kranich and lotts listening to many voices pala crd 5-29-15
TRANSCRIPT
1
Listening to Many Voices: Community Conversations at Rutgers University LibrariesbyNancy Kranich and Megan Lotts
Rutgers University [email protected]@rutgers.edu
4
From Dialogue to Action
Formed a Liaison Action Team Developed an Action Agenda Created a Vision for the future
of liaison relationships Convened Liaison Assembly
meetings Defined new roles for
liaisons
Planned and convened community conversations
5
Understand our campus communities better
Become more deeply rooted in the life of our communities
Create a narrative around shared community aspirations
Engaging our campus communities
6
Generate constructive, inclusive discourse
Envision a greater sense of possibility
Increase relevance, significance, impact
Act with intentionality based on readiness
Achieve shared goals
Turning outward
7
Starting Point
1. ID problems
2. Visioning
3. Aspirations
What we Get Rooted in
Complaints Blame
Wish lists Disconnected
from Reality
Based on reality Focus on
community
What it Creates
Problem lists No shared sense
of direction
False hope Not rooted in
people’s reality
Shared aspirations that roots work
Possibility
Stage 1: Starting points
8
Listening to Many Voices
Understand and identify people’s shared aspirations
Authentic engagement that reflects people’s reality
Convened New Brunswick campus and library faculty, students and administrators for community conversations about the Undergraduate, Graduate, and International Experience from 2012-2014
Learned about shared community aspirations
9
Identify Aspirations
1. What kind of Rutgers undergraduate/graduate/international community do you want?__________________________________________________
2. Why is that important to you? _______________________________________________________
3. How is that different from how you see things now? _______________________________________________________
4. What are some of the things that need to happen to create that kind of change?_______________________________________________________
Community conversation questions
11
6 Community Conversations
Engaged a cross-section of the Rutgers community: 38 external in May 2012 26 librarians in November,
February Focused on the
Transformation of Undergraduate Education
Used tools from the Harwood Institute for Public Innovation --now in partnership with ALA
12
Themes of external conversations
Build inclusive communities on campus that embrace diversity and engage across differences
Engage through informal relationships
Teach critical thinking/transliteracy skills for success in and out of school
13
Themes of internal conversations
Eager to engage but uncertain how
Focus more on specific communities
Work in teams and build partnerships
Get in the flow of users Build connections, not
just collections Provide students a
comfort zone
14
Graduate education community conversations
Met with the Graduate School before and after
Engaged a cross-section of Rutgers graduate students: 44 total—4 conversations
Shared the findings with a group of 8 faculty and administrators
Liaison Assembly open space discussion with 20 librarians and library staff
15
Graduate community aspirations and concerns1. Interdisciplinary collaboration and
interaction in a comfortable setting 2. Acceptance and inclusion3. Access to information of interest to
graduate students 4. Creation of more of a graduate identity 5. Differing needs for different
communities
16
Innovation spaces: Reflections from our conversations
What did you make of the conversations?
What are we learning? Why is this important? What are the implications for
our work? What possibilities are there for
moving ahead? What insights did this
conversation spark?
… A different conversation
17
Stage 2: Executing strategies and actions that fit our COMMUNITY
Develop strategies that achieve results and also build community
Identify and act on specific pockets of change that align to local context
Focus on creating conditions necessary for community change
Determine “who to run with” as partners
Develop networks for innovation/learning
19
Calibrating our work: community rhythms
How broad and deep is the community’s leadership?
How strong and constructive are the community norms?
How broad and deep are the informal networks and links?
How strong is the collection of catalytic organizations?
20
Source: Working Together Project, Community-Led Libraries Toolkit, p. 16, http://www.librariesincommunities.ca/resources/Community-Led_Libraries_Toolkit.pdf
21
Pockets of change
Engaged Events and ActivitiesRU Voting, Constitutional Café
and Learning CommunitiesHonors Program PartnershipCareer Readiness CurriculumExhibits and DialoguesRevised Position DescriptionsCreate Teams to build
Community
22
Rutgers SAS Honors Program
Rutgers SAS Honors Summer Reading Committee chooses a book as their reader & theme for the colloquium course.
• Honors program invites the author to speak, engage with students, and sign books.
