_kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
1/26
Structural Engineering Lab
3.1 kind of fatigue design .
(1) Safe life design
(2) Fail safe design
(3) Damage tolerance design
(4) Fracture controlled design
3. Fatigue Design3.1 Kind of Fatigue Design
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
2/26
Structural Engineering Lab
3.2 Fatigue Design of Bridge.Actual stress (S ) is function of next factor as follows:
S = f (S n, K td , K tw)
Where ,S : actual stress(2 nd stress ) which is considered cause of all stress concentration .Sn : nominal stress(first stress ) which is decided by area and section factor of member for loadK td : elastic stress concentration which is decided by geometric type of structural memberK tw : elastic stress concentration which is dominated by welding (such as welding type, welding defect,
fabrication error, etc) and fabricating .
To prevent fatigue crack initiation , S have to control less than limit value .If possible, S n , and K td , K tw should be reduced.
3. Fatigue Design3.2Fatigue Design of Bridge.
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
3/26
Structural Engineering Lab
3.2.1 Allowable stress based on crack initiation life
In fatigue strength analysis ,it is reasonable to decision on the basis of P-S(Q)-N curve
that fatigue life relates load density to fracture probability .
Fatigue strength analysis which is based S-N curve and statistical data andcumulative damage data is carried out .
For fatigue crack initiation is local behavior,So, it is recommended to use ofSA-N curve which related fatigue life and local stress and strain thanS-N curve which related fatigue life and nominal stress(first stress) .
3. Fatigue Design3.2Fatigue Design of Bridge.
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
4/26
Structural Engineering Lab
Setting up Fatigue design ofstructural member
Fatigue strength ofstructural member
External forceestimation
S-N curvedecision
Structural memberor model test
SA-N curvedecision
Mean stressestimation
Fluctuating stressestimation
Fatigue strengthcurve estimation ofstructural member
Fatigue strengthcurve of basic
specimen
local stress frequencyDistribution of
structural member
The law ofaccumulated damage
Accumulated damage value
Allowable stress calculation
Setting up of limitsaccumulated value
Safety, economy
Allowable stress determination
3. Fatigue Design3.2Fatigue Design of Bridge.
(Fig 3.1 Estimation procedure of allowable stress for safe life design)
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
5/26
Structural Engineering Lab(Fig 3.2 Flow chart for crack propagation life design)
Setting crack propagation path
Analysis of stress intensity factor
Setting up Structural member for analysis of fatigue crack propagation
Stress analysis of structural member estimation of external force(random load)
estimation of mean stress estimation of fluctuation stress
Equation of crack propagation rate
Stress frequency distribution of structural member
Calculation of crack propagation quantity ,
Assumption of initial crack
l
Setting limit crack size,
Calculation of crack propagation life
cl
cl l
3. Fatigue Design3.2Fatigue Design of Bridge.
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
6/26
Structural Engineering Lab
3.3 Allowable stress and safety factor(Empirical safety factor)
In strength design, allowable stress is decided by divide criterion strength by empirical safety factor.Load is respectively using another safety factor according to static, dynamic, impact load etc.
Criterion strength take static fracture strength.This is not so good. because of make down the accuracy of allowable stress.Fatigue strength is effected by notch effect, size effect, surface finishing etc.
So, Recently, criterion strength take actual load and actual fracture strength.
Relation allowable stress l and safety factor S and fatigue limit u is as follows:
Where, u : fatigue limit of standard specimen which finishing surfaceS = m + s
m : safety factor for fatigue limit of material (1.1 ~1.2, 1.5)
s : safety factor for stress(1.1, 1.5 ~ 2)
3. Fatigue Design3.3 Allowable and safety factor.
ual S 21
1
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
7/26Structural Engineering Lab
3.4 Fatigue Safety of Steel Bridge
In Korea used allowable stress design method, acquirement of safety is only dependent on safety factor .In countries used limit state design method , acquirement of safety is mainly described
as partial safety factor, reliability index, fatigue damage parameter, uncertainty of service load etc.
3. Fatigue Design3.3 Allowable and safety factor.
d
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
8/26Structural Engineering Lab
3.4 Fatigue Safety of Steel Bridge3.4.1 Partial Safety Factor(In here, JSSC and EUROCODE are present as follows)In fatigue design by JSSC, fatigue safety is determined from
Where, and are the design stress range and the allowable fatigue stress range . b ,w ,i are the partial safety factors to consider fatigue loads and uncertainty of structures.
b = factor for influence partial fatigue damage on safety strength and performance ofstructures ( strength reduction factor )
w = factor for social influence when structures cause fatigue fracture ( significance factor )i = factor for possibility to find a fatigue damage by inspecting before fatigue failure
(inspection factor )
Value of partial safety factor is determined by engineers. In JSSC, reference values for partial safety factor are presented but the magnitude of failure probability is not obvious.
