kungsleden presents the second quarter for 2012
DESCRIPTION
Property company Kungsleden presents the results of the second quarter for 2012. The full report is available at www.kungsleden.se/financialreportsTRANSCRIPT
Welcome to Kungsleden
Second quarter 2012
Thomas Erséus, Chief Executive
Start of the third quarter
■ The world around Kungsleden
– Economic and political uncertainty in Europe persisting
– Still-strained credit market
– Cautious and hesitant sentiment from banks
– Sweden is a stable economy in Europe, but the Swedish
economy is forecast to slow
■ Kungsleden
– All loans rearranged, but at higher margins
– Tax proceedings and tax rulings
– Continued positive progress of operations and good liquidity
– Lettings market working smoothly
| 2
Owning and managing properties with satisfied customers
| 3
High and stable returns for the long term with
risk diversification as a key ingredient
| 4
A quality portfolio with good returns
7.9% yield
322 properties
SEK 15.7 bn
Industrial/ware
house
40%
Retail
13%
Modular buildings
10%
schools, pre-schools,
offices and
construction sites
Office
27%
Other
10%
| 5
Increased gross profit for the second quarter
■ Net sales increased by 5% to SEK 561 (536) m
■ Gross profit increased by 3% to SEK 337 (328) m
■ Profit/loss before tax was SEK 72 (100) m and after tax SEK -671 (102) m.
The profit decrease is largely due to provisioning for potential tax costs and
lower earnings from property sales
■ Profit/loss for calculating dividends was SEK -177 (145) m, or SEK -1.30
(1.10) per share. Taxes payable amounts to SEK 258 m
■ Sold one property for SEK 5 (41) m with a profit of SEK 0 (20) m
■ Remaining refinancing requirement for 2012 arranged during April
| 6
Post balance sheet events
■ The Swedish Tax Agency has claimed that the Administrative Court
should consider further transactions Kungsleden executed in 2006–
2007. If Kungsleden is unsuccessful in this matter, the liquidity effect
would be approximately SEK 500 m. As recently as 2011, the
Administrative Court of Appeal in Stockholm found that the Swedish
Tax Evasion Act was not applicable in a similar case. No further
provisioning has been made for these claims.
■ Kungsleden sold two former NRP properties in Poland for EUR 12.5
m, in line with book value and acquisition cost.
■ Kungsleden sold 39 public properties in Härnösand, northern
Sweden for SEK 912 m, with an SEK 39 m effect on profit after tax
and SEK 26 m on Q3 profit for calculating dividends. Equity ratio +2
percentage points.
| 7
Increased net letting
■ New contracts with annual rental value of SEK 43 m
■ Economic occupancy levels of 89.3 (89.2)%
■ Average remaining lease term 4.8 years
■ Partnering with tenants to reduce environmental impact through
lower energy consumption
■ Increased customer loyalty
| 8
The first half-year 2012 in figures
| 9
Income Statement SEK m
2012
Jan/Jun
2011
Jan/Jun
Rental revenue 948 800
Sales revenues, modular buildings 169 144
Net sales 1,117 944
Property costs -292 -256
Production costs, modules -153 -132
Gross profit 672 556
Trading net 17 23
Sales and administration costs -131 -127
Profit/loss from participations in Hemsö 148 225
Net financial position -293 -274
Unrealised value changes, properties 2 72
Unrealised value changes, financial instruments 116 118
Profit/loss before tax 530 593
Tax -1,088 -84
Profit/loss after tax for the period -558 509
• Increase mainly
sourced from
properties
purchased over the
past year
| 10
Income Statement SEK m
2012
Jan/Jun
2011
Jan/Jun
Rental revenue 948 800
Sales revenues, modular buildings 169 144
Net sales 1,117 944
Property costs -292 -256
Production costs, modules -153 -132
Gross profit 672 556
Trading net 17 23
Sales and administration costs -131 -127
Profit/loss from participations in Hemsö 148 225
Net financial position -293 -274
Unrealised value changes, properties 2 72
Unrealised value changes, financial instruments 116 118
Profit/loss before tax 530 593
Tax -1,088 -84
Profit/loss after tax for the period -558 509
• 17% up thanks to
good order
bookings at the
Gråbo plant
| 11
Income Statement SEK m
2012
Jan/Jun
2011
Jan/Jun
Rental revenue 948 800
Sales revenues, modular buildings 169 144
Net sales 1,117 944
Property costs -292 -256
Production costs, modules -153 -132
Gross profit 672 556
Trading net 17 23
