konstruksjonsdagen 2018 petroleum safety authority€¦ · konstruksjonsdagen 2018 petroleum safety...
TRANSCRIPT
Audun S. KristoffersenPetroleum Safety Authority
Stavanger, Norway
Konstruksjonsdagen 2018
Petroleum Safety Authority
Structural Integrity in the
Barents Sea
Pre-study:
Establish the knowledge level relevant
for structural integrity for installations
operating in the Barents Sea
Phase 1 Phase 2 Main study:
Based on recommendations from
Pre-study
For installations operating in the Barents Sea
Risk Assessment - Results
1. Risers exposed to interaction with ice
2. Stability requirements and accidental flooding caused by ice impact
3. Uncertainty in modelling of ice loads
4. Uncertainty in factors used for ice loads
5. Uncertainty in local loads from ice
6. Ship collison with ice-strengthened vessels
Glacial Ice Impact
• Objective: Will the inherent capacity of a facility to withstand a ship impact be
sufficient to withstand an impact with glacial ice?
Performhydrodynamic
analysis
Perform Impactanalysis
Evaluate
Select Semi
Impact Energy
• Impact energy reference value for requirements to ship impact assessments in
IMO MODU/NMA is 14 MJ
In present analysis ~0.94-0.98
From DNVGL-RP-C204
Summary
• Vertical extent of damage assumed for ship impact assessment is not
sufficient for glacial ice impact assessments
• The strengthened area may not be sufficient to withstand glacial ice impact
from the ice volumes studied herein
• Structural components assumed not exposed to ship impact may be exposed
to impact from glacial ice
• The horizontal penetration of damage may exceed 1.5 m which is the
minimum requirement for ship impact
• The pressure-area formulation used to assess glacial ice impact is associated
with uncertainty that should be considered in estimating glacial ice loads
Further Work
• Increase the understanding of ice motion in waves
• Further study components assumed not exposed to ice collision