l003 dmv demand for state hearing 8-24-2007

8/14/2019 L003 DMV Demand for State Hearing 8-24-2007

1/9

Rik Munson

218 Landana Street

American Canyon, California 94503

To: Director, California department of Motor Vehicles.

Certified Mail #7001 2510 0007 5228 8408CC: STATE OF CALIFORNIA RISK MANAGEMENT

Certified Mail #7003 1010 0003 5137 8599

Re: Notice of intent to suspend registration in reference to one 1992/AUDI License plate

Number 2ZGS391 VIN Number WAUDK54A4NN026555

NOTICE: This letter constitutes legal notice.NOTICE: This letter is a formal demand for state hearing.

NOTICE: This letter constitutes both actual and constructive legal notice to the Director

of the California Department of Motor Vehicles, and its/his/hers/their agents and assigns,that the Director and the Department are in default and in breach of fiduciary obligations

and that YOUR BOND IS AT ISSUE!

NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL

NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT

Dear Director,

Please be advised that I am in receipt of a communication from your agency,

STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES, hereinafter the

department, titled NOTICE OF INTENT TO SUSPEND dated August 6, 2007 in

reference to a private use automobile, identified in your letter as private use vehicle

1992/AUDI License plate Number 2ZGS391 VIN Number WAUDK54A4NN026555 and

stating the departments intent to suspend the vehicle registration unless proof of

financial responsibility is provided to the department by 9/7/2007.

So there will be no ground for misunderstanding, let me make it perfectly clear

that my correct and proper Christian appellation is Rik Wayne Munson, that I, Rik Wayne

Munson am a sovereign citizen, domiciled in the republic state of California, I am a non-

resident alien to the federal UNITED STATES and a non-resident to California. I am a

sovereign born, state Citizen Domiciled on the land, on California, the state of the

republic, United States of America, and reserve all rights under both the common law and

1


2/9

Uniform Commercial Code provisions including but not limited to UCC 1-103 and 1-

207.

I specifically reject, deny and refute all claims alleging Rik Wayne Munson to be

the all capital lettered idem sonans RIK WAYNE MUNSON, the label used by the

department to identify me in its system of records which it has refused or otherwise

failed to correct.

Please be further advised that the questions of identity as well as a number of

other relevant questions regarding the jurisdiction of the department to affect my right to

use of the public streets and highways for purposes of private conveyance was addressed

to you on September 23, 2004 in a letter delivered as CERTIFIED MAIL # 7003 1010

0003 5137 8612. As of this date Thursday, August 23, 2007 both the DMV director and

the department have refused or otherwise failed to answer the questions addressed in that

letter.

These same relational issues as well as others were raised again in a letter dated

May 6, 2006 delivered as Certified Mail #7003 1010 0003 5137 8582. As of

this date Thursday, August 23, 2007 the department has refused or otherwise failed to

answer the questions addressed in that letter.

You are further advised Mr. Director that silence where there is a duty to speak isfraud. The streets and the highway belong to the people and their use for private

conveyance is a right not a privilege subject to regulation by the state or local

municipalities. My exercise of the federally protected right to travel unregulated may not

be converted to a crime and may not be converted to a privilege nor can the receipt of any

privilege be made contingent upon the waiver of a known constitutionally protected right.

As you well know Mr. Director, The STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT

OF MOTOR VEHICLES operates under a grant from congress found at 49 USC

subchapter VI and is certified by the United States (corporate) to issue drivers licenses.

The STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES is certified by

the federal government to issue commercial drivers licenses and may be decertified in

which case the department may no longer issue said licenses. The arteries of interstate

2


3/9

commerce are reserve to congress under Article IV of the federal constitution and what

the STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES regulates is the

safe operation of Commercial Motor vehicles used in intrastate commerce. There is no

state police power to interfere with private travel.

Notice: You are hereby noticed that I will sign no document promising to appear in a

commercial court when I am not engaged in the privileged use of the streets or highways.