Sales and administration costs -131 -127
Profit/loss from participations in Hemsö 148 225
Net financial position -293 -274
Unrealised value changes, properties 2 72
Unrealised value changes, financial instruments 116 118
Profit/loss before tax 530 593
Tax -1,088 -84
Profit/loss after tax for the period -558 509
• Net sales
increased by 18%
| 12
Income Statement SEK m
2012
Jan/Jun
2011
Jan/Jun
Rental revenue 948 800
Sales revenues, modular buildings 169 144
Net sales 1,117 944
Property costs -292 -256
Production costs, modules -153 -132
Gross profit 672 556
Trading net 17 23
Sales and administration costs -131 -127
Profit/loss from participations in Hemsö 148 225
Net financial position -293 -274
Unrealised value changes, properties 2 72
Unrealised value changes, financial instruments 116 118
Profit/loss before tax 530 593
Tax -1,088 -84
Profit/loss after tax for the period -558 509
• A 21% gain due to
new purchases in
2011
| 13
Income Statement SEK m
2012
Jan/Jun
2011
Jan/Jun
Rental revenue 948 800
Sales revenues, modular buildings 169 144
Net sales 1,117 944
Property costs -292 -256
Production costs, modules -153 -132
Gross profit 672 556
Trading net 17 23
Sales and administration costs -131 -127
Profit/loss from participations in Hemsö 148 225
Net financial position -293 -274
Unrealised value changes, properties 2 72
Unrealised value changes, financial instruments 116 118
Profit/loss before tax 530 593
Tax -1,088 -84
Profit/loss after tax for the period -558 509
• Comparing sales
proceeds with
acquisition cost gives
the effect of sales on
profit for calculating
dividends, which is
SEK 14 m
• Value changes of
SEK -0.3 m and
deductions for
deferred tax of SEK
-3 m are additional to
the trading net of
SEK 17 m
| 14
Income Statement SEK m
2012
Jan/Jun
2011
Jan/Jun
Rental revenue 948 800
Sales revenues, modular buildings 169 144
Net sales 1,117 944
Property costs -292 -256
Production costs, modules -153 -132
Gross profit 672 556
Trading net 17 23
Sales and administration costs -131 -127
Profit/loss from participations in Hemsö 148 225
Net financial position -293 -274
Unrealised value changes, properties 2 72
Unrealised value changes, financial instruments 116 118
Profit/loss before tax 530 593
Tax -1,088 -84
Profit/loss after tax for the period -558 509
• Increase mainly a
result of larger
property portfolio
| 15
Income Statement SEK m
2012
Jan/Jun
2011
Jan/Jun
Rental revenue 948 800
Sales revenues, modular buildings 169 144
Net sales 1,117 944
Property costs -292 -256
Production costs, modules -153 -132
Gross profit 672 556
Trading net 17 23
Sales and administration costs -131 -127
Profit/loss from participations in Hemsö 148 225
Net financial position -293 -274
Unrealised value changes, properties 2 72
Unrealised value changes, financial instruments 116 118
Profit/loss before tax 530 593
Tax -1,088 -84
Profit/loss after tax for the period -558 509
• Corresponds to
50% of Hemsö’s
profit after tax. The
lower figure is
mainly due to lower
unrealised value
changes on
properties
| 16
Income Statement SEK m
2012
Jan/Jun
2011
Jan/Jun
Rental revenue 948 800
Sales revenues, modular buildings 169 144
Net sales 1,117 944
Property costs -292 -256
Production costs, modules -153 -132
Gross profit 672 556
Trading net 17 23
Sales and administration costs -131 -127
Profit/loss from participations in Hemsö 148 225
Net financial position -293 -274
Unrealised value changes, properties 2 72
Unrealised value changes, financial instruments
116 118
Profit/loss before tax 530 593
Tax -1,088 -84
Profit/loss after tax for the period -558 509
• Negative change
mainly explained
by higher loan
volume from larger
property portfolio
and higher interest
margins
| 17
Income Statement SEK m
2012
Jan/Jun
2011
Jan/Jun
Rental revenue 948 800
Sales revenues, modular buildings 169 144
Net sales 1,117 944
Property costs -292 -256
Production costs, modules -153 -132
Gross profit 672 556
Trading net 17 23
Sales and administration costs -131 -127
Profit/loss from participations in Hemsö 148 225
Net financial position -293 -274
Unrealised value changes, properties 2 72
Unrealised value changes, financial instruments 116 118
Profit/loss before tax 530 593
Tax -1,088 -84
Profit/loss after tax for the period -558 509
• Positive impact in
the year due to
rising long yields
| 18
Income Statement SEK m
2012
Jan/Jun
2011
Jan/Jun
