upgrading the on- and off-ramps

Extending the Metro Green

Light Rail Line south towards

San Pedro through Redondo

Beach and Torrance

21

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

55%

39%

58%

44%

54%

44%

48%

34%

24%

28%

18%

23%

17%

17%

20%

22%

6%

6%

7%

8%

5%

5%

8%

11%

17%

15%

20%

17%

22%

16%

22%

6%

8%

6%

6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents


All Residents


All Residents


All Residents



Total Less Lkly.

80% 7%

67% 10%

76% 6%

66% 6%

71% 9%

62% 10%

69% 12%

56% 16%

Central Los Angeles residents and self-reported likely November 2016 voters are more likely to vote for the measure if it extends the Crenshaw

LAX Light Rail Line; improves freeway connections in Downtown; and extends the northbound bus and carpool lane on the 110 freeway.

Q13 j-m (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now like to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will be funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 3 – Central Los Angeles County)


Extending the Metro Crenshaw LAX Light Rail Line, which is

currently under construction, to the Metro Purple Line on Wilshire

and through West Hollywood to the Metro Red Line in Hollywood

Improving freeway connections around Downtown Los Angeles

on the 5, 10, 60 and 101 freeways through East LA

Extending the northbound bus and carpool lane on the 110 freeway

past the current bottleneck at Adams Boulevard into Downtown LA, thereby improving traffic flow,

reducing congestion and improving safety

Establishing frequent bus service along Vermont Avenue that

operates in its own dedicated lane with fewer stops; connecting

South Los Angeles with the Metro Red Line and Purple Line subway at Wilshire and Vermont

22

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

52%

48%

49%

41%

48%

42%

49%

43%

19%

18%

21%

21%

19%

23%

17%

14%

5%

8%

8%

7%

11%

5%

9%

17%

19%

20%

16%

22%

16%

20%

17%

6%

7%

7%

5%

6%

7%

8%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents


All Residents


All Residents


All Residents



Total More Lkly.

Total Less Lkly.

71% 6%

66% 8%

70% 7%

62% 15%

67% 7%

65% 13%

66% 8%

57% 18%

Within each respective group, there are no statistical differences in the likelihood of voting with respect to each San Gabriel Valley

project, with one exception - upgrading the 71 Freeway scores lowest among self-reported likely November 2016 voters.

Q13 n-q (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now like to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will be funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 4 – San Gabriel Valley)


Extending the Metro Gold Light Rail Line further east from East LA along the 60 freeway towards the

605 freeway in South El Monte

Connecting North Hollywood, Burbank, Glendale and Pasadena

by light rail

Extending the Metro Gold Light Rail Line which is currently under

construction to Azusa, further east through Glendora and San Dimas

toward Claremont

Upgrading the 71 freeway from a four- and six-lane expressway to

an eight-lane freeway between Mission Boulevard and the

60 freeway in Pomona

23

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

53%

53%

50%

42%

27%

23%

29%

16% 11% 12%

9%

17%

14%

18%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents


All Residents



Total Less Lkly.

80% 7%

76% 6%

79% 7%

59% 23%

San Fernando Valley residents and self-reported likely November 2016 voters are more likely to vote for the measure if it improves

traffic flow on the 101 freeway and connects the San Fernando Valley to LAX by a subway line under the Sepulveda Pass.

Q13 r-v (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now like to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will be funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 5 – San Fernando Valley)


Improving the traffic flow along

the 101 freeway between the

Ventura County line and the

Hollywood Freeway in

Universal City by widening the

road at key bottlenecks and

upgrading the on- and off-ramps

Connecting the San Fernando

Valley to LAX by a subway line

under the Sepulveda Pass

24

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

49%

56%

44%

33%

37%

31%

28%

19%

21%

21%

19%

12%

7%

8%

8%

8%

14%

18%

7%

10%

7%

11%

16%

25%

23%

36%

5%

5%

5%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents


All Residents


All Residents



Total More Lkly.

Total Less Lkly.

