l. monica negrila, ma, lmhc, mhp ikron of greater seattlepdfs/hs+commission/... · 2017-10-26 ·...
TRANSCRIPT
L. Monica Negrila, MA, LMHC, MHP IKRON of Greater Seattle
Behavioral Health Services
Mental Illness
Mental Health
Behavioral Health
Behavioral Health Services
AddictionSubstance Use Disorder
Behavioral Health
Background
In 2010, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA—or ACA) charged the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) with developing a National Quality Strategy (NQS) to better meet the promise of providing all Americans with access to health care that is safe, effective, and affordable
ACA HHS NQS
NQS Goals:
1. Evidence Based Practices
2. Person-Centered Care3. Coordinated Care
4. Healthy living- communities5. Reduction of adverse events6. Cost reduction
WA State DBHR
The Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery (DBHR) was organized to integrate state-funded services for substance use, mental health and problem gambling.
Goals are to prevent substance use disorders and support holistic, evidence-based, person-centered care that addresses both medical and behavioral health conditions while reducing overall costs.
Behavioral Health
Services
Mental Health Services
Substance Use Services
2016 - Mental Health and Substance Use Treatment integration
SAMHSA’s Definition By behavioral health, SAMHSA refers to mental/emotional well-
being and/or actions that affect wellness.
Behavioral health problems include substance use disorders; alcohol and drug addiction; and serious psychological distress, suicide, and mental disorders. Problems that range from unhealthy stress or subclinical conditions to diagnosable and treatable diseases such as serious mental illnesses and substance use disorders are included.
The phrase “behavioral health” is also used to describe service systems that encompass prevention and promotion of emotional health; prevention of mental and substance use disorders, substance use, and related problems; treatments and services for mental and substance use disorders; and recovery support.
Washington State Behavioral Health Services
DBHR
BHO
BHProviders
BHProviders
BHO
BHProviders
Why Behavioral Health?
Pros:
Inclusive less stigmatized more hopeful
concept (behavior can be changed)
Cons:
Limiting on behavioral change, does not consider environment and other factors
BH Services- classifications Crisis - Acute/Inpatient
Mental Health Care
State Psychiatric Hospitals
Behavioral Health –Residential and Outpatient
Peer Support
Substance Use Disorders- Detox, Inpatient, Residential, Outpatient
Problems of Gambling
Co-occurring Disorders
Tobacco Free
Drug Court & Other related Services
Behavioral Health Integration
The State of Washington has committed to integration of medical care, substance use treatment and mental health care.
Goal to achieve full integration statewide by 2020.
HCA- Health Care Authority
In charge of the physical health and behavioral health integration (Jan. 1 2020)
Various levels of integration across regions in WA state (early adopters, mid-adopters)
Challenges and opportunities
Resources:
http://www.kingcounty.gov/elected/executive/health-human-services-transformation/behavioral-physical-health-integration.aspx#background
https://www.hca.wa.gov/about-hca/healthier-washington/integrated-physical-and-behavioral-health-care
HERO HouseEmployment Programs
Presented By:
• Kaz Uchimura, BSWEmployment CoordinatorEarl PetersonMember Representative
Statistical Information
• Unemployment rate in US among people with disabilities was at 10.5% in 2016 to 4.6 % unemployment rate with people with no disabilities. – Bureau of Labor and Statistics
• Research shows that 60 to 70 percent of people with severe mental illness want to work.– National Alliance of Mental Illness
Unemployment Rates for individuals with mental health challenges can be
as high as 90%!National Governor’s Association
Independent Employment (IE) Positions maybe full or part time and position belongs to the member. The member will participate in the competitive interview process and there is no formal relationship between the Clubhouse and the employer; however, Clubhouse staff will assist in the member’s career development if needed.
Supported Employment (SE) HERO House helps members to obtain their
jobs. We follow IPS (Individual Placement and Support) model particularly designed for people who are recovering from mental illness.
This model is evidence-based. IPS clients are twice as likely to gain employment (55% v. 28%) and have had better outcomes.
Supported Employment includes:
• Assistancewith applications, resumes & cover letters
• Personalized preparation for interviews and overall career development
• On‐site Job Support & Training
• Continuing Communication with Clients, Employers & Clubhouse/Mental Health Agency via in person meetings, phone and e‐mail
Transitional Employment (TE)
TE jobs are part time, entry level jobs and time limited opportunities that last between 6-9 months to build current resumes and references. TE sites belong to HERO House. In the event that a TE members can NOT perform the required job duties, HERO House provides coverage for the position, even on sick days. Staff will get trained first to learn what the job duties are and train our members at work places; therefore, employers never have to worry about providing a training to our member.
