ks overview - global ccs members meeting - rotterdam 2011

GLOBAL CCS INSTITUTE

WWW.GLOBALCCSINSTITUTE.COM

SHARING NEW INFORMATION FROM PROJECTS AROUND THE WORLD

Sean McClowry – General Manager, Knowledge Management

10 May 2011


2

INTRODUCTION

Framework

We have created an advanced framework on which we are executing

Content

We have valuable knowledge to share from projects, content partners and the Institute

Platforms

We have developed sophisticated digital platforms to enhance dissemination and collaboration

Engagement

We need your participation to make this work


3

OUR MISSION: share knowledge to accelerate deployment of CCS

Identify Needs

Collectand

Create

Register and Store

Analyse and Verify

Process and

Add Value

Measure and Review

Advocate

Assist Projects

Share knowledge


* Letter of Intent

Tenaska Trailblazer Project

• FEED studies

Tenaska/Entergy Nelson 6 CCS Project

• Development studies

Rotterdam CCS Network Project, RCI

• Storage and shipping studies

Getica, ISPE• Feasibility Study

CarbonNet, Victorian Government

• Commercial and Planning studies

Callide Oxyfuel Project, OPTL*

• Transport and CO2 injection studies

Project Pioneer, TransAlta

• FEED studies

American Electric Power, Mountaineer• FEED studies

ROAD Project, Maasvlakte CCS

• FEED studies & execution planning

Chiyoda Project, Chiyoda/Tokyo University• Shuttle shipping study

INSTITUTE-SUPPORTED PROJECTS FOR KNOWLEDGE SHARING

4


Feasibility/FEED Case Studies

Project CaptureTransport/ Infrastruct

ure

Storage and MMV

Finance and

Commercial

Policy, Legal and Regulation

Public Engageme

nt

Risk and Environme

nt

Rotterdam CCS Network Project ü ü ü ü ü üRomanian CCS Demo Plant ü ü ü ü ü Trailblazer Energy Center ü ü ü ü ü Nelson 6 CCS Project (Phase 1) ü TransAlta Pioneer ü ü ü ü ü ü ü

AEP Mountaineer ü ü üChiyoda Project üROAD Project ü ü ü ü ü

KNOWLEDGE TOPICS COVERED

5


FUNDED PROJECTS: Examples of recent deliverables from RCI and Tenaska Trailblazer

6

Knowledge products – Trailblazer Tenaska

Development History of the ProjectCO2 Technology Evaluation, Methodology and Criteria

Public Engagement activities

Report on Steam Turbine SizingCarbon Capture Plant Layout Integration with a New Coal Fired Power Generating FacilityDeep Saline Sequestration Study

Knowledge products – Rotterdam CCS Network Project

Detailed technical and cost reports for 3-4 storage sites in Dutch sector North Sea

Historic Case Study on the Rotterdam CCS network

Methodology report on the Independent Storage Assessment


FUNDED PROJECTS: Upcoming deliverables from Europe

7

Knowledge products – GETICA Romania Permitting ReportSummary Report NER300 Application Financial Scenarios ReportPublic Feasibility Study Report

Knowledge products – Rotterdam CCS Network Project Historic Case Study on the Rotterdam CCS network Overall supply chain optimization Liquid Logistics Shipping ConceptReport on Rotterdam CO2 hub safety – including port and offshore infrastructure development, along with a range of CO2 transportation solutions, including shipping Report on lessons learned from the feasibility study of the CO2 liquid logistics shipping concept

Knowledge products – ROAD Project Special report on CO2 capture technology selection methodology Non-confidential FEED study report Reports on permitting processes and public engagement Report on Mitigating project risks including handling of business risks Report on the Execution Strategy of the project


FUNDED PROJECTS : Upcoming deliverables from North America

8

Knowledge products – Project Pioneer (Transalta)

Report on the Regulatory gaps for implementing CCSCase Study on the socio - economic impact of an integrated CCS ProjectSpecial report on the Construction execution strategy for the ProjectNew developments in MMV technology Non confidential version of FEED study report of the integrated project (2012)

Knowledge products – Mountaineer Project (A.E.P)CO2 Compression report Report on CCS integration issuesThe business case – financial modelling and local impacts of CCSNon confidential version of FEED study report of the integrated project

Knowledge products – Tenaska Trailblazer Building a Consortium to Develop a New Pulverised Coal Plant with Post-combustion CaptureBridging the commercial gap for CCS (ERCOT base load power and EOR market factors) Financing a new pulverized coal plant with CCS.Non confidential version of FEED study report


FUNDED PROJECTS: Accessing key deliverables

9


10

Key Findings

Government commitments towards demonstrating CCS between US$ 33 and US$ 44 billion

77 projects have been identified and an increasing number of projects are moving to advanced planning and execution stages

Around 30 CCS network projects have been identified of which more that half involve extensions of existing EOR networks

Australia, Canada, China, India, much of Europe and the United States have made significant advances in national and regional high-level storage assessments during the past two years

Large uncertainly and variety around up-front costs of CCS projects

The cost of moving from a desktop screening assessment to a fully assessed site that is ready for development is high

Increasing number of Knowledge Sharing initiatives are underway nationally and internationally

Consistent themes around public engagement are emerging from the limited case-studies around the world

Significant progress has been made in the development of legal and regulatory frameworks at regional and (inter) national levels

GLOBAL STATUS OF CCS: 2010


Best practice guide for government, regulators and industry to test regulatory systems and permitting processes for CCS.