3. Fatigue Design3.3 Allowable and safety factor.
( )b w i d a
d
d a
b
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
9/26Structural Engineering Lab
3.4 Fatigue Safety of Steel Bridge
[Partial Safety Factor]In EUROCODE, fatigue safety is determined from
Where, e is the equivalent stress range related to spectrum of the design frequent stress range, a is the allowable fatigue stress range .f ,m are the partial safety factors for fatigue load and strength, respectively.
f is factor related to uncertainty which can be included the magnitude of fatigue load,the transfer of stress range from fatigue load, the effect of spectrum ofdesign frequent stress range on equivalent stress range, the design life,the increase of fatigue load and etc. m is uncertainty included into fatigue strength and factor in relation to error of the fatigue life.
3. Fatigue Design3.3 Allowable and safety factor.
d b
a f e
m
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
10/26Structural Engineering Lab
3.4 .2 Fatigue damage parameterValue of m at Eq. is approximately 3 based on the Pariss fatigue crack propagation.
Therefore, slope of S-N curve obtained from integral Eq. is approximately -1/3.
As sample size for the fatigue test results of one structural detail increases gradually,
slop of the S-N curve calculated by least Square Method is tend to converge into approximately -1/3.
From two reasons above mentioned, slop of the S-N curve is -1/3, not a random variable.Therefore, parameter defined by next equation can be applied.
Variable of C is calculated by this equation in accordance with cycle number ( N) and stress range ( )
for the each fatigue specimens.
3. Fatigue Design3.3 Allowable and safety factor.
d b
( ) mc N 3m
)( K C m
dN da
)( K C m
dN
da
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
11/26Structural Engineering Lab
3.4 .2 Fatigue damage parameter
In case of frequent stress range, C i is considered and defined as follows
Where, i : one of stress range components at the spectrum of frequent stress range
ni : cycle number of i
It is assumed that fatigue failure is occurred if follow condition is satisfied.
Constant stress range ( e) caused fatigue failure can be describedusing frequent stress range, ( ) as follows
3. Fatigue Design3.3 Allowable and safety factor.
d b
( ) mi i ic n
1
k
ii
c c
1
k
ii
N n
( ) mec N
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
12/26Structural Engineering Lab
3.4 .2 Fatigue damage parameterFollow equation can be obtained by substituting Eq. and Eq.
to Eq. .
This equation is similar form with equivalent stress range of Eq. .
Eq. describes that fatigue failure occurs when total cumulative of C i is equal to C.
Therefore, C i presents a part of fatigue damage.Such a feature of C i , C is called fatigue damage parameter.
3. Fatigue Design3.3 Allowable and safety factor.
d b
1
k
ii
c c
( ) mec N ( )m
i i ic n
1/
1
{ ( ) }k
m mie i
i
n
N
ame c N )(
1
k
ii
c c
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
13/26Structural Engineering Lab
4. Fatigue Standard of Various countries(KOREA, USA, BS, JAPAN, CANADAetc)
5
1) KOREA : Korea Bridge Design CodeKorea Railway bridge design code .
2)USA : AASHTO(American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials )
3) BS (Eurocode)
4)JAPAN
5)CANADA
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
14/26Structural Engineering Lab
5
[Korea]Korea Bridge Design Code
1) Design stress range should not exceeds allowable fatigue stress range.2) Maximum stress of joint part should not exceeds allowable fatigue stress range.3) Cycles number of maximum stress range(load number)
- Primary member : 2 million (truck (DB) load), 500 thousand(lane load)- Transverse member, structure detail part : 2 million (truck load)
4) Allowable fatigue stress are made by combined load including live load and wind load.*(This is a little different that the wind load is not included in Eurocode BS 5400 part 10)
Korea Railway bridge design code
1) Allowable fatigue stress range : 95% of nondestructive probability.*(This is a little different from 97.7% of Eurocode BS 5400)
2) Grade classification of joint part :4 grade(for vertical stress), 3 grade(for shear stress).
*(This is not detailed compare with Japan, USA, BS, CANADA.)
Fatigue Standard of (KOREA)
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
15/26Structural Engineering Lab
5
[AASHTO]Fatigue design criteria of AASHTO = AWS until 1965.
1) Design stress range should not exceeds allowable fatigue stress range.2) Primary load transfer member is applied to allowable fatigue stress range of singular loading path3) Cycles number of maximum stress range(load number)
- Primary member : 2 million (truck (DB) load), 500 thousand(lane load)
- Transverse member, structure detail part : 2 million (truck load)4) Allowable fatigue stress are made by combined load including live load and wind load.
*(This is a little different that the wind load is not included in Eurocode BS 5400 part 10)
Fatigue Standard of (AASHTO, USA)
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
16/26Structural Engineering Lab
5
[BS]Fatigue design standard(BS) was printed as BS 5400 Part 10 in 1980.
1) Permissible value of stress is prescribed as stress range not stress limit value.
When strength of fatigue is evaluated, magnitude of stress by dead load is no relation.
2) Fatigue strength evaluation method which considered actual stress for weld structure is adopte d.
3) Design life is guaranteed until 97.7% of nondestructive probability and design life is until120 years .
4) It is possible to calculate fatigue strength for any design life.
5) Definition of design life is defined as safely serviceable period.
Fatigue Standard of (BS)
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
17/26Structural Engineering Lab
5
[BS]--- LOAD---I] Load of railway bridge :
1) Standard railway load is considered including double track loading .
