kppc: partnering to improve our environment, health & economics eastern kentucky power envision...
TRANSCRIPT
KPPC: Partnering to Improve Our KPPC: Partnering to Improve Our Environment, Health & EconomicsEnvironment, Health & Economics
Eastern Kentucky PowerEnvision Energy Conference
October 18, 2006
Cam MetcalfExecutive Director
www.kppc.org
2
The Big Squeeze is on!There is a new global business environment!
Core Values
Environmental
Social – “Interested Parties” Legal & Other Requirements
Market
Technology Diffusion
Water Climate
Resources Life Cycle
Management
Responsibility & Roles Transparency Accountability
Corporate Values Leader’s Values Societal Values
Globalization E-Commerce Cost
Containment Developing Countries
Regulations
Homeland Security Take Back Laws Self Reporting
Materials P2 Technologies Connectivity
Resource Scarcity
Public Concerns
Inefficient use of Resources
3
Our “Universal Backyard”Our “Universal Backyard”
NIMBY NOTE BANANA CAVE NOPE
4
What is KPPC?What is KPPC?
KPPC is a non-profit organization established in 1994 through legislative mandate
Statewide technical assistance program
Based at the University of Louisville’s Speed
School of Engineering
Funding from companies that generate solid & liquid hazardous wasteHazardous Waste Assessment Fund (20%)
5
Kentucky Pollution Prevention Kentucky Pollution Prevention CenterCenter
Mission
The Kentucky Pollution Prevention Center (KPPC) at the University of Louisville is Kentucky’s primary resource for technical information and assistance to improve environmental performance.
The Center facilitates and promotes the proactive implementation of management systems and technologies to improve the competitiveness of businesses, industries and other organizations.
6
P2 = Source ReductionP2 = Source Reduction
P2 means “Source Reduction” & other practices that reduce or eliminate the creation of pollutants through:
Increased efficiency in the use of raw materials, energy, water or other resources; or
Protection of natural resources by conservation.
Resource Management
7
Move Up theMove Up theWaste Management HierarchyWaste Management Hierarchy
Disposal
Source Reduction/E2
Reuse/Recycling
Energy Recovery
Treatment
Continual Continual ImprovementImprovement
8
P2 is SellingP2 is SellingMultimedia ApproachesMultimedia Approaches
W aterA irS olidsT imeE nergy Efficiency (E2)
9
Resource AccountingResource Accounting
Non-product Resource Use
Non-product Resource Loss
ThroughputIn
Interim/FinalProduct
$
$
10
KPPC Energy Assessments & KPPC Energy Assessments & Cost SavingsCost Savings
AssessmentsAssessments DollarsDollars
05
1015
2025
30
FY01-02 FY02-03 FY03-04 FY04-05 FY05-06
-500,000
1,000,0001,500,000
2,000,0002,500,000
3,000,000
Number of Audits Potential Savings
11
Low Temperature Conversion Low Temperature Conversion CoatingCoating
Manufacture of RecliningChair Parts
Previously used high temperature multi-step phosphated process
Successfully trialed single step non-phosphated experimental material at ambient temperatures Reduced H2O usage from 93,000 g/yr to
13,000 g/yr or ~ 86% (NO DRAINS) No sludge technology/minimize solid waste Tank life extended from 7 wks. to 18 wks.
Substituted water-based paint (cures @ 225OF) for solvent-based paint (cures @ 325OF)
Saved $200,000 in energy (2005 prices)
Improved quality performance
Processed parts to paintProcessed parts to paint
Cross hatch adhesion testCross hatch adhesion test
12
Energy Management Energy Management ProgramProgram
MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL
GOALS
TARGETS
PROJECTS
MEASURE & VERIFY
MONITOR & MEASURE
ENERGY PROFILE
ENERGY ASSESSMENT
13
““Low Hanging Fruit!”Low Hanging Fruit!”Utility Bill AnalysisUtility Bill Analysis
Billing/Rate Structure Six Facilities Over $550,000 in Total Annual Savings One Month Average Payback Minimal O&M & Implementation Costs
Power Factor Improvements/Demand Reduction Two Facilities Over $20,000 in Total Annual Savings 1.4 Year Average Payback Minimal O&M About $37,000 in Implementation Costs
14
Pump Case StudyPump Case Study
Wastewater Pump House (3) 200 hp pumps (Using DOE’s PSAT Tool)
23-month payback to complete motor wiring for VFDs
(or remove VFDs)
$10,000/yr. savings to switch to Demand-Based Rate
15
Reduce Energy Use in Process & Facility
Boilers & Steam Systems, HVACCompressed Air SystemsPlug Load Motors & PumpsLightingBuilding Envelope
E2 Assessment OpportunitiesE2 Assessment Opportunities
Overall ResultsOverall Results