Takes a CCS project application through the approval process in a regulatory test exercise.

Suitable for national and regional governments.

Produced by SCCS researchers on behalf of the Scottish Government and supported by the Institute.

11

CCS REGULATORY TEST TOOLKIT


Exercise preparation requires:o Resources and governance;o Stakeholder engagement;o Regulatory analysis; ando Preparation for the event.

A one-day workshop allows stakeholders to test the regulatory system using a selected CCS project (real or simulated).

Managed follow-up to communicate exercise findings, agree actions and deliver benefits is critical.

12

CCS REGULATORY TEST TOOLKIT


Effective Public Engagement is essential

Each CCS project and community is unique:o Every project requires an tailored engagement process.o Regions may have vastly different approaches.

Consistent themes are emerging on areas of importance: o Establish effective levels of trust with local communities.o Communicate the case for CCS with balanced information in an

ongoing dialogue with local stakeholders.o Ensure that outreach activities reflect a partnership approach

involving joint decision making.o Understand the local context and identify the social value

proposition.

13

SHARING KNOWLEDGE ON PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT


Commissioned with CSIRO and the global social research network.

A practical guide for project proponents to plan their engagement .

Provides a range of methods and activities for addressing social considerations for successful CCS project deployment.

Built from real case studies .

Will improve over time as it is used by more projects.

14

SHARING KNOWLEDGE ON PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT: Toolkit


15

The toolkit provides Social data collection methods Stakeholder identification methods A project baseline survey Independent steering group model Citizen task force/advisory board model Example role descriptions Example media products Swot analysis worksheet Example engagement plan Example project timeline

SHARING KNOWLEDGE ON PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT: Toolkit


Pre-Announcemento Information Gatheringo Initial local contacto Public announcemento Legislative Briefings

Stakeholder Identification

Jobs

o Information Gathering

o Value Proposition

16

SHARING KNOWLEDGE ON PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT: Tenaska Trailblazer


Community Outreacho Community Representativeo Project Website/E-mailo Civic Group Presentationso Earned Mediao Open Houseo Advertising

Air Quality Permit

Water Conservation

Legislative Outreach

17



18



Global Status of CCS Report

Tenaska Trailblazer Report

Communications and Engagement Toolkit for CCS Projects

Case Studies:o What happened in Barendrecht?o Carson CCSo FutureGeno CO2CRC Otway Project Case Study o ZeroGen

Towards a Public Communication and Engagement Strategy ... (Scottish Centre for Carbon Capture)

Best Practices for Public Outreach and Education for Carbon Storage (US DoE)

Community Engagement Guidelines (WRI)

19

SHARING KNOWLEDGE ON PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT: Learn more


20

SHARING KNOWLEDGE ON PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT: Campaign

Reports

Conversations

Opinions

Toolkits

Methods


We’ve launched a Japanese knowledge sharing networko Involves about key staff of ~15 major CCS-related organisations in Japan.

o Collaboration is face-to-face and on the Institute’s extranet.

o Facilitators include JGC and its partners (Quintessa, AIST and McKinley).

Focused on identifying decisions and sharing knowledge ono National energy portfolio changes after the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear

crisis.

o Role of CCS in a revised national energy portfolio, e.g., enhancement of the fossil power stations.

o Risks associated with earthquakes and tsunamis on underground storage of CCS in Japan.

o Risk of seismic activity induced by CO2 injection.

Will publish a public summary report in August21

HOW WE ENGAGE: Japanese CCS knowledge network


An open and collaboratively developed CCS methodology, covering ...

HOW WE ENGAGE: OpenCCS project methodology

Identify ExecuteEvaluate Operate ClosureDefine

Transport

Storage

Power Capture

Industry Capture


23


http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/openccs

http://www.globalccsinstitute.com/openccs


24



HOW WE ENGAGE: we’re building an expertise-driven approach

Required expertise Strong experience in energy economics Peer recognition

Motivation

Willing to publish non-confidential information in exchange for greater access to information from other experts.

Contact requirements

Wants to be notified about any opportunity to contribute expertise in field.

ExpertsHow do the economics of CCS stack up against other renewable energy economic models in meeting climate change objective?

QEconomic modelling

CCS Market and Economic Conditions

Market Conditions for Renewable Energy

A


26

Framework

We’ll continue to improve on our approach based on your feedback

Content

Our library of knowledge products and expertise will grow over time

Platform

We base our approach around knowledge platforms and will be making many improvements

Engagement

Success will come with your participation

NEXT STEPS


www.globalccsinstitute.com27

ks overview - global ccs members meeting - rotterdam 2011

Business

feed studies

public engagement

upcoming deliverables

funded projects

ccs

projects

institute

methods