Unmet needs for our members
• Access to public services • Housing• For HERO House, potential members
References
• www.bls.gov/ (Bureau of Labor)• www.nami.org (National Alliance on Mental Illness)
• www.nga.org (National Governor Associasion)
• HERO House: www.herohouse.org
IKRON OFGREATER SEATTLE
A Continuum of Behavioral Health Services…
IKRON –In Pictures
IKRON’S MISSION:
To assist adults and youth who use IKRON’s services to build self-confidence, attain greater self-sufficiency, lead more meaningful and fulfilling lives, and to obtain and maintain satisfying employment.
PHILOSOPHY TO SERVICES:
Everyone has the potential to live a fulfilling and independent life regardless of barriers
Uniqueness consists in: 1. Strength-based approach to services; School of life versus
educational background
2. Positive home-like environment
3. View of participant in services – equal partners; team approach
DBHR CERTIFIED SERVICES:
Currently providing: In the future:
Employment Services Mental health Case Management
(health insurance, community resources)
Individual and Group Counseling Psychiatric Services-Medication Substance Use Disorder Level I Substance Use Disorder Level II Peer Support Services DUI Assessments
Primary Care
Current Funding Sources
DVR
KC
WDC
City of Kirk. andIss.Other
CITY OF KIRKLAND FUNDING
Opportunities met: Challenges:
Fills in the gaps in areas where other funding is not available (e.g. DVR, lack of health insurance, etc.)
Increases opportunities for local residents
Increased awareness and prevention
Local systems, not local residents (e.g. Probation)
Services available, limited direct support (transportation, direct funding)
System challenges (housing)
STAY CONNECTED… PRICELESS!
What money can’t buy:
Volunteers – services, mentoring, development
Serving on the Board of Trustees
Becoming a Community Partner: vocational assessments, career exploration, informational interviews, consultation
THANK YOU!
IKRON of Greater Seattle3805 108th Ave NE, Ste. #204
Bellevue, WA-98004
(425) 242-1713
www.seattle.ikron.org
THE IKRON TEAM…
HOUSING STRATEGY ADVISORY GROUP
STRATEGIES FOR ASSISTANCE BY CITIES
Overall Housing Strategies
CITY STRATEGIES/TOOLSLAND USE REGULATIONS
INDIRECT ASSISTANCE◦ DENSITY BONUS/ HEIGHT INCREASE
DIRECT ASSISTANCE
CITY STRATEGIES: Land Use Regulations:
Supply Diversity and Relative Affordability
◦MIXED USE◦ SENIOR HOUSING REGULATIONS◦ PUD/ DENSITY AVERAGING◦ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS◦ COTTAGE HOUSING◦ ZERO‐LOT LINE/DUPLEX
Micro apartments in Ped Friendly / Transit Rich
5
What is a ‘micro unit’?o Limited Size
o Independent units(bath, cooking facility)
o Typically some common area(May include larger kitchen)
o Reduced Parking
o May bundle costs (e.g. utilities)
o Relatively affordable
SENIOR HOUSING REGULATIONS
Riverside Landing: Bothell
Brandenwood: Bellevue
ACCESSORY DWELLING UNITS(ADU’s)
COTTAGE HOUSINGConover Commons (Redmond)
Danielson Grove / Kirkland Bungalow Cottages (Kirkland)
CITY STRATEGIES/TOOLS: Land Use Incentives
Within the market / explicit affordability / moderate‐low cost
LAND USE INCENTIVES
◦ DENSITY BONUSES
◦ REDUCED PARKIMG
◦ FEE WAIVERS
ZONING/REGULATORY INCENTIVES
Lakeview Commons (Kirkland)
Kelsey Lane (Bellevue)
Pacific Inn (Bellevue) – Reduced Parking
Land Use IncentivesEast King County
11
Increased significantly in last few years
Helps offset decrease of moderate priced market housing.
Create broader mix of moderate priced housing: ownership / more 2+ bdrm
CITY STRATEGIES/TOOLSDirect Assistance
Low – Very Low Cost / Range of Needs / Throughout East King County / ‘Opportunity’
◦ FUNDING ASSISTANCE◦ General Funds / CDBG / Other◦ Grants / Loans
◦ FEE WAIVERS
◦ SURPLUS LAND
East King County Trust Fund
A range of incomes and householdsGeographic balance over timeOver $47 million of city resources:◦ General funds (~40%), ◦ Federal CDBG funds (~20%), and
◦ ‘Other’ (e.g. land, fee waivers, repayments) (~40%).
Agencies leveraged almost $450 million.