Rental revenue 948 800
Sales revenues, modular buildings 169 144
Net sales 1,117 944
Property costs -292 -256
Production costs, modules -153 -132
Gross profit 672 556
Trading net 17 23
Sales and administration costs -131 -127
Profit/loss from participations in Hemsö 148 225
Net financial position -293 -274
Unrealised value changes, properties 2 72
Unrealised value changes, financial instruments 116 118
Profit/loss before tax 530 593
Tax -1,088 -84
Profit/loss after tax for the period -558 509
• Has been charged
with a provision of
SEK -985 m after
the risk of negative
outcomes in a
number of tax
proceedings has
increased
| 19
Income Statement SEK m
2012
Jan/Jun
2011
Jan/Jun
Rental revenue 948 800
Sales revenues, modular buildings 169 144
Net sales 1,117 944
Property costs -292 -256
Production costs, modules -153 -132
Gross profit 672 556
Trading net 17 23
Sales and administration costs -131 -127
Profit/loss from participations in Hemsö 148 225
Net financial position -293 -274
Unrealised value changes, properties 2 72
Unrealised value changes, financial instruments 116 118
Profit/loss before tax 530 593
Tax -1,088 -84
Profit/loss after tax for the period -558 509
• Lower figure mainly
due to provisioning
for a tax case and
lower earnings
from Hemsö, which
reported significant
positive unrealised
value changes on
properties in the
previous year
| 20
Income Statement, by segment
SEK m, Jan-Jun 2012
Wholly
owned
properties
Nordic
Modular Hemsö Other
Total
Kungsleden
Rental revenue 821 127 948
Sales revenues, modular buildings 169 169
Net sales 821 296 1,117
Property costs -269 -23 -292
Production costs, modules -153 -153
Gross profit 552 120 672
Trading net 17 17
Sales and administration costs -88 -32 -11 -131
Profit/loss from participations in Hemsö 148 148
Net financial position -263 -30 -293
Unrealised value changes, properties 32 -30 2
Unrealised value changes, financial instruments 88 10 17 115
Profit/loss before tax 338 38 165 -11 530
Tax -92 -10 -4 -982 -1,088
Profit/loss after tax for the period -246 28 161 -993 -558
| 21
Profit for calculating dividends
2012 2011
SEK m Jan-Jun Jan-Jun
Gross profit 672 556
Sales and administration costs -131 -127
Net financial position -293 -274
Profit from property management 248 155
Realised items
Trading net on sale 17 23
Realised value changes, properties 0 5
Deduction for deferred tax on sale -3 0
Realised value changes, financial instruments -81 -31
Realised items -67 -3
Profit for calculating dividends from Hemsö 107 81
Taxes payable -343 -10
Profit for calculating dividends -55 223
| 22
Kungsleden’s assets
| 23
Assets, returns and funding
30 Jun 2012 Yield
Properties 14,215 8.0%
Nordic Modular 1,535 7.6%
Participations and long-term receivables from Hemsö
2,667 6.5-7.0%
Receivables, vendor notes 433 7.0%
Total earning assets 18,860 7.8%
Equity 6,800
Interest-bearing liabilities 10,767
Working capital (other items are a net liability) 1,293
Total funding 18,860
| 24
Higher average interest, but also higher property
yield
Proportional method 31 December 2011
Equity method 31 Dec 2011
Equity method after refinancing as of 26 April
Equity method 30 June after cancellation of swaps
Average interest rate
4.8% 5.5% 6.7% 6.4%
Property yield
7.2% 7.9% 8.0% 7.9%
| 25
Funding
| 26
Funding secured
■ In total, Kungsleden re-arranged loans of SEK 7.4 billion in 2012
■ Loans of SEK 1,915 m mature in the next 12 months
■ Of these maturities, SEK 850 m relate to financing 39 public
properties sold to Hemsö
■ One-third of the remaining refinancing requirement for the next 12
months is in place
| 27
Loan to value ratios at market levels
30 Jun 12 31 Dec 11 30 Jun 11
Loan to value ratio, properties 68% 68% 68%
All credit facilities in relation to earning assets (properties, participations and receivables from Hemsö and receivables from vendor notes)
57%
55%
55%
| 28
Maturity structure, credit facilities
As of 30 Jun 2012
Utilised
credits,
SEK m
Un-utilised
credits,
SEK m
Total credits,
SEK m
2012 1,222 260 1,482
2013 694 - 694
2014 1,220 - 1,220
2015 5,610 900 6,510
2016 2,023 - 2,023
Total 10,769 1,160 11,929
Average conversion term, years 2.5 2.4
Equity ratio
30 Jun 12
35%
31 Dec 11
37%
30 Jun 11
35%
LTV ratio 68% 68% 68%
| 29
Maturity structure, fixed-interest periods
As of 30 Jun 2012
Loans,
SEK m
Interest
derivativ
es,
SEK m
Ave.