2) Specially, Dead load is not considered in weld joint. But, Dead load is considered in non-welded part.3) Effective stress range is calculated by sum of maximum tensile stress and 60% of maximumcompressive stress.
II] Load of highway bridge :1) Total weight of live load is 320kN(32.6ton).2) One vehicle is loading at one bridge.3) Lane driving by Standard vehicle is limited by slow lane and adjacent to the slow lane.4) Effective stress range is same with railway bridge case.
Fatigue Standard of (BS)
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
18/26
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
19/26Structural Engineering Lab
5
[JAPAN]
[Japan Bridge design code]
Fatigue design is not so much allocating in Japan bridge design code.Because the result of study from railway association and JSSC can be used as manual .
[Japan Railway design code]1) Joint details is divided by 5 grade.2) Fatigue strength cycles are number of 2 million.
3) The kind of steel is 400MPa and 490MPa.
Fatigue Standard of (JAPAN)
5
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
20/26Structural Engineering Lab
5
[CANADA][Calculation of stress range]1) This is calculated using ordinary elastic analysis and the principles of mechanics of materials .2) More sophisticated analysis is required only in case not covered in table 9.
eg: major access holes and cut-offs.
3) Stress range is the algebraic difference between the maximum stress and minimum stress at a givenlocation. : thus, only live load induces stress range.
4) Stress range need be applied only at location that undergo a net applied tensile stress.So, stress ranges that are completely in compression need not be investigated for fatigue.
Fatigue Standard of (CANADA)
5
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
21/26Structural Engineering Lab
5
[CANADA][Design Criteria]
Where,fatigue resistance.
where, fatigue life constant,number of stress range cyclesnumber of application of loadconstant amplitude threshold stress rangecalculated stress range at the detail due to passage of the fatigue load.
F sr f sr
F sr
F nN
srt
31
n N
F srt f sr
Fatigue Standard of (CANADA)
5
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
22/26Structural Engineering Lab
5
[CANADA][Cumulative fatigue damage]The total damage that results from fatigue loading, not applied at constant amplitude, shall satisfy
Where,number of expected stress range cycles at stress range level i.
number of cycles that cause failure at stress range level i.
0.1 N nN
fi
i
nN i N fi
Fatigue Standard of (CANADA)
5
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
23/26
Structural Engineering Lab
5
[CANADA]
[Cumulative fatigue damage]The summation shall include low-stress cycles with stress range less than F srtin accordance with the requirement that for such cycles the fatigue resistance F` srshall be taken as :
Where , is obtained by setting for valueof at which
The fatigue constant , and are given in next table.
nN
' 5
1
'
N n N n '
'
'
51
31
N nnN '
F F srt sr
N n '
'
Fatigue Standard of (CANADA)
5
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
24/26
Structural Engineering Lab
5
1)To establish the Fatigue Analysis Tools2)To work out Prediction Method of Remaining Fatigue Life by Fatigue Analysis3) To provide the Fracture Prevention Plan
4)To develop an adequate Analysis Tools for Fatigue and Fracture5)The Problem of stress and deformation in welding part.6)The Problem of the behavior of stress and deformation in steel member welding
joint under cycle loading.
7)To develop model of cycle loading
5. Current Research of Fatigue
5
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
25/26
Structural Engineering Lab
5
1
Stress history measurement and fatigue life assessment of coped stringers of steel railway bridge under being in service.
Estimation methods for strain-life fatigue properties from hardness Evaluation of fatigue damage
A study on characteristics of Fatigue crack growth in SM570 steel A study on parameters affected the fatigue crack growth in steel structure member. An experimental study on fatigue crack growth characteristic of welded high-strength steel. Fatigue Crack Growth and Crack closure Behavior of Structural Materials Fatigue Crack Propagation and Crack Closure under Random Loading Elastic-Plasic Fatigue Crack Growth Behavior under Repeated Two-Step Loading estimation of probabilistic distribution of fatigue crack propagation using the first-order taylor expansion of crack geometry
An experimental study on the fatigue of torque shear type high tension bolted joint. A study on fatigue crack at coped stringer of the plate girder subway bridge. behavior od the crack initiation , transition and fatigue crack growth of rail steel. The Cyclic Plastic Strain and Cumulative Fatigue Damage
The Cyclic Plastic Strain and Cumulative Fatigue Damage Under Actual Loading
6. Current Research of Fatigue
5
-
8/10/2019 _kyongho_chang_2_2007.ppt
26/26
5
Iterative modeling scheme of 2-D mixed fatigue crack growth Fatigue crack growth analysis of steel deckplates under bending stress. fatigue crack growth analysis of high strength steel(posten 80) with out-of-plane gusset. The computational model for fracture and fatigue of structure steel member under random loads analysis of two-dimensional fatigue crack growth under mixed mode loading. Finite Element Analysis of Closure Behaviour of Fatigue Cracks in Residual Stress Fields
data base for fatigue strength development of software for damage evaluation
An Expert System for Estimation of Fatigue Properties of Metallic Materials
J-INTEGRAL for a 3 D interface crack configuration in welds of dissimilar steels
COD
6. Current Research of Fatigue