“I’m so excited to meet an author, I hope to write a book one day”
23
Informing and educating
Visiting honors students in their space
Creating a libguide for book & colloquium course
Providing library brochures, and contact information
24
Listening and consulting
Joined the SAS Honors Reading Committee comprised of students, faculty & staff
Heard more aspirations and concerns of honors students, faculty, and staff
Began teaching a section of the SAS Honors Colloquium
25
Discussing and debating
Engaged with students, faculty, and staff of the SAS Honors Colloquium
Learned more about the needs of facilitators and their roles on campus
Listened to students talk more about the libraries, how they use them, and what they would like to see
26
Engaging and collaborating
Continued to create libguides for book & colloquium
Brainstormed on how the libraries can be involved in organizational changes
Staged Amazing Race event for all SAS honors programs
Amazing Race Library Exploration for Rutgers Transfer Students
27
Scarlet Knight Days 2013
Photo credits John Brennan
Caricatures Open Mic Night
Music & snacks in the Scarlet Latte
28
Scarlet Knight Days 2014
Snack Carts, Library giveaways, the Sam Tobias Quartet, Meet the Scarlet Knight, Block Party, Polynomiography, and the popcorn machine Engaged with approximately 1127 students.
“the libraries are uplifting & fun as well as thoughtful & generous”“I received confirmation that the libraries are great for trying to
engage students”“I liked meeting librarians and eating cookies”
29
Geek Week 2015
Coordinated Geek Week by UE Team
Advertised on RUL social media & Geek Week schedule
11 attendees
30
RU Game? 2015
Partnered w/ RUPA, Super Smash Club (SSC), RU athletics, & RUL
Convened panel of 1 prof, grad students, and freshman
120 attendees Catalyst for future
collaborations w/ SSC & Select Start
Started a conversation
31
Stage 3: Embedding and sustaining change
Cultivate a can-do community narrative
Build a shared capacity to strengthen our community together
Recalibrate our efforts Apply practice across our organization Align our organization outward facing Adopt outward facing performance
measures
32
Shift our thinking to turn outward Recognize new opportunities and
connections Uncover a sense of common purpose Set realistic goals Engage more deeply with students Act intentionally to reflect aspirations Align our strategies with others on campus Partner with the Rutgers community in
meaningful and significant ways
Develop new orientation, approaches and capacities for libraries through this work
Examples: turning outward toward communities stronger emphasis on authentic engagement increased capacity to engage with the
community stronger set of relationships for moving ahead
and acting upon community priorities
33
Measure Organizational Impact
Increase community capacity to concert—to work together to solve problems
Identify and train a pool of conveners, moderators, recorders, and issue framers
Develop connections34
Build Community Capacity
35
For further reading:
Brown, Karen and Kara Malefant. (2012). Connect, Collaborate, and Communicate: A Report from the Value of Academic Libraries Summit (Chicago: Association of College and Research Libraries).
Covert-Vail, Lucinda and Scott Collard, (2012). New Roles for New Times: Research Library Services for Graduate Students (Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
Dewey, Barbara. (2004). “The Embedded Librarian: Strategic Campus Collaborations,” Resource Sharing & Information Networks 17 (2004): 5-17.
The Harwood Institute. (2014). Public Innovators Workbook. Chicago, IL: ALA.
The Harwood Institute and American Library Association. Libraries Transforming Communities. (2014). Tools for Community Engagement and Innovation.
Jaguszewski, Janice M. and Karen Williams. (2013). New Roles for New Times: Transforming Liaison Roles in Research Libraries. Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries.
36
For further reading (cont) Kenney, Anne. (2014). Leveraging the Liaison Model: From Designing 21st
Century Research Libraries to Implementing 21st Century. (NY: Ithaka S+R).
Kranich, Nancy, Megan Lotts, and Gene Springs. (2014). “The Promise of Academic Libraries Transforming Campus Communities,” College and Research Libraries News. 75 #4 (April): 182-186.
Lougee, Wendy. (2002). Diffuse Libraries: Emergent Roles for the Research Library in the Digital Age (Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources).
Mack, Daniel C. and Gary W. White, eds. (2015). Assessing Liaison Librarians: Documenting Impact for Positive Change. Chicago, IL: Association of College and Research Libraries (PIL #67).
Shumaker, David. (2012). The Embedded Librarian: Innovative Strategies for Taking Knowledge Where It’s Needed (Medford, NJ: Information Today).
Williams, Karen. (2009). “A Framework for Articulating New Library Roles” in Karla Hahn, Research Library Issues, Special Issue on Liaison Librarian Roles, no. 265 (Washington, DC: Association of Research Libraries).
37
Listening to many voicesRutgers University Libraries
Thanks!
Nancy Kranich, [email protected]
Megan Lotts, [email protected]