korean drug approval-patent linkage
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/2/2019 Korean Drug Approval-patent Linkage
1/3
Central International Law Firm
March 2012
Drug Approval-Patent Linkage in Korea
The recently revised Korean Pharmaceutical Affairs Act (KPAA) stipulates a Patent List (so-
called Green List), which corresponds to the Orange Book of the US and on which patent
information relevant to an original drug (OD) may be listed. The KPAA also stipulates a
generic drug marketers duty to notify the OD marketing approval holder and OD patent
holder of the fact that he has filed an application for marketing approval of a generic drug
(GD). Details of the Korean drug approval-patent linkage system are given below.
1. Listing of Patent Information by OD Marketers
1) Who can request the KFDA to list patent information?
A person who obtains the marketing approval for an OD may request the Korea Food andDrug Administration (KFDA) to list patent information relating to the OD in the Patent List of
the KFDA (see Article 31ter(1) of the KPAA).
That is, an OD marketing approval holder, who may be a patentee or a licensee of the
patent, may request the KFDA to register patent information in the Patent List.
2) When to request entry into the Patent List
For an original drug whose marketing will be approved on or later than March 15, 2012, a
request for registration in the Patent List must be filed within thirty (30) days from the
marketing approval date (see Article 30bis(1) of the Enforcement Regulation of the KPAA).
One thing to note is that the patent linkage system also applies to drugs whose marketing
was approved before March 15, 2012. For those drugs, the deadline for making a listing
request is June 14, 2012 (three (3) months from March 15, 2012).
3) Patents eligible for listing
For the listing of patent information on the Patent List, the following criteria must be met (see
Article 30bis(3) of the Regulation):
The patent is directed to one of the following:
- substance,
- formulation,
- composition, and
- medicinal use
The patent is directly relevant to the main ingredient and its standard, ingredients and
their amounts, formulation, efficacy/effect, and method of use/dosage of the approved
drug;
The patent is directly relevant to the safety, efficacy, and quality as recognized by theCommissioner of the KFDA at the time of approving the drug based on submitted
1
-
8/2/2019 Korean Drug Approval-patent Linkage
2/3
Central International Law Firm
March 2012
materials;
The patent differs from the patents already listed in the Patent List in the aspects of
safety, efficacy, and quality;
The patent has not yet expired and is valid; and
The drug approval is valid.
4) Information to be entered in the Patent List
The information subject to listing on the Patent List includes (see Article 30bis (2) of the
Regulation):
The name of the drug which received marketing approval and the identity of the
approval holder;
Information about the patentee (or about its agent having an address or businessplace in Korea if the patentee has neither an address nor a business place in Korea);
The registration date and the expiry date of the patent;
The patent number; and
Information about the relevant claims of the patent.
In the above, the information about the relevant claims should include a detailed description
of how each claim is relevant to the approved drug.
2. Notification by GD Marketers
1) Notification obligation
If a person applies for marketing approval of a GD and uses safety and efficacy data of an
OD listed on the Patent List, he must notify both the OD marketing approval holder and the
OD patentee except in some exceptional circumstances.
Such a notification must be made within seven (7) days from the date on which the GD
marketer applies for drug approval (see Article 30ter(1) of the Regulation).
2) Contents of the notification
A notification to the OD holder must contain the following (see Article 30ter(1) of the
Regulation):
The application date for GD approval;
The fact that the application for GD approval was made by submitting bioequivalence
test data based on the safety and efficacy data of the OD, for the purpose of selling
the GD by commercially manufacturing or importing it before the patent expires; and
Reasons for believing that the patent is invalid or that the GD does not infringe the
patent.
2
-
8/2/2019 Korean Drug Approval-patent Linkage
3/3
Central International Law Firm
March 2012
3) Exemption from the notification obligation
A GD marketer is exempted from the notification obligation in the following cases (see Article
31quater(1) of the KPAA):
(i) Where the patent term has expired;
(ii) Where the GD marketing approval is requested on the condition that the GD will
be sold only after the patent has expired;
(iii) Where the patentee and the OD holder agree that they do not require such
notification;
(iv) Where the Intellectual Property Tribunal or a court rendered a decision that the
patent is invalid or a decision that the GD does not infringe the patent; or
(v) Under circumstances which are similar to above subparagraphs (i) to (iv) and are
provided by the Ministerial Decree of the Ministry of Health and Welfare.
3. Suspension of GD Approval
The KORUS FTA gives Korea a grace period for which Korea may postpone the
implementation of measures for suspending the GD approval process. The grace period is
three (3) years from the effectuation date of the KORUS FTA.
Accordingly, the revised KPAA does not contain provisions for staying marketing approval
proceedings of generic GDs. The KPAA is expected to be amended sooner or later to set up
a system that stays the proceeding for approving a GD when the holder of an OD patent files
a patent infringement action against the GD marketer.
As for how long a GD approval proceeding will be stayed when a patentee brings a patent
infringement action against a GD marketer, currently, the Korean government seems to
consider staying the drug approval proceeding until the issuance of a court judgment
confirming non-infringement or for twelve (12) months from the filing date of the infringement
action if no court judgment is rendered within the twelve months.
3