interest,
derivatives,
%
Ave. interest,
loans and
derivatives, years
Average fixed
interest term,
years
2012 10,769 - -
2013 - -
2014 800 3.9
2015 2,400 4.2
2016 500 3.9
2017 500 4.1
2018 3,650 4.2
2019 800 3.5
2020 800 3.7
2021 400 3.8
Summa derivat 10,769 9,850 6.4 4.8
Marknadsvärdering av lån och
derivat 939
Summa 11,708
| 30
Lower balance sheet total with new reporting
SEK m 2012 2011
ASSETS 30 Jun 31 Dec
Goodwill 201 201
Properties 14,838 14,788
Machinery and equipment 14 15
Participations in Hemsö 1,177 1,084
Long-term receivables from Hemsö 1,500 1,500
Deferred tax receivable 0 1,020
Other long-term receivables 251 443
Non-current assets 17,982 19,051
Inventories 21 17
Current receivables 438 240
Assets held for sale—properties 912 905
Assets held for sale—other assets 18 14
Cash and bank balances 298 684
Current assets 1,687 1,860
TOTAL ASSETS 19,668 20,911
| 31
Lower balance sheet total with new reporting
SEK m 2012 2011
EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 30 Jun 31 Dec
Equity 6,800 7,719
Liabilities to credit institutions 8,267 8,154
Bond loans (unsecured) 1,599 1,599
Liabilities related to assets held for sale 901 901
Interest-bearing liabilities 10,768 1,654
Provisions 109 431
Deferred tax liability 82 -
Derivatives 944 1,156
Tax liability 276 83
Other non interest-bearing liabilities 660 807
Liabilities related to assets held for sale 29 60
Non interest-bearing liabilities 2,101 2,537
TOTAL EQUITY AND LIABILITIES 19,668 20,911
| 32
Tax position
| 33
The Swedish Tax Agency’s new view has retroactive
consequences
■ The current taxation climate is different, and the Swedish Tax
Agency has changed its view of transactions executed historically.
■ The application of legislation has become more stringent, and
predictability has deteriorated
■ Retroactive legislation is prohibited but has become a consequence
of tax court interpretations
■ Kungsleden’s view is that the company has fully complied with the
laws and practice in place when submitting each tax return
■ The company evaluates its position on a continuous basis and is in
dialogue with tax experts
| 34
22 tax cases outstanding
| 35
Kungsleden’s tax cases
■ BV transactions
■ Internal restructuring
■ External impairment losses
■ Losses on liquidations of limited partnerships
| 36
BV transactions
■ In 2004 – 2006, Kungsleden sold properties through Dutch subsidiaries (as
was then common for property companies). Gains from such divestments
were not liable for tax in the Netherlands
■ The Swedish Tax Agency’s view is that proceeds from such divestment
should be reallocated and subject to taxation in Sweden. This view was
corroborated by the Administrative Court, which reported its ruling in 2010.
■ Kungsleden appealed against the Administrative Court’s ruling at the
Administrative Court of Appeal. The Administrative Court of Appeal issued a
stay on proceedings in anticipation of a decision from the Supreme
Administrative Court in a case whose circumstances were comparable with
Kungsleden’s, known as the Cyprus case.
■ The Supreme Administrative Court ruled on the Cyprus case in May 2012,
and found that the Swedish Tax Evasion Act was applicable to the
procedure.
| 37
BV transactions, cont.