You are hereby further noticed that: if the exercise of my liberty to the use of the public

thoroughfares for purposes of private conveyance is interfered with under the color of

state police authority and an armed paramilitary officer of any municipal corporation,

county sheriff or state police agency interrupts my liberty and commits the federal

felonies of kidnap and carjack under color of state law, local custom, policy or practice I

will arrest him/her on the spot for violations under title 18 of the United Stated codes. If

his fellow officer does not take him/her into his/her lawful custody and hold him/her for

federal authorities I will arrest them for a felony violation of the California Penal Code.

In any event I will hold you Mr. Director, STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

MOTOR VEHICLES and does 1-100 individually and severally liable for any injury or

depravation of liberty that results.

Notice: Mr. Director, you and the STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF

MOTOR VEHICLES are hereby noticed that your silence in regard to the questions

raised in my previous letters, identified Supra, is fraud. Answers to the questions I have

raised are my property. I have named the dollar amount that I accept from you and the

department for your continued withholding of my property. Your failure to object to the

terms of said offer and your continued withholding of my property pursuant to that offer

to contract is acceptance by both specific performance and tacit procuration. In the

absence of your surrendering the information property described above I will be

invoicing you and the department for the outstanding obligation owed to me.

Notice: Mr. Director, you are hereby instructed to take proper notice of the following

excerpts from the Uniform Bonding Code as your bond is at issue.

3


4/9

MUNICIPAL BONDING IS INTENDED FOR ACCIDENTAL MISUSE OF POWER:

BONDING IS NOT INTENDED TO PROTECT OFFICIALS IN THE DELIBERATE

MISUSE OF POWER, THAT IS, THE COMMISSION OF CRIMINAL ACTS.

MANY OFFICIALS THINK THAT THEY CAN DO WRONG AND HIDE BEHIND

THE LIMITED LIABILITY AND THE BOND OF THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATIONFOR WHICH THEY WORK. THEY FORGET THE REAL BASIS OF THEIR

AUTHORITY.

ONLY WHEN MALFEASANT OFFICERS HAVE BEEN DRAWN OUT INTO THE

OPEN AWAY FROM THE VEIL OF LIMITED ACCESS TO, AND THE LIMITED

LIABILITY OF, THE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, CAN THEY BE COMPELLEDTO ANSWER CIVILLY FOR THEIR ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND BE MADE TO

SURRENDER THEIR OWN PERSONAL PROPERTY FOR THEIR OWN

UNLAWFUL ACTS.

THE ONLY SUITS WHICH OFFICERS OF A RENEGADE GOVERNMENT CAN BE

MADE TO ANSWER TO ARE PUBLICLY FILED CRIMINAL CQMPLAINTS WITH

CIVIL VALUE NOTED PER 18 U.S.C. 241, 242 BECAUSE FAILURE OF

PROSECUTION WOULD REINSTATE THE LAWFUL REMEDIES OF DUELINGAND CIVIL WAR. THEREFORE ALL PROSECUTORS AND OTHER SUPPORTING

OFFICIALS MUST BE BONDED. A PROSECUTOR WHO DOES NOT PROSECUTEA MALFEASANT OFFICIAL BECOMES A MALFEASANT PROSECUTOR, AND

THRUSTS THE PUBLIC AT THE BONDING COMPANY. BONDING COMPANIES

IN ORDER TO SURVIVE, MUST CANCEL THE BOND ON A MALFEASANT

PROSECUTOR FOR HIS LACK OF SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND MAKE HIM

DEPENDENT ON HIS OWN PERSONAL RESOURCES FOR THE SEAT OF HIS

OWN AUTHORITY. OTHERWISE, THE CRIMINAL OFFENSE REVERTS TO A

CITIZENS COLLECTION ON THE CIVIL BOND. THE PUBLIC IS GETTING

BETTER EDUCATED IN COMMERCIAL DEFENSE AND OFFENSE. THE TIMEHAS COME FOR BONDING COMPANIES TO GET SMART ALSO, OR BE

FINANCIALLY DEVASTATED BY OFFICIAL MALFEASANCE. THE UNIFORM

BONDING CODE IS A FIRST STEP TOWARD BETTER BONDING.