PROJECTS ASSISTED 1993 ‐ 2016
HOUSING TYPE# UNITS / BEDS FUNDING*
Family 2,196 $25,882,324
Senior 669 $10,478,642
Homeless 341 $8,169,739
Special Needs 163 $3,394,582
TOTAL 3,369 $47,925,286* Includes funding, land donations, fee waivers
ARCH Sphere of Influence‘East’ King County
Kenmore WoodinvilleBothell
CITY PERSPECTIVEValue of working collectively:
Challenge of securing opportunities in high market area◦ Can pursue best opportunities where ever located◦ Create geographic and housing balance over time.
Allows all cities, regardless of size, to provide assistance◦ Smaller cities hard to have impact
Cooperation with other cities –◦ Leverage other funding◦ Learn from each other◦ Efficiency in administration
Housing markets/needs not defined by city boundaries
PROVIDER’S PERSPECTIVE
Stable Funding Leads to Stable OrganizationsAbility to grow and mature
Better developers and owners
Result is more affordable housing
Paving the WayPlanning
Community Receptiveness
Creating opportunity: Surplus/underutilized public land
Kirkland
Bellevue
Creating opportunity: Faith Properties
Creating opportunity: Fee Waivers (Permit / Impact Fees)
Village at Overlake KCHA (Redmond)
SPECIAL NEEDS HOUSING
(Friends of Youth): Kirkland
DD Group Home
(Residence East)Bellevue
HOMELESS HOUSINGFamily Village (YWCA)
Avondale Park (Hopelink / FOY / CCS)
Petter Court (Attain) Kirkland
HOMELESS HOUSING
HopeLink Place Bellevue
SENIOR HOUSING
Washington Court
(Assisted Living):
Bellevue
Cambridge Court(Independent Living)
Bellevue
FAMILY RENTAL
Highland Garden (St. Andrews) - Klahanie
Easternwood (LATCH) ‐ Bothell
FAMILY RENTALPreservation
Chalet (Imagine Housing) - Bellevue
Plum Court (DASH) ‐ Kirkland
SECTION 8 PRESERVATION
Wildwood (DASH) : Bellevue
Ellsworth House Imagine Housing (Mercer Is.)
FAMILY OWNERSHIP
Newcastle Townhomes (Habitat) - Newcastle
SUMMARYKeys to Success
Reduce builder risk◦ Technical studies / Permit process / market
Reduce costs◦ Land / Permits / subsidy
Minimize Pre‐Development Cash Flow◦ Land payment timing / Pay for technical studies
PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHERCITIES ACTING AS A CATALYST FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING
◦ Combining Strategies
◦ Partnering with Private and Community Groups
◦ Understanding / Reducing ‘RISK’
PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHERGreenbrier Heights - Woodinville
• senior, family rental/ownership•County surplus land•Narrow Roads•Cottages
•Affordable Housing Bonus•Wetland Density Transfer•City Fee Waivers• Funding from 3 cities, County, State
PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHERVillage at Overlake - Redmond
• Mixed use: Housing above Park n Ride
•Housing emphasis area
•City fee waivers
• Funding: 3 cities, County, State
PUTTING IT ALL TOGETHER
Riverside Landing - Bothell
• Senior Rental
•Surplus City/County land
•Senior overlay zoning
• Funding from 3 cities, County, State
HOMECHOICE WAY
Program to allow communities to explore creating a small neighborhood that maintains the traditional design character and quality of single family neighborhoods, while also offering a range of ownership housing choices.
DESIGNOverall Concept
Traditional Subdivision
12 Lots/12 Homes
HomeChoice Way
12 Lots/24 Homes
DESIGNPotential Forms of Housing
Single Family Home
DESIGNPotential Forms of Housing
Duplex (on a corner lot)
DESIGNPotential Forms of Housing
Multi‐unit home designed to look like single family home
Multi‐Unit Home
DESIGNPotential Forms of Housing
Detached Cottages
Cottage HousingThird Street Cottages (Langley)
DESIGNOverall Concept
ISSUES FACING SUBURBSLack of Understanding◦ Deal with myths◦ Put a face on it
Economics
Newer Land Use Patterns
Government Structure◦ Resources (financial and staff) to address complex issue◦ No history / experience◦ Political Dynamics
MIXED USE HOUSING
Lionsgate : Redmond
Kitsilano
Vancouver, B.C.
PUD/DENSITY AVERAGING
Cambridge Senior Apts: Bellevue
Yarrow Point PUD
Kirkland
ZERO‐LOT LINE/DUPLEX
‘Community Development’ aspect of affordable housing
Marry together more philosophical aspects of working on affordable housing, with the technical aspects (real estate economics); the data driven aspects, and specific strategies.