■ If the Administrative Court of Appeal would rule that the conclusions of the
Cyprus case were directly applicable to Kungsleden’s proceedings, this
would imply a liquidity effect of SEK 140 m and profit effect of SEK 335 m,
which the company provisioned in the second quarter of 2012.
| 38
Internal restructuring
■ In May and July 2012, the Administrative Court ruled on three cases
relating to impairment losses resulting from internal restructuring
transactions conducted in 2004 and 2006 respectively.
■ The Administrative Court found that the Swedish Tax Evasion Act
was applicable to these transactions.
■ If these proceedings are definitively ruled against Kungsleden, the
majority of the increased assessed income could be offset against
loss carry-forwards. Taxes payable amount to SEK 18 m.
■ In 2009, Kungsleden provisioned SEK 325 m for one of these
proceedings. In addition to this provision, the company judges that
the effect on equity would amount to SEK 48 m if the definitive
outcome was against Kungsleden. Accordingly, a further provision of
SEK 48 m was made in the second quarter of 2012.
| 39
External impairment losses
■ In 2005-2008, Kungsleden companies acquired several property
companies. These properties were sold to another group company
and a need for impairment occurred in the Kungsleden company.
This impairment loss was also claimed as a tax deduction.
■ In 2012, the Swedish Tax Agency claimed that courts should
consider whether five of these transactions could be contested using
the Swedish Tax Evasion Act.
■ If the Swedish Tax Agency’s claim prevails, this would result in
additional taxes payable of SEK 1,390 m.
■ The procedure was conducted in accordance with applicable
practice from the Supreme Administrative Court and applicable
practice from the Administrative Court of Appeal. Against this
background, the company judges that the final outcome will be
positive, and accordingly, there has been no provisioning for this
case.
| 40
External impairment losses, ruled in June 2012
■ In June 2012, Kungsleden received rulings from the Administrative
Court of Appeal regarding deductions for external impairment
losses, fiscal year 2008.
■ The Administrative Court of Appeal found that the effect of new
legislation, that came into force in April 2008, was that even
transactions carried out before April could be affected. The
deduction for impairment losses was thus denied.
■ Kungsleden intends to appeal against this ruling at the Supreme
Administrative Court.
■ If the final outcome is negative, Kungsleden estimates taxes payable
at SEK 100 m. In the second quarter 2012, Kungsleden provisioned
SEK 342 m for these proceedings.
| 41
Loss on liquidation of limited partnership
■ In April 2012, the Administrative Court of Appeal issued its verdict on
two cases relating to the fiscal year 2004. In these cases, the Court
found that losses on the liquidation of limited partnerships were not
actual from a group perspective and thus not tax deductible.
■ Kungsleden has lodged an appeal against these rulings at the
Supreme Administrative Court.
■ If the final outcome is against Kungsleden, the liquidity effect
amounts to SEK 80 m. A provision of SEK 260 m was made in the
first quarter of 2012.
| 42
Kungsleden’s tax position
■ Kungsleden has taken up a total of SEK 1,310 m as a tax cost, of
which SEK 985 m in 2012
■ A total of 22 tax proceedings are ongoing, of which Kungsleden has
not provisioned for 7
■ Given negative outcomes in all these proceedings, the estimated:
– effect on equity would be approx. SEK 1,380 m (in addition to the
SEK 1,310 m provisioned)
– liquidity effect would be approx. SEK 1,890 m
■ The final outcome may be higher or lower
| 43
Total yield until mid-August 2012
10 largest shareholders represent 26% of votes & capital
■ Nordea fonder 6.0
■ Länsförsäkringar fonder 3.8
■ Norwegian Government 2.6
■ Olle Florén and companies 2.5
■ Danske Invest fonder 2.2
■ Pensioenfonds PGGM (NL) 2.1
■ SHB fonder 1.8
■ Swedbank Robur Fonder 1.7
■ AP4 1.7
■ AP2 1.4
25.8
Source: SIS Ägarservice, 30 Jun 2012
| 45
Kungsleden—the here and now
| 46
A high-yielding portfolio with low risk
■ Uncertainty regarding tax position
■ Strong and stable cash flows
■ Long lease contracts with strong customers
■ Portfolio composition provides geographical diversification
■ Multiple property segments diversify risk
■ Loan to value ratio at market levels
■ Strong customer relations and high employee commitment
■ High equity ratio
■ Strong liquidity
■ Financing secured
■ Focus on value creation
| 47
Questions