Claims Access Pursuant to Civil Rights Law

Improper enforcements which run counter to the U.S.

Constitution can involve as many as thirty-five (35)

violations of the provisions of the United States

Constitution valued per 18 US 241 at $10,000 per

constitutional violation, per offense, per officer, per

injured party when the officer is acting as a part of a law

enforcement agency effort.

The civil value is therefore approximately $50,000 per

enforcement offense, per enforcement officer, per injuredparty.

The statutes enabling the suit and civil claim are part of

the Federal Civil Rights Act of 1871. (42 USC 1983, 1985,

1986 . . .) These statutes guarantee, among other things,

the equal protection of the law for racial minority groups.

Although the argument is commonly raised that these

statutes apply only to racial minority population groups,

4


5/9

they actually apply to racial discrimination regardless of

the race and regardless of the population of the group.

The application of these equal protection statutes to only

racial minority population groups would create a racial

discrimination against racial majority population groups,

and hence impose a justice minority situation upon the

racial majority population groups. But this would take the

racial minority statutes applicable to a majority race,

because the intended purpose of the statute is to eliminate

the prejudicial discrimination of the law and its

enforcement, not to favor any specific race, color, creed,

religious faith, sec or population group (be it small or

large).

The issue can be made even clearer by a second very

appropriate example. The legal professions labor union,

the Bar Association, was established immediately after the

Civil War to substitute a system of general slavery to

replace the old system of black slavery, by guaranteeing a

monopoly of the courts for attorneys, judges and municipalcorporations (city, county, state). This labor union, the

Bar Association, has forbidden anyone but union (Bar)

attorneys to give legal advice, and has prevented anyone

from being assisted in court by a non-union lawyer or by a

non-lawyer, thus converting the courts into closed union

shops. This corresponds to pre-Civil War United States

wherein blacks were not taught to read and were not allowed

to get a public education lest they become strong enough

persons to speak out against their repression and overthrow

their slave masters.

The unionization of the legal system by the Bar Association

makes the people individually, and the public as a whole, a

legal justice minority group with access to the Civil

Rights Act of 1871 and to 42 USC 1983, 1985 and 1986.

The bar association act is in violation of anti-trust and

anti-monopoly laws of the U.S.

Organized Crime in Government

Government officials maintain control of the courts by

licensing lawyes and by forbidding the common citizens to

practice law or give legal advice, three phrases which

have never been adequately defined for any statute. Toprotect government dominance, law schools are the only

schools allowed to teach law, and specifically safe law

(attornment). To protect malfeasance, attorneys are

forbidden to file criminal complaints against malfeasance

officials, officer and clerks and against officers of other

corporations If they disobey, they lose their license to

practice law. Similarly, when the citizen files a criminal

complaint against a public official, the prosecutor is

expected to protect the public official from prosecution

5


6/9

for official malfeasance by exercising some mystical

doctrine of selective prosecution (an act of misprision

of crime) which is nothing more or less than an excuse for

legal prejudice to issue from the prosecutors office

calculated to overthrow the publics legal redress against

official malfeasance.

Bonding of Governments in General

Conclusion

A government (its officials, its officers, and its clerks)

will not be

bonded:

1. If it does not eliminate its own internal malfeasance

with the same diligence that it pursues civilian felons.

(In other words, a government shall clean its own nest

thoroughly),

2. If it rules by force without reason and/or without

the consent of the people, which it governs in such a case,it shall be deemed a criminal government and its officials,

officers, and clerks shall be deemed criminally malfeasant,

3. If it behaves with malice or with deliberate contempt

or rudeness towards its citizens.