2017 Housing Strategy Plan UpdateHuman Services Commission
October 24, 2017
What is the Housing Strategy Plan?• A discrete list of tasks identified to implement the Housing goals
and policies in the Comprehensive Plan• City has had a Housing Strategy Plan since 1st Comprehensive
Plan after GMA• Last updated in 2007 • Comprehensive Plan updated in 2015
Housing Strategy Plan Outcomes• Since 2010
– Inclusionary Housing– Zoning and Design Regulations
for South Kirkland TOD– Advocated for state legislation to
exempt impact fees– Implemented impact fee
exemptions– Allowed impact fee deferrals– Adopted Section 8
nondiscrimination requirements
Housing Strategy Plan Outcomes– Became a CDBG Joint
Agreement City– Increased annual ARCH Housing
Trust Fund contributions (local projects funded: FOY campus, South Kirkland Park & Ride, Athene, DD Group Home)
– Updated Comprehensive Plan– Partnered with ARCH and others
to begin siting process for shelter
Inclusionary Housing
Affordable Units Ownership Rental Payment Total
Inclusionary Requirements(Completed or Under Const.)
13 4 8 25
MFTE(Completed)
23 23
South Kirkland TOD(Completed)
58 58
Permitting 206
Pre-permitting 131
Total 443
Housing Strategy Plan Update Process• Goal is to create a work program for housing issues• Engage a cross section of the community as an advisory group to create the
strategy plan– Neighborhood associations (through KAN)– Small business– Large business– Faith community– School community– Planning Commission– Houghton Community Council– Human Services Commission– Senior Council
Housing Strategy Plan Update Process• Also engage the broader community during the process to:
– Educate– Increase awareness– Build a base of support for future actions
Housing Goals
Housing Strategy Plan Update Process• 9 meetings over 8 months, so
far– 6 meetings providing
background to group, including input from housing stakeholders
– 3 meetings identifying and sorting strategies
Housing Strategy Plan Update Process• Sample Strategies
– Address the “Missing Middle”• Promote walkability within neighborhoods• Allow limited commercial development • Increase pocket parks• Allow smaller lots and more diverse housing
– Increase supply of small, single story homes– Encourage more ADU construction and use– Advocate for reform to condominium liability laws– Public funding for affordable housing
Housing Strategy Plan Update Process• Outreach to broader community
– 6 Focus Groups • Seniors• Students• Downtown Merchants• English Language Learners• Real Estate• Safe Parking
Housing Strategy Plan Update Process• Outreach, continued
– On-line survey – Available for 1 month– Advertised through press releases and social media– 1,468 responses
Housing Strategy Plan Update Process – Survey
7%
13%
15%
22%
24%
33%
20%
47%
44%
4%
12%
11%
21%
20%
24%
46%
29%
36%
89%
76%
74%
58%
56%
43%
33%
24%
19%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
Housing options that are affordable are hard to come by.
Relatively affordable housing options are being demolished.
Families, particularly young families, have limited housing options in Kirkland.
Kirkland lacks small housing alternatives, such as ”micro‐ housing,” tiny houses, cottages and small …
Overall, Kirkland does not have an adequate supply of housing.
Most housing options have easy access to public transit.
Kirkland lacks specialized senior housing options.
Seniors are able to age in their existing home.
Homes that accommodate extended families are plentiful.
How would you rate the following statements for Kirkland today?
Disagree Neutral Agree
Housing Strategy Plan Update Process – Survey
23%
20%
23%
30%
29%
37%
31%
26%
31%
25%
19%
46%
11%
17%
21%
14%
16%
9%
16%
24%
20%
29%
38%
13%
66%
63%
56%
56%
54%
54%
53%
50%
50%
46%
43%
41%
0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100%
There is a range of housing options for households at all stages of life.
There are opportunities to “age in place,” either in your current home or housing specifically for seniors.
Higher density housing opportunities exist close to good transit service.
New housing fits in with and preserves the character of the existing community.
Neighborhoods are stabilized by preserving existing housing and maintaining its relative affordability.
There is housing available for local employees earning $25,000 to $60,000 each year.
Home ownership opportunities are increased for a wider range of households.
There is more single family housing available.
There are opportunities for young households, including students or entry level workers, through individual or…
New housing provides a diversity of architecture.
There is housing available for adults with special needs.
There is a range of housing affordable to a wide range of incomes, including lower incomes (less than $25,000).
Which of these statements are successful outcomes for Kirkland in the next 20 years?
Disagree Neutral Agree
Housing Strategy Plan Update Process• Outreach, continued
– Community Workshop (December 5th or 6th)– Questions for workshop:
• Are these the right strategies to address citizen’s concerns?• If not, what ideas do you have?• Are there areas that we can build on or go further with?• What questions do you have or think others will have?
Housing Strategy Plan Update Process• Next Steps
– Workshop– Group prepares recommendation– Check in with Planning Commission– Final recommendation to City Council – 1st Quarter 2018
• Questions or comments?