77% 16%

75% 20%

65% 13%

53% 18%

56% 15%

43% 18%

San Fernando Valley Continued

Q13 r-v (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now like to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will be funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 5 – San Fernando Valley)


Connecting the San Fernando Valley to LAX

by a subway line under the Sepulveda Pass. This would be funded partially by a new toll Express Lane travelling

along the 405 from the Valley to LAX in both directions

Converting the Metro Orange Line Busway to a light rail line

connecting Woodland Hills, North Hollywood, the Burbank

Airport, Pasadena and the Greater San Gabriel Valley

Creating a dedicated light rail along Van Nuys Boulevard

connecting Sylmar and Van Nuys Civic Center

through the communities of Panorama City, Pacoima and

the of San Fernando

25

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

51%

42%

41%

36%

21%

26%

30%

30%

5%

5%

10%

7%

15%

18%

14%

17%

5%

6%

8%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents


All Residents



Total More Lkly.

Total Less Lkly.

72% 8%

68% 7%

71% 11%

67% 8%

Within each respective group, there are no statistical differences in the likelihood of voting with respect to each

North County project, with one exception – improving streets near the hospital and medical buildings scores

lowest among self-reported likely November 2016 voters.

Q13 w-z (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now like to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will be funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 6 – North County) (N=205)


Improving the traffic flow

along the I-5 freeway in Santa

Clarita, Newhall and Castaic

by widening the road at key

bottlenecks and upgrading

the on- and off-ramps north

of the 5 and 14 interchange

Building a new highway, also

known as the High Desert

Corridor, between the

14 freeway in Palmdale and

15 freeway in Victorville,

which would be located north

of the 138 through Palmdale,

Littlerock, Sun Village and

Lake Los Angeles

26

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

44%

36%

47%

41%

27%

19%

20%

25%

7%

6%

5%

16%

28%

18%

20%

10%

7%

8%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents


All Residents



Total Less Lkly.

70% 10%

55% 8%

66% 8%

67% 6%

North County Continued

Q13 w-z (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now like to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will be funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 6 – North County) (N=205)


Improving existing streets and

constructing new streets to

the regional Antelope Valley

Hospital and surrounding medical

facilities in Lancaster to increase

access for emergency vehicles,

patients and visitors

Improving the traffic flow along the

14 freeway by widening the road

at key bottlenecks, including

improving the Avenue S bridge

in Palmdale and upgrading the on-

and off-ramps north of the I-5 and

14 interchange in Canyon Country

27

DRAFT WORK PRODUCT

53%

57%

49%

52%

49%

50%

36%

43%

23%

22%

26%

23%

23%

19%

29%

13%

5%

5%

5%

5%

7%

12%

9%

12%

13%

14%

17%

23%

31%

6%

5%

5%

7%

6%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

All Residents


All Residents


All Residents


All Residents



Total More Lkly.

Total Less Lkly.

76% 6%

79% 9%

75% 8%

75% 9%

72% 8%

68% 11%

64% 6%

57% 7%

Southeast Los Angeles County residents and self-reported likely November 2016 voters are more likely to support the

measure if it adds a carpool and a regular lane on the 5 freeway, improves traffic flow along the 710 freeway and constructs a

light rail line from downtown to the Orange County line.

Q13 aa-dd (All residents/Self-reported Definite vote Nov. 2016). While the last list I read you directly benefits all areas of Los Angeles County, I would now like to read you a detailed list of projects or services that will specifically benefit your area. Please tell me whether knowing that this project or service will be funded by the measure makes you more or less likely to vote yes on the measure. (Asked Only Voters In Planning Area 7 – Southeast Los Angeles County) (N=201)


Adding a carpool and a regular lane on the 5 freeway between the 605 and the 710 freeways

through Commerce and Downey

Improving the traffic flow along the 710 freeway by widening the road at key bottlenecks and upgrading

the on- and off-ramps between downtown LA and the Ports of Los Angeles and Long Beach

through such southeast cities as Bell, South Gate and Paramount

Constructing a light rail line from downtown LA to the Orange

County Line through Paramount, Bellflower and Cerritos

Extending the Metro Gold Light Rail Line to East Los Angeles

further east toward Whittier along Washington Boulevard through

Commerce, Pico Rivera, and Montebello

12100 Wilshire Blvd, Suite 350

Los Angeles, CA 90025

Phone (310) 828-1183

Fax (310) 453-6562

Richard Bernard [email protected]

28

For more information, contact:

John Fairbank [email protected]

la county transportation - long range plan issues survey ... · los angeles county transportation...

Documents