Let us contemplate our forefathers, and posterity and

resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us from the

former, for the sake of the latter. The necessity of the

times, more than ever, calls for our utmost circumspection,

deliberation, fortitude and perseverance. Let us remember

that if we suffer tamely a lawless attack upon our liberty,

we encourage it, and involve others in our doom. It is a

very serious consideration that millions yet unborn may be

the miserable shares of the event

Samuel Adams Speech (1771)

FURHER:2.4 - BONDING INSURANCE STATUTES

Compulsory Insurance

The bonding of statutes which require natural persons (non-

incorporated persons) to purchase insurance, must be very

carefully analyzed, and be regarded with the utmost

caution. As a general rule, it is against the law for any

entity to compel any citizen to pay any wager or premium

for the privilege of not being injured or for the privilegeof not being threatened with injury (Protection Insurance

Racketeering). [Footnote: U.S. R.I.C.O. Laws]

Corporations may be required by the state in which they are

incorporated, to purchase public hazard insurance because

the corporation, being an artificial/paper person (a legal

fiction), is regarded as having no conscience other than

the state, making the state as a silent partner of the

6


7/9


8/9

such as Rothschild, so, some states prostitute their

legislative power as an inducement to get insurance

companies to give them a better payment rate for their own

malpractice insurance coverage premiums for their own

corporate activities, by compelling citizens to purchase

motor vehicle insurance.

In any compulsory motor vehicle insurance scheme, a

citizen's purchase of motor vehicle insurance is guaranteed

by a threat of injury in the form of a suspension of the

driver's license, seizure of the vehicle, fines and

imprisonment if the citizen does not comply with the

state's mandate. This creates the basic fabric of a

protection insurance racket, hence a very real credibility

problem for insurance and bonding companies.

The bonding problem gets really nasty when a judge compels

a citizen to either buy auto insurance or to quite driving

"his" (the "citizen's") car. Because a bond or insurance is

only a promise to pay and not a tangible product, a citizen

can lawfully and rightfully argue that, like a savings andloan or a bank, an insurance bonding/bonding company might

not be around when damage is done and it is time for a

claim payoff. Therefore the citizen can lawfully guarantee

the auto insurance policy by putting a common law lien on

enough of the property of the law enforcement officer and

the judge to cover the face value of the insurance policy.

"This commercial lien cannot be removed."

"A federal R.I.C.O. action against the enforcement officer

and the judge can also compel them to pay all of the

premiums for all of the persons whom they have compelled to

buy insurance."

The voluntary purchasing of motor vehicle insurance is

smart. It is a good investment. But compulsory purchase of

any sort of insurance in order to continue the daily act of

living is protection insurance racketeering. Any bonding

company which bonds compulsory motor vehicle insurance

statutes is going to have big irresolvable problems, and

any officer or judge who enforces compulsory motor vehicle

insurance statutes is laying himself wide open to economic

ruin.

Please be further advised Mr. Director that section 4 of Title 18 of the United States

Codes compels me to report the criminal malfeasance of government officials under

penalty of federal felony. Make no mistake about it. If you violate my rights under color

of state police authority I will report it in the form of a criminal complaint AND civil suit

brought before the United States District Court. You are further advised that if my liberty

8


9/9

is interrupted by armed paramilitary based upon any action by the department I will hold

you and the department individually and severally liable.

Please be further advised that the NOTICE OF INTENT TO SUSPEND dated

August 6, 2007 refers to a private use automobile (1992/AUDI License plate Number

2ZGS391 VIN Number WAUDK54A4NN026555) that is not a commercial motor

vehicle as that term is defined at 49 CFR sections 390.5 and 398.1(d).

If the STATE OF CALIFORNIA possesses any claim against the private use automobile

identified above, you have 30 days from receipt of this letter to identify the nature of said

claim including any and all lawful authority upon which your claim arises.

In the absence of evidence of claim against the above described private use automobile

you and the department are instructed to surrender to me the manufacturers original

Certificate of Origin. In the event that the original Certificate of Origin has been

destroyed you and the department are instructed to provide me with a certified copy of

said Certificate of Origin, which is to be stamped as the original.

In order to live the life of republican freedom a citizen must know the law and be well

disposed to use it. You will find that I do and that I am.

Respectfully submitted Friday, August 24, 2007

________________________________________Rik W Munson, Private Attorney General

Pg. 9of9

9

l003 dmv demand for state hearing 8-24-2007

Documents