BuildingEnergy Savings
(kWh/yr)
Demand Savings
(kW)Energy Savings
(MMBtu/yr) Cost Savings Investment Costs Payback (yr)
No. of Rec- commen-dations
Brown/Ahrens 667,140 1,086 1,671 $ 57,406 $ 782,965 13.6 11
JCTMS 393,473 - 967 $ 41,097 $ 586,265 14.3 10
Rangeland 132,759 - 409 $ 15,321 $ 196,775 12.8 7
Barret 107,200 - 574 $ 18,350 $ 258,700 14.1 9
Oppenheimer 25,353 68 66 $ 2,296 $ 33,826 14.7 5
Gottschalk 17,299 59 118 $ 2,332 $ 43,242 18.5 3
Humanities 607,387 1,250 927 $ 50,833 $ 692,128 13.6 7
Davidson Hall 252,565 404 - $ 15,420 $ 46,550 3.0 5
Metro Hall 126,011 523 22 $ 17,695 $ 51,220 2.9 8
MH Annex 238,738 16 68 $ 19,278 $ 94,325 4.9 8
Fiscal Court Bldg 170,555 478 706 $ 20,700 $ 299,730 14.5 8
Total 2,738,480 3,884 5,528 $ 260,728 $ 3,085,726 11.5 81
17
E2 = Less GHG EmissionsE2 = Less GHG Emissions
Electricity Reduced/Saved – 2,738,480 kWh Save 375 Metric Tons of Coal Reduce CO2
by 1,698 Metric TonsOne of main GHG (Risen 30% Since Industrial
Revolution) Reduce Methane by 14,068 Metric Tons
More Potent GHG Than CO2
Reduce Nitrous Oxide (NOx) by 24,334 Metric TonsCombines with Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) & Sunlight to
Make Smog
18
Technology Diffusion Technology Diffusion InitiativeInitiative
Technical Assistance for ImplementationOpportunity & technology identification
Identify interested clients
Top management (core values & goals)
Financial (procurement & financing)
Legal considerations & contracts
Installation, startup & training
19
Daylight Harvesting BallastsDaylight Harvesting Ballasts
Photosensor Dip Switch
Light Fixtures
SkylightsSkylights
Row 1 Row 2 Row 3
20
Daylight Harvesting BallastsDaylight Harvesting Ballasts
21
Results
Daylight Harvesting BallastsDaylight Harvesting Ballasts
Energy Savings (kWh/yr)
Energy Cost Savings
($/yr)
% Energy Savings
Coleridge Taylor- Library
1,074 $69 52.4%
Coleridge Taylor – Stairwell
3,041
(24 hrs.)
$194 48.5%
Whitney Young – Library
1,782 $43 55.2%
22
Daylight Harvesting BallastsDaylight Harvesting Ballasts
Benefits: Average of 50% energy savings
Demand reduction
Better quality light
Requires no wiring to central control panel
Can integrate with on/off control systems
Qualifies for state & federal energy incentives
Easy installation
Initial low cost premium (~$52 vrs. $34)
VendingMiserVendingMiser Testing Testing
Energy Savings 30% to 60%
A typical refrigerated vending machine can use over 2.600 kWh/yr At $0.08/kWh = $210/yr
VendingMiser TestingVendingMiser Testing
Temperatures inside the machine ran between 41 and 43˚F without the Vending Miser. The red line indicates that power usage was significantly
reduced when traffic was low, nights and weekends.
25
What are Boiler Controls?Add-on controls to space heating boilers (Hot Water/
Steam) to reduce short-cycling & improve efficiency
TDI – Boiler ControlsTDI – Boiler Controls
Boiler Controls work because boilers: Are Sized for the coldest day Short cycle Are Inefficient Do not have
hot water resets
& other controls
26
Results
TDI – Boiler ControlsTDI – Boiler Controls
Energy Savings
W/O Controls (Therms/DD)
Energy Savings
with Controls (Therms/DD)
Energy Savings (Therms/
DD)
Energy Cost
Savings
($/yr)
% Energy Savings
Male High School 6.69 6.49 0.2 $1,170 3%
(15%)
Seneca High
School17.18 16.21 0.97 $5,670 6%
(10%)
27
28
Soci
ety
Soci
ety
Economics
Economics
EnvironmentEnvironment
TripleTripleBottom LineBottom Line
Sustainable PerformanceSustainable Performance
Triple Bottom LineSocial well-beingStrategic plan for economic goalsGuiding Principles for
Environmental Management System
• Pollution Prevention & Energy Efficiency
• Compliance with all regulations
• Continual improvement
• Conservation of natural & cultural resources
29
KY EXCEL is a voluntary program open to any individual, business or
organization that wishes to improve & protect Kentucky’s
environment in ways that extend beyond Kentucky’s environmental
requirements.
www.dca.ky.gov/KYEXCEL
30
“Leader” = EMP Implementation
“Partner” = EMP Development
“Master” = EMS Excellence
Acceptance & Compliance
Tolerance
Denial
Evolution of EnvironmentalEvolution of EnvironmentalManagement PlanningManagement Planning
Sustainability
Reactive
Proactive
Mission Driven
31
KPPC Contact InfoKPPC Contact Info
Cam Metcalf ………… [email protected]
Kentucky Pollution Prevention Center (KPPC)420 Lutz HallUniversity of LouisvilleLouisville, Kentucky 40292
Phone: (502) 852-0965
Fax: (502) 852-0964
Web Site: www.kppc.org